Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Practice: Short Paper
157 (
4
); 358-362
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2989_20

Hormonal profile of survivors of breast cancer with fatigue: A pilot study

Department of Surgery, Dr BSA Medical College & Hospital, New Delhi, India
Department of Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences & Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, India
Department of Medicine & Endocrinology, University College of Medical Sciences & Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, India

For correspondence: Dr Shardool Vikram Gupta, Department of Surgery, Dr BSA Medical College & Hospital, Secor-6, Rohini, New Delhi 110 085, India e-mail: drshardool@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

One of the most common problems experienced by breast cancer survivors (BCSs) is fatigue. There has been little research about the status of hormones in breast cancer patients as an aetiology of cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Hence, a pilot study was conducted to assess the levels of hormones such as thyroid, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS), oestrogen and progesterone in BCSs with fatigue.

Methods:

BCSs with complaints of fatigue were assessed using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) tool and evaluation of the hormone profiles was done in moderate-to-severe fatigued survivors. Data collected were analyzed to look for any association between fatigue and altered hormonal levels.

Results:

In this study, 56 per cent (n=62) of survivors experienced moderate-to-severe fatigue out of 110 patients reporting fatigue. Thyroid functions were deranged in 22 patients (35.48%). The thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels were found to have a significant negative association with the severity of fatigue, (P<0.05). Twelve patients (19.35%) had reduced DHEAS levels suggestive of impaired hormone synthesis in the adrenal gland. Twenty two postmenopausal survivors (35.48%) had raised oestradiol levels.

Interpretation & conclusions:

The findings of this study suggest that the hormonal milieu, especially thyroid hormone and DHEAS may have a role in CRF experienced by BCSs and needs further exploration.

Keywords

Breast cancer
fatigue
hormone
hypothyroidism
survivors
thyroid profile

Fatigue constitutes one of the most common side effects of cancer and its treatment1. Studies suggest that about one quarter to one third of the survivors experience persistent fatigue for up to 10 years after cancer diagnosis2. The aetiology of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is not well understood and is likely multifactorial. Over the past two decades an array of biological mechanisms have been proposed for CRF including anaemia, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation, 5-HT(hydroxytryptophan) neurotransmitter dysregulation and increased activity of various cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)3,4. The hormone status of fatigue in other medical conditions has been studied well, but in CRF, it remains largely under-explored5,6. For instance the serum levels of cortisol have been reported to have reduced in severe fatigue3 and the relationship of thyroid profile with fatigue has also been established in many diseases6. Low level of dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS) have also been shown in fatigued patients in chronic conditions. but not in CRF5. Similarly, oestrogen and progesterone profile has not been investigated in breast cancer survivors (BCSs) with fatigue, though these have been shown to have a correlation with fatigue in certain condition in a few studies7,8.

In view of a possible correlation of hormonal dysfunction with CRF in BCSs, this exploratory study was undertaken to assess the level of fatigue using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) scale; to estimate the hormonal levels (TSH, fT3, fT4, cortisol, DHEAS, oestrogen and progesterone) in fatigued BCSs; and to analyze the data for possible correlation of hormonal profile with CRF.

Material & Methods

This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the department of Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences and associated Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, India, between December 2014 and December 2017, after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. A written informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria: Breast cancer survivors (BCSs; n=148) who completed their primary treatment (surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy) and were disease-free with a minimum of six months follow up were included in the study.

Survivors who were on any drugs which cause fatigue (e.g. antihypertensive, statins and fibrates); known cases of endocrinopathy (e.g. thyroid disease and diabetes), and those who had chronic medical conditions associated with fatigue such as (anaemia, chronic malnutrition, multiple sclerosis, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, HIV/AIDS, end-stage renal diseases, psychiatric diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis) were excluded from the study. Since this was a preliminary study, a sample size of 60 was taken as a sample of convenience in lieu of similar past studies.

Demographic and clinical profile: Demographic and clinical details were recorded in a predesigned pro forma. All participants were interviewed personally and the English and Hindi versions of the BFI scale developed by Mendoza et al9 was filled out. The permission to use BFI-English and Hindi versions in the current study was obtained from MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Texas, USA. There were nine items on BFI, measured on numeric rating scales from 0 to 10. The first three items inquired about the present fatigue level of the participants; at its usual level; and at its worst level during the previous 24 h. The next six items described how much fatigue has interfered with aspects of their life during the past 24 h. The validity and reliability of the BFI (Multilingual - English, Hindi, Italian, etc.) have been established10,11. The mean value of all the responses was marked as the global score. Fatigue was classified as mild (global score: 1-3), moderate (global score: 4-6) or severe (global score: 7-10). The assessment of the hormone profile was made only in BCSs with moderate-to-severe fatigue (score >3).

Hormonal assessment: For the assessment of hormonal profile, participants were asked not to have any drinks such as alcohol, coffee or other food stimulants and not to do exercise/heavy work 12 h before the appointment for collection of samples, to eliminate any confounding effects. After 30 min of rest, 5 ml blood was withdrawn by venipuncture using sterile precaution from each participant. Levels of oestrogen, progesterone, cortisol, TSH, fT3, fT4 were measured in serum using radioimmunoassay kits and analyzers (Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, Indianapolis, USA). The main outcome measures were: (i) dimension and severity of fatigue in BCSs; (ii) changes in hormone levels in patients with moderate and severe fatigue.

Statistical analysis: All data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Clinical and demographic characteristics were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics. Scoring of fatigue using BFI was done as prescribed for this inventory scale9. Independent sample Mann-Whitney U test was used to test null hypothesis for non-normal distribution in our study population. For the correlation of fatigue severity with hormones, Spearman correlation was used.

Results & Discussion

Demographic and clinical details of the study population are provided in Table I. Of the 148 BCSs participants enrolled in this study, 110 (74.32%) had fatigue. Of these 48 participants (43.63%) reported mild fatigue; 50 (45.45%) had moderate and 12 (10.91%) had severe fatigue. On analysis of BFI, we found that the largest contribution to the global score was made by fatigue interfering with walking ability (21.07%), followed by fatigue interfering with mood (19.98%).

Table I Clinical and demographic profile
Characteristics Number of patients, n (%)
Age (yr)
20-29 10 (9.10)
30-39 8 (7.27)
40-49 27 (24.55)
50-59 42 (38.18)
60-69 19 (17.27)
>69 4 (3.64)
Menopausal status
Premenopausal 20 (18.18)
Menopausal 90 (81.82)
Natural 78 (70.91)
Chemotherapy induced 12 (10.91)
Stage of breast cancer
I 12 (10.91)
II 53 (48.18)
III 38 (34.54)
IV 7 (6.36)
Histopathological diagnosis
Invasive ductal carcinoma 81 (73.64)
DCIS alone 6 (5.45)
Invasive ductal carcinoma + DCIS 14 (12.73)
Medullary carcinoma 5 (4.55)
Metaplastic adenocarcinoma 4 (3.64)
Type of surgical procedure
Modified radical mastectomy 89 (80.91)
Breast conservation surgery 19 (17.27)
MRM with LD flap reconstruction 2 (1.82)
Chemotherapy 90 (81.82)
Radiotherapy 75 (68.18)
Hormone therapy 86 (78.18)

DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; LD, latissimus dorsi

These findings are in concurrence with other studies in literature where 30-60 per cent of participants reported to have moderate-to-severe fatigue in long-term survivors2,12. Fatigue has been reported to have a negative impact on work, social relationships, mood and daily activities. The mood has been reported to be one of the four adverse effects of survivorship13.

In case of the hormonal profile, about one fourth (25.81%) of participants had reduced fT3 levels below the reference range. Four participant (6.45%) showed reduced fT4 levels. Twenty two participants had raised TSH levels (35.48%) while only two had diminished TSH levels (Table II).

Table II Hormone profile of the study population and its correlation coefficient
Hormone levels (reference range) Normal levels, n (%) Increased, n (%) Decreased, n (%) Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) P
fT3 (1.5-5.0 pg/ml) 46 (74.19) 0 16 (25.81) −0.045 0.810
fT4 (0.95-2.23 ng/ml) 58 (93.55) 0 4 (06.45) 0.009 0.960
TSH (0.17-4.0 mIU/L) 38 (61.29) 22 (35.48) 2 (03.23) −0.363 0.004
DHEAS (30-333 µg/dL) 50 (80.65) 0 12 (19.35) 0.032 0.865
Cortisol (7-25 µg/dL) 60 (96.77) 0 2 (3.23) −0.207 0.264
Oestradiol (pre-menopausal 30-485 pg/ml, post-menopausal 15-75 pg/ml) 32 (51.61) 22 (35.48) 8 (12.90) 0 0.999
Progesterone (pre-menopausal 0-23.5 ng/ml, post-menopausal 0-1.2 ng/ml) 62 (100.00) 0 0 −0.322 0.077

DHEAS, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate; fT3, free triiodothyronine ; fT4, free throxine; TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone

In the present study, 10 participants (16.12%) had overt hypothyroidism, while 12 (19.35%) had subclinical hypothyroidism and two had subclinical hyperthyroidism. Overall 38.7 per cent (n=24) of the participants with moderate-to-severe fatigue had deranged thyroid profiles (Table II). None of these patients were detected to have any thyroid disorder in the preoperative workup. Twelve participants (19.35%) had reduced DHEAS levels suggestive of impaired hormone synthesis in the adrenal gland. Two survivors (3.23%) had reduced morning cortisol levels while the rest had it within the normal limits. Twenty two post-menopausal survivors (35.48%) had raised oestradiol levels, while a few (n=8, 12.90%) had reduced oestradiol levels. No pre- or post-menopausal survivors had deranged progesterone levels (Table II).

TSH levels showed a significant correlation with levels of fatigue (P = –0.363). A higher level of fatigue was associated with lower levels of TSH (P<0.05). Spearman correlation coefficients of various hormones are depicted in Table II.

The relationship between thyroid dysfunction and breast cancer have so far been evaluated only by a few studies. One prospective study on the thyroid function in breast cancer showed that the overall prevalence of thyroid disease was 46 per cent in breast cancer patients as compared to 14 per cent in controls, with nontoxic goitre, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis being the most common diagnoses14. In another study, the incidence of thyroid disease was found to be higher in patients than in controls (58 vs. 18%, P<0.05), and subclinical hyperthyroidism was found to be the most frequent (31%) disorder15.

Cytotoxic agents have been suggested to influence thyroid function in BCSs, contributing to symptoms such as fatigue, weight gain, amenorrhoea, and decreased physical activity. Thyroid function may also get affected by chemotherapy, radiotherapy or cancer biology itself, either directly or through hypothalamo-pituitary-thyroid axis16.

In this study, one fifth (19.35%) of the participants had reduced levels of DHEAS. DHEAS is exclusively synthesized in the adrenal gland and is a precursor of steroid hormones. Our findings suggest a possible aetiology of the adrenal gland wherein a defect in the hormonogenesis may play a role in the genesis of fatigue. Improvement in general fatigue with DHEAS supplementation has been reported in females with primary Sjögren’s syndrome as well as the general population5. This provides some support to our hypothesis. However, the role of DHEAS in CRF needs to be explored further in detail.

It has been shown that raised endogenous sex hormones (like oestradiol) are strongly associated with breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women17. A similar trend was found in our study as well. However, lowered levels of oestradiol signify chemotherapy-induced HPA suppression and ovarian failure as shown in few of our patients.

So far, as per the author’s knowledge, this is the first study which has looked at a spectrum of hormones in Indian BCSs with fatigue. Since this was conducted as a pilot study, the sample size was small for the results to be statistically significant. Furthermore, baseline levels of hormones at the beginning of treatment were not noted, which would have strengthened the validity of the study findings.

To conclude, fatigue is a common problem among most survivors of breast cancer which needs to be addressed. Hypothyroidism and reduced DHEAS levels, indicating malfunction of thyroid and adrenal glands likely have a causative role in its pathogenesis. However, further exploration in larger studies is warranted to validate these findings.

Financial support and sponsorship

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. , , , . Cancer-Related Fatigue in Cancer Survivorship. Med Clin North Am. 2017;101:1085-97.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Fatigue in long-term breast carcinoma survivors: A longitudinal investigation. Cancer. 2006;106:751-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Fatigue and proinflammatory cytokine activity in breast cancer survivors. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:604-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Mechanisms of cancer-related fatigue. Oncologist. 2007;12((Suppl 1)):22-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Effect of dehydroepiandrosterone administration on fatigue, well-being, and functioning in women with primary Sjögren syndrome: A randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:91-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Is there a relationship between fatigue perception and the serum levels of thyrotropin and free thyroxine in euthyroid subjects? Thyroid. 2012;22:1236-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Effect of estrogen and testosterone replacement therapy on cognitive fatigue. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:173-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Hormone replacement therapy and cognition:systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2001;285:1489-99.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: Use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Cancer. 1999;85:1186-96.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Assessment of fatigue in cancer patients and community dwellers: Validation study of the Filipino version of the brief fatigue inventory. Oncology. 2010;79:112-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Assessment of cancer-related fatigue among cancer patients receiving various therapies: A cross-sectional observational study. Indian J Palliat Care. 2017;23:207-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Long-term fatigue and cognitive disorders in breast cancer survivors. Cancers (Basel). 20191896;11
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Behavioral symptoms in patients with breast cancer and survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:768-77.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . Relationship between breast cancer and thyroid disease: Relevance of autoimmune thyroid disorders in breast malignancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81:990-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , . Profile of thyroid hormones in breast cancer patients. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2005;38:761-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Radiotherapy-induced thyroid disorders. Cancer Treat Rev. 2004;30:369-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , . Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: Reanalysis of nine prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:606-16.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top