Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Viewpoint
149 (
3
); 326-328
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_499_19

Patient-driven initiatives for prioritizing drug discovery for rare diseases

Department of Biology, Ashoka University, National Capital Region, Sonepat 131 029, Haryana, India
School of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110 067, India

*For correspondence: alok.bhattacharya@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

India has made great strides in pharmaceuticals with a market size of about $40 billion in this sector. However, our success mostly lies in generics and biosimilars for common disorders12. There has been little effort to take on the challenge of new drug discovery, especially for rare and neglected diseases where treatments are either not available or are forbiddingly expensive3. For many rare genetic disorders, the emerging technologies of gene therapy, gene editing and stem cells are being harnessed in advanced countries to develop novel treatments. With the Indian economic growth on an upward trend, and with the coming-of-age of our pharmaceutical industry, it is reasonable to expect much greater indigenous efforts in new drug discovery taking place within India. While we are amply endowed with intellectual resources, we need to evolve the culture of collaborative problem-solving if we are to succeed in the complex endeavour of new drug discovery. Not only do the clinicians, scientists, funding agencies and pharmaceutical companies require to synergize but the patients cannot be mute spectators and must join these efforts. Highly organized patient groups in some rare diseases have provided the momentum and driven the research, through resource generation, lobbying with regulatory bodies and keeping track of new technologies applicable to their diseases4.

Patients can best articulate the special concerns of rare diseases

Due to their low frequency, rare diseases are almost invisible to people who matter - doctors, scientists and policymakers. Lack of awareness, even among doctors, results in little effort to study these diseases and find treatments. This is where patient advocacy can play crucial roles4. A highly successful patient group in the U.S. ‘Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy’ (PPMD) demonstrated how the best interests of patients could be served through organized efforts of parents and caregivers of children suffering from Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)56. In response to a draft guidelines issued for public comment in March 2013, by the European Medicines Agency on clinical investigation of medicinal products for the treatment of DMD, PPMD prepared a white paper, ‘Putting PatientsFirst,’ to communicate the concerns of the stakeholders who believed that the draft guidelines did not adequately address the patients’ needs7. As a result, the U.S. federal regulatory body, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) invited PPMD to submit a proposed draft guidance document for the industry. With help from a bevy of scientific experts, industry representatives and healthcare and policy consultants, PPMD crafted a set of guidelines in 2014 for developing drugs for DMD4. The FDA used the group's regulatory guidance the first-ever from a rare disease patient organization as a blueprint for its own draft recommendations8. In April 2016, Sarepta Therapeutics was denied clearance for the drug Exondys 51 for DMD by the U.S. FDA, on the ground of insufficient data to show the drug's benefit. The clinical trial had been done with only 12 patients. However, patients and their families felt that the drug was beneficial and should not be denied to them. Patient advocacy groups including the Muscular Dystrophy Association and PPMD pressed their case with FDA and succeeded in reversing the decision in September 2016. FDA reversed its decision as the patient groups convinced them that a rare disease with no good treatment options warranted listening to the patient community9. Sarepta was asked to conduct a larger two-year clinical trial to confirm that the drug increases dystrophin levels and improves motor function in patients9. Accelerated approval made this drug available to patients based on initial data. FDA has been working to incorporate patient opinion in regulatory review processes as it recognizes that patients are perhaps better placed to weigh the benefits with the potential risks that they may undertake with a new drug10.

Patients can contribute to prioritizing drug targets and planning clinical trials

It is recognized that patient involvement can help in planning clinical trials in multiple ways, especially in fixing end points and treatment outcome11. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) is being used in the assessment of clinical trials. Carrillo from the National Institutes of Health, USA, recently reported that ‘Incorporation of disease-specific PRO endpoints is of growing importance in drug development. Detecting a clinically meaningful treatment effect that also results in a meaningful effect on quality of life is necessary to allow for adequate review of promising drug therapies’12. Use of PRO in clinical trials has also been stressed by the FDA in their guidelines for industry13. Moreover, patient groups can help in the efficient and cost-effective recruitment of participants in trials, which can effectively lower the cost of drug development.

Patients have also supported drug development by contributing to fundraising required for drug development. In both Europe and the USA, there are many success stories. Muscular Dystrophy Association of America has helped to carry out the development of a gene therapy system in spite of scepticism from industry14. Development of therapy for Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy is being mainly supported by patient groups, such as Jain Foundation15. A recent study carried out by EURODIS (Rare Diseases Europe) showed that 37 per cent of the rare diseases patient groups in Europe supported research towards therapy to different extent16. The Dystrophy Annihilation Research Trust (DART) has completed preclinical studies for an exon-skipping therapy and The Dystrophy Annihilation Research Trust (DART) in India has completed preclinical studies for an exon-skipping therapy and has got permission to treat a DMD patient.

India with its large population size needs to replicate the success of DART by incentivizing and promoting patient groups and including them in the entire process of drug development pipeline starting with identification of drug targets to planning and execution of clinical trials. None could have greater motivation to find rapid treatment for a rare disease than the parents of a suffering child. Including patients and their loved ones as participants in the rare disease drug discovery endeavour is, thus, the need of the hour.

Financial support & sponsorship: None.

Conflicts of Interest: Both the authors (AB and SB) are trustees of World without GNE Myopathy, an organization working to find a cure for rare neuromuscular genetic disorders.

References

  1. , . The drug discovery and development industry in India-Two decades of proprietary small-molecule R&D. Chem Med Chem. 2017;12:786-818.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Drug discovery and development in India. . BioPharm Int. 28:10-1. Available from: http://www.biopharminternational.com/drug-discovery-and-developmentindia
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Rare genetic diseases: Update on diagnosis, treatment and online resources. Drug Discov Today. 2018;23:187-95.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Patient-centered drug approval: The role of patient advocacy in the drug approval process. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017;23:1078-82.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Parent project muscular dystrophy. Available from: https://www.parentprojectmd.org/
  6. , , , , . Patient-centered benefit-risk assessment in duchenne muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2017;55:626-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. . Parent project muscular dystrophy. Putting patients first. Available from: https://www.parentprojectmd.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/WhitePaper_PuttingPatientsFirst.pdf
  8. . Food and Drug Administration. Duchenne muscular dystrophy and related dystrophinopathies: Developing drugs for treatment guidance for industry. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM450229.pdf
  9. New trial for exondys 51 yet to come but goal is to embrace more Duchenne patients, Sarepta says in interview. . Florida, USA: BioNews Services, LLC; Available from: https://www.musculardystrophynews.com/2017/10/04/dmd-therapy-exondys-51-awaits-new-trial-sarepta-aimsfor-more-duchenne-patients/
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Exondys 51 approval history. Available from: https://www.drugs.com/history/exondys-51.html
  11. , , , , . A community-engaged approach to quantifying caregiver preferences for the benefits and risks of emerging therapies for duchenne muscular dystrophy. Clin Ther. 2014;36:624-37.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Patient reported outcomes in GNE myopathy: Incorporating a valid assessment of physical function in a rare disease. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40:1206-13.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. . FDA revising draft guidance on developing treatments for rare diseases. Available from: https://musculardystrophynews.com/2019/02/01/fda-revisingdraft-guidance-on-developing-treatments-for-rare-diseases/
  14. . Muscular Dystrophy Association: Solid Biosciences launches DMD gene therapy trial. Available from: https://www.mda.org/press-releases/solidbiosciences-launches-dmd-gene-therapy-trial
  15. Myonexus Therapeutics Secures $2.5 Million Seed Financing to Clinically Advance Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy (LGMD) Gene Therapies. Available from: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20171213005559/en/Myonexus-Therapeutics-Secures-2.5-Million-Seed-Financing
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Involvement of patient organisations in research and development of orphan drugs for rare diseases in Europe. Mol Syndromol. 2012;3:237-43.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top