Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
146 (
3
); 334-340
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1348_15

Prognostic significance of plasma matrix metalloprotease-2 in pancreatic cancer patients

Department of Gastroenterology & Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Reprint requests: Dr Anoop Saraya, Department of Gastroenterology & Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029, India e-mail: ansaraya@yahoo.com

Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

Pancreatic cancer has a propensity for wide stromal invasion. Matrix metalloprotease-2 (MMP-2) is a protease that degrades the peri-tumoural tissue and helps in tumour dissemination. Thus, this study was aimed to assess any association of plasma MMP-2 levels with clinicopathological parameters and survival of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Methods:

Plasma samples from 127 pancreatic cancer patients were analyzed for MMP-2 levels by ELISA. Survival and other clinicopathological parameters of patients were analyzed for any correlation with plasma MMP-2 levels.

Results:

The mean MMP-2 levels in pancreatic cancer patients were 560.3±222.0 ng/ml which were significantly elevated compared to chronic pancreatitis patients (P<0.001) and healthy individuals (P<0.05). The plasma levels of MMP-2 significantly correlated with tissue expression of this protease (P=0.004). However, MMP-2 levels did not exhibit any association either with clinicopathological parameters or with survival.

Interpretation & conclusions:

Elevated MMP-2 levels were observed in blood of pancreatic cancer patients which correlated with its tissue expression. However, these levels did not associate with survival or any clinicopathological parameters of patients. Further studies need to be done to confirm the prognostic/clinical significance of MMP-2 in cancer patients before and after surgery.

Keywords

Matrix metalloprotease-2
pancreatic cancer
prognosis

Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths with a five-year survival rate of only five per cent12. At present, surgical resection is the only choice of treatment for pancreatic cancer, but post-resection recurrence is common in 80-90 per cent of patients who undergo surgery3. Pancreatic cancer is a highly invasive and metastatic neoplasm, and this behaviour accounts for its poor prognosis. The local microenvironment contributes significantly to the progression of cancer with tumour-associated proteolytic enzymes playing a key role in invasion and metastasis of solid tumors4. Invasive tumour cells have a marked ability to degrade extracellular matrix via activation of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2. MMP-2 is secreted as an inactive zymogen and requires distinct activation processes to be converted into an active MMP-25.

MMP-2 has been studied in various cancers in tissue as well as blood. Co-expression of MMP-2/MMP-9 in breast tumour cells has been considered to be an independent risk factor for patient survival6. Dong et al7 reported MMP-2 overexpression as an independent prognostic indicator for survival of patients with colorectal cancer. However, MMP-2 was found to be of limited prognostic value in breast cancer tissue8, ovarian cancer tissue9 and colorectal tumour tissue10. Though Hong et al10 observed MMP-2 to be an insignificant predictor of prognosis in colorectal cancer, MMP-2 overexpression correlated with T-stage indicating some role of MMP-2 in progression of the disease. Immunohistochemical studies on pancreatic cancer have shown that MMP-2 expression correlates with local advancement of tumour, vascular encasement by tumour, lymph node involvement, metastasis and recurrence rate11121314. In a study on oral squamous cancer cell lines, active MMP-2 was noted to contribute to lymph node invasion15. Vasala et al16 did not find any correlation between MMP-2 expression and survival or with any of the clinicopathological parameters in bladder cancer patients. In another study on pancreatic tumour tissue, MMP-2 was not found to be an independent prognostic marker, but its epithelial expression correlated with tumour stage and grade17.

Increased levels of MMP-2 protein in serum have been observed in breast cancer1819. Sheen-Chen et al18 found higher MMP-2 levels correlating with advanced tumour staging and advanced lymph node status. However, Patel et al19 observed that raised MMP-2 levels did not correlate with clinicopathological factors in breast cancer. Acar et al20 demonstrated that serum MMP-2 levels were significantly lower in patients with ovarian malignancies than those in the controls. MMP-2 has been proposed to be a putative biomarker for gastric cancer in serum21 and body fluids22. In pancreatic cancer, only one study23 reported raised levels of serum MMP-2 in a subgroup of pancreatic cancer patients with unresectable disease. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the plasma levels of MMP-2 protein in pancreatic cancer patients and to look for any clinical and/or prognostic significance of this protease in pancreatic cancer.

Material & Methods

The study was performed on 127 consecutive confirmed pancreatic cancer patients who came to the departments of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, between 2007 and 2011. The diagnosis was confirmed on the basis of computed tomographic scan and/or histopathological evidence. Patients who were found to have periampullary carcinoma, neuroendocrine tumour or insulinoma were excluded. The study was approved by the Institute's Ethics Committee and informed written consent was taken from all patients. Blood samples (10 ml) were drawn and collected in vacutainers. The plasma was separated by centrifuging at 2000 ×g for 10 min at room temperature, within two hours of blood collection. The separated plasma was divided into 200 μl aliquots and stored at −80°C till further use. The plasma samples of 25 healthy individuals (relatives or attendants of patients) and 25 chronic pancreatitis patients were also collected as controls.

Of the 127 pancreatic cancer patients, 25 underwent surgical resection of the tumour. The remaining patients were unresectable and were offered other palliative or chemotherapeutic procedures. Three-month post-operative blood samples were collected from patients who underwent surgical tumour resection and were processed and stored; their clinical data were recorded to see for any recurrence of the disease.

ELISA for matrix metalloprotease-2 (MMP-2) protein: The concentration of MMP-2 in the plasma was determined using an ELISA kit (Calbiochem, Merck, USA) as per the manufacturer's instructions. Plasma samples were diluted 1:20 (v/v) with sample diluent. A standard curve for MMP-2 was plotted, and concentration of MMP-2 in plasma samples of patients was extrapolated from this curve. Carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels were also measured by ELISA.

Statistical analysis: Student's t test, Mann–Whitney U-test and Chi-square test were used for comparing variables between groups. For correlating MMP-2 levels in tissue with that of blood, McNemar Chi-square test was used. For assessing survival, Kaplan–Meier method24 and log-rank test25 were used. The software SPSS 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

The mean age of the patients in the study group was 55±10.2 yr. Of the 127 patients, 88 were males and 39 were females. Clinical investigations describing the patient disease status are given in Table I. Serum levels of CA19-9 were recorded for 96 (75.6%) patients and the mean level was 2772.8±981 U/ml.

Table I Summary of clinical parameters of the patients with carcinoma of pancreas (n=127)

On the basis of imaging parameters, tumour was found to be at resectable stage in 40 (31.4%) patients. However, after biopsy or fine needle aspiration cytology, and during surgery, the number of patients who actually had resectable tumour was 25 (19.6%). After surgery, 14 patients were followed up and their post-operative samples were collected after three months of surgery. The other nine patients who underwent surgery either died before three months or were not available for sample collection.

Survival data: Of the 127 patients, 101 patients died due to the disease, eight patients were alive until the last follow up (three years) was done, six patients died due to reason other than pancreatic cancer while 12 patients were lost to follow up. Overall survival time of the patients was considered as the period between the day on which sample was taken and the day of death of the patients. The median overall survival time of all the patients taken together was five months (range 1-36 months). Patients who were lost to follow up were considered alive and their survival time was recorded until the last follow up.

Matrix metalloprotease-2 levels in plasma: The mean value for MMP-2 levels in plasma of 127 pancreatic cancer patients was 560.3±222.0 ng/ml. This was significantly higher than that of chronic pancreatitis patients (245±68.3 ng/ml; n=25) (P<0.001) as well as healthy individuals (250±140 ng/ml; n=25) (P<0.05). No significant association was observed between plasma MMP-2 levels and clinicopathological parameters (such as tumour size, vascular encasement, lymphatic invasion, stage of the disease and metastasis) (Table II). However, a positive correlation was observed between MMP-2 and CA 19-9 levels in plasma (r=0.243; P=0.012) of cancer patients (n=96).

Table II Association of plasma matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) levels with clinicopathological parameters of patients with carcinoma of the pancreas (n=127)

Prognostic significance of MMP-2 in plasma: Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was used to calculate the cut-off for the survival analysis. The ROC curve was drawn for MMP-2 and the area under the curve was 0.702 (Fig. 1A). The strength of the association of MMP-2 levels in plasma with prognosis was assessed by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. A cut-off level of MMP-2 at 500 ng/ml was decided for MMP-2 protein using ROC curve where optimal sensitivity and specificity were 66.31 and 65.3 per cent, respectively. The median overall survival time for patients with low (<500 ng/ml) levels of MMP-2 (median survival time: six months) was not significantly different from that of patients with high (≥500 ng/ml) levels of MMP-2 (median survival time: five months) (Table III). Kaplan–Meier survival curve showing cumulative survival as a function of time for low and high levels of MMP-2 is shown in Fig. 1B.

(A) Receiver operating characteristic curve for matrix metalloprotease-2 (ng/ml). (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curve for pancreatic cancer patients with low levels of matrix metalloprotease-2 (<500 ng/ml) (blue) and patients with high levels of matrix metalloprotease-2 (≥500 ng/ml) (red) in plasma (log-rank test, P=0.134).
Fig. 1
(A) Receiver operating characteristic curve for matrix metalloprotease-2 (ng/ml). (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curve for pancreatic cancer patients with low levels of matrix metalloprotease-2 (<500 ng/ml) (blue) and patients with high levels of matrix metalloprotease-2 (≥500 ng/ml) (red) in plasma (log-rank test, P=0.134).
Table III Comparison of survival between groups in patients with carcinoma of pancreas (n=127)

Among the other clinicopathological parameters, shorter survival correlated with patients having vascular encasement (P=0.003), metastasis (P=0.001), locally advanced disease (P=0.008) and advanced stage (P=0.004) (Table III).

Further, parameters such as metastasis, stage of the disease and MMP-2 levels were taken in multivariate analysis and only metastasis was found to be independent prognostic marker (P=0.01; hazard's ratio=1.86, 95% confidence interval=1.1, 3.0). Parameters such as vascular encasement and locally advanced disease though found to associate with survival in univariate analysis, but could not adjusted in multivariate analysis because as clinically known, these parameters are responsible for giving rise to metastatic disease and influence survival.

Correlation with carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9: Of the 14 patients who were followed up after resection, 10 showed recurrence of disease. Patients with distant recurrence (n=3) after surgery had higher levels of both MMP-2 (525±213 ng/ml) and CA19-9 (3546±1210 U/ml) compared to MMP-2 (362±120 ng/ml) and CA19-9 (457±213 U/ml) in patients with local recurrence (n=7). The four patients who did not have recurrence after three months had low MMP-2 (230±110 ng/ml) and CA19-9 (342±212 U/ml) levels.

Correlation between blood and tissue levels of MMP-2: To see the concordance between tissue and blood levels of MMP-2, its expression in tumour tissue of the 25 patients who underwent surgical tumour resection was compared with the levels in their blood samples26. The levels of MMP-2 in tissue as well as in blood were individually divided into low expression (0-4 scores) and high expression (5-8 scores) categories and then analyzed for correlation. The immunoreactivity pattern of MMP-2 in pancreatic tumour tissue is shown in Fig. 2A, B. Table IV shows the comparative account of the MMP-2 levels in plasma with the immunoreactivity of MMP-2 in pancreatic tumour tissue. Taken together, there was a significant correlation between blood and tissue expression of MMP-2 protein (P=0.004) (Table IV).

(A) Photomicrograph showing strong immunoreactivity of pancreatic tumour tissue with matrix metalloprotease-2 in ducts (IHC ×100). (B) Photomicrograph showing mild matrix metalloprotease-2 staining in stroma of pancreatic tumour tissue (IHC ×200).
Fig. 2
(A) Photomicrograph showing strong immunoreactivity of pancreatic tumour tissue with matrix metalloprotease-2 in ducts (IHC ×100). (B) Photomicrograph showing mild matrix metalloprotease-2 staining in stroma of pancreatic tumour tissue (IHC ×200).
Table IV Correlation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) in tissue and blood (n=25)

Discussion

We analyzed plasma MMP-2 concentration in patients with pancreatic cancer and found it to be significantly higher than those of normal healthy individuals and chronic pancreatitis patients. Another study focussing on MMPs and their inhibitors in pancreatic cancer patients also reported elevated levels of MMP-223. This was in agreement with the observations of Sheen-Chen et al18 in breast cancer patients. Angulo et al27 reported increased MMP-2 mRNA levels in blood of patients with bladder cancer as compared to that of healthy controls. Acar et al20 demonstrated that serum MMP-2 levels were significantly lower in patients with ovarian malignancies than those in the control subjects.

There are studies that have assessed not only concentration of total MMP-2 in the blood but also measured the activity of MMP-2 in serum or plasma with conflicting results. Decock et al28 reported that the total MMP-2 concentration in plasma of patients with primary breast cancer was not significantly higher as compared to controls, but the MMP-2 activity was observed to be significantly increased in cancer patients than control. Contrary to this, Somiari et al29 found that total MMP-2 concentration was higher in patients with breast cancer than controls, but concentration of active MMP-2 was found to be higher in control group as compared to cancer patients.

In our study, no correlation of MMP-2 concentrations in plasma was found with survival or any of the clinicopathological parameters. This could be because we measured total MMP-2 and not the active form of this enzyme. Vasala et al30 found that low circulating pro-MMP-2 as well as low tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2 levels were associated with poor prognosis in patients with bladder cancer. Kuvaja et al31 showed that serum concentration of pro-MMP-2 correlated inversely with node positivity and advanced stage of the disease and high nuclear grade of the tumour while elevated levels of the active form were found to be associated with survival in patients with breast carcinoma. Thus, the effect of MMP-2 on clinical and pathological parameters, progression of disease and survival of patients may be due to interplay of pro-form, active-form and inhibitor of MMP-2.

Limitations of this study were that only total MMP-2 levels were measured and small sample size involved.

In conclusion, elevated levels of MMP-2 were observed in patients with carcinoma of the pancreas as compared to healthy control, but these levels did not show any association with survival or any clinicopathological parameters. However, blood levels of this protein correlated with tissue expression of the protein. Further studies with a large sample need to be done to confirm these findings.

Acknowledgment

The study was supported by grants from Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi. The first author (NS) received CSIR-JRF-NET fellowship from the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India, New Delhi.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , , , . AGA technical review on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. American Gastroenterological Association. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:1464-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Surgery for pancreatic cancer: Recent controversies and current practice. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1626-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas 201 patients. Ann Surg. 1995;221:721-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . The microenvironment of the tumour-host interface. Nature. 2001;411:375-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Matrix metalloproteinase degradation of extracellular matrix: Biological consequences. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998;10:602-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Prognostic value of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and aminopeptidase N/CD13 in breast cancer patients. Med Oncol. 2012;29:561-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Matrix metalloproteinase 2 promotes cell growth and invasion in colorectal cancer. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2011;43:840-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , . Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and MMP-9 expression in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Pathol Res Pract. 2011;207:747-53.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Expression of MMP-2, -7, -9, MT1-MMP and TIMP-1 and -2 has no prognostic relevance in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncol Rep. 2012;27:1049-57.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -7 expression in colorectal cancer. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27:133-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Matrix metalloproteinases and their role in pancreatic cancer: A review of preclinical studies and clinical trials. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:668-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , . Imbalance of expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of the matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs) in human pancreatic carcinoma. J Pathol. 1997;182:347-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Expression of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2), membrane-type 1 MMP and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 and activation of proMMP-2 in pancreatic duct adenocarcinomas in hamsters treated with N-nitrosobis(2-oxopropyl)amine. Carcinogenesis. 1999;20:1323-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . Involvement of matrix metalloproteinase-2 activity in invasion and metastasis of pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer. 1998;82:642-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . Possible contribution of active MMP2 to lymph-node metastasis and secreted cathepsin L to bone invasion of newly established human oral-squamous-cancer cell lines. Int J Cancer. 1997;70:120-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , . Matrix metalloproteinase-2 immunoreactive protein as a prognostic marker in bladder cancer. Urology. 2003;62:952-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , . Expression of matrix metalloproteinases and the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases and their local invasiveness and metastasis in Chinese human pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2000;73:95-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , . Serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase 2 in patients with breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2001;173:79-82.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , . Role of serum matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 to predict breast cancer progression. Clin Biochem. 2011;44:869-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Clinical significance of serum MMP-2 and MMP-7 in patients with ovarian cancer. Med Oncol. 2008;25:279-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , . Clinical significance of serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) and its tissue inhibitor (TIMP-2) in gastric cancer. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2011;49:125-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , . MMP-2 as a putative biomarker for carcinomatosis in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:2015-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , . The estimation of metaloproteinases and their inhibitors blood levels in patients with pancreatic tumors. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:137.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . Nonparameteric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , . Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966;50:163-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , . Prognostic significance of extracellular matrix degrading enzymes-cathepsin L and matrix metalloproteases-2 [MMP-2] in human pancreatic cancer. Cancer Invest. 2013;31:461-71.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , . Detection and molecular staging of bladder cancer using real-time RT-PCR for gelatinases (MMP-2, MMP-9) and TIMP-2 in peripheral blood. Actas Urol Esp. 2011;35:127-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , . Plasma gelatinase levels in patients with primary breast cancer in relation to axillary lymph node status, her2/neu expression and other clinicopathological variables. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2005;22:495-502.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , . Circulating MMP2 and MMP9 in breast cancer – Potential role in classification of patients into low risk, high risk, benign disease and breast cancer categories. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:1403-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , . Low circulating levels of proMMP-2 are associated with adverse prognosis in bladder cancer. Tumour Biol. 2008;29:279-86.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , . Low serum level of pro-matrix metalloproteinase 2 correlates with aggressive behavior in breast carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2006;37:1316-23.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top