Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
155 (
5-6
); 496-498
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_2232_21

Impact of COVID-19 vaccination on disease severity & outcomes in hospitalized patients in a tertiary care centre in the second wave

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Apollo Hospitals, Bengaluru 560 076, Karnataka, India
Department of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Hospitals, Bengaluru 560 076, Karnataka, India

*For correspondence: ravihetal@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

COVID-19 vaccination has been shown to reduce disease severity12, but there are scant reports of outcomes in vaccinated hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in India. We present here the outcomes in vaccinated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in the second wave hospitalized in Apollo Hospital, a tertiary care center, Bengaluru, India. The characteristics of the patients were as follows; 500 consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia were admitted over 40 days between April 21 and May 30, 2021; of these 320 (64%) were males and the mean age was 52.5±15.8 yr. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.6±4.8 kg/m2; 256 (51.2%) patients had at least one comorbidity; 37.5 and 30.5 per cent of patients had diabetes mellitus and hypertension, respectively. While all patients had an increased C-reactive protein (CRP) level, mean CRP level at admission was 70.8±31.2 mg/dl. On admission, 265 (53%) patients required respiratory support ranging from low-flow oxygen to mechanical ventilation. In the remaining 235 patients without respiratory support at admission, 85 (36%) patients worsened clinically and eventually required respiratory support during the course of hospitalization. The overall mortality rate was 17.2 per cent, with a median length of hospital stay of six days.

Of the 500 patients, 148 (29.6%) were vaccinated with at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine before being hospitalized; of these, 14 (9.5%) had received both doses. The majority of vaccinated patients [124 (84%)] received the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 coronavirus vaccine (Covishield), while 24 (16%) received BBV152 (Covaxin). The median time from the first dose to hospitalization was 25 days (1-150 days) and second dose to admission was 18 days (2-51 days).

Data was tabulated and analysed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp. Chicago, IL, USA). Results were analysed in a descriptive fashion as numbers and percentages, mean and standard deviation, median and inter quartile range (IQR). Difference between mean and median was expressed using chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. Correlation analysis was performed using linear correlation and results expressed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. P<0.05 was considered as significant.

The mean age of vaccinated patients (VPs) was 58.4±13.6 yr compared to 49.9±16 yr in non-vaccinated patients (NVPs) (P<0.05). Assessing disease severity, 29 of 148 (19.6%) VPs compared to 125 of 352 (35.5%) NVPs had severe disease at presentation (P<0.05). This was also reflected in the laboratory parameters, with VPs having a significantly lower CRP level at baseline (74.2 vs. 64.5 mg/dl, P<0.05). In terms of respiratory support, 66 (44.5%) VPs required respiratory support at baseline, compared to 199 (56.5%) of NVPs (P<0.05). Of note, the need for respiratory support was lower in VPs despite a higher mean age as noted above (58.4±13.6 yr) and more comorbidities (71 vs. 53%, P<0.05). Of the 352 NVPs, 170 (48%) had worsening hypoxia during hospitalization as compared to only 51 of 148 (34.5%) patients in the VP group (P<0.05). The overall mortality was numerically lower in the VP group (VP 13.5% vs. 18.75% NVP), though statistically not significant. The cause for mortality in all cases was severe COVID-19 pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The subgroup analysis between VP and NVP groups is presented in the Table.

Table Subgroup analysis of vaccinated and unvaccinated patients
Subgroup analysis - vaccination
Parameters No vaccine ≥1 dose Overall P
Baseline characteristics
n (%) 352 (70.4) 148 (26.8) 500
Mean age (yr) 49.9±16.0 58.4±13.6 52.5±15.8 <0.05
Males, n (%) 228 (64.5) 92 (62) 320 (64) 0.72
Mean CRP 74.2±32.8 64.5±25.4 70.8±31.2 <0.05
Median duration from symptom onset to hospitalization (days) 5 (0-15) 5 (0-15) 5 (0-15) 0.8
≥1 comorbidity, n (%) 189 (53.5) 105 (71) 256 (51) <0.05
Oxygen support at baseline, n (%) 199 (56.5) 66 (44.5) 265 (53) <0.05
Moderate cases*, n (%) 227 (64.5) 119 (80.4) 346 (69.2) <0.05
Severe cases$, n (%) 125 (35.5) 29 (19.6) 154 (30.8)
ICU admissions, n (%) 61 (17.3) 19 (12.8) 80 (16) 0.23
Outcomes
Worsening hypoxia+, n (%) 170 (48.3) 51 (34.5) 221 (44.2) <0.05
Mortality^, n (%) 66 (18.75) 20 (13.5) 86 (17.2) 0.15
LOHS (days) 6 (1-24) 6 (1-30) 6 (1-30) 0.2

*Moderate case: Pneumonia with no signs of severe pneumonia and any of the following – RR ≥24/min, shortness of breath or SpO2 90-93 per cent; $Severe case: Severe pneumonia with any one of the following – RR ≥30/min; respiratory distress or SpO2 <90 per cent or ARDS, sepsis and septic shock; +Worsening hypoxia: Requirement of oxygen support in patients previously on room air at admission; ^Mortality: All cause in-hospital mortality. CRP, C-reactive protein; LOHS, length of hospital stay; ICU, intensive care unit; SpO2 , oxygen saturation; RR, respiratory rate; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome

All the 20 of 148 (13.5%) VPs who died had received a single dose of vaccine. All patients who received two doses (14/148, 9.5%) were discharged from the hospital. The VPs who died had a higher mean CRP (113 vs. 56.3 mg/dl, P<0.05) as compared to survivors and were on respiratory support at admission.

The analysis of data focusing on outcomes in vaccinated hospitalized COVID-19 patients, showed that vaccination with both vaccines had a significant impact on reducing severity of disease, inflammatory markers, need for respiratory support and a trend towards lower mortality. This effect was seen despite the VPs having more risk factors such as higher mean age and comorbidities. Similar results were noted in studies from Europe, Israel and Brazil23. The data published by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, suggest that vaccines effectiveness in preventing death after the first dose is 96.6 per cent and after two doses is 97.5 per cent4. The impact of single dose versus two doses could not be evaluated, as most of these patients (134/148, 90.5%) were vaccinated with only a single dose. There was no mortality in the VPs who received two doses, but this finding could not be confirmed with a large number of patients. This remains the main lacunae of the study.

In conclusion, our study suggests the role of vaccination in impacting disease severity despite hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia. It raises additional questions on outcomes such as mortality and the role of one versus two vaccine dose(s).

Financial support & sponsorship: None.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , , , , , , . BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a nationwide mass vaccination setting. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1412-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Israel's real-life evidence that vaccine can prevent severe COVID-19. JAMA. 2021;325:1603.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Estimating the early impact of vaccination against COVID-19 on deaths among elderly people in Brazil:Analyses of routinely-collected data on vaccine coverage and mortality. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;38:101036.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. . One Covid vaccine jab 96.6% effective in averting deaths, two 97.5%:Centre. Available from: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/one-covid-vaccine-jab-96-6-effective-in-averting-deaths-two-97-5-centre-101631211897726.html
  5. . linical management protocol for COVID-19 (In adults). Available from: https://www.mohfw.gov.in/pdf/UpdatedDetailedClinicalManagementProtocolforCOVID19 adultsdated24052021.pdf

    Fulltext Views
    16

    PDF downloads
    11
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top