Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
141 (
6
); 836-838
doi:
10.4103/0971-5916.160722

Mutations in gyrA & parC genes of Shigella flexneri 2a determining the fluoroquinolone resistance

Cholera & Environmental Microbiology Laboratory, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Thiruvananthapuram 695 014, India
Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College Hospital Thiruvananthapuram 695 011, Kerala, India

*For correspondence: sabu@rgcb.res.in

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Shigellosis or bacillary dysentery is caused by a group of facultative anaerobic Gram-negative rods of the genus Shigella. Worldwide, about 165 million cases of shigellosis were reported annually (99% occurring in the developing world) with one million associated deaths1. Approximately 60 per cent of deaths involve children younger than five years2. Four Shigella species, S. dysenteriae, S. flexneri, S. boydii, S. sonnei cause shigellosis in humans. Of these, S. flexneri is the most frequently isolated species in developing countries, which has six serotypes and two variants (X, Y) including subserotypes3456. Antibiotic therapy lessens the risk of serious complications and death, shortens the duration of symptoms and hastens the elimination of Shigella from the stool. Multidrug resistance is widespread in Shigella and the current treatment of shigellosis is with ciprofloxacin and with three second-line antibiotics; pivmecillinam, azithromycin and ceftriaxone7. Since 2002, there has been an alarming increase in S. flexneri resistant to fluoroquinolones in India, thereby limiting the treatment options891011. We report here two isolates of S. flexneri type 2a isolated from a hospital in Kerala in 2010 which were found to be resistant to fluoroquinolones and possessed mutations in gyrA and parC genes.

Two isolates of Shigella (SF1 and SF2) were isolated from a 62 yr old female and a 52 yr old male dysentery patients who presented with severe bleeding per rectum, fever and inflammatory bowel disease, admitted to Medical College Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India in 2010. There was no history of travelling and they were taking protein powder as food supplement. Both patients responded well with injection of cefotaxime. The isolates were confirmed as Shigella species by biochemical tests and serotyped using commercially available antisera (Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan). These were stored in Luria–Bertani broth (BD, Difco, MD, USA) containing 50 per cent glycerol at -80°C.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby–Bauer disc susceptibility method12 according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines13. The antibiotic discs (µg) (Hi-Media Laboratories, Mumbai, India) used were ampicillin (10), ceftriaxone (30), nalidixic acid (30), ciprofloxacin (5), ofloxacin (5), norfloxacin (10), trimethoprim (5), tetracycline (30), chloramphenicol (30), streptomycin (10), gentamicin (10) and co-trimoxazole (1.25 + 23.75). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as control. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of nalidixic acid, norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin were determined using E test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden).

The bacterial cell lysate was used as a template for PCR analysis. The bacteria grown overnight at 37 °C in Luria-Bertani broth were boiled, snap-cooled and stored at -20°C until use. Quinolone resistance determining regions (QRDR) of gyrA, gyrB, parC and parE were amplified as described previously1415. The amplified products were separated on a 1 per cent agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized using a BIORAD Gel Doc EZ Imager (Bio Rad, USA). PCR products were purified using ExosapIT (USB) and sequencing reactions were carried out using the Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, USA). Nucleotide sequencing was performed in both directions with the same PCR primers used for the amplification of the target genes in an automatic sequencer (ABI Prism 3200; Applied Biosystems). Sequences were edited with BIOEDIT v7.1.3 (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html) and compared in BLAST of the NCBI database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST).

The two Shigella isolates (SF1 and SF2) were identified as S. flexneri 2a by serotyping with specific antisera. Antibiogram revealed that both the isolates were resistant to ampicillin, co-trimoxazole, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, norfloxacin, trimethoprim, chloramphenicol, streptomycin and gentamicin. The isolates did not show resistance to ceftriaxone. Antimicrobial resistance has been increasing among Shigella and the choice of antibiotics becoming limited with the emergence of multidrug resistant strains. In the present investigation, the test isolates were resistant to two or more classes of antibiotics, including ampicillin and co-trimoxazole. Similar findings have been reported from different parts of the country8910. Both isolates showed high level resistance to ciprofloxacin (MICs of 24 and 12 µg/ml) and for norfloxacin (MICs of 32 µg/ml for both). Both isolates possessed mutations in gyrA at position 87 with the replacement of D-aspartic acid with N-asparagine and at position 80 of parC with the replacement of serine by isoleucine. None of the isolates had any mutation in gyrB or parE genes. The mutation reported in parC gene is in accordance with the previous reports915. In gyrA gene, mutation initially happens at 83rd position (S83L) followed by D87N16. But in the present study, the isolates did not show any change at 83rd position of gyrA gene. The resistance to fluoroquinolones may be due to the acquisition of mutations in the QRDR of DNA gyrase (gyrA and gyrB) and topoisomerase IV (parC and parE), plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) determinants, such as (qnr), aminoglycoside aac(6′)-Ib-cr and active efflux of quinolones17. Since only the QRDR genes were sequenced, the possibility of other mechanisms in the observed resistance to fluoroquinolones was not ruled out.

Shigellosis is a major public health problem in India and several reports have identified S. flexneri to be the predominant circulating serotype in different parts of the country810111819. A study conducted in 1978 identified 16 Shigellae from Calicut and Trivandrum, of which eight were S. flexneri. Three of these showed resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulphadiazine and tetracycline20. The emergence of fluoroquinolone resistant S. flexneri type 2a is a therapeutic challenge in the treatment of shigellosis. Periodic monitoring and reporting of Shigella serotypes circulating in the country and their antibiotic susceptibility will help the clinicians in the proper selection of drugs and their judicious use for shigellosis.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases (NICED), Kolkata, for serotyping the isolates. The authors are thankful to Prof. M. Radhakrishna Pillai, Director, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Thiruvananthapuram for the support and facilities provided. The first author (DMP) acknowledges the financial assistance provided by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi in form of Junior Research Fellowship.

References

  1. , . Shigellosis: the current status of vaccine development. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008;21:313-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Decrease in shigellosis-related death without Shigella spp.-specific interventions, Asia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1718-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Antimicrobial resistance in shigellosis, cholera and campylobacteriosis. Available from http://www.who.int/drugresistance/Antimicrobial_resistance_in_shigellosis_cholera_and_cmpdf
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Laboratory protocol: Serotyping of Shigella spp. WHO Global Foodborne Infections Network. . Available from: http://www.antimicrobialresistance.dk/data/images/protocols/gfn_shigellaserotypification-final-29-06-10.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Wide dissemination of multidrug resistant Shigella isolates in China. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:2527-35.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Atypical class 1 integron coexists with Class 1 and Class 2 integrons in multidrug resistant Shigella flexneri isolates from China. Curr Microbiol. 2011;62:802-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the Control of Shigellosis, including epidemics due to Shigella dysenteriae type 1. . Geneva: WHO; Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2005/9241592330.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , . The recent trends in shigellosis: A JIPMER perspective. J Clin Diagn. 2012;6:1474-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant Shigella species isolated from epidemic and endemic cases of shigellosis in India. J Med Microbiol. 2008;l57:856-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Magnitude of drug resistant shigellosis: A report from Bangalore. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009;27:358-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Changing epidemiology of shigellosis and emergence of ciprofloxacin-resistant Shigellae in India. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:678-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , . Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966;45:493-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Clinical laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 21st Informational Supplement, M100- S21. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI; .
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , . Role of active efflux in association with target gene mutations in fluoroquinolone resistance in clinical isolates of Vibrio cholerae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:2676-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , . Alteration in the GyrA subunit of DNA gyrase and the parC subunit of topoisomerase IV in quinolone-resistant Shigella dysenteriae serotype 1 clinical isolates from Kolkata, India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:1660-1.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , . Mechanisms of resistance to quinolones. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(Suppl 2):S120-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , . Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance: a multifaceted threat. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22:664-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . Shigellosis in Puducherry. Indian J Med Res. 2008;127:621-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , . Subtype prevalence, plasmid profiles and growing fluoroquinolone resistance in Shigella from Kolkata, India (2001-2007): a hospital-based study. Trop Med Int Health. 2010;15:1499-507.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , . Drug resistant shigellosis in south India. Indian J Med Res. 1978;68:413-7.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    25

    PDF downloads
    9
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top