Translate this page into:
Exome sequencing uncovers promising candidate genes for foetal structural malformations
#Equal contribution
For correspondence: Dr Shailesh Shankar Pande, Department of Genetic Research Centre, ICMR- National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai 400 012, Maharashtra, India e-mail: pandes@nirrh.res.in
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
Abstract
Background & objectives
Prenatal ultrasonography in the first and second trimesters detects foetal structural anomalies in up to five per cent of pregnancies. These anomalies are often suspected to have a genetic cause. While conventional genetic tests such as karyotyping, fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH), and chromosomal microarray (CMA) have been used alongside whole-exome sequencing (WES), their combined diagnostic yield in malformed foetuses is limited to 40 per cent, leaving most cases undiagnosed. This study aimed to identify novel genetic factors linked to foetal structural malformations.
Methods
A total of 44 medically terminated foetuses were included in this study with severe structural malformations from a maternity hospital in the western part of India. We performed a comprehensive genetic analysis of products of conception (POC) employing karyotyping, FISH, CMA (750K resolution) and WES. Further, in cases with inconclusive genetic findings, we reanalysed the WES data using our in-house analysis pipeline and Exomiser (v13.2.1).
Results
Genetic anomalies identified among the 44 foetuses included trisomy 21 (n=4), trisomy 13 (n=3), and XXY mosaicism 47 (n=1) in 18.1 per cent (8 out of 44) of the cases. Further, CMA identified CNVs in 13.6 per cent (n=6) cases, of which five cases showed pathogenic CNVs. With the inclusion of WES, the diagnostic yield increased by 4.5 per cent. We reanalysed the WES data and identified six potential candidates, including RUNX2 (spinal dysraphism), PALLD (Arnold-Chiari malformation), KMT2D (Holoprosencephaly), FBN2 (structural heart and spine defects), CPLANE1 (Dandy-Walker malformation), and KMD1A (structural brain abnormality).
Interpretation & conclusions
This study summarises the findings of genetic evaluation of malformed foetuses in a low-resource setting, which caters to low-income groups of society. The candidate genes reported in this study offer scope for functional studies in relevant animal models to establish genotype-phenotype correlation.
Keywords
Exome sequencing and foetal anomalies
foetal structural abnormalities
genetics of foetal malformations
neural tube defects
prenatal genetic diagnostics
Foetal structural anomalies (FSAs) include a diverse array of developmental defects and are genetically heterogeneous. These anomalies can impact single or multiple systems, such as the central nervous system (CNS), cardiac, renal, and skeletal systems1,2. FSAs are genetically heterogeneous and can be attributed to genetic causes such as aneuploidies, copy number variations (CNVs), and monogenic defects. Conventional genetic testing methods, including karyotyping, FISH, quantitative fluorescence-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR), and chromosomal microarray (CMA), are the most commonly available standard-of-care genetic diagnostic tests for FSAs3,4. In prenatal genetic diagnosis, whole exome sequencing (WES) has become a valuable addition to the genetic diagnostic toolbox alongside conventional methods.
In recent years, multiple studies have used WES to understand the genetic aetiology of severe foetal anomalies, especially in foetuses with normal chromosomal profiles. The diagnostic yield across the spectrum of FSAs has been reported to range from 6.2 to 80 per cent, with variability observed across different foetal anomaly phenotypes and the number of anomalies detected4-11. The diagnostic yield appears notably elevated in certain foetal malformations, such as CNS abnormalities, compared to analogous monogenic phenotypes identified during early childhood8. Conversely, a considerable proportion of FSAs detected via antenatal ultrasonography (USG) are lethal in utero or may undergo medical termination, potentially evading genetic dissection and aetiological investigation. Moreover, comprehensive genetic testing remains largely inaccessible and unaffordable to most of the population in countries like India. Thus, the monogenic aetiology of many severe FSAs encompassing syndromic and non-syndromic forms remains inadequately characterised. Therefore, this study aimed to identify novel genetic causes and potential candidate genes associated with different types of foetal malformations by adopting a comprehensive genomics strategy.
Materials & Methods
This study was undertaken at the department of Genetic Research Centre, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai after obtaining the ethical clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee for Human Studies. In this study WES was performed on medically terminated foetuses manifesting structural abnormalities yet exhibiting normal chromosomal profiles. Subsequently, we used phenotype-driven variant prioritisation algorithms to identify candidate genes linked with various antenatally-detected foetal structural malformations.
Informed written consent was obtained from the respective parents, and pre/post-test genetic counselling was provided. Total 44 foetuses (of which 6 belonged to consanguineous couples) that were medically terminated due to various syndromic and non-syndromic malformations (Supplementary Table I) observed during antenatal ultrasound scanning were prospectively obtained from the study hospital. All the cases were recruited from the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital, Mumbai, India, between October 2021 to May 2023. The antenatal ultrasound scans were performed using GE Voluson S8 with a 3.5 MHz curvilinear and 3D/4D probe. The products of conception (POC) (Placental villi and/or foetal thigh muscle) obtained after the medical termination of the pregnancy were ruled out for placental pathologies and known maternal risks.
Karyotyping, FISH, and CMA
Genomic DNA extraction from the foetal tissues/POC and peripheral blood samples of parents was performed using a QIAamp Fast DNA tissue/blood mini kit (QIAGEN, Germany). All the cases were screened for chromosomal abnormalities by karyotyping and/or FISH (n=44). For karyotyping, foetal tissues were treated with collagenase and cultured in AmnioMAX™ (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA) medium followed by incubation at 37°C for 10-12 days. Cultured cells were harvested using 40 µl colcemid and incubated at 37°C for 45 min followed by 0.25 per cent trypsin treatment. For parental karyotyping, 1 ml of blood was added to Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) medium (4 ml DMEM mixed with 1 ml FBS) (GIBCO, ThermoFisher Scientific, USA) along with 100 µl PHA (GIBCO, ThermoFisher Scientific, USA). The cells were cultured at 37°C for 72 h in a CO2 incubator, and colcemid was added one hour before the termination. Post-harvesting, cells (both POC and blood) were fixed in Carnoy’s fixative, and banding was performed using the standard protocol12. About 20 cells were analysed per patient using ISCN 2020 guidelines13. In cases where karyotyping was not possible, FISH was performed using AneuVysion® Multicolor DNA Probe Kit (Abbott, USA). Dual colour probe – LSI 13/21 was used for the detection of chromosomes 13 and 21) and FISH was tri-colour probe – CEP 18 / X / Y was used for the detection of Chromosomes 18, X and Y14.In cases with normal Karyotype/FISH results (n=36), CMA was performed using Affymetrix CytoScan™ 750k array as per the manufacturer’s protocol. Further, CMA Data was analysed using Chromosome Analysis Suite (ChAS) version 4.3.0.71.
Whole exome sequencing and data analysis
WES was performed in POCs with normal karyotype or FISH findings (n=30), and parental WES was performed in nine cases. WES was performed on the Illumina NovaSeq platform (mean depth of 80-100X, with 97% coverage of target bases and ≥20x depth). Data processing, alignment, and variant calling were executed following the Genomic Analysis Tool Kit (GATK) best practices framework for germline variant identification. Briefly, sequencing reads were aligned to the human reference genome (GRCh38), and base quality recalibration was performed using the DRAGEN bio-IT platform. Variant calling was accomplished through the GATK pipeline, followed by annotation using ANNOVAR and OpenCRAVAT15-17.
Clinically relevant causal variants were filtered and prioritised using Golden Helix VarSeq and Varsome workflow implementing the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants. Clinically significant variants using the compilation of disease databases such as Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), ClinVar, and the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD). Further, variants were filtered based on their minor allele frequencies (MAF) in gnomAD (v3.1.2 and v4.0.0), 1000 Genome phase-3, and dbSNP (GCF_000001405.38). Rare variants with MAF≤0.01 were retained for further analysis. Additionally, in silico pathogenicity prediction tools such as PolyPhen-2, SIFT, REVEL, CADD, SpliceAI, etc.) were employed to glean further insights into the potential functional impact of the variants. Finally, the variants were classified adhering to the established guidelines set forth by the ACMG18. Pathogenic (P) and likely-pathogenic (LP) variants in genes with a known link to the specific foetal malformations observed were designated as conclusive findings and reported to the parents (Figure).

- Flow diagram of the pipeline used for WES data analysis and variant prioritization. VEP, variant effect predictor (ensembl); DP, depth; GQ, genotype quality; AAF, alternate allele frequency; MAF, minor allele frequency; LoF, loos-of-function; SIFT, sorting intolerant from tolerant; CADD, combined annotation dependent depletion; REVEL ,rare exome variant ensemble learner; MoI, mode of inheritance; OMIM, online Mendelian inheritance in man; ACMG, American college of medical genetics and genomics GenCC, gene curation coalition; VUS, variant of unknown significance.
Candidate gene prioritization
To address inconclusive or negative WES outcomes, a phenotype-driven variant prioritisation pipeline was employed as detailed in our previous work19. Briefly, variants that were absent or showed MAF≤0.001 in gnomAD (v3.1.2 and v4.0.0) were filtered. These variants were further filtered using ensemble variant scoring methods (CADD≥25; REVEL≥0.6; SpliceAI: ≥0.3) and variant classification was performed by following the latest ACMG variant classification guidelines. The potential candidate genes for foetal malformations were identified by using OMIM data, zebrafish ( https://zfin.org/ ), and knockout mouse model phenotype databases [Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI)], enabling cross-species comparison and validation. Furthermore, an additional phenotype-driven variant prioritisation algorithm, Exomiser (v13.2.1) was used, to prioritise variants in individual samples based on relevant Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms20. Lastly, the top five candidate genes in each sample were manually curated by evaluating phenotype evidence from available literature and multiple databases such as the Gene Curation Coalition (GenCC), DECIPHER, The Human - Mouse: Disease Connection (HMDC), GeneMatcher (genematcher.org), VarElect and MONDO. Only genes without GenCC evidence or genes classified as ‘supportive’, ‘moderate’ or ‘strong’ but not ‘definitive’ by GenCC for the respective foetal malformation phenotype (observed in this study) were considered as candidate genes. The exome analysis pipeline used in this study has been depicted in figure.
Results
We studied 44 foetal cases with severe anomalies that were detected mainly during the second trimester of pregnancy by USG. At the time of testing, the median gestational age was 20 wk (range: 12-28 wk), and the median maternal age was 27 yr (range: 21-39 yr). Based on the phenotypic presentation and organ system(s) involved, we classified the foetal malformations into the following categories: (i) syndromic or multiple malformations (n=14); (ii) neural tube defects (n=9), (iii) structural brain abnormalities (n=7), (iv) structural heart defects (n=6), (v) skeletal defects/dysplasia (n=6), and (vi) renal anomalies (n=2) (Supplementary Table I). All the terminated foetuses underwent meticulous exclusion for placental pathologies and known maternal risks.
Aneuploidies and CNVs
Chromosomal analysis using karyotyping/FISH identified trisomies in 18.1 per cent (8 out of 44) of the cases (Supplementary Table II). This included trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) in four cases, trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome) in three cases, and one case of 47XXY mosaicism (15% mosaic). We performed CMA in cases with normal karyotype/FISH and identified CNVs in 13.6 per cent (n=6) cases, of which five showed pathogenic CNVs (Table I; Supplementary Table I, and Fig. 1). We observed a de novo CNV in the 17p11.2 region in two POCs that displayed distinct phenotypic presentations (Table I and supplementary Fig. 2). Notably, the foetus exhibiting structural heart malformations showed a 3.68 Mb copy gain in this region (Supplementary Fig. 2), contrasting with another foetus characterised by skeletal dysplasia, which showed a 3.45 Mb copy loss in the same 17p11.2 region (Supplementary Fig. 2). The 17p11.2 CNV observed in these two foetuses overlapped with the 17p11.2 microduplication syndrome region with two important dosage-sensitive genes, RAI1 and FLCN (Supplementary Fig. 2). This region is known to be associated with Smith-Magenis and Potocki-Lupski syndromes (Supplementary Fig. 2)21.
Sample Id | Maternal age (yr) | Obstetric history | Gestational age (wk + days) | Clinical features | CNV/Size (chromosomal interval)* | ISCA classification | Number of OMIM genes in the duplicated/deleted segment | Known phenotypes/syndromes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AB0015 |
30 | Primigravida | 23+2 | Hypoplastic bipartite right ventricle; Moderate tricuspid regurgitation; Pulmonary atresia-intact ventricular septum | Copy gain/3.68 Mb (17p11.2; Chr17:16,754,004-20,435,048) | Pathogenic | 44 | 17p11.2 microduplication syndrome; Potocki-Lupski syndrome |
AB0016 | 25 | G2A1 | 22 | Vermian hypoplasia/evolving Dandy Walker Malformation, prefrontal oedema | Maternally inherited copy loss/343 Kb (16p11.2:28,696,865-29,039,870) | VUS | 10 | Variable and incompletely penetrant phenotypes such as developmental delay and craniofacial dysmorphism |
AB0033 | 28 | G3A2 | 22 | Skeletal dysplasia; Coarctation of Aorta | Copy loss/3.45 Mb (17p11.2; Chr17:16,891,061-20,350,036) | Pathogenic | 43 | 17p11.2 Recurrent deletion syndrome;Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS) |
AB0035 | 26 | G2P1L1 | 21 | B/L Dysplastic kidney with small bladder; hydronephrosis; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; VSD; Tiny echogenic focus seen in the left ventricle | Copy loss/101 Kb (7q11.23; Chr7:74,772,859-74,873,686) | Pathogenic | 2 (NCF1 and GTF2IRD2) | Williams-Beuren syndrome |
AB0045 | 25 | Primigravida | 21+6 | Cross fused renal ectopia, Left kidney fused with right kidney, Loss of corticomedullary differentiation in right kidney | Copy loss/610 Kb (16p11.2; Chr16:29,568,701-30,178,708) | Pathogenic | 22 (Includes TBX6 and PRRT2) | Skeletal-Renal dysplasia syndrome, CAKUT |
AB0047 | 28 | G4P2L2A1 | 20+1 | Gross hydrocephalus, Asymmetric cardiac chambers, Dilated right atrium and ventricle | Copy gain/9.5 Mbin 13q11q34 (Partial Trisomy13) | Pathogenic | 287 | Trisomy 13 |
Variants from known genes for foetal malformations
WES analysis identified causative genetic variants in two out of 44 cases (4.5%). In foetuses AB0005 and AB0041, P/LP variants were identified in ASPM and SPECC1L genes, respectively. Reanalysis of the exome data led to the identification of VUS in two additional cases: AB0018 (CNOT1) and AB0023 (ANKRD11) (Table II). However, the two VUS variants identified in AB0018 and AB0023 need to be functionally evaluated to understand the genotype-phenotype correlation. Thus, a definitive diagnosis was achieved in two foetuses that showed P or LP variants with a matched mode of inheritance for the phenotype (Table II). Among the two cases with P or LP variants, foetus-AB0005, was aborted due to primary microcephaly and WES identified a homozygous, Loss-of-function (LoF) variant: rs199422194; ASPM(NM_018136.5):c.9697C>T; NP_060606.3:p.(Arg3233Ter) in the ASPM gene. In the second foetus (AB0041) with a definitive diagnosis, a novel, monoallelic, LP variant:SPECC1L(NM_015330.6):c.2836C>T; NP_056145.5:p.(Arg946Ter) was identified in the SPECC1L gene (Table II). In total, a conclusive genetic diagnosis was achieved in 36.3 per cent of cases (16 out of 44 cases) with various foetal malformations by using Karyotyping/FISH, CMA, and WES.
Sample ID (Gestational age in wk+days) | Foetal Phenotype (USG findings) | Gene (Chromosomal location) | Variant (HGVS genome coordinates) | Variant consequence | rs_ID | Zygosity/Inheritance | MAF (gnomAD, v4.0.0) | ACMG classification | OMIM phenotype |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AB0005 | Microcephaly, sloping forehead, head circumference was less than 1st Centile (<2 standard deviations) | ASPM (1q31.3) |
c.9697C>T; p.Arg3233Ter (NC_000001.11:g. 197090328G>A) |
Stop-gain | rs199422194 |
Hom/ Autosomal recessive |
Absent | P | Primary microcephaly 5 |
AB0018 | Semi lobar holoprosencephaly, cleft lips, syndactyly of feet, and echogenic intracardiac focus in the right ventricle |
CNOT1 (16q21) |
c.1235C>G; p.Ser412Cys (NC_000016.10:g. 58580741G>C) |
Missense | rs1377910433 | Het/De novo | 3.19e-6 | VUS | Holoprosencephaly 12 |
AB0041 | Foetal long bones less than 3rd Centile, sloping foetal chin, and micrognathia | SPECC1L (22q11.23) | c.2836C>T;p.Arg946Ter (NC_000022.11:g. 24365484C>T) | Stop-gain | rs2041742779 | Het/De novo | 2.56e-6 | LP | Teebihypertelorism syndrome 1 |
AB0023 | Anterior encephalocele, cranial defect |
ANKRD11 (16q24.3) |
c.225A>G:p. p.(T75=) (NC_000016.10:g. 89305207T>C) | Splice-site loss | Novel | Het/De novo | Absent | VUS (SpliceAI score: Donor loss- 0.38) | KBG syndrome, Autosomal Dominant |
HGVS, human genome variation society; VUS, variant of unknown significance; Hom, homozygous; Het, heterozygous; Com Het, compound heterozygous; MAF, minor allele frequency; ACMG, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics; P, pathogenic; VUS, variant of unknown significance; LP, likely pathogenic; OMIM, online Mendelian inheritance in man; SpliceAI, https://spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org/ . Variants are based on genome build GRCh38 and ASPM transcript NM_018136.5, ENST00000367409.9; CNOT1 transcript NM_016284.5, ENST00000317147.10; MPDZ transcript NM_001378778.1, ENST00000319217.12; SPECC1L transcript NM_015330.6, ENST00000314328.14; ANKRD11 transcript NM_013275.6, ENST00000301030.10
Candidate genes
We re-analysed the exomes using a phenotype-driven variant prioritization approach and a discovery analysis pipeline to identify candidate genes linked to observed FSAs. We report six potential genes: RUNX2 and PALLD (neural tube defects), KMT2D and KDM1A (structural brain abnormalities), and FBN2 and CPLANE1 (multi-system malformations). These genes were predicted to be disease-causing, with strong genotype-phenotype associations based on knockout zebrafish and mouse models (Table III).
Sample ID | Foetal Phenotype | Gene (Chromosome location) | Variant (HGVS genome coordinates) | Consequence | rs_ID | MAF (gnomAD, v4.0.0) | CADD_PHRED | REVEL | SPLICE AI | MGI Mouse phenotype | GenCC evidence | ACMG classification (Varsome score) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AB0002 | Large defects in lumbar spine, soft tissue swelling extending almost all lumbar vertebral segments |
RUNX2 (6p21.1) |
c.608T>C; p.Val203Ala (NC_000006.12:g.45437974T>C) |
Mis | Novel | Absent | 26 | 0.99 | NA | Abnormal vertebrae morphology (MP:0000137); Abnormal vertebral arch morphology (MP:0004599) | Definitive: Cleidocranial dysplasia-1 | LP (7P:0B) |
c.1382G>C; p.Gly461Ala (NC_000006.12:g.45547121G>C) |
Mis | rs554124503 | 7.98E-06 | 24 | 0.79 | NA | VUS (2P:0B) | |||||
AB0004 | Arnold-Chiari malformation, spina bifida with meningocele at the lumbosacral region, ventriculomegaly |
PALLD (4q32.3) |
c.1087+1G>A; p.? (NC_000004.12:g.168668369G>A) |
SS | Novel | Absent | 35 | NA | Donor loss (0.98) | Open neural tube defect (MP:0000929) | NA | LP (9P:0B) |
AB0009 | Holoprosencephaly |
KMT2D (12q13.12) |
c.2485G>T; p.Glu829Ter (NC_000012.12:g.49051198C>A) |
SG | Novel | Absent | 35 | NA | NA | Abnormal forebrain development (MP:0003232) | Definitive; Kabuki syndrome 1 | LP (9P:0B) |
AB0012 | Kyphoscoliosis of the cervical spine; Absent Ductus Venosus |
FBN2 (5q23.3) |
c.7276C>A; p.Pro2426Thr (NC_000005.10:g.128278704G>T) | Mis | rs1263307630 | 1.749e-5 | 26 | 0.94 | NA |
Abnormal skeleton development (MP:0002113), Abnormal heart morphology (MP:0000266) |
Definitive: Congenital contractural arachnodactyly | LP (5P:0B) |
AB0013 | Iniencephaly; Meningocele; Likely Dandy-Walker syndrome |
CPLANE1 (5p13.2) |
c.313A>T; p.Lys105Ter (NC_000005.10:g.37245503T>A) |
SG | Novel | Absent | 35 | NA | NA | Abnormal cerebellum morphology (MP:0000849) | Definitive: Joubert syndrome 17 | LP (9P:0B) |
AB0021 | Agenesis of Corpus Callosum |
KDM1A (1p36.12) |
c.2513C>T; p.Ala838Val (NC_000001.11:g.23083246C>T) |
Mis | Novel | Absent | 28 | 0.96 | NA | Nervous system phenotype (MP:0003632) | Supportive: Palatal anomalies-widely spaced teeth-facial dysmorphism, developmental delay syndrome | LP (6P:0B) |
USG, ultrasonogram; Mis, missense variant; SS, splice-site variant; SG, stop-gain variant; CADD, combined annotation dependent depletion; REVEL, rare exome variant ensemble learner; MGI, Mouse Genome Informatics; GenCC, Gene Curation Coalition; P, pathogenic; B, benign; VUS, variants of unknown significance; NA, not available. Variants are based on genome build GRCh38 and RUNX2 transcript NM_001024630.4, ENST00000647337.2; PALLD transcript NM_001166108.2, ENST00000505667.6; KMT2D transcript NM_003482.4, ENST00000301067.12; FBN2 transcript NM_001999.4, ENST00000262464.9; CPLANE1 transcript NM_001384732.1, ENST00000651892.2; KDM1A transcript NM_001009999.3, ENST00000400181.9
Antenatal USG of foetus AB0002, from a non-consanguineous couple, showed a large lumbar spinal canal defect with overlying soft tissue swelling, extending almost all lumbar vertebral segments, suggesting spinal dysraphism. We identified missense, compound heterozygous variants in the RUNX2 gene, which are likely to be causative based on the phenotype-based prioritization algorithms (Exomiser combined score: 0.76, Exomiser phenotype score: 0.54, P=2.1; E-3). The RUNX2 knockout mice show abnormal vertebrae morphology (MGI phenotype; MP:0000137). In humans, RUNX2 is known to cause cleidocranial dysplasia with osseous manifestations22.
Foetus AB0004 presented Chiari II malformation (lumbosacral meningocele and obliteration of cisterna magna) at 17 wk and six days of gestation (Supplementary Table I). In this foetus, we report a homozygous, novel, splice-site variant; c.1087+1G>A:p.? in the PALLD gene (Table III). This variant was predicted to be LP and is absent in gnomAD (v4.0.0) and our Indian genome databases (IndiGenome). Our analysis predicted PALLD as a strong candidate for neural tube defects (Exomiser combined score: 0.97, Exomiser phenotype score: 0.75, P=4.4;E-4).
Foetus AB0009 presented with holoprosencephaly at 12 wk of gestation, and the mother had a history of medically terminated pregnancy due to foetal malformation. In this foetus, we identified a de novo, monoallelic, LoF (stop-gain) variant; c.2485G>T; p.E829X (LP) in the KMT2D gene. The candidacy of KMT2D is strongly supported by its role in cranial neural crest cell differentiation and forebrain development in mice. Knockout mice show abnormal dentate gyrus morphology (MP:0000812)23,24. In humans, monoallelic germline variants in KMT2D were reported in Kabuki syndrome (OMIM: 147920). Interestingly, a recent study has reported monoallelic pathogenic variants in two unrelated individuals with holoprosencephaly25.
Antenatal USG of foetus AB0012 at 20 wk and three days revealed kyphoscoliosis of the cervical spine, increased nuchal translucency, and structural heart defects. In this foetus, WES identified a de novo monoallelic missense LP variant, rs1263307630 (c.7276C>A; p.P2426T) in the FBN2 gene. In mice, Fbn2 gene disruption leads to multisystem abnormalities that include abnormal skeletal morphology (MGI phenotype- MP:0005508) and abnormal cardiovascular system morphology (MGI phenotype-MP:0000266)26. In humans, monoallelic variants in FBN2 are known to cause congenital contractual arachnodactyly (CCA) (OMIM:121050)27-29.
We identified a novel, monoallelic de novo LP variant:c.313A>T; p.K105X in the CPLANE1 gene in an aborted foetus (AB0013) presented with iniencephaly; meningocele and suspected Dandy-Walker syndrome features. CPLANE1 is a ciliopathy-associated gene that is known to cause Joubert syndrome (OMIM:614615), Oral-Facial-Digital (OFD) syndrome type VI (OMIM:277170) and Cerebellar atrophy (CA) in humans30-33. Mice with ablated Cplane1 gene show structural brain abnormalities such as decreased brain size (MGI phenotype-MP:0000774) and abnormal cerebellum morphology (MGI phenotype-MP:0000849).
Foetus AB0021 and its twin foetus AB0020 showed different structural malformations. Unfortunately, the POC of foetus AB0020 was not available for genetic testing (Supplementary Table I). Foetus AB0021 presented with agenesis of corpus callosum up on USG at 19 wk of gestation. We identified a novel, monoallelic missense variant: c.3513C>T; p.A838V (LP), in the KDM1A gene. In humans, pathogenic variants in KDM1A were reported in individuals with developmental delay and distinctive facial features34.
Discussion
Apart from common trisomies like trisomy 21 and trisomy 13, this study identified a mosaic 47XXY foetus (AB0061) with bilateral echogenic dysplastic kidneys and a distended bladder and urethra, suggesting congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT). All trisomy 13 cases showed mono ventricle on USG examination (Supplementary Fig. 3). We also observed a de novo, overlapping pathogenic CNV in the 17p11.2 region in two aborted foetuses with distinct phenotypic presentations: one (AB0015) with a 3.68 Mb copy gain showed structural heart malformations, while the other (AB0033) with a 3.45 Mb copy loss had skeletal dysplasia. These divergent CNV patterns in the same genomic region highlight the role of genetic variations in influencing foetal development.
Among the 44 cases studied, 31.8 per cent (14/44) showed chromosomal aneuploidies and CNVs. WES increased the diagnostic yield by an additional 4.5 per cent (P/LP variants), with VUSes identified in 4.5 per cent of cases. Using phenotype-driven variant prioritisation and cross-species comparison, we identified six potential candidate genes in six cases (13.6%). The diagnostic yield of WES in this study is slightly lower than in other studies, likely due to the small sample size. (Supplementary Fig. 1 and 3). Clinical exome analysis pipelines using WES data prioritize rare variants from genes that are definitively or strongly associated with the phenotypes. Therefore, in the first attempt to identify variants with diagnostic value, we utilised the clinical exome analysis algorithms (using WES data) and identified P/PL and VUS variants in 4 cases (Table II).
We report six potential candidate genes, including RUNX2, PALLD, KMT2D, KDM1A, FBN2, and CPLANE1, for different foetal structural malformations (Table III). Of these six candidate genes, PALLD is not definitively associated with any human disease phenotypes to date. The PALLD gene encodes for palladin, a cytoskeletal-associated protein that plays an important role in mouse embryogenesis35. Disruption of palladin in mice results in neural tube closure defects and embryonic lethality36. The MGI mouse phenotypes for Palld knockout include open neural tube (MP:0000929) and exencephaly (MP:0000914). Based on the above evidence, we propose PALLD as a strong candidate for Chiari II malformation or neural tube defects. The lack of gene-disease association information for PALLD in humans could be due to its lethal phenotype, which cannot be manifested beyond the neonatal period. Genes such as Palld that cause severe structural malformations and embryonic lethality in mice models can serve as potential candidates for reverse phenotyping in foetuses with severe structural malformations.
In line with other studies, this study demonstrated that WES is useful not only in improving prenatal diagnostic capabilities but also in expanding our understanding of the monogenic causes of FSAs. Large-scale systemic genomic studies of FSAs may provide deeper insights into the distinctive roles of various genes during embryogenesis and foetal development. Knowledge of these genes may help improve the genetic diagnostic yield of numerous foetal malformations.
While WES has improved diagnostic yield for foetal malformations, its widespread use in developing countries is limited by factors like the lack of genetic counselling and testing centres, especially in rural India. A more practical approach would be a tiered diagnostic algorithm, prioritizing conventional genetic tests for specific malformations and reserving WES for inconclusive or negative results (Supplementary Fig. 4). This aligns with the pilot study, which suggests conventional genetic tests remain effective for diagnosing many foetal malformations with WES used as a secondary test when these tests are inconclusive or negative. However, due to limitations of this study that include small sample size and lack of foetal autopsy data, the observed diagnostic yield of WES in FSAs is low. To conclude, the present study demonstrates that WES significantly improves the genetic diagnostic accuracy for monogenic forms of FSAs beyond conventional genetic testing approaches. Thus, comprehensive genetic testing offers a more thorough basis for perinatal management, recurrence risk assessment in subsequent pregnancies, and genetic counselling. Furthermore, WES is a highly useful discovery genomics tool to identify novel genetic causes in FSAs that are left genetically undiagnosed using conventional genetic testing approaches such as Karyotyping/FISH and CMA.
Acknowledgment
The authors acknowledge the encouragement, guidance and support from Dr. Geetanjali Sachdeva, Director, ICMR-NIRRCH. Ms. Shiny Babu, Mr. Adnanullah Khan, Miss. Juili Bharankar, Ms. Amisha Kumari, Dr. Venkanna, Dr. Dhanjit Das, all the GRC and NIRRCH staff are also acknowledged for their support.
Financial support & sponsorship
This study received funding support from Indian Council of Medical Research (Grant number: 5/7/96/MH/Adhoc/2020-RBMCH, dated: 19/07/2021).
Conflicts of Interest
None.
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for manuscript preparation
The authors confirm that there was no use of AI-assisted technology for assisting in the writing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
References
- Risk of major congenital malformations in relation to maternal overweight and obesity severity: Cohort study of 1.2 million singletons. BMJ. 2017;357:j2563.
- [Google Scholar]
- Systematic evaluation of genome sequencing for the diagnostic assessment of autism spectrum disorder and foetal structural anomalies. Am J Hum Genet. 2023;110:1454-69.
- [Google Scholar]
- Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2175-84.
- [Google Scholar]
- Promises, pitfalls and practicalities of prenatal whole exome sequencing. Prenat Diagn. 2018;38:10-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Exome sequencing of foetal anomaly syndromes: Novel phenotype-genotype discoveries. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;27:730-7.
- [Google Scholar]
- Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study. Lancet. 2019;393:747-57.
- [Google Scholar]
- Application of exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of foetal structural anomalies: Clinical experience and lessons learned from a cohort of 1618 fetuses. Genome Med. 2022;14:123.
- [Google Scholar]
- Whole exome sequencing as a diagnostic adjunct to clinical testing in fetuses with structural abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51:493-502.
- [Google Scholar]
- Prenatal exome and genome sequencing for foetal structural abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228:140-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Rapid prenatal diagnosis using targeted exome sequencing: A cohort study to assess feasibility and potential impact on prenatal counseling and pregnancy management. Genet Med. 2018;20:1430-7.
- [Google Scholar]
- McGowan-Jordan J, Hastings RJ, Moore S, eds. An international system for human cytogenomic nomenclature (2020) reprint of ‘cytogenetic and genome research. Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG Karger; 2020.
- Chromosome 22 microdeletion by F.I.S.H. in isolated congenital heart disease. Indian J Pediatr. 2006;73:885-8.
- [Google Scholar]
- ANNOVAR: Functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:e164.
- [Google Scholar]
- Deriving the consequences of genomic variants with the ensembl API and SNP effect predictor. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2069-70.
- [Google Scholar]
- Integrated informatics analysis of cancer-related variants. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020;4:310-7.
- [Google Scholar]
- Exome and genome sequencing for pediatric patients with congenital anomalies or intellectual disability: An evidence-based clinical guideline of the American college of medical genetics and genomics (ACMG) Genet Med. 2021;23:2029-37.
- [Google Scholar]
- Exome sequencing and functional analyses revealed CETN1 variants leads to impaired cell division and male fertility. Hum Mol Genet. 2023;32:533-42.
- [Google Scholar]
- Improved exome prioritization of disease genes through cross-species phenotype comparison. Genome Res. 2014;24:340-8.
- [Google Scholar]
- Prenatal diagnosis of 17p11.2 copy number abnormalities associated with smith-magenis and potocki-lupski syndromes in fetuses. Front Genet. 2021;12:779237.
- [Google Scholar]
- Identification of novel CBFA1/RUNX2 mutations causing cleidocranial dysplasia. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2001;24:648-56.
- [Google Scholar]
- The KMT2D kabuki syndrome histone methylase controls neural crest cell differentiation and facial morphology. Development. 2020;147:dev187997.
- [Google Scholar]
- Histone deacetylase inhibition rescues structural and functional brain deficits in a mouse model of kabuki syndrome. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:256ra135.
- [Google Scholar]
- Novel heterozygous variants in KMT2D associated with holoprosencephaly. Clin Genet. 2019;96:266-70.
- [Google Scholar]
- Optimizing genomic methods for mapping and identification of candidate variants in ENU mutagenesis screens using inbred mice. G3 (Bethesda). 2018;8:401-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Identification of novel FBN2 variants in a cohort of congenital contractural arachnodactyly. Front Genet. 2022;13:804202.
- [Google Scholar]
- Identification of a novel missense FBN2 mutation in a Chinese family with congenital contractural arachnodactyly using exome sequencing. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0155908.
- [Google Scholar]
- Prenatal ultrasound findings in a fetus with congenital contractural arachnodactyly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;20:395-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Novel mutations in the ciliopathy-associated gene CPLANE1 (C5orf42) cause OFD syndrome type VI rather than Joubert syndrome. Eur J Med Genet. 2018;61:585-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Whole-exome sequencing identified novel variants in CPLANE1 that causes oral-facial-digital syndrome Ⅵ by inducing primary cilia abnormality. J Cell Mol Med. 2022;26:3213-22.
- [Google Scholar]
- Clinical and genetic characteristics of 36 children with Joubert syndrome. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1102639.
- [Google Scholar]
- Genetic heterogeneity underlying phenotypes with early-onset cerebellar atrophy. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:16400.
- [Google Scholar]
- Gene discovery for mendelian conditions via social networking: De novo variants in KDM1A cause developmental delay and distinctive facial features. Genet Med. 2016;18:788-95.
- [Google Scholar]
- miR96- and miR182-driven regulation of cytoskeleton results in inhibition of glioblastoma motility. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2023;80:367-81.
- [Google Scholar]
- Disruption of palladin results in neural tube closure defects in mice. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2005;29:507-15.
- [Google Scholar]