Translate this page into:
POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma from a tertiary cancer care centre in eastern India
For correspondence: Dr Sushant Vinarkar, Department of Molecular Pathology, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata 700 160, India e-mail: drsushantvinarkar@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Faizal F, Vinarkar S, Midha D, Banerjee S, Sabnam S, Bhattacharjee C, et al. POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma from a tertiary cancer care centre in eastern India Indian J Med Res. 2026;163:436-41. DOI: 10.25259/IJMR_1861_2025
Abstract
Background and objectives
POLE exonuclease domain mutated tumours are a molecular subtype of endometrial carcinoma with paradoxically favourable prognosis despite high-grade histological features. Most data are from Western populations, with limited studies in Indian cohorts. This study aimed to determine the frequency, mutation spectrum, and clinicopathological characteristics of POLE-mutated endometrial carcinoma from a tertiary cancer centre in Eastern India.
Methods
This retrospective study was conducted between August 2022 to December 2024 at a tertiary cancer centre in Eastern India. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour tissue from 327 cases with endometrial carcinoma underwent DNA extraction and Sanger sequencing of exons 9–14 of the POLE gene. Only pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were included. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess associations between POLE status and tumour grade or histological type.
Results
Fifteen of 327 cases (4.6%) harboured POLE mutations, 13 of which were pathogenic. Most (12/15) showed endometrioid histology, and 40% had high-grade features. The common mutations were P286R, V411L, and S459F. No significant association was found between POLE status and histologic grade or type of endometrial carcinoma.
Interpretation and conclusions
The frequency of POLE mutations was lower than global averages but consistent with other Indian studies. Detected variants were recurrent hotspot mutations. The study underscores the importance of integrating POLE testing into routine diagnostic workflows for endometrial carcinoma in India.
Keywords
Endometrial cancer
Hotspot mutations
Molecular subtypes
Pathogenic POLE mutations
Sanger sequencing
The DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) gene encodes the enzyme responsible for strand synthesis and proofreading during DNA replication. Mutations in its exonuclease domain impair proofreading, resulting in an ultramutated phenotype with a markedly elevated tumour mutational burden.1,2 These alterations define the POLE-ultramutated subgroup of endometrial carcinoma within The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification, which also includes p53-abnormal (p53abn), mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd), and no specific molecular profile (NSMP) subtypes.3,4 The clinical relevance of this system is well established: p53abn tumours behave aggressively with poor prognosis, whereas POLE-mutated tumours are consistently associated with excellent survival, supporting treatment de-escalation and minimising unnecessary adjuvant therapy.5,6 The ultramutated, immune-rich profile of POLE-mutated endometrial carcinomas also makes them strong candidates for anti–PD-1 therapy such as pembrolizumab.7
Traditional histopathology, even when supported by immunohistochemistry, is limited by interobserver variability and may not reliably predict outcomes.8,9 Molecular classification overcomes these shortcomings by identifying biologically distinct subgroups with clear prognostic implications.
In the POLE ultra-mutated endometrial carcinomas, mutations cluster within exons 9 to 14 of the exonuclease domain, with recurrent ‘hotspot’ variants including P286R, V411L, S297F, A456P, and S459F. Among these, P286R and V411L are the most frequent.10,11 To assist in the interpretation of variant pathogenicity, Castillo et al12 proposed a scoring system based on features such as specific base substitution patterns, low insertion frequency, high tumour mutational burden, and recurrence in EC. In their analysis, 11 recurrent hotspot mutations scored ≥4 and were considered pathogenic. This approach helps ensure that only clinically relevant mutations inform prognosis and management.
The majority of available data on POLE mutations are from Western populations. There are limited reports from other regions, including India, where genetic background, case mix, and access to molecular diagnostics may differ. Regional studies are therefore essential to define the prevalence and mutation spectrum in diverse patient populations.
Although next-generation sequencing (NGS) provides comprehensive genomic profiling and allows simultaneous assessment of tumour mutational burden, its high cost and limited availability in resource-constrained settings restrict routine use.13 Sanger sequencing, though more targeted, remains a reliable, cost-effective, and widely accessible method for detecting recurrent hotspot mutations in the POLE exonuclease domain, making it highly relevant for clinical practice in such contexts.
The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and spectrum of POLE exonuclease domain mutations in endometrial carcinoma diagnosed at a tertiary cancer centre in Eastern India and to evaluate their correlation with histological subtype and grade.
Methods
This was a retrospective observational study undertaken by the department of Molecular Pathology, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India. The archived clinical and pathological data from digital hospital records of Tata Memorial Centre (TMC) was used for undertaking the secondary analysis. An ethics waiver was obtained for carrying out this analysis from the Institutional Review Board of the TMC, Kolkata. This study analysed data from cases of endometrial carcinoma referred for POLE gene mutation testing at between August 2022 and December 2024. During the study period, molecular analysis was requested for 339 cases of endometrial carcinoma, of which 327 were tested for mutations in the POLE exonuclease domain. The sample rejection criteria for POLE exonuclease domain mutation analysis at our centre were as follows: FFPE tissue was excluded if tumour cellularity after macrodissection was below 40%, if the FFPE block was more than two years old, or if extensive mucin or necrosis was present, as these act as PCR inhibitors. Samples were also rejected when the extracted DNA was of poor quality or quantity, when amplification failed, or when Sanger sequencing quality-control metrics were not met. In our cohort, 12 cases with inadequate tumour tissue or failed amplification of exons 9 to 14 were excluded from the study.
Tissue selection
The tumour sections were re-examined to confirm tumour type and grade, and to identify blocks with adequate tumour cellularity (≥40%). Representative FFPE tissue blocks were selected for molecular analysis. In cases with significant stromal or necrotic admixture, manual macrodissection was performed to enrich for neoplastic areas, using marked haematoxylin and eosin (H and E) slides as a guide. For macrodissection, tumour-rich areas were selected on H and E slides, requiring at least 50–60% tumour nuclei. Stromal and necrotic regions were excluded. To minimise interobserver variation, two pathologists independently marked suitable regions, and discrepancies were resolved by joint review at a multiheaded microscope.
DNA extraction and quality assessment
Genomic DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA FFPE tissue kit on the QIAsymphony SP platform (Qiagen, Germany), following the manufacturer’s automated protocol. DNA purity and concentration were assessed using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Samples with suboptimal purity (A260/280 ratio <1.8) underwent repeat extraction from a different FFPE tissue block if available.
PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing
Exons 9 to 14 of the POLE gene (NM_006231), corresponding to the exonuclease domain, were amplified using primers recommended by Yu et al.14 PCR was performed using a high-fidelity Taq DNA polymerase master mix, i.e., Platinum SuperFi (Invitrogen), in a 25 µL reaction volume containing 50 ng of template DNA. The thermal cycling protocol is shown as a Supplementary Figure. Post-PCR amplification, a 2% agarose gel was used to visualise the amplified products. Bidirectional sequencing was performed from the purified amplified products using BigDye terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on the ABI 3500 genetic analyser (Applied Biosystems, USA). Data were collected and analysed using sequencing analysis software version 7 (Applied Biosystems, USA).
Raw sequencing files were analysed using Mutation Surveyor v5.1.1 (Soft Genetics, State College, PA, USA). Both automated variant calling and manual analysis were performed against the POLE reference sequence (NM_006231) using NCBI reference standards. All POLE gene Sanger sequencing data generated in this study are available in the NCBI GenBank repository under accession numbers BankIt3027783:PX661176 - PX661502. Case-wise accession IDs are listed in Supplementary Table.
The minimum quality-control thresholds for FFPE DNA Sanger sequencing were as follows: the electropherogram had to show the expected base-pair size according to the standardisation protocol with clear, sharp peaks; the average signal intensity needed to exceed 175 relative fluorescence units (RFU); and the average quality value (QV) across the base pairs in the region of interest had to be at least 20. In addition, any variant had to be confirmed in both the forward and reverse strands.
Variants were classified based on established criteria by Castillo et al,12 incorporating data from ClinVar and COSMIC databases, published literature, and variant interpretation guidelines. Only mutations recognised as pathogenic or likely pathogenic were included in the POLE-ultramutated category for molecular classification. Variants of uncertain significance were documented but excluded from final subtype stratification. The spectrum of POLE mutations in consecutive tested cases and their correlation with tumour type and grade were studied.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were applied where appropriate. Correlations between POLE mutation status and histological type and grade were assessed using Fisher’s exact test (MedCalc online software, version 23.2.1), as the categorical data had lower than expected cell counts.15,16
Results
During the study period, 339 patients were treated for endometrial carcinoma at our institute. Of these, POLE mutation testing was successfully performed in 327 cases, which formed the study cohort. The mean patient age was 59.9 years (range: 37–81 yr), with a median of 60 years.
Endometrioid carcinoma was the most common histological subtype, accounting for 234 cases (71.6%), followed by serous carcinoma (45 cases, 13.8%), carcinosarcoma (17 cases, 5.2%), dedifferentiated carcinoma (7 cases, 2.1%), and clear cell carcinoma (7 cases, 2.1%). Mixed and ambiguous histologies comprised the remaining cases. All ambiguous cases were independently reviewed by two pathologists to confirm classification. Tumour grade was available in 320 of 327 cases. Low-grade tumours were observed in 197 cases (60.2%), while 123 cases (37.6%) were high-grade.
POLE mutations were detected in 15 of 327 tumours (4.6%). The majority occurred in endometrioid carcinomas (12 cases), with one case each of serous carcinoma, ambiguous histology, and mixed histology (endometrioid+serous).
Spectrum of POLE mutations
Thirteen of the 15 cases harboured pathogenic POLE mutations, while two cases harboured variants of uncertain significance. One of these harboured dual variants (D301N and L280R) identified by Sanger sequencing. The cases with variants of uncertain significance were not included in the POLE-mutated category for molecular classification ( Table).
| Mutation/variant | Number of cases | Variant classification |
|---|---|---|
| P286R | 7 | Pathogenic |
| S459F | 2 | Pathogenic |
| V411L | 2 | Pathogenic |
| Y458H | 1 | VUS |
|
D301N and L280R (Both mutations found in the same patient) |
1 | VUS (both) |
| S297F | 1 | Pathogenic |
| A456P | 1 | Pathogenic |
Hotspot Mutations: The numbers in the mutation nomenclature refer to the position at which the amino acid change has occurred. P, proline; R, arginine; S, serine; F, phenylalanine; V, valine; L, leucine; Y, tyrosine; H, histidine; D, aspartic acid; N, asparagine; A, alanine; VUS, variant of uncertain significance
Figure shows the representative electropherograms of the two most observed POLE exonuclease domain mutations in our series (P286R and V411L), demonstrating the characteristic dual peaks seen in a heterozygous base substitution.

No significant association was found between POLE mutation status and tumour grade [Odds ratio (OR)=1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37–3.09; P=1.00]. Similarly, no statistically significant association was found between POLE mutation and tumour type (OR= 2.39, 95% CI: 0.53–10.84; P=0.37).
Discussion
We identified POLE exonuclease domain mutations in a small but clinically important subset of tumours, aligning with the well-established prevalence of ∼5–10% reported globally. The mutations were most often seen in endometrioid carcinomas, with P286R and V411L representing the most frequent alterations. Endometrial carcinoma shows a rising incidence worldwide, with the mean age at diagnosis varying across populations. In India, prior studies have reported mean ages in the mid-50s to early 60s, and our cohort of 60 years corroborates this pattern, suggesting no significant regional deviation.17,18
The prevalence observed in our series closely mirrors that from neighbouring Asian populations while appearing somewhat lower than pooled global estimates. A Thai cohort reported a prevalence of 5.1%, while two South Indian studies documented 2.7% and 10.4%, placing our findings intermediate between these extremes.19-21 Large-scale meta-analyses from predominantly Western cohorts report higher pooled rates of ∼8%, highlighting regional variability. A Japanese cohort described POLE mutations in 8.7% of cases, confined to P286R and V411L. However, their analysis was limited to exons 9 and 13, the two known hotspots, and thus did not capture additional rare variants.22 In contrast, our comprehensive interrogation of the entire exonuclease domain identified both common and rare alterations, underscoring how methodological scope can influence reported prevalence. This distinction also has clinical implications: hotspot-restricted testing may underestimate mutation frequency, whereas broader sequencing provides a more complete profile for molecular stratification. A large Chinese study reported a prevalence of 8.9%, where P286R and V411L were the most frequent mutations, while Q453R also emerged as a recurrent variant, further underscoring geographic heterogeneity in mutation spectra.23
Consistent with the broader literature, most POLE-mutated tumours in our cohort displayed endometrioid morphology. Although the association was not statistically significant, likely owing to small numbers, meta-analyses with larger datasets have likewise observed a predominance of endometrioid histology without reaching significance.24 Histological subtype remains clinically relevant as recent pooled evidence from previously published literature indicates that within the same molecular subgroup, non-endometrioid tumours portend worse outcomes compared with endometrioid carcinomas.25 Another key observation was that 40% of our POLE-mutated cases were histologically high grade. This paradox of tumours with aggressive morphology but indolent clinical behaviour has been consistently described in the literature and is attributed to the ultramutated phenotype, high neoantigen load, and robust immune response characteristic of POLE-mutated cancers.26
The mutational spectrum in our study reaffirmed the predominance of P286R and V411L, while also documenting less common variants such as S297F and A456P.27 Although we did not detect a founder mutation, subtle shifts in distribution compared with other populations may reflect population-specific variation that merits further investigation. Two cases harboured variants of uncertain significance of which one case showed dual variants (D301N and L280R) on Sanger sequencing. Although not classified as POLE-mutated, the location of these variants in the exonuclease domain suggests possible functional relevance. In line with TCGA recommendations, tumour mutational burden assessment could have further clarified their significance, but this was not feasible in our setting due to cost and resource constraints.3 Also, since PCR and Sanger sequencing were performed exclusively on tumour-derived DNA, and paired peripheral blood or normal tissue were not tested, the distinction between somatic and germline variants could not be ascertained in our study.
The landmark TCGA study, which classified endometrial cancers into the four prognostically distinct groups, requires extensive genomic testing, which is often impractical. To address this, simplified approaches such as the ProMisE classifier and the BAGP recommendations combine widely available techniques like MMR and p53 immunohistochemistry with targeted POLE sequencing. This stepwise strategy is also endorsed by the 2021 ESMO–ESGO–ESTRO consensus guidelines.28,29 Our testing method follows this simplified yet effective model by systematically sequencing the entire POLE exonuclease domain, enabling detection of both common and rare variants. This is particularly relevant in resource-constrained settings, where cost-effective sequencing provides reliable results. While focused assays such as real-time PCR and digital PCR deliver sensitive and rapid detection of known POLE hotspots at lower cost, they cannot capture rare or novel variants. Overall, these findings reinforce the clinical utility of incorporating POLE mutation analysis into the molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma in India.
Author contributions
FF: Data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation, manuscript writing; SV: Data analysis and critically revising for intellectual content; DM: Critically revising for intellectual content; SB: Data acquisition, initial analysis; SS: Data acquisition, initial analysis; CB: Data acquisition, initial analysis.
Financial support and sponsorship
None.
Conflicts of Interest
None.
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for manuscript preparation
For language brevity and improved structuring, we have sparingly used ChatGPT (GPT-5, OpenAI, 2025) as a writing aid in the introduction and discussion sections. The authors take full responsibility for the scientific content, accuracy, and final version of the manuscript.
References
- DNA polymerase ε relies on a unique domain for efficient replisome assembly and strand synthesis. Nat Commun.. 2020;11:2437.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Structural basis for processive daughter-strand synthesis and proofreading by the human leading-strand DNA polymerase Pol ε. Nat Struct Mol Biol.. 2024;31:1921-31.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- The TCGA molecular classification of endometrial cancer and its possible impact on adjuvant treatment decisions. Cancers (Basel).. 2021;13:1478.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature.. 2013;497:67-73.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Current and emerging prognostic biomarkers in endometrial cancer. Front Oncol.. 2022;12:890908.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Utility of molecular subtypes and genetic alterations for evaluating clinical outcomes in 1029 patients with endometrial cancer. Br J Cancer.. 2023;128:1582-91.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Pembrolizumab in endometrial cancer: Where we stand now. Oncol Lett.. 2021;22:821.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- The genomic heterogeneity of FIGO grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma impacts diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility. Int J Gynecol Pathol.. 2016;35:16-24.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Poor interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of high-grade endometrial carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol.. 2013;37:874-81.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The frequency of POLE mutation in endometrial carcinoma and prognostic implications: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pathol Transl. Med. 2020;54:471-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Prognostic significance of POLE proofreading mutations in endometrial cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst.. 2014;107:402.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma. J Pathol.. 2020;250:323-35.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- QPOLE: A quick, simple, and cheap alternative for POLE sequencing in endometrial cancer by multiplex genotyping quantitative polymerase chain reaction. JCO Glob Oncol.. 2023;9:e2200384.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Detection of POLE subtypes in high-grade endometrioid carcinoma by BaseScope-ISH assay. Front Oncol.. 2019;9:831.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- MedCalc Software Ltd. Fisher exact probability calculator. Available from: https://www.medcalc.org/calc/fisher.php, accessed on May 23, 2025.
- Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test. Restor Dent Endod.. 2017;42:152-5.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Epidemiological characteristics of endometrial cancer patients treated at a tertiary health center in National capital territory of India. J Cancer Res Ther.. 2023;19:452-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Early endometrial carcinoma: Experience and outcomes. J Cancer Res Ther.. 2023;19:S0.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molecular-based classification of endometrial carcinoma in Northern Thailand: Impact on prognosis and potential for implementation in resource-limited settings. BMC Womens Health.. 2023;23:605.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Association of molecular subgroups with pathological parameters in endometrial carcinomas. Indian J Cancer.. 2024;61:408-14.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Analysis of patients with endometrial carcinoma using the ProMise classifier: A pilot study from India. Arch Gynecol Obstet.. 2024;309:1499-508.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Clinical impact of endometrial cancer stratified by genetic mutational profiles, POLE mutation, and microsatellite instability. PLoS One.. 2018;13:e0195655.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- POLE mutation combined with microcystic, elongated and fragmented (MELF) pattern invasion in endometrial carcinomas might be associated with poor survival in Chinese women. Gynecol Oncol.. 2020;159:36-42.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clinicopathological characteristics of POLE-mutated/ultramutated endometrial carcinoma and prognostic value of POLE status: A meta-analysis based on 49 articles incorporating 12,120 patients. BMC Cancer.. 2022;22:1157.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Impact of endometrial carcinoma histotype on the prognostic value of the TCGA molecular subgroups. Arch Gynecol Obstet.. 2020;301:1355-63.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- POLE mutations improve the prognosis of endometrial cancer via regulating cellular metabolism through AMF/AMFR signal transduction. BMC Med Genet.. 2019;20:202.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Functions, interactions and prognostic role of POLE: A bioinformatics analysis. J Gynecol Oncol.. 2025;36:e45.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Predictive biomarkers in endometrial carcinomas: A review of their relevance in daily anatomic pathology. Surg Exp Pathol.. 2024;7:21.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- The rise of a novel classification system for endometrial carcinoma; integration of molecular subclasses. J Pathol.. 2018;244:538-49.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
