Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
136 (
4
); 674-675
pmid:
23168710

Resistance to ceftriaxone in Vibrio cholerae

Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry 605 006, India
Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry 605 006, India

+For correspondence: subhashparija@yahoo.co.in

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Cholera characterized by rice water stools is more common in developing countries due to poor sanitation and improperly protected water supply1. As with most enteric pathogens cholera can be controlled by rehydration alone but antimicrobials are indicated in severe cases and also to reduce the course of disease. Spread of cholera epidemics has been associated with emergence of drug resistant strains2. The current therapy for cholera as indicated by the World Health Organization3 primarily involves tetracycline and ciprofloxacin. Drug resistance in bacterial pathogens has increased at an alarming rate over the last few decades. Progressive drug resistance in Vibrio cholerae has been noted as evident from the available literature48. Though the use of a third generation cephalosporin is not yet recommended for the treatment of cholera, but the appearance of resistance to this group of antimicrobials is quite alarming910. Here, we report the resistance to ceftriaxone, a third generation cephalosporin, in V. cholerae isolates from three paediatrics cases.

The three cases (age range two boys of 1 and 4 yr and one 2 yr girl) had reported to the department of Pediatrics between the months of June and August 2010 at Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, with history of passing loose, watery stools (>9-10 time in a day) and were provisionally diagnosed to be suffering from cholera. The cases reported to the hospital on different months, independent of each other. Also, they did not belong to the same locality and were unrelated.

The stool samples were inoculated onto MacConkey agar and thiosulphate citrate bile-salt sucrose (TCBS) agar (Hi-media, Mumbai). Enrichment was provided with alkaline peptone water, subculture from which was done after 6 h of incubation at 37°C onto MacConkey agar and TCBS agar. Suspected colonies were identified as V. cholerae by the standard biochemical tests1112, the serogroup was confirmed by agglutination with specific antiserum (BD Difco™, Becton Dickinson, USA). Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by the Kirby-Bauer method as per Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI)13, which showed that this isolate was resistant to ampicillin (10 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), co-trimoxazole (25 μg) and sensitive only to ciprofloxacin (5 μg) and tetracycline (30 μg). All the three children were treated with ciprofloxacin.

The three isolates were subjected to the agar dilution test and E test (BioMérieux, Sweden) for the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ceftriaxone. For the agar dilution method, ceftriaxone-sodium salt (Hi-media, Mumbai, India) and Mueller-Hinton (M-H) agar (Hi-media, Mumbai, India) were used. The drug was reconstituted in sterile distilled water (as described by the manufacturer), was stored at 4°C and used within 2 days of reconstitution. Different dilutions of the drug were used starting from 0.5 to 128 μg/ml. For growth controls, plates containing drug free agar were also prepared. The MIC was performed as per recommendations13. ATCC Escherichia coli 25922 was inoculated on each plate as growth control. To check for viability of each test isolate and also as an added check for purity, control plates that did not contain drugs were inoculated last. Inoculated plates were allowed to stand for several minutes until the inoculum drops had been completely absorbed by the medium; then the plates were inverted and incubated at 37°C for 20 h before the results were read. The E-test was carried out as per the manufacturer's instructions. The strips containing the antibiotics were applied with sterile forceps and incubated at 37°C overnight. Tear drop shaped zone of inhibition was observed in all three agar plates. MIC was read as the value on the E strip where the two arms of the ellipse met. According to the CLSI13, the breakpoints for MIC of cefrtiaxone are sensitive (<1 μg/ml), intermediate resistant (2 μg/ml) and resistant (>4 μg/ml). The MIC of the three V. cholerae isolates was 16 μg/ml, by the agar dilution method as well as the E test method, which indicated resistance to ceftriaxone. The double disk synergy test was performed as described earlier14 which was negative. As the genetic analysis of these isolates could not be done, therefore the mechanisms mediating the reduced susceptibility of these isolates to ceftriaxone is not yet clear.

Increase in antimicrobial resistance in enteric pathogens is especially important in developing countries where diarrhoea is common. Globally, many strains of V. cholerae have shown resistance to commonly used antibiotics including tetracycline, co-trimoxazole, ampicllin, chloramphenicol and nalidixic acid10 but have largely remained susceptible to the third generation cephalosporins. Resistance to cephalosporins was first documented in Argentina10 where the MIC of ceftazidime was determined to be 64 μg/ml.

The detection of resistance to ceftriaxone in V. cholerae is a matter of concern, considering the epidemic potential of the organism. Excessive use and misuse of antimicrobials can create an effective selection pressure on microbes which in turn can develop mechanisms to render these antimicrobials ineffective. There is a need to monitor the resistance pattern of this organism and also the use of antimicrobials in its control.

References

  1. , , , , , , . Antimicrobial resistance of Vibrio cholerae O1 serotype Ogawa isolated in Manhica District Hospital, southern Mozambique. J Antimicrob Chemoth. 2007;60:662-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Antimicrobial resistance of bacterial pathogens associated with diarrheal patients in Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68:666-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cholera outbreak. In: Assessing the outbreak response and improving preparedness. Geneva: WHO; Global task force on cholera control. WHO/CDS/CPE/ZFK/2004.4
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . In vitro susceptibility of Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor strains associated with an outbreak of cholera in Kerala, Southern India. J Antimicrob Chemoth. 2001;47:357-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Antimicrobial resistance in developing countries. Part I: recent trends and current status. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:481-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Emergence of tetracycline-resistant Vibrio cholerae O1serotype Inaba in Kolkata, India. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2008;61:128-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains of Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor among hospitalized patients with cholera in Calcutta, India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:1605-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Epidemiology & antibiograms of Vibrio cholerae isolates from a tertiary care hospital in Chandigarh, north India. Indian J Med Res. 2009;129:613-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Changing profile of Vibrio cholerae O1, O139 in Delhi & its periphery (2003-2005) Indian J Med Res. 2007;125:633-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Plasmidic extended-spectrum ß-lactamases in Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor isolates in Argentina. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:1462-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Laboratory methods for the diagnosis of epidemic dysentery and cholera. Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; . WHO/CDS/CSR/EDC/99.8
  12. , , , . Isolation and identification of Vibrio cholerae O1 from fecal specimens. In: , , , eds. Vibrio cholerae and cholera: Molecular to global perspectives. ASM Press: Washington DC, USA; . p. :3-25.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) In: Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria (2nd ed). Wayne, PA: CLSI; . approved guideline. M45A2
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . Extended spectrum β-lactamases conferring transferable resistance to newer β-lactam agents in Enterobacteriaceae: Hospital prevalence and susceptibility patterns. Rev Infect Dis. 1988;10:867-78.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    16

    PDF downloads
    11
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top