Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
134 (
5
); 653-657
doi:
10.4103/0971-5916.90990
pmid:
22199104

Pulmonary function studies in young healthy Malaysians of Kelantan, Malaysia

School of Health Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia
Present address: Department of Physiology, University of Calcutta, University College of Science & Technology, 92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata 700 009, India

Reprint requests: Dr Amit Bandyopadhyay, Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, University of Calcutta, University College of Science & Technology, 92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata 700 009, India bamit74@yahoo.co.in

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

Pulmonary function tests have been evolved as clinical tools in diagnosis, management and follow up of respiratory diseases as it provides objective information about the status of an individual's respiratory system. The present study was aimed to evaluate pulmonary function among the male and female young Kelantanese Malaysians of Kota Bharu, Malaysia, and to compare the data with other populations.

Methods:

A total of 128 (64 males, 64 females) non-smoking healthy young subjects were randomly sampled for the study from the Kelantanese students’ population of the University Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu Campus, Kelantan, Malaysia. The study population (20-25 yr age group) had similar socio-economic background. Each subject filled up the ATS (1978) questionnaire to record their personal demographic data, health status and consent to participate in the study. Subjects with any history of pulmonary diseases were excluded from the study.

Results:

The pulmonary function measurements exhibited significantly higher values among males than the females. FEV1% did not show any significant inter-group variation probably because the parameter expresses FEV1 as a percentage of FVC. FVC and FEV1 exhibited significant correlations with body height and body mass among males whereas in the females exhibited significant correlation with body mass, body weight and also with age. FEV1% exhibited significant correlation with body height and body mass among males and with body height in females. FEF25-75% did not show any significant correlation except with body height among females. However, PEFR exhibited significant positive correlation with all the physical parameters except with age among the females. On the basis of the existence of significant correlation between different physical parameters and pulmonary function variables, simple and multiple regression norms have been computed.

Interpretation & conclusions:

From the present investigation it can be concluded that Kelantanese Malaysian youths have normal range of pulmonary function in both the sexes and the computed regression norms may be used to predict the pulmonary function values in the studied population.

Keywords

FEV1
FEV1%
FVC
Malaysian
PEFR
pulmonary function

Several reference values for spirometry have been published from different parts of the globe, such as pulmonary functions in Europeans12, North American populations3, populations from different parts of the Indian subcontinent46, Chinese7 and other non-Caucasian populations89. There are significant differences in pulmonary studies carried out in western world and Asian subcontinent due to significant differences in anthropometric parameters. There are also significant variations in respiratory pressures in different ethnic groups. Similar studies have been reported in Malaysian populations which comprises three main ethnic groups, namely Malays, Chinese and Indians10. However, these studies on Malaysian populations were conducted in the populations of Kuala Lumpur and Penang1013. The normal standards for different dynamic pulmonary function measurements in Malaysian populations residing at other provinces (except Kuala Lumpur and Penang) of Malaysia have not yet been reported. Since habitat is one of the multifarious factors which influence lung function tests14, the reporting of reliable reference standard for pulmonary function measurements from other provinces of Malaysia seemed important, especially in view of the paucity of pertinent data.

The present study was, therefore, aimed to determine the lung function parameters in normal young healthy non-smoking male and female Malaysian university students of Kelantan state (Kelantanese Malaysians), Malaysia; compare the lung function measurements with the previously reported data in Non-Kelantanese Malaysian populations as well as in populations from other countries; and derive reliable prediction formulae for lung volumes in the Kelantanese Malaysians.

Material & Methods

Selection of subjects: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Sports and Exercise Science Laboratory of School of Health Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia. A total of 128 (64 males and 64 females) non-smoking healthy young Kelantanese Malaysian subjects were randomly selected from the Kelantanese students’ population of the University Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu Campus, Kelantan. The study population belonged to the age group of 20-25 yr and with similar socio-economic background. The mean age, body height, body mass and body surface area (BSA) were 22.71±2.30 and 21.63±2.03 yr; 170.50±6.01 and 159.36±8.38 cm; 65.50±6.40 and 55.87±8.94 kg; 1.762±0.110 and 1.591±0.193 m2 in male and female groups, respectively. The sample size was calculated using the method of Dupont & Plummer15 where the input of confidence interval was set as 95%. The study was conducted with 64 subjects in each group which was greater than the computed sample size of 45 per group. Each subject filled up one questionnaire16 to record their personal demographic data, health status and consent to participate in the study. Students doing regular exercise, having the history or existing obstructive or restrictive type of respiratory diseases and taking treatment for the same were excluded from the study. Subjects with any history of pulmonary diseases were also excluded from the study. The experimental protocol was explained to all the volunteers. Each subject signed the written informed consent form.

The study was approved by the Human Ethical Committee, University Sains Malaysia.

Preparation of subjects: Age of each subject was calculated in nearest year from the date of birth as obtained from the University record. Body height was measured with the subject standing barefoot on a stadiometer with an accuracy of ± 0.50 cm whereas the body mass was measured to an accuracy of ±0.1 kg by using a standard spring balance (Seca, Germany) with the subject wearing minimum clothing. Body surface area (BSA) was calculated using the equation of DuBois and DuBois17.

Determination of dynamic pulmonary function measurements: The dynamic pulmonary functions were recorded on a omputerized spirometer (Pony Spirometer Graphic 0476, Cosmed, Italy). The parameters measured were forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), FEV1 as a percentage of FVC (FEV1%), mid expiratory flow rate (FEF25-75%), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and forced expiratory time (FET). The spirometer was calibrated daily using calibration syringe of 2 liters. All the measurements were conducted in standing posture with nose clipped18. These tests were recorded at noon before lunch, as expiratory flow rates are highest at noon19. For each volunteer three satisfactory efforts were recorded with at least 3-5 min rest between the consecutive trials as per the standard norm14. The system was calibrated at source to read all measures at body temperature and pressure saturated with vapour (BTPS). In one subject, all the records i.e. anthropometric measurements and recording of pulmonary function measurements were conducted in one sitting on the same day.

Statistical analysis: Data were expressed as mean±SD. Student's t-test was used to compare the significance of difference between means. Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient ® was computed to test the significant relationship between two parameters. Regression analysis was done to compute the prediction norms for predicting pulmonary function measurements from different physical parameters. The level of significance was set at P<0.05.

Results & Discussion

The values of correlation coefficient between different physical parameters and the studied lung function parameters were shown in Table I. Depending on the existence of significant values of correlation coefficients, the simple and multiple regression norms for prediction of various pulmonary function measurements from different physical parameters were computed (Table II).

Table I Values of correlation coefficients between pulmonary function measurements and physical parameters in male and female young Kelantanese Malaysians of Kota Bharu
Table II Simple regression norms for the prediction of pulmonary function measurements in male and female young Kelantanese Malaysians of Kota Bharu

FVC and FEV1 exhibited significant correlation with body height and body mass among males whereas in the female group FVC and FEV1 exhibited significant correlation with body mass, body weight and also with age.

FEV1% exhibited significant correlation with body height and body mass among males. FEF25-75% did not show any significant correlation except with body height among females. However, PEFR which is considered as one of the most significant parameter to indicate one's pulmonary function status6, exhibited significant positive correlation with all the physical parameters except with age among the females.

Since body height and body mass exhibited highest values of correlation coefficient with FVC, FEV1 and PEFR in both the sexes, these two parameters were considered as the independent variables to compute the multiple regression norms for prediction of pulmonary function measurements in the studied population (Table III).

Table III Multiple regression norms for the prediction of pulmonary function measurements in male and female young Kelantanese Malaysians of Kota Bharu

Comparison of pulmonary function measurements of the present study with those of foreign population and those of populations from other provinces in Malaysia is difficult due to variations in the anthropometric profiles that largely affect the lung function measurements. Due to such obstacle, the values of pulmonary function measurements reported in other studies were standardized with age and height for a valid comparison.

The values of FVC (3.94±0.63 and 2.75±0.45 l in males and females, respectively) and FEV1 (3.55±0.55 and 2.49±0.41 l in males and females, respectively) in both the sexes were higher than the previously reported values among Malaysians1011. However, the FEV1% (90.13±4.19%) observed in the present study in male subjects was higher than that of the value reported from other provinces in Malaysia10. On the other hand, FEV1% (90.86±4.49%) observed among females in the present study was lower than the earlier reported data from other parts of Malaysia11. Such difference might be attributed to the variation in habitat, ethnicity and the socio-demographic nature14. Singh et al10 reported FVC, FEV1 and FEV1% values of 3.81±0.03 l, 3.43±0.03 l and 90.02±0.3 per cent in Malaysian males of Penang, Malaysia. The same group11 reported FVC, FEV1 and FEV1% values of 2.60±0.02 l, 2.41±0.02 l and 92.4±0.4 per cent in Malaysian females from other privences of Malaysia. The FEF25-75% and PEFR values observed in the present study were 266.83±59.8 and 204.34±54.8 l/min and 503.56±75.6 and 362.07±48.7 l/min in males and females, respectively.

The pulmonary function measurements depicted among males were higher than the male populations of South India20, Nepal21 and West Pakistani workers in UK22. The pulmonary function measurements of the males were comparable with the non-smoking men of Calcutta, India5. Values observed in the present study were also higher than the Rajasthan Indians23.

The FVC observed among males in the present investigation was lower than the age-matched Europeans1, New Guineans24 and Senegalese9. The precise reason for these inter-ethnic differences is uncertain although it has been attributed to both genetic and environmental factors14.

All the lung function parameters in females were lower in the present study in comparison with American, Jordanian, Caucasian and European populations212225. The FVC and FEV1 values obtained in Pakistani healthy adults26 of similar age group were well comparable with the present study. Such finding might be attributed to the similarity in nutritional and socio-economic conditions of both the countries.

Majority of studies indicated significant positive correlation of body height with FVC, FEV1 and PEFR as also observed in both the genders of the present investigation. Comparison of the present anthropometric data with previously reported data from Malaysia and other countries revealed that variation in FVC, FEV1 and PEFR of the presently studied population differed proportinally with the body height of the concerned population.

In other studies561011, age exhibited significant negative correlation with pulmonary function measurements whereas in the present investigation females exhibited significant positive correlation. This finding might be due to younger age group and narrow age-range in the present investigation. Chatterjee et al5 proposed that age related decline in pulmonary function measurements might be due to progressive loss of elastic recoil with aging even in absence of impairment by cigarette smoking and pulmonary diseases. Such age related changes might not have appeared in the present young population.

The FVC in females was higher than that of Indian women but lower than their European counterparts2527. The age and height matched females of New Guineans24 also had higher values of FVC than the females of the current study.

Simple and multiple regression equations have been computed to use as norms for the prediction of FVC, FEV1 and PEFR from body height and body mass in the studied population (Table III). The standard errors of estimate (SEE) of the computed equations are substantially small enough to recommend these norms for practical use in epidemiological studies and also in clinical settings.

From the present investigation it can be concluded that Malaysian youths have normal range of pulmonary function in both the sexes. However, the computed equations could be recommended as standard norms to predict the pulmonary function values in the studied population.

Author acknowledges Universti Sains Malaysia for financial support to conduct the study.

References

  1. , , , , , , . Spirometric reference values from a Mediterranean population. Bull Eur Physiopathol Resp. 1986;22:217-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Spirometry in healthy adult never-smokers. Clin Physiol. 1988;8:329-39.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Distribution of forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity in healthy, white, adult never-smokers in six US cities. Am Rev Resp Dis. 1985;131:511-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Physiological norms in Indians: Pulmonary capacities in health, ICMR Special Report. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research; . p. :38.
  5. , , , . Pulmonary function studies in healthy non-smoking men of Calcutta. Ann Hum Biol. 1988;15:365-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Peak expiratory flow rate in female brick-field workers of West Bengal, India. Ergonomics SA. 2006;18:22-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Pulmonary function studies in healthy Chinese adults in Singapore. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1971;104:128-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Clinical spirometry in normal Bantu. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1968;97:585-97.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Spirometric reference values in Senegalese black adults. Eur Respir J. 1989;2:252-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Spirometric volumes in Malaysian males. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1994;25:341-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Spirometric volumes in Malaysian females. Jpn J Physiol. 1992;42:407-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Ethnic differences in normal spirometric lung function of Malaysian children. Respir Med. 1994;88:349-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) of Malaysian children. Med J Malaysia. 1991;46:82-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . Pulmonary function studies in health school boys of West Bengal. Jpn J Physiol. 1991;41:797-808.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:589-601.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. . Standard questionnaires on respiratory symptoms, tests of pulmonary function, and chest radiographs. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978;118:10-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Clinical calorimetry. Tenth paper. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med. 1916;17:863-71.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , . Pulmonary function correlates with body composition in Nigerian children and young adults with sickle cell disease. J Trop Pediatr. 2008;54:87-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , . The pulmonary clock. Thorax. 1981;36:481-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , . Prediction of some ventilatory norms in healthy Indian males of 21-69 years age. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1983;27:45-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , . Spirometric standards for healthy nonsmoking adults. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1971;103:57-67.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , . Ventilatory function test values of health adult Jordanians. Thorax. 1981;36:546-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , . Lung function tests in Rajasthani subjects. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1979;23:8-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , . Lung function in coastal and high land New Guineans - comparison with Europeans. Thorax. 1973;28:320-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , . Lung function in healthy British women. Thorax. 1979;34:359-65.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , . Pulmonary function studies in healthy Pakistani adults. Thorax. 1978;33:243-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , . A study of pulmonary function among Indians and assessment of the Wright peak flow meter in relation to spirometry for field use. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1967;96:707-16.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top