Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
152 (
1-2
); 124-125
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2609_20

Optimal dosing & time: Issues to get hydroxychloroquine safety & efficacy against COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2

Department of Internal Medicine, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil

*For correspondence: fabricio.souza.neves@ufsc.br

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Due to its in vitro antiviral characteristics and immunomodulatory properties, chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are candidates for the prevention and treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) for more than a decade1. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with SARS-CoV-2 renovated its interest, but clinical studies until now showed only a few (if any) benefits from CQ/HCQ in the treatment of COVID-192.

It is important to note that a possible explanation to this failure is based on the pharmacokinetic characteristics of these drugs. CQ and HCQ have large volumes of distribution due to their extensive sequestration by tissues, and therefore, a prolonged time is needed to reach stable plasmatic concentrations (the steady state). Both CQ and HCQ are used as immunomodulatory drugs in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, and clinical improvement is obtained only after some weeks of treatment. This correlates with time to reach steady state. It was estimated that HCQ at a dose of 310 mg/day would take 14 days to reach 90 per cent of the plasma steady state3. Higher daily doses would lead to higher steady-state concentrations and shorten the time to achieve them. However, very high dosage is also associated with increased toxicity4. This pharmacokinetic profile makes CQ/HCQ more suitable for pre-exposure prophylaxis than for the treatment of COVID-19.

Chatterjee et al5 in their case-control study about pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 with HCQ in healthcare workers demonstrated that HCQ provided significantly additional protection against COVID-19 beginning after four weeks of use of maintenance dose of HCQ 400 mg once weekly, in a progressive dose-response relationship. A single loading dose of HCQ 400 mg twice a day (bid) was also used.

These are encouraging results. Obviously, the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) cannot be neglected (the study shows the highest odds ratio with its use), but we are now able to consider an additional element of protection with HCQ in prophylactic use for those who are in high-risk of infection (healthcare workers).

To contribute to this effort, I additionally suggest the use of HCQ (400 mg bid) on the first day, followed by 400 mg three times a week in the first week, and then the maintenance dose of HCQ 400 mg once weekly. This scheme with a slightly higher loading dose in the first week may warrant earlier clinical benefits (after the first seven days)6. It would be useful for populations who already are at risk of COVID-19 infection, to get faster clinical benefits probably without significant risk of adverse effects.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , , , , , . Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: An old drug against today's diseases? Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3:722-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Virological and clinical cure in COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020;92:776-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Pharmacology of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine retinopathy. New York: Springer; .
  4. , , , , . Bioavailability of hydroxychloroquine tablets in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1989;27:771-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Healthcare workers & SARS-CoV-2 infection in India: A case-control investigation in the time of COVID-19. Indian J Med Res. 2020;151:459-67.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Finding the dose for hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis for COVID-19: The desperate search for effectiveness. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2020 101002/cpt1874
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    16

    PDF downloads
    9
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top