Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
151 (
1
); 87-92
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_204_19

Laboratory surveillance of chikungunya in Madhya Pradesh, India (2016-2017)

Division of Virology and Zoonoses, ICMR-National Institute of Research in Tribal Health, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
Maximum Containment Laboratory, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune, Maharashtra, India

For correspondence: Dr Pradip V. Barde, ICMR-National Institute of Research in Tribal Health, Nagpur Road, Garha, Jabalpur 482 003, Madhya Pradesh, India e-mail: pradip_barde@hotmail.com

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

Chikungunya (CHIK) is a neglected, re-emerging arboviral disease. Limited information on CHIK-confirmed cases during interepidemic period is available from India. This surveillance study was conducted in Madhya Pradesh (MP), India, during the years 2016-2017, to provide information about CHIK cases.

Methods:

Blood samples collected from patients suspected having CHIK were tested by immunoglobulin (Ig) IgM ELISA or real time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) for the detection of CHIK virus (CHIKV)-specific IgM antibodies or viral RNA, respectively. Partial envelope-1 gene sequencing was done. Clinical and demographic data were collected and analyzed.

Results:

Of the 4019 samples tested, 494 (12.2%) were found positive for CHIKV infection. The positivity was detected in both rural and urban areas. The mean age of CHIK-positive cases was 33.12±18.25 yr. Headache and joint pain were the most prominent symptoms, 34.6 per cent (171/494) of the CHIK cases required hospitalization and six patients with CHIKV infection died. The East/Central/South African genotype of CHIKV was found to be circulating in the study area.

Interpretation & conclusions:

Our study recorded a higher CHIK positivity during 2016-2017 in comparison to earlier reports from MP, India. A high proportion of CHIK cases required hospitalization and deaths were also reported, which indicated the severity of the disease in the study area. In-depth molecular analysis of the virus and other risk factors is essential to understand the trends in disease severity.

Keywords

Chikungunya
CHIKV
epidemiology
genotype
severity

Chikungunya (CHIK) is a mosquito-borne viral infection, characterized by a sudden onset of fever, muscle and joint pain that is sometimes accompanied by skin rash. The symptoms, such as arthralgia, may last for months to years, especially in adults12. In 2006, the CHIK virus (CHIKV) re-emerged in India after 32 years, causing the epidemic affecting more than 1.4 million people across the 13 States, and post epidemic, a declining trend was seen till 201134. From 2011 to 2015, the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP) reported an average of about 20,000 suspected CHIK cases across the country every year. However, >3-fold rise in suspected CHIK cases was noticed in 20165.

The CHIKV has single-stranded positive sense RNA that is about 12 kb long. The virus is classified into three genotypes namely Asian, East/Central/South African (ECSA) and West African, and these genotypes are known to affect the epidemiology of the disease6. Prior to 1973, the Asian genotype was circulating in India, which was replaced by the ECSA genotype in 2005-20067.

The CHIKV infection gets lower priority in comparison to dengue (DEN) and other infectious diseases, probably because of its non-fatal outcome89. Further, countrywide limited availability of diagnostic facilities has resulted in underestimating the true burden of this disease. In the recent past, CHIKV has shown increasing severity, and the co-circulation and co-infection of CHIKV along with other infections have increased the severity of the disease101112. The possible long-term impact on health, education and economic growth, per capita income, foreign direct investment and tourism makes CHIK an important clinical entity13.

There are only a few studies depicting the epidemiology of CHIK during non-outbreak situations1415. We present here the findings of laboratory-based surveillance of CHIK in Madhya Pradesh (MP), India. The finding of this study may serve as the baseline data for future studies and help programme managers, policymakers and clinicians for their endeavours in controlling CHIK in this region.

Material & Methods

The virology laboratory of Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)-National Institute of Research in Tribal Health (NIRTH), Jabalpur, is an apex referral laboratory of NVBDCP for DEN and CHIK in MP and Chhattisgarh5. Different government hospitals across MP refer blood or serum samples of the admitted and outdoor patients suspected for DEN and CHIK to this laboratory following NVBDCP case definitions5. A total of 4019 samples of suspected cases of DEN and CHICK referred during the period of January 2016-December 2017, were included in this study. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (NIRTH-201601/03).

Data collection: The clinical and personal information of these cases was collected in the predesigned forms and digitized. The CHIK-positive cases were followed up to three months using telephonic communication. Further, to determine the trends, data regarding population, CHIK cases and climatic conditions were downloaded from reliable sources and analyzed51617.

Laboratory diagnosis: Samples collected in the acute phase of infection (0-5 days of onset) were tested by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-developed Trioplex real time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) assay that can detect DEN virus (DENV), CHIKV and Zika virus18. The samples collected beyond five days post onset of disease were tested for the presence of CHIKV- and DENV-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) IgM antibodies using IgM antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune India). All the assays were conducted following respective manufacturer's protocol.

Sequence and phylogenetic analysis: The real-time RT-PCR-positive samples with low cycle threshold (CT) value were randomly selected and subjected to rRT-PCR as described by Naresh Kumar et al19 the resulting E1 gene amplicon of 330 bases was subsequently sequenced as described earlier8. The sequences were curetted using software BioEdit Version 7.0.9.0 (Tom Hall, Ibis Therapeutics, CA, USA) subjected to BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) to check the identity; these nucleotide sequences were converted to aminoacid sequences using online ExPASy translate tool (https://www.expasy.org) and checked for mutations. The sequences (n=10, 4 from 2016 and 6 from 2017) were submitted to GenBank, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The phylogenetic tree of the current sequences along with earlier published CHIKV sequences (n=38) was constructed using the maximum likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model in MEGA5 software (https://mega.software.informer.com/5.0/) with 1000 bootstrap8.

Data analysis: The data collected were segregated based on age, sex, region, season, etc. The age groups were based on the assumption that children below five years were mostly at home, children aged between 6 and 15 yr were school going, age group of 16-45 yr was of active/earning population of young adults and those 46-60 yr old were considered as old adults, whereas 61 yr and above were senior citizens. The resulting data were computed using odds ratio and Student's t test.

Results & Discussion

During the study, a total of 4,019 samples were tested, of which 494 (12.29%) were positive for CHIKV infection. The positivity was significantly higher [odds ratio (OR): 3.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.18-4.32, P<0.001], when compared with positivity with earlier years (2011-2015) when 4.4 per cent (37/848) samples were found positive by this laboratory (unpublished data).

In 2016, a total of 1472 suspected case samples were received from 25 districts, of which 164 (11.1%) samples from 18 districts were found positive. In 2017, a total of 2547 samples were received from 24 districts, of which 330 samples (12.9%) from 20 districts were found positive. The positivity increased during 2017; however, it was not significant. Segregation of the data to determine CHIK cases in rural and urban areas revealed higher positivity in urban (56.07%, n=277) areas than rural (43.92%, n=217) areas.

An increase was observed in suspected and laboratory-confirmed CHIK cases in MP in 2016-2017, and our findings were in concordance with the reported cases by the NVBDCP5. Limited epidemiological information during interepidemic periods regarding confirmed CHIK cases was available mainly because of limited diagnostic facilities and non-referral of samples for CHIK by the clinicians. Detection of CHIK cases from both rural and urban areas of more than 20 districts of MP suggested the widespread distribution of this infection in MP.

In 2016, 48 cases were found positive for both DENV and CHIKV IgM antibodies and one case was positive for DENV and CHIKV RNAs. During 2017, 37 cases were detected with DENV and CHIKV IgM antibodies, whereas DENV and CHIKV RNA was detected in 20 samples. This indicated that both these viruses were co-circulating and co-infecting the human population. The mean age of CHIK-positive cases was 33.12±18.25 yr (males: 32.11±18.78; female: 34.26±17.59 yr). Among the positive cases, 57.89 per cent (286/494) belonged to the age group of 16-45 year, while 4.86 per cent (24/494) belonged to the age group of 0-5 yr (Table). Similar findings were recorded during outbreaks from other parts of the country2021. Probably, the age group of 16-45 yr is at higher risk of exposure to the day biting Aedes aegypti in home as well as at schools, colleges and their workplaces. Although more males (257/1999, 12.85%) were positive for CHIKV infection than females (237/2018, 11.74%), the difference was not significant (Table). Similar observations have also been reported from other parts of the country2022.

Table Age- and sex-wise chikungunya positivity in 2016 and 2017
Age group (yr) Male Female Total
Tested Positive (%) Tested Positive (%) Tested Positive (%)
0-5 97 12 (12.37) 114 12 (10.53) 213 24 (11.27)
6-15 266 20 (7.42) 275 28 (10.18) 541 48 (8.87)
16-45 1223 152 (12.43) 1181 134 (11.34) 2404 286 (11.90)
46-60 257 44 (17.12) 282 39 (13.83) 539 83 (15.40)
61 and above 156 29 (18.59) 166 24 (14.46) 322 53 (16.46)
Total 1999 257 (12.85) 2018 237 (11.74) 4019* 494 (12.29)

*Sex of one suspected case was not available and one was transgender

Among the total 494 CHIK-positive cases, fever was recorded in 418 (84.6%), followed by headache in 232 (46.9%), chills in 218 (44.1%), arthralgia in 193 (39%), malaise in 183 (37%), rigors in 178 (36%) and body rash in 35 (7%) patients. While 21.3 per cent (35/164) of CHIK-positive patients required hospitalization in 2016, 41 per cent (136/330) were hospitalized in 2017, with the average hospitalization days being 7.9±4.1. One hundred and thirty seven CHIKV-positive cases (adults=117, children=20) could be followed up, of whom six patients died and the rest recovered completely and had no CHIKV-related symptoms; however, joint pain for several weeks was the prominent complaint particularly among the adults (71.7%) than in children (20%). Of the six patients who succumbed to death, two had cancer as an underlying condition; two were tested positive for both CHIKV and DENV by IgM antibodies. No underlying condition was determined in the remaining two patients.

CHIKV-positive cases were recorded throughout the year, but the cases were significantly higher during the monsoon and post-monsoon period (Fig. 1). Further, rRT-PCR-positive cases were detected only during the monsoon and post-monsoon period in 2016. Interestingly, we detected one and 13 rRT-PCR-positive cases in the months of May and December in 2017, respectively (Fig. 1), IgM positivity was also increased significantly during winter (November-December) of 2017 in comparison to the same period in 2016 (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.28-2.06; P=0.001) (Fig. 1). The monsoon and the post-monsoon season are recorded to be favourable for breeding of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes in the area16. Our observation regarding rRT-PCR positivity in the monsoon and post-monsoon season indicated that campaign to reduce mosquito breeding sites before the monsoon and intensified anti-mosquito measures during the monsoon would be helpful in lowering vector density, which, in turn, would help in reducing disease burden. CHIK rRT-PCR-positive cases were deleted in December 2017, which were not detected in December 2016. Environmental conditions such as rainfall, humidity and temperature are known to affect the occurrence of CHIK cases23. However, there was no significant difference in the study area in rainfall, humidity and temperature in 2017 when compared with that of earlier years16. The average temperature in May 2017 was 35±1.9°C and in December, it was 19.5±1.8°C, not favouring the mosquitogenic conditions.

Graph showing month-wise chikungunya-positive cases; month and year are shown on the X-axis, the number of tested cases are shown on the Y-axis and positive cases are shown on secondary axis.
Fig. 1
Graph showing month-wise chikungunya-positive cases; month and year are shown on the X-axis, the number of tested cases are shown on the Y-axis and positive cases are shown on secondary axis.

Gene sequences from 10 samples (GenBank Accession No. KY315505-KY315508 and MG934546-MG934551) were obtained. Certain synonymous mutations in CHIKV partial E1 gene were detected in comparison to the virus detected in 2011 (GenBank Accession No. JX911895). The sequencing analysis of partial E1 gene revealed that the circulating CHIKV belonged to ECSA genotype (Fig. 2). The genetic studies in the past showed that prior to 2000, Asian genotype of CHIKV was circulating in India and it was replaced by ECSA genotype in 2005-200624. The ECSA genotype of CHIKV is shown to produce severe and long-lasting symptoms, even deaths and thus have public health implications101225. Since its first detection in 2005, several mutations have been reported in the CHIKV genome624. It will be worthwhile undertaking full-genome studies to understand polymorphism in CHIKV circulation in Central India.

A phylogenetic tree of chikungunya virus E1 gene sequences of 2017 (with circle symbol and in bold) was constructed by using the maximum likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model in MEGA5 software. The analysis involved four chikungunya virus E1 gene sequences (with triangle symbol) of 2016 and one (with diamond symbol) of 2011 submitted from Jabalpur, India, and other 38 reference sequences downloaded from National Center for Biotechnology Information database. The strains are represented by their GenBank accession number followed by the country of origin along with State and city followed by the year. Onyong-nyong virus was used as the outgroup.
Fig. 2
A phylogenetic tree of chikungunya virus E1 gene sequences of 2017 (with circle symbol and in bold) was constructed by using the maximum likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model in MEGA5 software. The analysis involved four chikungunya virus E1 gene sequences (with triangle symbol) of 2016 and one (with diamond symbol) of 2011 submitted from Jabalpur, India, and other 38 reference sequences downloaded from National Center for Biotechnology Information database. The strains are represented by their GenBank accession number followed by the country of origin along with State and city followed by the year. Onyong-nyong virus was used as the outgroup.

Our study had a few limitations such as failure to conduct genome-wide sequencing and to test suspected cases, and data were collected only from 24 districts of MP. On the other hand, depicting CHIK situation in MP, India, by testing more than 4000 samples and documenting year-round data for the period of two years were the strengths of this study.

In conclusion, our study showed that CHIK is an important emerging problem in urban and rural areas of MP, India. Early diagnosis will help in the timely management of patients and quick interventions to control outbreaks. These data would be useful for the preparedness and interventions for the future CHIK outbreaks in the State.

Acknowledgment

Authors thank Servshri Mohan Shukla for his help in sequencing and Santosh Jadhav and Nikilesh Pacharane for assisting in data management. Authors acknowledge the help received from Dr L. Shivlata in molecular analysis, and thank the State Directorate of Health Services, Government of Madhya Pradesh, and doctors and patients of medical colleges and district hospitals.

Financial support & sponsorship: This work was supported by funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA (cooperative agreement, Grant #6 NU2GGH001903-02). The last author (PVB) acknowledges the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) (Grant No. VIR/43/2011-ECD-I) and National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP), Directorate of Health Services, Government of India, New Delhi, for financial support and providing Dengue and Chikungunya IgM kits, respectively. Authors thank the authorities of the CDC, USA and NIV, Pune, India, for providing Trioplex real-time RT-PCR kits and Dr Kayla Laserson for constant support

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. . Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs327/en/
  2. . Chikungunya Virus Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/chikungunya/
  3. , . Re-emergence of chikungunya virus in India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006;24:83-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Fading chikungunya fever from India: Beginning of the end of another episode? Indian J Med Res. 2014;139:468-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. . Available from: http://nvbdcpgovin/
  6. , , . Chikungunya: Epidemiology. F1000Res. 2016;5:82. pii: F1000 Faculty Rev
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Current status of dengue and chikungunya in India. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2014;3:22-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Co-circulation of dengue virus serotypes with chikungunya virus in Madhya Pradesh, Central India. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2014;3:36-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Chikungunya, a paradigm of neglected tropical disease that emerged to be a new health global risk. J Clin Virol. 2015;64:144-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Alert: Severe cases and deaths associated with chikungunya in Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2017;50:585-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Arboviruses emerging in Brazil: Challenges for clinic and implications for public health. Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:30.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , . Excess mortality related to chikungunya epidemics in the context of co-circulation of other arboviruses in Brazil. PLoS Curr. 2017;9 pii: ecurrentsoutbreaks14608e586cd321d8d5088652d7a0d884
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Preliminary estimate of immediate cost of chikungunya and dengue to Gujarat, India. Dengue Bull. 2010;34:32-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . Seroprevalence and clinical manifestations of chikungunya virus infection in rural areas of Chandrapur, Maharashtra, India. J Vector Borne Dis. 2017;54:35-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Chikungunya virus infection in West Bengal, India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2016;34:213-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. . . Weather Data. New Delhi: IMD; Available from: http://hydro.imd.gov.in/ hydrometweb/(S(poiisw45md1gka552mlk0y2n))/DistrictRai fall.aspx
  17. . . Available from: http://wwwdataforallorg/dashboard/censusinfoindia_pca/
  18. . Trioplex Real-Time RT-PCR Assay, Instructions for Use. Available from: https://wwwcdcgov/zika/pdfs/trioplex-real-time-rt-pcr-assay-instructions-for-usepdf
  19. , , , . Molecular characterization of chikungunya virus from Andhra Pradesh, India & phylogenetic relationship with Central African isolates. Indian J Med Res. 2007;126:534-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Chikungunya fever outbreak in Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India. Indian J Med Res. 2015;142(Suppl S1):111-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , . Chikungunya outbreak in Garo Hills, Meghalaya: An epidemiological perspective. Indian J Med Res. 2015;141:591-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , . Epidemiology of chikungunya based on laboratory surveillance data-India, 2016-2018. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2019;113:259-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , . Rainfall and chikungunya incidences in India during 2010-2014. Virusdisease. 2018;29:46-53.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , . Chikungunya outbreaks caused by African genotype, India. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1580-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , . Chikungunya fever. Lancet. 2006;368:186-7.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top