Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Article
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Article
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Viewpoint
163 (
2
); 203-206
doi:
10.25259/IJMR_2525_2025

Real time public display dashboards: Reframing road traffic accidents in India

Department of Cybersecurity, Strayer University, Arlington, United States
Department of Surgery and Global Health, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, United States
Department of Public Health, Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar, Ahmedabad, India

For correspondence: Dr Rahul Jindal, Department of Surgery and Global Health, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, United States e-mail: jindalr@msn.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Tiwari S, Jindal RM, Mavalankar D. Real time public display dashboards: reframing road traffic accidents in India. Indian J Med Res. 2026;163:203-6. doi: 10.25259/IJMR_2525_2025.

Abstract

India’s escalating number of road traffic accidents, demands systemic transformation beyond traditional enforcement measures. This viewpoint proposes the establishment of a public, real-time Trauma Dashboard to transform fragmented, delayed reporting into an open, evidence-based system of accountability. The dashboard would integrate cross-verified datasets from police, hospitals, and insurance companies through interoperable digital platforms such as Open Data Kit (OTK), and Talend Open Studio, or similar platform hosted on the Government of India’s MeghRaj Cloud. Automated cross-verified data flows would provide dynamic insights into crash patterns, high-risk zones, and temporal trends. Drawing on successful precedents such as the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) Air Quality Index and trauma registries - UK Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN), US National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) and India’s National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organization (NOTTO), this project proposes to facilitate continuous monitoring, policy responsiveness, and public awareness.

Keywords

CPCB AQI dashboard
Dashboards
Mortality and morbidity of trauma
Public-private-partnership
Road traffic accidents
Trauma

India loses over 150,000 lives annually to road traffic accidents.1 These are reported as isolated events rather than indications of systemic failure in urban planning, enforcement, and response. Without aggregated visibility, road trauma counts among India’s most under-recognised public health crises. The annual total of those who die on Indian roads or 1.19 million worldwide as estimated by the World Health Organization is a major public health issue.2

This viewpoint proposes the creation of a real-time Trauma Dashboard to regularly record and display road accident data. A Dashboard has the potential to highlight preventable deaths, guide enforcement, and foster accountability at the local, state, and national levels.

Advocacy to implement road safety laws globally

International practice has shown that regular reporting, citizen participation, and transparent data can drive sustainable road safety reforms. The EU Road Safety Exchange (2020–2025) connects countries to share best practices towards the Vision Zero aim to eliminate fatalities by 2050.3 In Sweden, Vision Zero policy combines data-driven interventions and public display Dashboards for measuring progress.4 In Australia, coalitions among health agencies and media exist to enable contextual accident reporting rather than singular incidents.5

In India, civil society initiatives - the SaveLIFE Foundation and policy actions such as the Good Samaritan Law demonstrate the potential of evidence-based advocacy to trigger policy change.6 Much of India’s accident data is not standardised, and in some instances available only upon request, which limits awareness and compliance. A real-time Trauma Dashboard, built through a public–private partnership (PPP) model, may combine these streams of data and give an open window into avoidable deaths, translating advocacy into governable action.

Reliability of data input into a proposed Trauma Dashboard

The reliability of a Trauma Dashboard will be dependent on the quality and reliability of its input data ( Figure shows proposed outline). Trauma data is obtained from a variety of sources - emergency departments, police blotters, and insurance claims, each with differing formats, reporting standards, and timeliness. Without convergence, gaps and inconsistencies could dilute the system’s credibility. To avoid this, standardised reporting protocols, interfaces with electronic health records, and independent validation systems must be instituted.

Outline of proposed Dashboard.
Figure.
Outline of proposed Dashboard.

India’s own domestic experience with air-quality dashboards is instructive. The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) employs calibrated sensors, standardised air quality index (AQI) methodology, and automated real-time feeds to minimise the scope for human judgment and allow cities to be comparable to each other (CPCB AQI Dashboard).7

India collects a plethora of data on road accidents from multiple agencies such as the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH), National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), State traffic police, and insurance companies. However, the information are not centralised and real-time; data are scattered among departments and are generally released after cumbersome application process or in annual reports.

This lack of accessible, aggregated data seriously impedes public awareness, timely analysis, and evidence-based policymaking. Developing a real-time, publicly visible Dashboard would mobilise this dormant data as an active instrument of accountability and prevention.

Global precedents in trauma data systems

Other nations provide examples of how real-time Trauma Dashboards can revolutionise tracking and policy response. UK Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) provides a national trauma registry and performance Dashboard that enables hospital-level benchmarking of outcomes, influencing care quality and redesign of the trauma system.8 Similarly, in the US, National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) and National Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) serve as real-time reference systems for the occurrence of trauma and improvement in care.9 India’s National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organization (NOTTO) dashboard shows how public, real-time, transparent registries can engage different stakeholders with digital governance.10

A similar model can be utilised for tracking road trauma, linking ambulances, hospitals, and police departments into one network for real-time reporting. Implications from such systems can be used in developing an Indian Road Trauma Dashboard with a focus on interoperability, measurement-based data collection, and real-time feedback loops.

Public - Private Partnership (PPP) model

The proposed Dashboard can adopt a PPP model in both innovation and sustainability.

Public stakeholders

MoRTH, National Informatics Centre (NIC), and State Health Departments could handle data governance and standards.

Private partners

Select technology firms, academic analytics labs, and NGOs can supply data integration, visualisation, and AI analytics.

Outcome

Such a partnership would ensure credibility, cost-sharing, and rapid rollout, as in CPCB’s air quality monitoring network or NOTTO’s organ donation registry system.

The multiple nodes on the Dashboard could integrate data from traffic police accident reports, hospital emergency and ambulance logs, and insurance company databases through standardised APIs (Application Programming Interface). It would be presented by districts as well as the State, updated hourly, and published publicly on web, billboards, and mobile interfaces. The architecture could enable real-time public awareness. The proposed data collection and flow for a National Trauma Dashboard is shown in Table.

Table. Proposed data collection and flow for a National Trauma Dashboard (India)
Level Primary data source Key data elements collected Data validation and transmission Central integration / End-user access
Local (District / City) Traffic police, emergency ambulance services, hospital emergency departments Time and location of crash, GPS coordinates, number of persons injured/deceased, vehicle type, cause (speeding, alcohol, road condition), emergency response time Automated digital entry via mobile/tablet; GPS tagging and timestamp; daily upload to State Dashboard through secure API
State / Regional State health departments, transport departments, police traffic wing Aggregation of district data; injury severity classification; hospital capacity/utilisation Data cleaning, de-duplication, and verification by nodal officer; automated sync to National Dashboard
National (Central repository) MoRTH iRAD, ICMR-NIC collaboration Consolidated dataset covering all states; analytics on trends, demographics, and hotspots AI-based anomaly detection; cross-validation with NCRB and insurance records Public Trauma Dashboard (web and mobile); access for policymakers, media, researchers
Public and policy feedback loop Citizens, civil society, researchers, media Real-time visualisation, policy alerts, open datasets Feedback channels for corrections and suggestions Drives awareness, accountability, and evidence-based enforcement

MoRTH, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways; iRAD, Integrated Road Accident Database; ICMR-NIC, Indian Council of Medical Research - National Informatics Centre; APIs, application programming interface; GPS, global positioning system

Technology platform and software framework

To implement the suggested Trauma Dashboard, an open-source, modular software stack can be utilised. The aim is to have interoperability, minimal implementation cost, and rapid scalability across metropolitan cities and beyond as shown in Supplementary Table I.

Supplementary Table I

Automated checks will be done through the (NIC-hosted MeghRaj Cloud infrastructure with Ministry of Road Transport and Highways - Integrated Road Accident Database (MoRTH-iRAD) and Indian Council of Medical Research - National Informatics Centre (ICMR-NIC) collaboration datasets. Data packets routed from State Dashboards could go through multi-layer checks like de-duplication, timestamp and geo-tag cross-verifications, and schema integrity with Talend Data Quality modules. Artificial-intelligence-based algorithms will detect outliers or inconsistencies by comparison with National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) crash reports, insurance claim database information, and hospital admission information through the National Health Stack application programming interface (API). Cryptographic checksums will provide integrity of transmission, and nodal officers could perform regular manual verification to reconcile state-level and national aggregates before releasing these publicly on the Trauma Dashboard.

Public interface and visibility

The proposed Trauma Dashboard must be designed as a multi-platform public information system, highly visible over digital, institutional, and physical interfaces in order to achieve maximum awareness and policy sensitivity. Supplementary Table II gives the proposed methods of public display of trauma data.

Supplementary Table II

We propose that the Trauma Dashboard should be placed in the public domain through a national and State-level web portal, supported by mobile applications and embeddable media devices. Additional citizen involvement can also have live Dashboards displayed on electronic billboards at key junctions and transport hubs. This multi-channel launch will ensure that road safety information is not restricted to policymakers, but included as part of the public’s daily awareness, similar to air-quality or weather dashboards.

Overall, a Trauma Dashboard is not only a helpful technical tool as an agent of change; it converts scattered accident reports into system analysis that reveals patterns of risk and disparity. In the process, it makes them transparent to enable civil society and media to put pressure for enhanced enforcement of road safety laws and mobilise public opinion for reforms. We recommend that the establishment of a Trauma Dashboard must be followed by its governance - transparency of data collection, and display. Furthermore, the intent of such a Dashboard is prevention; aligning trends in the data with targeted safety measures such as improved road design, enforcement of helmet and seatbelt use and anti-drunk driving measures.

We believe that the display of road deaths, suicides, and accidents on the same page as weather reports and stock market indices to sensitise citizens that safety is measurable. Research will have to be carried out to assess the impact of the proposed Trauma Dashboard, initially in a geographically defined urban city, followed by a State and eventually India-wide. AI enabled technological advances may enhance our ability to collect, validate, and disseminate real time data.

Author contributions

ST, RMJ, and DM: Conception or design of the work; acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work, manuscript writing; RMJ: Guarantor. All authors have read and approve the final printed version of the manuscript. 

Financial support and sponsorship

None.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of AI-assisted technology for assisting in the writing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , . Road traffic injuries and fatalities–the scourge of India. Transp Dev Econ.. 2025;11:17.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Global road safety. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/transportation-safety/global-road-safety, accessed on October 28, 2025.
  3. EU Road Safety Exchange, European Commission. Road Safety Awards. Available from: https://roadsafetyexchange.eu/, accessed on October 28, 2025.
  4. Vision Zero Network. New national goal to eliminate traffic deaths by 2050 boosts local Vision Zero efforts. Available from: https://visionzeronetwork.org/new-national-goal-to-eliminate-traffic-deaths-by-2050/, accessed on October 28, 2025.
  5. National Road Safety Strategy. Fact sheet: Social model approach to road safety. Available from: https://www.roadsafety.gov.au/nrss/fact-sheets/social-model-approach, accessed on October 28, 2025.
  6. SaveLIFE Foundation. Saving lives on roads in India and beyond since 2008. Available from: https://savelifefoundation.org/, accessed on October 28, 2025.
  7. data.govin, Open Government Data (OGD) Platform India. Real-time Air Quality Index from various locations. Available from: https://data.gov.in/, accessed on October 28, 2025.
  8. . National neurotrauma registry data in low- and middle-income countries—current status and future requirements: Comment on “Neurotrauma surveillance in national registries of low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review and comparative analysis of data dictionaries”. Int J Health Policy Manag.. 2023;12:7935.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  9. American College of Surgeons. National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Available from: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/ntdb/, accessed on October 28, 2025.
  10. National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organization (NOTTO). Directorate General of Health Services. [Homepage on the Internet] Available from: https://notto.gov.in/, accessed on October 28, 2025.
Show Sections
Scroll to Top