Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Perspective
149 (
3
); 329-331
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1517_18

Implementation framework for One Health approach

Communicable Diseases, WHO/SEARO, New Delhi 110 002, India
Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Inextricable coexistence of human beings with animals, plants and environment has been both beneficial and malefic. Animals and plants sustain human life and are essential for food security for the growing human population. An ever-increasing and unstoppable number of human infectious diseases arise from animals; 60 per cent of all human infectious disease are transmitted from animals1 and 75 per cent of all emerging infectious diseases originate from animals1. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate that every year, around 2.6 billion people suffer from zoonotic illnesses and around 2.7 million succumb to these2. Several pandemics in current millennium including severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), middle-east respiratory syndrome (MERS), influenza H5N1, influenza H1N1 and influenza H7N9 have animals as their sources. Around 1.67 million viruses are estimated to be enzootic with up to 50 per cent of these having the potential to invade humans under conducive environment including deforestation and damage to local ecosystem3. One of the major drivers of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) perceived as the biggest challenge in global efforts to control communicable diseases, is the humongous irrational use of antimicrobial agents in the animal health sector4. Responding effectively to these challenges warrants a comprehensive, multisectoral, multi-institutional and multidisciplinary approach.

One Health is a validated, integrated and holistic approach that is being advocated by the World Health Organization (WHO)5, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)6 and the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE)7 for combating health threats to humans and animals through human-animal-plant-environment interface. A tripartite agreement8 between these three organizations has been in vogue since 2010 to apply One Health approach. One Health concept aims to attain optimal health for people, domestic animals, wildlife, plants and environment. This makes it a complex philosophy with inherent barriers in successful implementation at the country level where sector-specific approaches have been in vogue and well established.

Some of the barriers hampering implementation in countries include fragmented and disconnected governance of health, animal health and environment, lack of clarity about the definition, concept and scope of One Health approach, under-recognition of its economic benefits, absence of an agreement between health, veterinary and environment professionals on way forward and inadequate training activities9. Efforts have been made to institutionalize and operationalize One Health in Rwanda by having a three-pronged approach. This nationally coordinated plan comprised interdisciplinary collaboration at the government level, strengthening surveillance system for early detection of zoonoses and augmenting capacity for all aspects including research at the human-animal-ecosystem interface10. Zambia utilized this approach in mitigating outbreaks of avian influenza and pandemic influenza in the past11.

Framework for effective implementation of One Health incorporates political commitment, policy formulation, sustainable financing, programme development, knowledge sharing, institutional collaboration, capacity enhancement, engagement of civil society and active participation of the communities. One Health is a simple and powerful concept with a complex implementation process. It is imperative to bring about a change in the narrative in national response to zoonoses, improving food security and ensuring environmental integrity. The change has to be catalyzed by the top political leadership. Strong continuous advocacy, especially by international development partners, namely FAO, OIE and WHO, sharing of evidence-based outcomes, expected economic gains and global best practices should be shared with the top national leadership. The Sustainable Development Goals being intertwined offer a unique opportunity for advocacy as well as an integrated methodology12. The political declaration by the United Nations General Assembly on combating AMR13 strongly recommends the One Health approach.

Pooled national financial resources can fuel accelerated implementation of One Health approach for better public health outcomes. A paradigm shift in the national policy formulation is urgently required to desectoralize human, animal, plant and ecosystem health and to take a more integrated, interconnected and logical programmatic approach towards human and animal health. Knowledge integration at every stage of policy development shall be a prerequisite to strengthen the coordination and governance14.

The success of One Health implementation shall depend on the extent of attainment of institutional collaboration, joint planning and coordinated comprehensive surveillance for the early detection and prevention of zoonoses15. Data and science shall be the cornerstones of planning, implementation and monitoring. The all-encompassing multisectoral capacity building of various institutions needs to be undertaken swiftly for fast-tracking initial efforts. For long-term implementation, theory and practice of One Health should find exhaustive inclusion and visibility in the educational curriculum as well as continuous skills’ upgradation activities for all specialities.

One Health may not succeed fully if it remains a purely governmental endeavour. Awareness of individuals and civil society followed by their active participation shall augur well for the success of this programme. The celebration of 3rd November every year as the One Health Day may galvanize engagement of communities and enhance advocacy with decision makers. One Health programme has to be evidence driven. Research needs to be promoted and encouraged for a better understanding of risk management, economic implications, improving intersectoral coordination and translating global best practices into national action plans to provide policy inputs and help in the development of cost-effective interventions. Today, the world faces the burgeoning challenge of emerging infectious diseases, AMR, food security to rapidly growing human populations and mitigating environmental degradation. This is indeed a long battle but can be won by working together with an honest implementation of One Health approach.

Financial support & sponsorship: None.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Saving lives by taking a one health approach. Atlanta: CDC; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/onehealth/pdfs/OneHealth-FactSheet-FINAL.pdf
  2. , , , , , , . The global virome project. Science. 2018;359:872-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. . . WHO global action plan for antimicrobial resistance. Geneva: WHO; Available from: http://www.who.int/antimicrobial-resistance/globalaction-plan/en/
  4. . . One health. Geneva: WHO; Available from: http://www.who.int/features/qa/one-health/en/
  5. . Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Thoughts of FAO on one health. Rome: FAO; Available from: http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/home/en/news_archive/2010_one-health.html
  6. . World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE); One Health “at a glance”. Available from: http://www.oie.int/en/for-the-media/onehealth/
  7. . . The Tripartite's commitment: Providing multi-sectoral, collaborative leadership in addressing health challenges. Geneva: WHO; Available from: http://www.who.int/zoonoses/tripartite_oct2017.pdf?ua=1
  8. , , , . The challenges of implementing an integrated one health surveillance system in Australia. Zoonoses Public Health. 2018;65:e229-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Implementing one health as an integrated approach to health in Rwanda. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2:e000121.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . ’One health’ and development priorities in resource-constrained countries: Policy lessons from avian and pandemic influenza preparedness in Zambia. Health Policy Plan. 2015;30:215-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Roadmap to a one health agenda 2030. CAB Rev. 2017;12:1-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. . United Nations General Assembly. World health leaders agree on action to combat antimicrobial resistance, warning of nearly 10 million deaths annually if left unchecked. United Nations. Available from: https://www.un.org/press/en/2016/ga11825.doc.htm
  13. , , , , , , . Knowledge integration in one health policy formulation, implementation and evaluation. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96:211-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . One health proof of concept: Bringing a transdisciplinary approach to surveillance for zoonotic viruses at the human-wild animal interface. Prev Vet Med. 2017;137:112-8.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    31

    PDF downloads
    14
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top