Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
147 (
1
); 51-57
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1665_15

Risk factors for ruptured intracranial aneurysms

Department of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China

For correspondence: Dr Wen Li, Department of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, PR China e-mail: xqwgxwl@163.com

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

The treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs) remains controversial; the ability to predict the risk of rupture for an aneurysm would be of clinical value. The aim of this study was to determine and evaluate the predictive value of the risk factors of IA rupture.

Methods:

This retrospective study involved 379 consecutive patients with 441 aneurysms between August 2011 and July 2014. Based on clinical data and computed tomography angiography findings, the potential of risk factors to predict the aneurysmal rupture was assessed using statistical methods.

Results:

Age, hypertension, heart disease, diabetes mellitus, cerebral atherosclerosis, aneurysms located at the internal carotid artery (ICA) and neck width (N) correlated negatively with rupture risk. Aneurysms located at the anterior communicating artery, bifurcation, irregularity, with a daughter sac, aneurysm height, maximum size, aspect ratio (AR), height-to-width ratio and bottleneck factor were significantly and positively correlated with rupture risk. The multivariate logistic regression model revealed that bifurcation aneurysm, irregular aneurysm and high AR increased the rupture risk, while cerebral atherosclerosis, aneurysm located on the ICA and greater N decreased the risk. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of AR curve values differed according to circumstances.

Interpretation & conclusions:

Cerebral atherosclerosis, location in the ICA and larger N were the protective factors against aneurysm rupture, and IAs located at bifurcations, irregular shape and increased AR indicated a greater rupture risk.

Keywords

Angiography
computed tomography
intracranial aneurysm
risk factors
rupture
subarachnoid haemorrhage

Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) are abnormal dilations of the arteries in the brain that usually occur at Willis' circle or at arterial bifurcations1. The universal usage of non-invasive imaging methods has led to an increase in the number of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) found by chance2. IAs affect 3-8 per cent of the world's population3, with ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) being the most common cause of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and causing a mortality rate of 40-50 per cent and a morbidity rate of 10-20 per cent4. While this suggests that UIAs should be treated to prevent SAH, the surgical and endovascular treatments for UIAs are with risk, with mortality and morbidity rates of up to 5 per cent5. The optimal UIA management strategy remains open to debate. The decision to treat incidental UIAs must be balanced against the risk of rupture. Thus, the ability to predict the risk of rupture for a given incidentally detected aneurysm would be of enormous clinical value. A number of researchers have focussed on evaluating the role of dynamic blood flow16; however, this requires prospective follow up to monitor the haemodynamic changes of IAs, which is very difficult and often unavailable due to considerations of expense, time and ethical issues6. Therefore, it is important to consider other morphological indices and personal or familial factors when evaluating the risk factors for aneurysm rupture, including aspect ratio (AR), cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and hypertension7. The imaging patterns of IAs in the Chinese population have been described that might be related to rupture8.

The purpose of this study was to determine the patient-related factors and image characteristics of IAs to identify the risk factors of aneurysm rupture.

Material & Methods

The data included in this retrospective study were extracted from the hospital medical records of Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, PR China. Details of age, sex, personal history of hypertension, heart disease, diabetes mellitus, cerebral atherosclerosis, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking and history of SAH were extracted from clinical records. The patients' records/information was anonymized and de-identified before analysis. The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee.

Between August 2011 and July 2014, a total of 9050 consecutive patients underwent head computed tomography angiography (CTA) examinations in Xinqiao Hospital, and a total of 435 patients were diagnosed with aneurysms. The patients with aneurysms were managed with both observation and treatment by coiling or clipping. Overall, 56 patients were excluded based on the following criteria: patients with traumatic, mycotic, fusiform or extradural aneurysms; aneurysms with poor-image quality and aneurysms with a maximum diameter <1.8 mm (too small to measure accurately). Thus, 379 patients with 441 aneurysms (326 patients with single aneurysm and 53 patients with multiple aneurysms; of the 53 patients, 45 patients had two aneurysms, seven patients had three aneurysms and one patient had four aneurysms) were included in the analysis. In cases with multiple aneurysms, the ruptured aneurysm was determined based on the location of the haemorrhage in CTA or operative findings.

Computed tomography angiography

IAs were diagnosed and evaluated with CTA using a 64-slice CT machine (GE LightSpeed VCT; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). A quantity of 80 ml of non-ionic contrast medium (Visipaque 320; GE Healthcare) was injected into the antecubital vein at a rate of 4-4.5 ml/sec with an 18G needle and an automatic injector (Medrad; Warrendale, PA, USA). Images were then obtained with a 0.625 mm slice thickness with no overlap and transferred to the GE Advantix Workstation (Advantage Windows 4.5) for three-dimensional (3D) volume rendering (VR).

Image analysis: Aneurysms were found in a variety of locations, including anterior cerebral artery, anterior communicating artery (ACoA), posterior communicating artery, internal carotid artery (ICA), middle cerebral artery and posterior cerebral circulation (consists of superior cerebellar artery, anterior inferior cerebellar artery, basilar artery, basilar top and posterior cerebral artery). Side-wall aneurysms were defined as lesions located in only one parent vessel or at a branch that was much smaller than the parent vessel (<1/5th of the diameter)9. Bifurcation aneurysms were defined as lesions originating from major bifurcations10. Aneurysm shapes were classified as simple lobed or irregular, with lobular aneurysms or aneurysms with daughter sacs classified as irregular11.

The geometric indices of IAs on 3D VR images were measured independently manually by two neuroradiologists. The following four dimensions were measured in the plane parallel to the blood flow of the parent arteries: aneurysm depth (D, the longest diameter between the neck and dome); width (W, the maximum distance vertical to D); neck width (N)10 and maximum size (Dmax, the largest measurement in terms of maximum dome diameter or width)12. Subsequently, the aspect ratio (AR, the ratio of D-to-N), the depth-to-width ratio (DW, the ratio of D-to-W) and the bottleneck factor (BF, the ratio of W-to-N) were calculated710111314.

Statistical analysis: The size of sample was calculated according to the formula: N=2π(1−π)(zα+zβ)2/(p1−p0)2 (N, the size of the sample; α, probability of type-I error; β, probability of type-II error; zα and zβ, the standard normal table value of α and β; p1 and p0, case and control group exposed to the factors of exposure rate)15. According to the results of the preliminary experiment and previous research71314, we made age (<60 yr), hypertension and cerebral atherosclerosis as the main indicators, Nage=12113, Nhypertension=1537, Ncerebral atherosclerosis=10814. There were 379 consecutive patients in the study. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Independent t test were used to compare the means of continuous data. The Chi-square tests were used to compare categorical data. Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied considering ruptured (or unruptured) variable as dependent variable and patients' and morphological characteristics as independent variables selected by the step forward method14. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (CIs) were also calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed on the final model, and the optimal sensitivity and specificity of competent parameters were obtained by determining the cut-off point using the maximizing Youden's index.

Results

The demographic characteristics of the patients are reported in Table I. The age of the 379 patients was 57.6±12.88 years Of the 379 patients, there were 188 patients with RIAs and 191 with UIAs. Two hundred and forty patients were women (mean age: 58.1±12.98 yr) and 139 (36.7%) were men (mean age: 56.9±12.71 yr). Age, hypertension, heart disease, diabetes mellitus and cerebral atherosclerosis were individually in univariate analyses and found to be related to RIAs (P<0.05).

Table I Patient characteristics with ruptured and unruptured aneurysms

The morphologic features of aneurysms are listed in Table II. ACoA, bifurcation, irregular shape, daughter sac, D, Dmax, AR, DW and BF were significantly (P<0.001) higher among ruptured aneurysms compared to unruptured ones. ICA and N, on the contrary, were significantly (P<0.001) higher in unruptured aneurysms.

Table II The morphological features of aneurysms

The 17 variables (P<0.05) were entered into the forward stepwise multiple logistic regression model. This analysis revealed that bifurcation (OR 2.646), irregularity (OR 3.478) and AR (OR 2.484) strongly affected the risk of aneurysm rupture, while cerebral atherosclerosis (OR 0.107), ICA (OR 0.798) and N (OR 0.755) were associated with a decreased risk of aneurysm rupture (P<0.05) (Table III).

Table III Multiple logistic regression model for prediction of aneurysm rupture

The ROC analysis was performed for continuous data. The resulting curves are presented in Figs 1 and 2. Since the area of N under the ROC curve was small, only the threshold values of the AR were calculated. For AR of all aneurysms, bifurcation aneurysms, irregular aneurysms and irregular aneurysms located at bifurcations, the threshold values and the corresponding area under the curve values of the AR are listed in Table IV.

Receiver operating characteristic curves for binary logistic regression analysis of neck width. Data for (A) all aneurysms, (B) aneurysms located at bifurcations, (C) irregular aneurysms, and (D) irregular aneurysms located at bifurcations. The corresponding area under the curve values are 0.583 for (A), 0.563 for (B), 0.714 for (C) and 0.706 for (D).
Fig. 1
Receiver operating characteristic curves for binary logistic regression analysis of neck width. Data for (A) all aneurysms, (B) aneurysms located at bifurcations, (C) irregular aneurysms, and (D) irregular aneurysms located at bifurcations. The corresponding area under the curve values are 0.583 for (A), 0.563 for (B), 0.714 for (C) and 0.706 for (D).
Receiver operating characteristic curves for binary logistic regression analysis of the aspect ratio. Data for (A) all aneurysms, (B) aneurysms located at bifurcations, (C) irregular aneurysms, and (D) irregular aneurysms located at bifurcations. The corresponding area under the curve values are 0.750 for (A), 0.792 for (B), 0.634 for (C) and 0.685 for (D).
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic curves for binary logistic regression analysis of the aspect ratio. Data for (A) all aneurysms, (B) aneurysms located at bifurcations, (C) irregular aneurysms, and (D) irregular aneurysms located at bifurcations. The corresponding area under the curve values are 0.750 for (A), 0.792 for (B), 0.634 for (C) and 0.685 for (D).
Table IV Area under the curve for aspect ratio

Discussion

Our results showed that cerebral atherosclerosis, location in the ICA and larger N were the protective factors against aneurysm rupture, while IAs located at bifurcations, irregular shape and high AR indicated a greater rupture risk. Calcified and atherosclerotic walls are known to decrease the risk of IA rupture16. This study also demonstrated an inverse relationship between cerebral atherosclerosis and IA rupture. The reason may be that cerebral atherosclerotic or calcified walls slow the flow rates entering the aneurysm and reduce wall shear stress17.

The International Study of UIAs showed that decisions regarding UIAs treatment are based mainly on the size and location of the aneurysm18. It is well known that most UIAs are located in the ICA. In our study, IAs located in the ICA correlated negatively with rupture risk. These results also confirmed that IAs in the ICA seldom rupture. The reason seems that ICA with bigger diameter than other sites and IAs arising from ICA have thicker wall and maybe experience smaller wall tension19.

Our study showed that aneurysms located at bifurcations ruptured more frequently than those located at the side wall; the reason may be that bifurcation areas of arteries are known to be vulnerable sites, where the wall is weak and haemodynamic stress is changed20. An aneurysm with lobular or daughter sacs was classified as having an irregular shape11 and reported to be associated with a higher rupture risk2122. Our results also showed that irregular IAs were more prone to rupture, possibly because the irregular shape leads to instability of the blood flow pattern.

Some studies examined N, with most UIAs and RIAs being 2-3 mm wide at the neck and with no significant difference observed between UIAs and RIAs2123. The previous study showed that among aneurysms of the same depth in the same patient, the aneurysm with a larger N was less likely to rupture24. Our data showed that N was negatively correlated with rupture. One reason for this result may be that when the neck is larger, the blood flow is more sluggish.

The ARhas been widely studied and shown to correlate with IA rupture. Many researchers have attempted to select an optimal AR threshold value to predict IA rupture. Previous study reported a mean ARof 1.89 in RIAs and 1.39 in UIAs10. In contrast, other study reported that the ARof UIAs was greater than that of RIAs (2.3 vs. 1.8)22. In our study, the threshold value of ARwas smaller than the values reported in the literature2224 but close to that reported by Dhar et al25. In the present study, it was found that in different situations, the AR had different thresholds; these results were more accurate, practical and conducive to treatment than a general threshold.

Although many previous studies have reported that size ratio (SR) was associated with aneurysm rupture1025, the calculation method of the parameter is not unified. This ratio was defined as the maximum aneurysm height divided by the mean vessel diameter of all branches associated with the aneurysm102526. However, Etminan et al27 defined SR as the Dmax divided by parent artery diameter. Our data included side-wall and bifurcation aneurysms, so we did not consider SR as a risk factor in the study.

One limitation of this study was that RIAs might have changed in size or shape after rupture and would therefore, not reflect the data captured before rupture. Another limitation was that this was a retrospective analysis of the medical records from one hospital. In addition, the possibility that the UIAs would rupture in the future could not be excluded, and patients with IAs <1.8 mm were not included. Furthermore, family history was not used as a risk factor to predict IA rupture because this information was not obtained for some patients with SAH.

In conclusion, cerebral atherosclerosis, IAs location in the ICA and larger N were the protective factors against aneurysm rupture. On the other hand, since IAs located at bifurcations, with an irregular shape and a high AR indicated a greater likelihood of rupture, more attention should be paid to the aneurysm with these characteristics during the clinical practice.

Acknowledgment

Authors thank Ru-fu Xu, Professor of Epidemiology of the Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, for statistical treatment.

Financial support & sponsorship: This study was financially supported by Research Project of Third Military Medical University (2016YLC22).

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , , , , , , . Influence of hemodynamic factors on rupture of intracranial aneurysms: Patient-specific 3D mirror aneurysms model computational fluid dynamics simulation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:1255-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Ten-year detection rate of brain arteriovenous malformations in a large, multiethnic, defined population. Stroke. 2010;41:21-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:626-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 2007;369:306-18.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: A pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:59-66.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . The critical role of hemodynamics in the development of cerebral vascular disease. J Neurosurg. 2010;112:1240-53.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Characteristic features of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Predictive risk factors for aneurysm rupture. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:479-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Size, location, and multiplicity of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the Hong Kong Chinese population with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Hong Kong Med J. 2009;15:262-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke. 2011;42:144-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . Identification of a dichotomy in morphological predictors of rupture status between sidewall- and bifurcation-type intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2012;116:871-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Analysis of aneurysm rupture in relation to the geometric indices: Aspect ratio, volume, and volume-to-neck ratio. Neuroradiology. 2011;53:883-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Unruptured cerebral aneurysms do not shrink when they rupture: Multicenter collaborative aneurysm study group. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:155-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Morphological and clinical risk factors for the rupture of anterior communicating artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2013;118:978-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . Risk factors for the rupture of bifurcation intracranial aneurysms using CT angiography. Yonsei Med J. 2016;57:1178-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Methods in observational epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; . p. :332-4.
  16. , . Risk factors for the formation and rupture of intracranial saccular aneurysms in Shimane, Japan. World Neurosurg. 2010;73:155-64.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , . Hemodynamic patterns of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: A possible association with rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:297-302.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362:103-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , . Risk factors for the rupture of middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms using CT angiography. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0166654.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Risk factors associated with the presence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 2015;46:3093-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms and the assessment of rupture risk based on anatomical and morphological factors: Sifting through the sands of data. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;26:E2.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , . Size ratio correlates with intracranial aneurysm rupture status: A prospective study. Stroke. 2010;41:916-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , . Bottleneck factor and height-width ratio: Association with ruptured aneurysms in patients with multiple cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2007;61:716-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , . Is aspect ratio a reliable predictor of intracranial aneurysm rupture? Neurosurgery. 2004;54:1343-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , . Morphology parameters for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:185-96.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , . Differences in simple morphological variables in ruptured and unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2012;117:913-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , . The unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score: A multidisciplinary consensus. Neurology. 2015;85:881-9.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top