Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
136 (
2
); 289-291
pmid:
22960897

High occurrence of blaCMY-1 AmpC lactamase producing Escherichia coli in cases of complicated urinary tract infection (UTI) from a tertiary health care centre in north India

Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India

Reprint requests: Dr Neelam Taneja, Additional Professor, Incharge, Enteric Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh 160 012, India e-mail: drneelampgi@yahoo.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

AmpC beta lactamase producing Gram-negative bacteria have emerged worldwide. It is important to distinguish plasmid mediated AmpC β lactamases from chromosomally mediated enzymes for surveillance, epidemiology and hospital infection control as plasmid mediated genes can spread to other organisms. Occurrence of blaCMY-1 AmpC β-lactamase, a plasmid mediated cephamycinase was studied in 100 consecutive isolates of Escherichia coli from cases of complicated urinary tract infection (UTI). Screening for AmpC production was done by modified Hodge test, three dimensional test and AmpC disk test. All isolates showing a positive result by 2 out of 3 tests were then tested for blaCMY-1 gene by PCR. Fifty nine isolates were positive for AmpC β lactamase production, 56.6 per cent were positive by PCR. Eight out of 13 isolates which were negative by EDTA disk method were positive by PCR, whereas none of the isolates negative by 3D and modified Hodge test was positive by PCR. Among admitted patients urinary catheterisation was the major risk factor followed by obstructive uropathy, three patients developed urosepsis. High occurrence of blaCMY-1 AmpC β-lactamase warrants health care workers to endorse good hospital practices.

Keywords

AmpC β lactamases
blaCMY-1
E. coli
UTI

AmpC β-lactamases are clinically important cephalosporinases encoded on the chromosome of many Enterobacteriaceae and a few other organisms where they mediate resistance to cefazolin, cephalothin, cefoxitin, other penicillins, and β-lactamase inhibitor/β-lactam combinations. Transmissible plasmids have acquired genes for AmpC enzymes, which consequently can now appear in bacteria lacking or poorly expressing a chromosomal blaAmpC gene, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis1. Therapeutic options for infections caused by Gram-negative organisms expressing plasmid mediated AmpC β-lactamases are limited because these organisms are usually resistant to all β-lactams except cefepime, cefpirome and carbapenems. It is important to distinguish plasmid mediated AmpC β-lactamases from chromosomally mediated enzymes for surveillance; epidemiology and hospital infection control because plasmid mediated genes can spread to other organisms within the hospital. There are currently no guidelines to detect these though many phenotypic assays like modified Hodge test, three dimensional test (3D test), Tris EDTA disk tests and disk potentiation test using boronic acid, etc. are available1. Six families of plasmid mediated AmpC β-lactamases have been identified. These include MOX, CIT, DHA, ACC, FOX and EBC2. In a previous study we found high prevalence of AmpC β-lactamases in E. coli and Klebsiella spp. causing complicated UTI3. CMY-1 is a plasmid mediated cephamycinase first identified in 1989 from Korea and contributes to a significant proportion of cefoxitin resistant isolates of E. coli in Korea45 and blood stream isolates of K. pneumonia (14 of 61 isolates producing AmpC β-lactamase)6. We report here high occurrence of blaCMY-1 AmpC β lactamase producing E. coli in cases of complicated UTI.

A prospective study was undertaken at the Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India, to know the occurrence of blaCMY-1 AmpC production in isolates of E. coli obtained from patients with complicated urinary tract infection (UTI). Over a period of one month (January 2008), 100 consecutive E.coli isolates grown in significant counts from urine sample of patients with complicated UTI were included in the study. Repeat isolates from the same patient were excluded. Complicated UTI was defined as infection developing in a patient with anatomically, physiologically or functionally compromised urinary tractth . All demographic details of the patients were noted. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Institute. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by using the Kirby Bauer's disk diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines7 using the Muller Hinton agar (Difco, USA) and antimicrobial disks (Oxoid, UK and Hi-Media, Mumbai). The following drugs were tested: ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), nitrofurantoin (30 μg), and co-trimoxazole (25 μg). If an organism showed resistance to all the above mentioned drugs, then it was tested against second line agents like cefoperazone-sulbactam (75 μg + 30 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (75 μg + 10 μg) and imipenem (10 μg). E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as control for antibiotic susceptibility tests and preparing lawn culture for the phenotypic tests for AmpC β-lactamase production.

Isolates were initially screened for AmpC β- lactamase production by using a 30 μg disk of cefoxitin to detect AmpC production. All cefoxitin-resistant and cefoxitin-intermediate susceptible isolates were considered for further testing. For phenotypic confirmation, three tests, viz. modified Hodge test using cefoxitin disk4, AmpC disk test using TRIS EDTA8 and the modified three dimensional test9, were used. Distortion of inhibitory zone >3 mm was taken as positive for scoring the 3D and modified Hodge test. A clearly visible indentation or flattening of zone of cefoxitin inhibition was scored as positive for the AmpC disk test. All isolates showing a positive result by two out of the three tests were tested for the presence of the blaCMY-1 gene by PCR as described earlier10. Briefly, PCR was done using the oligonucleotide primers P1 (5’-GTGGAT TCA TCC GAG AAG ATG-3’) and P2 (5’-GATGGG CTT GTC CTC TTT CG-3’). The reaction conditions were 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 58°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, in a 20 μl volume mix, containing 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase, 0.2 pmol each of primer, 250 μM each of 4 dNTPs and 1 μl of the heat extracted template DNA. The presence of 258 bp band of the PCR products was detected by 1.5 per cent agarose gel electrophoresis.

Of the 100 isolates tested, 59 were positive for AmpC production. A total of 40 isolates were positive by all tests. The mean values of distortion zone for modified Hodge test and 3D test were 5.3 and 5.64 mm, respectively. The occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in these isolates was as follows; ceftriaxone-97 per cent (57/59), cefotaxime-95 per cent (56/59), gentamicin-92 per cent (54/59), amikacin-24 per cent (14/59), nalidixic acid-100 per cent (59/59), ciprofloxacin-97 per cent (57/59), norfloxacin-98.5 per cent (58/59), nitrofurantoin-19 per cent (11/59), co-trimoxazole-88 per cent (52/59). Eighteen of the 59 isolates were resistant to all first line drugs for which second line agents were tested. Resistance to cefoperazone plus sulbactam and piperacillin plus tazobactam was 72 per cent (13/18) each. All the 18 isolates were sensitive to imipenem. PCR established the presence of blaCMY-1 gene in 56.6 per cent (34/59) of the AmpC producing E. coli (Table). Eight of the 13 isolates which were negative by EDTA disk method were positive by PCR, whereas none of the isolates negative by 3D and modified Hodge test was positive by PCR.

Table Phenotypic tests and PCR for CMY-1 β-lactamase

Plasmid mediated cephamycinases represent clinically relevant new members of Class C β- lactamases which may spread both by translocation of the strains harbouring blaCMY genes and by transfer of the genes among members of the family Enterobacteriaceae because of their location on R factors. The CMY-1 genes are found adjacent to an insertion sequence common region involved in gene mobilization into class-1 integrons1. Plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases have been found worldwide but are less common than extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), and in E. coli, these appear to be less often a cause of cefoxitin resistance than an increased production of chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase1. Currently 43 CMY alleles are known; of which CMY-2 are the commonest CMY type reported having the broadest geographic spread. CMY2 is an important cause of β-lactam resistance in non typhoid Salmonella strains in many countries, there have been only a few reports regarding CMY-16. Of the 59 patients, 29 were males and 30 females, age ranged from 3 to 75 yr, with mean of 36 yr. There were 11 children <14 yr. Twenty six isolates were from outpatients. Among admitted patients urinary catheterisation was the major risk factor (20/33 cases) followed by obstructive uropathy (5 cases), malignancy (2 cases) and chronic renal failure (3 cases). Three patients developed urosepsis. In 48 patients, infection was of nosocomial origin denoting endemicity in our setting and calls for better infection control practices and surveillance for AmpC β-lactamase producing Gram-negative organisms.

References

  1. , . AmpC beta-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22:161-82.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase genes in clinical isolates by using multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:2153-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Occurrence of ESBL & Amp-C beta-lactamases & susceptibility to newer antimicrobial agents in complicated UTI. Indian J Med Res. 2008;127:85-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Further modification of the Hodge test to screen AmpC beta-lactamase (CMY-1)-producing strains of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Microbiol Methods. 2002;51:407-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Prevalence of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Korea. Microb Drug Resist. 2006;12:44-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Epidemiology and clinical features of bloodstream infections caused by AmpC-type-beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:3720-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. CLSI. In: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 18th Informational Supplement, M100-S18. Vol 28. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; .
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . AmpC disk test for detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae lacking chromosomal AmpC beta-lactamases. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:3110-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Occurrence and detection of AmpC beta-lactamases among Gram-negative clinical isolates using a modified three-dimensional test at Guru Tegh Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, India. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51:415-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . Comparative characterization of the cephamycinase blaCMY-1 gene and its relationship with other beta-lactamase genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1926-30.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    368

    PDF downloads
    211
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top