Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Article
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Article
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Editorial
163 (
3
); 265-268
doi:
10.25259/IJMR_923_2026

New tools and policies herald a major advance in tuberculosis diagnosis

Department of HIV, Tuberculosis, Hepatitis & Sexually Transmitted Infections, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Department of Global and Public Health, McGill School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

This editorial is published on the occasion of the World TB Day, March 24, 2026

For correspondence: Dr M. Pai, Department of Global and Public Health, McGill School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada e-mail: madhukar.pai@mcgill.ca

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Hall-Eidson P, Pai M. New tools and policies herald a major advance in tuberculosis diagnosis. Indian J Med Res. 2026;163:265-8. doi: 10.25259/IJMR_923_2026

For decades, tuberculosis (TB) care has relied heavily on sputum samples and smear microscopy, making diagnosis the weakest part of the TB cascade of care.1-3 In adults, an estimated quarter of people with presumptive TB are unable to provide sputum samples, and the limitations of microscopy, especially low sensitivity, are well known.4,5

Recognising this, in 2023, World Health Organization (WHO) published a new standard for universal access to rapid tuberculosis diagnostics, which recommends that: (i) facilities in all districts require the use of a WHO-recommended rapid diagnostic (WRD) as the initial diagnostic test for all individuals with presumed TB, (ii) all primary healthcare facilities have access to WRDs, (iii) all individuals with presumptive TB receive initial WRD testing, and (iv) that all clinicians have access to WRD test results to guide patient management.6

The WHO diagnostic standard urges all countries to accelerate the transition from smear microscopy to WRDs. While existing molecular WRDs have expanded access to quality TB and drug resistance testing services, cost and infrastructure requirements (among other factors) limit their use and continued scale-up in peripheral settings where most patients seek care. Fifteen years after the WHO endorsement of the Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid Inc, California, USA) test, less than 50% of people newly diagnosed with TB in 2024 were initially tested with a molecular WRD.7 Affordable, fit-for-purpose testing approaches have become exceedingly important, particularly as funding for global health and development becomes increasingly constrained.8 To meet these needs, new tests, sample types, and testing strategies are now recommended to change the landscape of what is possible for TB testing in 2026.

New testing class and new WHO policy

In February 2026, the WHO issued, for the first time, recommendations on new, affordable, near-point-of-care (NPOC) molecular tests for the diagnosis of TB, along with recommendations on easy-to-collect tongue swab samples to simplify and expand access to TB testing, and a new pooling strategy that can reduce test costs while reducing the time people wait for results.9

According to WHO, near point-of-care nucleic acid amplification tests (NPOC-NAATs) are molecular tests for TB detection with or without drug resistance that can produce results from a primary sputum or tongue swab sample in less than one hour using instruments that can be battery operated, do not require specialised infrastructure for use or storage, and can be done by testers without specialized laboratory skills at peripheral levels of the health system, much closer to where people live and work (i.e., communities and primary healthcare centres). However, like smear microscopy, this class of tests does not yet incorporate rifampicin-resistance detection and therefore requires reflex testing with a complementary solution (e.g., Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, Truenat MTB Rif-Dx, cobas MTB-RIF/INH, FluoroType MTBDR, BD MAX MDR-TB) for drug-resistance determination.

The first WHO endorsed product (Figure) in this new NPOC-NAAT class is the MTB Nucleic Acid Test Card by Pluslife Biotech (Guangzhou, China). To test, a provided swab is swirled in sputa ten times or across the tongue for 30 seconds and inserted into a sample tube that is pre-filled with lysis buffer and beads. The tube is then rapidly mixed and heated on a ThermoLyse instrument, and once done, the solution from the tube is dropped into the MTB Nucleic Acid Test Card and run on the Pluslife MiniDock (Pluslife Biotech, Guangzhou, China) amplification device that produces a result in approximately 30 minutes. Although not WHO endorsed yet, more NPOC-NAATs are in development or under evaluation to inform WHO policy assessment. Among these is the UniAMP® Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Nucleic Acid Test Card by Huwel Lifesciences in Hyderabad, India (Figure). Huwel is Pluslife’s exclusive licensed partner in India, operating under the UniAmp brand pursuant to Pluslife’s technology license. The Huwel UniAmp test is validated and approved by the Indian Council of Medical Research for use in India in advance of any WHO product assessments.10

Molecular tests manufactured in the Global South that can be used with sputum and tongue swab samples for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Photograph (A) shows the Truenat MTB Ultima chip, with tongue swabs processed by the TrueLyse technology, and (B) followed by DNA amplification using the Truelab real-time quantitative microPCR analyser by Molbio Diagnostics, India. (C) Photograph shows the UniAMP® Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Nucleic Acid Test Card used on the UniAmp NAT device by Huwel Life Sciences, Hyderabad, India. (D) shows the MTB Nucleic Acid Test Card used on the Minidock device by Pluslife Biotech (Guangzhou, China). Currently, only the Pluslife and Molbio technologies have been assessed and recommended by the World Health Organization Source: reproduced with permission (Madhukar Pai, Molbio Diagnostics and R2D2 Network).
Figure.
Molecular tests manufactured in the Global South that can be used with sputum and tongue swab samples for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Photograph (A) shows the Truenat MTB Ultima chip, with tongue swabs processed by the TrueLyse technology, and (B) followed by DNA amplification using the Truelab real-time quantitative microPCR analyser by Molbio Diagnostics, India. (C) Photograph shows the UniAMP® Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Nucleic Acid Test Card used on the UniAmp NAT device by Huwel Life Sciences, Hyderabad, India. (D) shows the MTB Nucleic Acid Test Card used on the Minidock device by Pluslife Biotech (Guangzhou, China). Currently, only the Pluslife and Molbio technologies have been assessed and recommended by the World Health Organization Source: reproduced with permission (Madhukar Pai, Molbio Diagnostics and R2D2 Network).

In addition to NPOC-NAATs, tongue swabs are also recommended for use on low-complexity automated NAATs (LC-aNAATs); expanding access to non-sputum testing across the testing network. These tests can be used to detect TB in less than two hours by testers with basic laboratory skills and technology placed in decentralised laboratory settings. Tongue swab use is specifically recommended for the existing Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra test, and the new Truenat MTB Ultima test from Molbio in Goa, India. This new assay was developed and optimised for swab use, where tongue swabs are collected for 30 seconds, inserted into a tube pre-filled with solution and beads, lysed on the dedicated TrueLyse instrument, and then transferred with a provided pipettor to the MTB Ultima chip for testing on the Truelab amplification device (Figure).

The new WHO recommendations, based on systematic and objective reviews of diagnostic accuracy, cost and cost-effectiveness, and end user value evidence from multiple countries, highlight that adults and adolescents with signs and symptoms of pulmonary TB, or who screen positive for pulmonary TB should receive NPOC-NAAT- or LC-aNAAT-based initial diagnostic testing on respiratory samples rather than smear microscopy. When sputum cannot be obtained, tongue swabs should be used on NPOC-NAATs, and may be used on LC-aNAATs, as initial diagnostic tests for TB.9 This expands options for TB testing to individuals that are unable to produce sputum, and are often at increased risk of TB morbidity and mortality, for the first time, helping to ensure they are diagnosed early and placed on appropriate treatment.

In the new policy, WHO highlights that ‘sputum remains the preferred sample type and should be collected and tested whenever possible, given improved diagnostic accuracy over tongue swabs.’9 This is because NPOC-NAAT and LC-aNAATs detect TB in sputum with summary sensitivities that are approximately 10-19% higher than that of tongue swabs when assessed among a majority of individuals that could produce sputum.

Compared with smear microscopy, the WHO Guideline9 Development Group judged the use of NPOC-NAATs on sputum to be very accurate [summary sensitivity of 85.4% (95% CI: 82.2–88.1) and specificity of 97.6% (95% CI: 96.9–98.1)], and NPOC-NAATs on tongue swabs to be accurate [summary sensitivity of 76.4% (95% CI: 71.2–80.9) and summary specificity of 99.2% (95% CI: 98.7–99.5)]. The diagnostic accuracy of tongue swab testing on LC-aNAATs varied between Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and Truenat MTB Ultima, with the swab-optimised MTB Ultima showing higher sensitivity in the assessed population than Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (76.2% vs. 66.6%, respectively).

How affordable is the first-in-class NPOC-NAAT? Recently, the Stop TB Partnership’s Global Drug Facility (GDF) announced the inclusion of the Pluslife’s MTB Nucleic Acid Test Card, Thermolyse device, and Minidock devices in their diagnostics catalogue. The price is USD 3.60 per test, while the two devices (MiniDock and Thermolyse) are priced at USD155 and USD 180, respectively, with a one-year warranty included.11 In the current era of funding and aid cuts, this level of affordability could allow countries to expand access with less budget.

Currently, the Global Fund is working with 13 early adopter high TB burden countries across the Americas, Africa, and Asia to work towards stepwise rollout of NPOC-NAATs in 2026 which can then feed into any larger investments under Grant Cycle 8 funding in 2027.12 Early adoption plans are likely to introduce NPOC-NAATs as complementary to existing testing network investments and designs, such as expanding testing in hard-to-reach areas that can be linked to TB treatment services but lack routine access to more centralised TB laboratories.

Implications for India

India accounts for about one-quarter of the global TB burden and nearly one-third of TB deaths.7 India’s National TB Elimination Programme (NTEP) has received high levels of political support and domestic funding, and India has already invested in over 9000 NAAT sites covering all districts. India is committed to transitioning from microscopy to upfront NAAT testing and greatly increase case finding, under the Dual-phase Operational Strategy for Tuberculosis elimination (DOST).13

The new WHO policies on NPOC-NAATs and tongue swabs are exceedingly well poised to help India realise this ambition. The fact that Indian made NPOC and low-complexity molecular technologies are available and validated by the Indian Council of Medical Research bodes well for scale-up, supporting local availability or manufacturing of the testing commodities and reducing reliance on complex global supply chains and product importation processes.10 Greater affordability, ability to complement the existing tiered testing network with decentralised molecular testing options at primary health centres, and ability to test people even if they can’t provide sputum samples will enable India to greatly expand the number and type of people to be tested, take testing closer to people, increase case finding, and helping to realise the DOST strategy goal of TB elimination.

It is worth noting that that all molecular technologies are multi-disease platforms and can be used for diverse needs, not just tuberculosis. Tests for HIV, influenza A and B, RSV, COVID-19, HPV, hepatitis B and C, and sexually transmitted infections are already available for one-stop-shop options and consolidation of testing services that are better suited to provide comprehensive results for health management. These solutions could play a key role in helping India achieve its goals beyond ending tuberculosis, such as ending the HIV/AIDS epidemic as a public health threat by 2030 and ensuring access to many of the diagnostics listed in India’s National Essential Diagnostics List (NEDL).14

To support India and other high burden countries with adoption and scale-up of NPOC-NAATs, WHO will soon release the second edition of the WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis. Module 3: Diagnosis. The updated guidelines (due to be published) will be accompanied by an updated WHO operational handbook on tuberculosis, which will provide guidance on all technologies, sample types and strategies currently recommended, steps for introducing new TB diagnostics into a health programme and updated model algorithms for testing and clinical management. A WHO Toolkit for near point-of-care and swab-based tuberculosis testing will also be published that outlines key steps for implementation of these new tools and provides customisable planning, readiness assessment, testing, training, and monitoring and evaluation materials to facilitate programme uptake.

In conclusion, after many years of innovation, research and development, we now have affordable, portable molecular tools and easy to collect samples. We can now truly reach people and settings that we previously could not. We call on high burden countries to adopt these new interventions as complementary solutions to other WHO-recommended products and strategies for testing, toward ensuring universal access to WHO-recommended initial and drug resistance testing services. If we cannot find TB, we cannot treat TB. And if we cannot treat TB, we cannot end TB.

Declaration

The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions or policies of the institutions with which they are affiliated.

Financial support and sponsorship

None.

Conflicts of Interest

PH is employed by the World Health Organization. She has no industry or financial conflicts to disclose. MP has no industry or financial conflicts to disclose. He serves as an advisor to non-profits – WHO, Gates Foundation, and Partners in Health. He was previously an editorial member of the Indian Journal of Medical Research.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of AI-assisted technology for assisting in the writing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , , . Transforming tuberculosis diagnosis. Nat Microbiol.. 2023;8:756-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. The lancet commission on diagnostics: Transforming access to diagnostics. Lancet.. 2021;398:1997-2050.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Improving measurement of tuberculosis care cascades to enhance people-centered care. Lancet Infect Dis.. 2023;23:e547-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: A systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis.. 2006;6:570-81.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Sputum scarcity among adolescents and adults with presumptive tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. medRxiv. 2025.11.02.25339326
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. World Health Organization. WHO standard: Universal access to TB diagnostics. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240071315. 2023, accessed on March 16, 2026.
  7. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2025. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240116924, accessed on March 16, 2026.
  8. , , . From dependence to self-reliance: The future of the global tuberculosis response. PLoS Med.. 2025;22:e1004824.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  9. World Health Organization. Near point-of-care tests, tongue swabs, and sputum pooling for TB. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/global-programme-on-tuberculosis-and-lung-health/diagnosis-treatment/npoc-tongue-swabs-and-sputum-pooling-for-tb, accessed on March 5, 2026.
  10. Indian Council of Medical Research. MTB/MDR-TB detection kits prospectively validated and approved by ICMR. Available from: https://www.icmr.gov.in/icmrobject/uploads/Static/1751000654_listofapprovedkitsfortb.pdf, accessed on March 9, 2026.
  11. Stop TB Partnership. An Early Present For 2026: Innovative Near-poc Pulslife TB Test Available In GDF Catalogue For $3.60. Available from: https://www.stoptb.org/news/early-present-2026-innovative-near-poc-pulslife-tb-test-available-gdf-catalogue-360, accessed on March 5, 2026.
  12. The Global Fund. The TB Quarterly Update. Innovations. Available from: https://www.theglobalfund.org/media/jljp31s4/tb_2026-02-quarterly-tuberculosis_update_en.pdf, accessed on March 9, 2026.
  13. , , , , , , et al. From DOTS to DOST: A new framework for TB elimination in India. Lancet Reg Health - Southeast Asia.. 2026;46:100721.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , . Introducing a national essential diagnostics list in India. Bull World Health Organ.. 2021;99:236-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top