Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
149 (
2
); 295-298
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_14_18

Pathogen burden & associated antibiogram of Pseudomonas spp. in a tertiary care hospital of India

Division of Trauma Surgery & Critical Care, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, New Delhi, India
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, New Delhi, India
Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

For correspondence: Dr Purva Mathur, Room No. 211, 2nd Floor, Microbiology Laboratory, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029, India e-mail: purvamathur@yahoo.co.in

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance particularly in Gram-negative bacilli is an increasing problem worldwide. Pseudomonas spp. is one the most common Gram-negative bacteria associated with nosocomial infections and therefore, its trend of antimicrobial resistance needs to be studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of antimicrobial resistance and changes in resistance pattern over a period of five years (2012-2016) in Pseudomonas spp. isolated from trauma patients attending a tertiary care hospital in north India. During the study, a total of 2444 Pseudomonas spp. were isolated from the various clinical sample. The most common species isolated was P. aeruginosa (2331, 95%). The highest level of resistance was observed against levofloxacin (1678, 69%) and the lowest level of resistance was observed against tobramycin (1254, 51%). Irrational and inappropriate use of antibiotics was found to be responsible for multidrug resistance in Pseudomonas spp. Hence, there is an urgent need to emphasize strict antibiotic policy to minimize the misuse of antimicrobials.

Keywords

Antimicrobial
infection
resistance
surveillance
susceptibility

Pseudomonas is an aerobic, motile, Gram-negative bacterium and has been implicated in diverse healthcare associated infections (HCAIs) such as pneumonia, urinary tract infection, skin and soft-tissue infections, in severe burns and in infections among immunocompromised individuals12345. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas is especially associated with increased mortality because no adequate therapeutic options exist678. Therefore, there is a need to conduct monitoring studies of Pseudomonas spp. for its resistance pattern. The present study was undertaken to find out the drug resistance and antibiotic susceptibility patterns in Pseudomonas spp. isolated from different clinical specimens of trauma patients at a tertiary care hospital of India.

This retrospective cross-sectional study comprised clinically significant isolates of Pseudomonas spp. that were isolated from trauma patients from January 2012 to December 2016. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee with written consent. Demographic details including age, gender and clinical history of patients were recorded from laboratory maintained computerized database. The isolates were collected from different clinical specimens such as blood, pus, tracheal aspirate, urine and sputum from wards, intensive care units (ICUs) and follow up patients. All these samples were processed as per standard microbiological methods. The bacterial isolates were identified to the species level by the VITEK2 system (BioMérieux, Lyon, France). The antimicrobial susceptibility data were derived from VITEK 2 system according to clinical and laboratory standard institute guidelines9. The standardized custom sensitivity panel used in the VITEK 2 system included 25 different antimicrobials for susceptibility testing of all Gram-negative isolates, but for the present study, only the susceptibilities of Pseudomonas spp. to common anti-pseudomonal agents were analyzed. The resistance of Pseudomonas spp. to individual antimicrobials was presented in absolute numbers and percentages and was analyzed year-wise. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS version 21 software (IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).

During the study period (January 2012 to December 2016), a total of 16,210 bacterial isolates were obtained, of which Pseudomonas spp. accounted for 2444 (15%). Of the total 2444 clinical isolates, P. aeruginosa (2331, 95%) was the most common species followed by P. luteola (22, 1%), P. putida (62, 2.5%), P. stutzeri (12, 0.4%), P. mendocina (15, 1%) and P. pseudoalcaligenes (2, 0.1%). The mean age of the patients was 34±1.94 yr (range 1-87 yr). Pseudomonas spp. were most commonly isolated from tracheal aspirate (420, 23.3%) followed by pus/wound swab (409, 22.7%), urine (375, 20.9%), blood (225, 12.5%), bronchoalveolar lavage (212, 11.8%), cerebrospinal fluid (50, 2.8%), tissue (42, 2.3%), drain fluid (21, 1.2%), central venous pressure tips (18, 1%), pleural fluid (7, 0.4%), bones (6, 0.3%), sputum (3, 0.2%) and other samples (12, 0.7%).

The prevalence of Pseudomonas spp. in our hospital setting was maximal in neurosurgery ward (590, 31 %), followed by surgery ward (417, 22%), surgical ICU (367, 19%), neurosurgical ICU (284, 15%), follow up outpatient department (163, 9%), emergency department (39, 2%) and orthopaedics ward (37, 2%). The year-wise and the total resistance pattern of the Pseudomonas isolated from 2012 to 2016 are described in the Table. All isolates were multidrug resistant. The highest level of resistance was observed against levofloxacin (1678, 69%) followed by gentamicin (1657, 68%), ciprofloxacin (1639, 67%), ceftazidime (1623, 66%), meropenem (1533, 63%), cefepime (1541, 63%), amikacin (1419, 58%), piperacillin (1363, 56%), imipenem (1301, 53%) and the lowest level of resistance was noted against tobramycin (1254, 51%). A decreasing rate of antimicrobial resistance was observed in amikacin, cefepime, piperacillin and ceftazidime from 2012 to 2016. The level of resistance of levofloxacin was constant during 2014-2016. Although ciprofloxacin, gentamycin, imipenem and meropenem showed an elevated level of resistance, no trend of resistance was observed.

Table Resistance pattern of Pseudomonas spp. against different antimicrobials, n (%)
Antimicrobials Year Total (%) P
2012 (n=540) 2013 (n=538) 2014 (n=546) 2015 (n=423) 2016 (n=397)
Amikacin 389 (72) 301 (56) 300 (55) 211 (50) 218 (55) 1419 (58) <0.001
Cefepime 415 (77) 355 (66) 333 (61) 228 (54) 210 (53) 1541 (63) <0.001
Ciprofloxacin 410 (76) 328 (61) 371 (68) 300 (71) 230 (58) 1639 (67) <0.001
Gentamicin 405 (75) 344 (64) 371 (68) 275 (65) 262 (66) 1657 (68) <0.001
Imipenem 318 (59) 247 (46) 333 (61) 224 (53) 179 (45) 1301 (53) <0.001
Piperacillin 340 (63) 307 (57) 289 (53) 228 (54) 199 (50) 1363 (56) 0.009
Tobramycin 416 (77) 441 (82) N/A N/A 397 (100) 1254 (51) <0.001
Ceftazidime 410 (76) 409 (76) 333 (61) 241 (57) 230 (58) 1623 (66) <0.001
Meropenem 394 (73) 317 (59) 355 (65) 241 (57) 226 (57) 1533 (63) <0.001
Levofloxacin 410 (76) 339 (63) 371 (68) 288 (68) 270 (68) 1678 (69) <0.001

N/A, not available

Infections with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas are not only associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, but it also presents an economic burden as these are associated with high treatment costs and longer duration of hospital stay when compared to those associated with their drug-susceptible counterparts1011. Identification and selection of an appropriate antibiotic to initiate therapy are essential to optimize the clinical outcome12. The isolation rate of Pseudomonas spp. in our trauma setting was 15 per cent which was similar to results published earlier1314. The rates in this study were different from our previous report15. In the present study, the Pseudomonas isolates were mainly obtained from tracheal aspirate followed by pus/wound samples that were similar to some previous studies16. The highest level of resistance was observed in levofloxacin, and the lowest level of resistance was observed against tobramycin. The observed rate of antibiotic resistance in our study against aminoglycosides such as amikacin and gentamicin was consistent with earlier studies1718. Drug resistance against quinolones such as ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin showed high resistance in our study which was in contrast with a previous study where clinical isolates were more susceptible to these antibiotics19. Cephalosporins are regarded as anti-pseudomonal drugs, particularly ceftazidime which is a third generation cephalosporin and shows efficacy in such infections. However, this drug also encountered higher resistance (66%) in our study as shown earlier20. The major limitation of our study was that molecular characterization of resistant isolates (genes and clones) could not be performed as the study was based on laboratory-maintained database.

Multidrug resistance in bacterial population is a great challenge in the treatment of patients with pseudomonal infections. This calls for monitoring and optimization of antimicrobial use. The strengthening of laboratory services at national and international levels will ensure effective surveillance of antimicrobial resistance. Further studies should focus on better administration of the existing antibiotic armamentarium, along with antibiotic stewardship programme.

Financial support & sponsorship: None.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , , . The Pseudomonas aeruginosa opportunistic pathogen and human infections. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13:1655-65.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Prevalence & antibiogram of Pseudomonas aeruginosa at SSG Hospital, Baroda, Gujarat, India. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2017;3:204-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Antibiotic resistance pattern in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from a private medical college hospital. KYAMC J. 2018;9:16-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Surveillance of Pseudomonas in COPD patients in a tertiary care hospital. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;3:1209-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Prevalence and antibiotic sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from CSOM in NMCH, Patna, India. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2017;6:2912-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . ReAct-Action on Antibiotic Resistance. Clinical and economic impact of common multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:813-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Mortality of COPD patients infected with multi-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A case and control study. Infection. 2009;37:16-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an emerging pathogen among burn patients in Kurdistan province, Iran. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2012;43:712-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 20th informational supplement. In: CLSI Document M100-S20. Wayne, PA: CLSI; .
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Our worst nightmare? Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:634-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , . Attributable hospital cost and length of stay associated with health care-associated infections caused by antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:109-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Report: Prevalence and resistance pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against various antibiotics. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2008;21:311-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from clinical and environmental samples in Minia, Egypt: Prevalence, antibiogram and resistance mechanisms. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60:1010-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , . Antimicrobial resistance pattern of clinical isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the University of Malaya Medical Center, Malaysia. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2011;5:5266-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas sp. causing infections in trauma patients: A 6 year experience from a South Asian country. J Glob Infect Dis. 2014;6:182-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , . Multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a threat of nosocomial infections in tertiary care hospitals. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015;65:12-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , . Multiple resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in contemporary medical practice: Findings from urinary isolates at a Nigerian university teaching hospital. Niger J Physiol Sci. 2008;23:105-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . Antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa in Enugu and Abakalilki, Nigeria. Internet J Infect Dis. 2009;8:2.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , . Antibiotic disc sensitivity pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from clinical specimens in Ilorin, Nigeria. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2005;34:303-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , . Occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in post-operative wound infection. Pak J Med Sci. 2004;20:187-92.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    426

    PDF downloads
    305
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top