Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Article
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Article
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
163 (
4
); 427-435
doi:
10.25259/IJMR_2041_2025

Evolution of incretin-based therapies: From GLP-1 monotherapy to dual and triple agonists: A new era in metabolic therapy

Department of Pharmacology, Moti Lal Nehru Medical College, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India
Department of Internal Medicine, Moti Lal Nehru Medical College, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India

For correspondence: Dr Jitendra Shukla, Department of Internal Medicine, Moti Lal Nehru Medical College, Prayagraj 211 008, Uttar Pradesh, India e-mail: jitendrashukla1688@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Gupta M, Shukla J. Evolution of incretin-based therapies: From GLP-1 monotherapy to dual and triple agonists: A new era in metabolic therapy. Indian J Med Res. 2026;163:427-35. doi: 10.25259/IJMR_2041_2025

Abstract

Incretin-based therapies have revolutionised the management of metabolic disorders, transitioning from DPP-4 inhibitors to advanced GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and next-generation dual and triple agonists. This review explores the evolving role of incretin pharmacology in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity, and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Literature from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar up to July 2025 was reviewed, emphasising pivotal trials and real-world evidence. While DPP-4 inhibitors offer modest glycaemic benefits, GLP1RAs such as liraglutide and semaglutide have demonstrated significant weight loss and cardiometabolic protection. Dual GIP/GLP-1 agonist tirzepatide and triple agonist retatrutide have shown unprecedented efficacy, with up to 24% body weight reduction and improvement in hepatic and inflammatory markers. Agents like cotadutide and efinopegdutide further expand indications to MASLD and metabolic dysfunction associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Despite promising outcomes, challenges persist in terms of cost, accessibility, and the underrepresentation of low- and middle-income countries in major trials. Pharmacogenomic variability may also influence therapeutic response. Incretin-based multi-agonists offer a transformative, multi-system approach to metabolic disease but require tailored implementation. This review provides an updated synthesis of therapeutic developments and outlines priorities for future research, regulatory policy, and equitable global integration as incretin-based therapies have evolved into a versatile class addressing glycaemic control, weight loss, and cardio-metabolic risk.

Keywords

GLP-1 receptor agonists
Incretin therapy
MASH
Metabolic syndrome
Type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a progressive metabolic disorder characterised by insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction.1 It often coexists with obesity, dyslipidaemia, and hypertension—contributing to the global burden of metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Despite the availability of multiple pharmacologic classes for glycaemic control, achieving durable outcomes with weight reduction and cardiometabolic benefit remains challenging.1

A major breakthrough in diabetes therapy was the identification of the incretin effect—the observation that oral glucose elicits a substantially greater insulin response than intravenous glucose at equivalent plasma glucose concentrations.2 This is mediated by incretin hormones, namely glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), secreted from L-cells and K-cells of the intestine, respectively.2

GLP-1 and GIP act via specific G protein–coupled receptors on pancreatic β-cells, leading to enhanced insulin gene transcription, insulin biosynthesis, and glucose-dependent insulin secretion.2 GLP-1 also suppresses glucagon, delays gastric emptying, and promotes satiety, while GIP primarily enhances insulin secretion and lipid storage.2 In healthy individuals, incretins account for up to 70% of postprandial insulin secretion.2 However, in T2DM, this incretin effect is diminished—particularly due to GIP resistance—leading to inadequate insulin response and hyperglycaemia.1

GLP-1 receptor agonists have shown proven efficacy in lowering HbA1c, promoting weight loss, and improving cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients.1 These benefits, along with a low risk of hypoglycaemia, have made incretin-based therapies a central component of modern diabetes care.

This review outlines the evolution of incretin-based therapies, with a focus on the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety profiles of GLP-1 RAs, dual GIP/GLP-1 agonists, and emerging triple agonists. Special attention is given to current clinical trial data and future therapeutic implications in metabolic diseases.

Methods

This review was conducted to comprehensively synthesise the evolution, pharmacology, and clinical implications of incretin-based therapies, including monotherapy and emerging dual/triple agonists, with a focus on metabolic disorders such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity, and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases, covering the period from database inception to July 2025. The search strategy employed a combination of MeSH terms and keywords, including but not limited to: “GLP-1 receptor agonists,” “DPP-4 inhibitors,” “GIP,” “glucagon,” “dual agonist,” “triple agonist,” “incretin therapy,” “tirzepatide,” “retatrutide,” “survodutide,” “MASLD,” “MASH,” “type 2 diabetes,” “obesity,” and “metabolic syndrome.” Boolean operators (AND/OR) were utilised to refine and optimise search results.

Inclusion criteria were: (i) peer-reviewed original articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical trial data, or expert guidelines; (ii) studies focusing on incretin-based therapies in metabolic disorders, including T2DM, obesity, MASLD, or Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH); and (iii) publications in the English language involving human or relevant animal models. Excluded materials comprised non-peer-reviewed editorials, letters, or commentaries lacking original data, as well as studies unrelated to incretin mechanisms or therapies. Studies confined exclusively to paediatric or gestational diabetes populations were excluded unless they provided dual/triple incretin therapy data.

From the initial pool, 77 references were finalised based on scientific rigor and clinical relevance. Key data were manually extracted and thematically organised into domains such as incretin physiology and pathophysiology, the evolution of GLP-1 and DPP-4-based monotherapies, dual/triple incretin agonists (mechanisms, efficacy, safety), and emerging indications in metabolic disease. Preference was given to high-level evidence from pivotal Phase 2 and 3 trials, landmark studies (e.g., LEADER, SUSTAIN, SURPASS, SURMOUNT), and comprehensive meta-analyses.

While the methodology did not follow a strict systematic review framework, each included study underwent critical appraisal with a focus on methodology, outcome validity, and translational applicability. Quantitative data—such as HbA1c reductions, body weight changes, and systolic blood pressure improvements—were visually synthesised using comparative bar charts developed via Python (v3.11, Matplotlib package) to facilitate interpretability and support comparative analysis across pharmacologic classes.

Results

Incretin physiology and pathophysiology

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are the two primary incretin hormones responsible for postprandial glucose regulation. GLP-1 is secreted from enteroendocrine L-cells in the distal ileum and colon, while GIP is secreted by K-cells in the proximal small intestine in response to nutrient ingestion, particularly carbohydrates and lipids.3-5 These hormones act via specific G protein–coupled receptors—GLP-1R and GIPR—expressed in various tissues, including pancreatic β-cells, adipose tissue, gastrointestinal tract, kidney, and the central nervous system.6-8

GLP-1 enhances glucose-dependent insulin secretion, suppresses glucagon release, delays gastric emptying, and promotes satiety via hypothalamic signalling.6,9,10 GIP primarily stimulates insulin secretion and plays a significant role in lipid metabolism by enhancing triglyceride storage in adipose tissue, promoting lipogenesis, and possibly contributing to obesity in insulin-resistant states.11-13

Glucagon, secreted by pancreatic α-cells, counterbalances insulin by promoting hepatic gluconeogenesis, glycogenolysis, and ketogenesis during fasting.14,15 Recent research has elucidated glucagon’s role in increasing energy expenditure and promoting weight loss when co-activated with GLP-1 and/or GIP, forming the mechanistic basis for emerging dual and triple receptor agonists.16-18 A comparative summary of the key physiological functions and receptor expression of incretin hormones is presented in Table I.

Table I. Summary of physiological roles of incretin hormones
Hormone Source Key function Receptor expression
GLP-1 L-cells (distal ileum, colon) Enhances insulin secretion, inhibits glucagon, delays gastric emptying, promotes satiety Pancreatic β-cells, CNS, stomach
GIP K-cells (duodenum, jejunum) Stimulates insulin secretion, enhances fat storage ↑ Pancreatic β-cells, adipocytes
Glucagon α-cells (pancreas) Increases hepatic glucose output, promotes energy expenditure (in co-agonism) Liver, CNS

GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; GIP, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide

The ‘incretin effect’—wherein oral glucose elicits a stronger insulin response than intravenous glucose—is well-preserved in healthy individuals and accounts for approximately 60–70% of postprandial insulin secretion.2,4,19 However, this effect is significantly blunted in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), due to both impaired incretin secretion and reduced receptor responsiveness.19-21 GIP, in particular, exhibits markedly reduced insulinotropic activity at physiological concentrations in T2DM—described as GIP resistance.22

This ‘incretin resistance’ has important clinical implications. While endogenous GLP-1 activity is reduced, pharmacological doses of GLP-1 receptor agonists can overcome this resistance and restore glycaemic control.23 In contrast, native GIP monotherapy has shown limited benefit; however, its co-activation with GLP-1R in dual or triple agonists (e.g., tirzepatide, retatrutide) has shown synergistic effects—including enhanced insulin sensitivity, appetite suppression, and significant weight loss.8,24,25

Emerging insights into the molecular basis of incretin resistance, including β-cell dedifferentiation, receptor downregulation, and inflammatory signalling, continue to guide development of next-generation metabolic therapies.26

Historical evolution of incretin-based therapies:

Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors

DPP-4 inhibitors were the first pharmacological agents to harness the incretin axis in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management. These oral drugs act by inhibiting the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4, which degrades endogenous incretins such as GLP-1 and GIP, thereby prolonging their insulinotropic activity. Common agents include sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, and alogliptin, which are typically weight-neutral and associated with a low risk of hypoglycaemia.27-31 Although they modestly reduce HbA1c (by ∼0.5–0.8%) and are generally well tolerated, their impact on weight loss and long-term cardiometabolic outcomes has been limited.29,32

Large cardiovascular outcome trials, including TECOS, SAVOR-TIMI,33 and EXAMINE, have demonstrated cardiovascular safety but not superiority for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)29 Furthermore, some DPP-4 inhibitors (notably saxagliptin) have raised concerns regarding increased risk of heart failure hospitalisation.29 These findings highlighted the need for more potent incretin-based strategies with broader metabolic benefits.

GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs)

From monotherapy to cardiovascular outcomes: GLP-1 receptor agonists emerged as a major advancement in incretin pharmacotherapy by providing pharmacological concentrations of GLP-1, resistant to enzymatic degradation.34,35 These agents, including exenatide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, semaglutide, and, more recently, oral semaglutide, mimic endogenous GLP-1 but with longer half-lives and enhanced receptor affinity.28,36 Their actions extend beyond glycaemic control to significant weight reduction, delayed gastric emptying, reduced appetite, and cardioprotection.31,35

Pivotal trials such as LEADER (liraglutide), SUSTAIN-6 (semaglutide), and REWIND (dulaglutide) have established the cardiovascular benefit of GLP-1RAs, with reductions in MACE, stroke, and renal endpoints.28,29,37 Head-to-head comparisons like SUSTAIN-7 confirmed semaglutide’s superiority over dulaglutide for both glycaemic control and weight loss.23 Notably, semaglutide has shown robust weight loss effects, approaching those of bariatric interventions in non-diabetic populations, as demonstrated in the STEP trials.33,38 Additionally, semaglutide and liraglutide have shown renoprotective effects, including reduced albuminuria and slower decline in glomerular filtration rate.39 Oral semaglutide (7–14 mg) is FDA-approved for T2DM and is currently under regulatory review at higher doses (up to 50 mg) for obesity, based on the OASIS trial results, offering a needle-free alternative for weight management.40,41 Table II outlines a comparative overview of pharmacologic features, efficacy, and clinical outcomes associated with DPP-4 inhibitors versus GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Table II. Comparison of DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists
Feature DPP-4 inhibitors GLP-1 receptor agonists
Mechanism of action Inhibit DPP-4 enzyme, increasing the half-life of endogenous GLP-1 and GIP28,36 Directly activate GLP-1 receptor, enhancing insulin and suppressing glucagon secretion35,36
Route of administration Oral tablets28 Mostly subcutaneous injections; oral semaglutide available35,40
Effect on HbA1c Modest reduction (⁓0.5–0.8%)29,32 Greater reduction (⁓1.0–1.5%)28,33
Effect on weight Weight-neutral27 Weight loss of 2–10 kg, higher with semaglutide and tirzepatide31,33,38
Cardiovascular benefit CV safety confirmed but not superior (e.g., TECOS, SAVOR-TIMI 53)29 CV benefit confirmed (LEADER, SUSTAIN-6, REWIND)28,29,37

These agents are now positioned as preferred second-line therapy in T2DM patients with obesity or established cardiovascular disease, per international guidelines.31,37 Despite their benefits, GLP-1RAs are limited by gastrointestinal side effects (e.g., nausea, vomiting) and cost, which may affect adherence in certain populations.33 Nonetheless, they represent a paradigm shift in the treatment of metabolic disease by addressing both glycaemic and extra-glycaemic endpoints.

Next-generation incretin-based therapies

The therapeutic landscape of metabolic disease has expanded rapidly with the advent of dual and triple incretin receptor agonists, which aim to synergise the beneficial effects of multiple gut hormones.

Dual agonists: GIP + GLP-1

Tirzepatide represents the first-in-class dual agonist targeting both GIP and GLP-1 receptors. It enhances glucose-dependent insulin secretion, delays gastric emptying, suppresses appetite, and improves adipose tissue insulin sensitivity through GIP receptor activation, while maintaining the glycaemic and satiety benefits of GLP-1 agonism.14,17,20 The SURPASS clinical program (SURPASS-1 to -6) demonstrated robust reductions in HbA1c (up to 2.5%) and body weight (up to 22.5%), with greater efficacy than both GLP-1 RAs and basal insulin comparators.14,15,42 Additionally, tirzepatide significantly improves lipid profiles and inflammatory markers, making it a promising agent for comprehensive cardiometabolic risk reduction.15,30,43 Real-world data support these findings, with consistent efficacy across diverse populations, including in early-phase Asian subgroup analyses, although India-specific data remain limited.14,42,44 Regulatory bodies such as the US FDA and EMA have approved tirzepatide for T2DM (as Mounjaro in 2022) and for chronic weight management (as Zepbound in 2023), and most recently for obstructive sleep apnoea in patients with obesity (approved in December 2024), with ongoing studies exploring expanded indications.33,45,46

Dual agonists: GLP-1+glucagon

Another approach harnesses the energy-expenditure and lipolytic effects of glucagon alongside the glucose-lowering and satiety-inducing actions of GLP-1. Survodutide, a GLP-1/glucagon dual agonist, has shown promising results in reducing visceral fat and hepatic steatosis, partly by increasing thermogenesis and mitochondrial uncoupling.37,47 Recent trials have demonstrated significant improvements in liver enzymes, insulin resistance, and weight loss, particularly in individuals with MASLD (formerly NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH).37,48,49 These findings support the repositioning of dual agonists as potential agents for the treatment of both obesity and fatty liver diseases.49-51

Triple agonists: GLP-1+GIP+glucagon

The most recent innovation involves triple agonists, such as retatrutide, which combine the insulinotropic action of GLP-1 and GIP with the thermogenic effects of glucagon. This multi-receptor approach aims to replicate the hormonal synergy observed after bariatric surgery.44,52,53 Early-phase studies of retatrutide show unprecedented weight reductions of up to 24% and reductions in liver fat content by ⁓82%, surpassing all currently approved monotherapy or dual agonist regimens.52-54 In addition to weight and glycaemic control, triple agonists may improve hepatic steatosis, lipid metabolism, and systemic inflammation, with implications for the comprehensive management of metabolic syndrome and MASH.55-57 Several triple agonists are now in Phase 2 and 3 trials, with retatrutide anticipated to gain FDA approval by 2026.52,54

Dual and triple incretin-based co-agonists represent a significant leap in metabolic therapy by targeting multiple pathways involved in glucose and energy homeostasis. As reviewed by Gutgesell et al,51 agents like tirzepatide (GIP/GLP-1) and retatrutide (GIP/GLP-1/glucagon) exhibit synergistic effects—improving glycaemic control, promoting substantial weight loss, and enhancing hepatic lipid metabolism beyond what is seen with GLP-1 monotherapy.58 Notably, triple agonists have demonstrated up to 24% body weight reduction while preserving lean mass, a potential advantage in advanced metabolic disease.1 Table III provides a detailed pharmacologic comparison across mono-, dual-, and triple incretin receptor agonists. The authors further highlight the importance of receptor selectivity and partial agonism, especially at the glucagon receptor, to balance efficacy and safety. Such tailored approaches are driving the development of next-generation agents like HM15211 and LY3437943, designed for obesity and MASLD/MASH.43

Table III. Comparative pharmacology of mono, dual, and triple incretin-based agonists
Parameter GLP-1 RA (Monotherapy) Dual agonist (GIP+GLP-1) – Tirzepatide Dual agonist (GLP-1+Glucagon) – Survodutide Triple agonist (GLP-1+GIP+Glucagon) – Retatrutide
Mechanism of action GLP-1R agonism ↑, insulin, ↓ glucagon, slows gastric emptying28,36 GLP-1R + GIPR agonism; synergistic insulinotropic, adipogenic, and appetite-suppressing effects44,52 GLP-1R + GCGR agonism; ↑ thermogenesis, hepatic lipid oxidation, energy expenditure37 Multi-receptor agonism (GLP-1R + GIPR + GCGR); amplified glycaemic, lipid, and weight control effects33,52,54
HbA1c reduction ∼1.0–1.5% ↓ with semaglutide/liraglutide4 Up to 2.4% ↓ in SURPASS-235 ∼1.5–2.0% ↓ in early trials6,30 Up to 2.5% ↓ in phase 2 trial25,31
Weight reduction 5–15% with high-dose semaglutide7,26 Up to 21% in SURMOUNT trials31 ∼10–15% in MASLD studies30 Up to 24.2% in retatrutide trials44
Appetite suppression Moderate, dose-dependent15 Significant suppression of food intake14 Strong satiety via glucagon-induced effects14 Potent anorectic effect via triple pathway activation52
Hepatic fat reduction (MASLD) Moderate improvement in steatosis37,58 Up to 45% reduction in hepatic fat content49 Strong reduction; MASH improvement observed49,50 Most potent hepatic benefit among incretin therapies49,50
GI side effects Common (nausea, vomiting)15 Similar to GLP-1 RA, dose-dependent50 Mild to moderate, titration helps14 High GI effects in early weeks, manageable50
Hypoglycaemia risk Low when used alone34 Low, unless combined with insulin/SU50 Low49 Low33,52
Cardiovascular profile Proven CV benefit (LEADER, SUSTAIN)15 MACE reduction (SURPASS-CVOT pending)50 Potential benefit, under investigation49 Early CV data promising52
Durability Once weekly to daily (agent-specific)15 Once weekly (Tirzepatide)52 Weekly (Survodutide)14 Weekly (Retatrutide)52
Access/cost issues Approved widely, cost a barrier in LMICs15 Limited access in some regions, costly52 Investigational, not yet widely approved63 Under trials, future access TBD652

GLP-1 RA, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; GIPR, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor; GCGR, glucagon receptor; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; MASH, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis; GI, gastrointestinal; CV, cardiovascular; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; CVOT, cardiovascular outcomes trial

Beyond survodutide, other GLP-1 and glucagon receptor dual agonists such as cotadutide and efinopegdutide have shown therapeutic potential in targeting both metabolic and hepatic endpoints. Cotadutide (MEDI0382) was developed to harness the complementary mechanisms of GLP-1-induced insulinotropic and anorectic effects alongside glucagon-mediated enhancement of energy expenditure and hepatic lipid oxidation. Clinical trials have demonstrated its ability to reduce hepatic fat content, improve insulin sensitivity, and promote moderate weight loss in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity, particularly those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH)49,53,59-61 Notably, cotadutide showed superior effects in reducing liver fat compared to GLP-1 monotherapy, making it a promising candidate for dual-targeting liver and metabolic dysfunction. However, its glycaemic efficacy was somewhat lower, and gastrointestinal tolerability remained a concern.

Similarly, efinopegdutide is a long-acting PEGylated GLP-1/glucagon receptor co-agonist that has shown promise in reducing hepatic steatosis and modulating lipid metabolism. Phase 2 data indicate its potential for treating MASLD/MASH, especially in patients with coexisting T2DM, with added benefits on satiety and fat oxidation49,59 To compare mechanistic actions, clinical endpoints, and safety profiles across the incretin-based agent spectrum, refer to Table III, and the Figure, which details pharmacologic attributes from GLP-1 monotherapy to dual and triple receptor co-agonists. While its weight reduction capacity is not as pronounced as newer triple agonists, efinopegdutide’s hepatic specificity and safety profile suggest a potential role as a niche therapy for metabolic liver diseases. Together, these incretins represent a growing class of next-generation incretin-based co-agonists with hepatocentric and metabolic benefits.

Comparative efficacy of GLP-1 RA (e.g., Semaglutide), GIP/GLP-1 dual agonist (Tirzepatide), GLP-1/Glucagon dual agonist (Survodutide), and triple agonist (Retatrutide) on HbA1c reduction, weight loss, appetite suppression (scale of 1–5), and hepatic fat reduction. Data compiled from key trials and peer-reviewed literature (2020–2025).
Figure. Comparative efficacy of GLP-1 RA (e.g., Semaglutide), GIP/GLP-1 dual agonist (Tirzepatide), GLP-1/Glucagon dual agonist (Survodutide), and triple agonist (Retatrutide) on HbA1c reduction, weight loss, appetite suppression (scale of 1–5), and hepatic fat reduction. Data compiled from key trials and peer-reviewed literature (2020–2025).

Discussion

Expanding therapeutic horizons

Incretin co-agonists are increasingly recognised for their broad-spectrum metabolic benefits that extend well beyond glycaemic control. Emerging evidence has underscored their effectiveness in obesity without diabetes, with agents such as tirzepatide and retatrutide achieving unprecedented weight reductions exceeding 20%, rivalling bariatric surgery outcomes in select patient populations.44,51,56 This has ushered in a new era of pharmacotherapy targeting non-diabetic obesity—an area previously underserved.

Simultaneously, dual and triple receptor agonists have demonstrated significant promise in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and steatohepatitis (MASH). Agents like cotadutide and efinopegdutide have led to marked reductions in hepatic fat content, improved transaminase profiles, and potential histological improvement in fibrosis and inflammation.33,46,48-50,62

Beyond hepatic and adipose tissues, incretin-based therapies have shown notable cardiorenal protective effects. GLP-1 receptor agonists are already established in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), while newer agents—tirzepatide and survodutide—may further enhance these benefits through synergistic weight reduction, lipid modulation, and suppression of systemic inflammation.27,29,37,58 Additionally, they are now being investigated for post-bariatric metabolic support, potentially helping stabilise weight trajectories and glycaemic parameters following surgery.38,45

From a regulatory perspective, tirzepatide is now approved for both T2DM and obesity in the United States, Europe, and Japan, while retatrutide and survodutide are in late-stage clinical development with substantial global momentum.44,56,63 Market uptake has been rapid, and real-world data have largely affirmed the efficacy and tolerability profiles observed in trials.37,56

Meanwhile, next-generation incretin agents—particularly triple agonists and GLP-1/glucagonco-agonists—continue to expand into new clinical indications. These include heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), polycystic ovary syndrome, and neurodegenerative diseases, reflecting their central anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties.41,64,65

Emerging pharmacogenomic data indicate considerable inter-ethnic variability in responsiveness to incretin-based therapies. Polymorphisms in genes such as GIPR, GLP1R, and TCF7L2 influence receptor activity and downstream signalling.65 However, major clinical trials—SURPASS, SURMOUNT, and RETAKE—have largely excluded South Asian and LMIC cohorts, raising concerns about generalisability and pharmacogenomic equity.3,4 Inclusion of these populations in Phase III and IV global trials is essential to tailor future therapy and policy decisions.

Lastly, cost-effectiveness remains a substantial implementation barrier. Despite robust metabolic benefits, high cost and restricted insurance coverage limit the uptake of these therapies in low- and middle-income countries. Health-economic models specific to resource-constrained settings are urgently needed to inform reimbursement strategies.5,6,7 Integration of these agents into public health systems like India’s Ayushman Bharat scheme or the WHO Essential Medicines List could substantially widen access, provided local efficacy and safety data are generated through real-world studies.

Therefore, triple agonists (GLP-1 + GIP + glucagon) are designed to:

  • Simultaneously target multiple metabolic pathways—enhancing insulin secretion (GLP-1, GIP), improving insulin sensitivity (GIP), and increasing energy expenditure and hepatic lipid oxidation (glucagon).43

  • Overcome the limitations of GLP-1 monotherapy, which primarily lowers glucose and body weight through appetite suppression but has modest effects on hepatic steatosis and thermogenesis.52,55

  • Leverage synergistic hormonal effects that mimic post-bariatric physiology, thereby delivering greater weight loss (up to 24%), profound hepatic fat reduction (∼82%), and robust glycaemic improvement compared with dual or single agonists.36,41

  • Expand indications beyond type 2 diabetes to obesity without diabetes, MASLD/MASH, cardiometabolic risk reduction, and potentially HFpEF and PCOS, based on emerging phase-2/3 evidence.41,46,62

  • Provide multi-system benefit, making them uniquely suited for complex metabolic disease where hyperglycaemia, adiposity, hepatic dysfunction, and inflammation coexist.5,6,7,41,46

The incretin-based therapeutic landscape has witnessed a remarkable evolution—from the modest glycaemic effects of early DPP-4 inhibitors to the transformative metabolic benefits seen with dual and triple agonists.29,32,44,52 This trajectory reflects a deeper understanding of incretin physiology, resistance mechanisms in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and the multifaceted roles of gut-derived hormones in energy homeostasis.35,44 GLP-1 receptor agonists have already established themselves as cornerstones in T2DM and obesity care, offering proven cardiovascular and renal protection.29,37,39 Building on this foundation, multi-agonist therapies such as tirzepatide and retatrutide have demonstrated unprecedented efficacy in reducing HbA1c, body weight, hepatic steatosis, and other markers of metabolic dysfunction.44,49,53,57

Beyond glycaemic control, these agents represent a new paradigm in holistic metabolic regulation, targeting interconnected pathways involved in obesity, MASLD, and cardiometabolic risk.48,49,50 The integration of these pharmacotherapies with lifestyle interventions and digital health tools further enhances the potential for personalised, sustained outcomes.5,16 As the therapeutic arsenal continues to expand, the future of metabolic disease management lies in tailoring co-agonist regimens to patient-specific profiles—bridging clinical efficacy with long-term safety, affordability, and equitable global accessibility.41,56,65

Author contributions

JS: Concepts, definition of intellectual content, clinical studies, data analysis, manuscript writing; MG: Concepts, design, literature search, clinical studies, data acquisition, data analysis, manuscript writing. All authors have read and approved the final printed version of the manuscript.

Financial support and sponsorship

None.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of AI-assisted technology for assisting in the writing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , , , , , . Harrison’s principles of internal medicine (20th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill; .
  2. , , , . Williams textbook of endocrinology (14th ed.). Philadelphia: Elsevier; .
  3. , , . Incretin-based therapies. J Diabetes.. 2012;4:55-67.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Incretin-based investigational therapies for the treatment of MASLD/MASH. Diabetes Res Clin Pract.. 2024;211:111675.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Incretin-based therapies for the management of cardiometabolic disease in the clinic: Past, present, and future. Med Res Rev.. 2025;45:29-65.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Incretin-based weight loss pharmacotherapy: Can resistance exercise optimize changes in body composition Diabetes Care. 2024. ;47:1718-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Incretin-based therapies: A paradigm shift in blood pressure management Hypertension. 2025. ;82:1167-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Anti-inflammatory potentials of incretin-based therapies used in the management of diabetes. Life Sci.. 2020;241:117152.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Cardiovascular effects of incretin-based therapies: Integrating mechanisms with cardiovascular outcome trials. Diabetes.. 2022;71:173-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Incretin-based therapies for diabetic complications: Basic mechanisms and clinical evidence. Int J Mol Sci.. 2016;17:1223.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  11. . Incretin-based therapies for liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol.. 2024;21:533.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , . Insights into incretin-based therapies for treatment of diabetic dyslipidemia. Adv Drug Deliv Rev.. 2020;159:34-53.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Effects of incretin-based therapies on renal function. Eur J Pharmacol.. 2018;818:103-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Recent advances in incretin-based pharmacotherapies for the treatment of obesity and diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne).. 2022;13:838410.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , . Incretin-based therapies, glucometabolic health and endovascular inflammation. Curr Pharm Des.. 2014;20:4953-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , . The expanding incretin universe: From basic biology to clinical translation. Diabetologia.. 2023;66:1765-79.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , . Incretin-based therapies and renin-angiotensin system: Looking for new therapeutic potentials in the diabetic milieu. Life Sci.. 2020;256:117916.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . Incretin based therapies and SGLT-2 inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract.. 2021;172:108604.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. . GLP-1 physiology in obesity and development of incretin-based drugs for chronic weight management. Nat Metab.. 2024;6:1866-85.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  20. , . Renal effects of incretin-based diabetes therapies: Pre-clinical predictions and clinical trial outcomes. Curr Diab Rep.. 2018;18:28.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  21. , . Pharmacology, physiology, and mechanisms of incretin hormone action. Cell Metab.. 2013;17:819-37.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , . Incretin based therapies: A novel treatment approach for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol.. 2014;20:7356-65.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , et al. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes of incretin-based therapies: A review of recent clinical trials. Curr Cardiol Rev.. 2020;16:253-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , et al. The effects of incretin-based therapies on β-cell function and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis combining 360 trials. Diabetes Obes Metab.. 2019;21:975-83.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , . The role of incretin-based therapies in prediabetes: A review. Prim Care Diabetes.. 2014;8:286-94.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , et al. The effects of incretin-based therapies on weight reduction and metabolic parameters in children with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev.. 2024;25:e13686.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , . The evolving story of incretins (GIP and GLP-1) in metabolic and cardiovascular disease: A pathophysiological update. Diabetes Obes Metab.. 2021;23:5-29.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. . Cardiovascular outcome studies with incretin-based therapies: Comparison between DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists. Diabetes Res Clin Pract.. 2017;127:224-37.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , . Are the lipid-lowering effects of incretin-based therapies relevant for cardiovascular benefit Curr Opin Lipidol. 2024. ;35:259-67.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , . Extra-pancreatic effects of incretin-based therapies: Potential benefit for cardiovascular-risk management in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab.. 2013;15:593-606.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , . Incretin drugs in diabetic kidney disease: Biological mechanisms and clinical evidence. Nat Rev Nephrol.. 2021;17:227-44.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , . Obesity pharmacotherapy: Incretin action in the central nervous system. Trends Pharmacol Sci.. 2023;44:50-63.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , . What is the pipeline for future medications for obesity Int J Obes (Lond) 2025. ;49:433-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , . Obesity and GLP-1. Minerva Endocrinol (Torino).. 2021;46:168-76.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , . Incretin‐based therapies – review of the physiology, pharmacology and emerging clinical experience. Intern Med J.. 2011;41:299-307.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , . Recent advances in incretin-based therapy for MASLD: From single to dual or triple incretin receptor agonists. Gut.. 2025;74:487-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. , , . Incretin hormones, obesity and gut microbiota. Peptides.. 2024;178:171216.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , et al. Mechanisms of action of incretin receptor based dual- and tri-agonists in pancreatic islets. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab.. 2023;325:E595-609.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  39. , . The promise of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) for the treatment of obesity: A look at phase 2 and 3 pipelines. Expert Opin Investig Drugs.. 2025;34:197-215.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. , , . Investigational and emerging gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) receptor-based therapies for the treatment of obesity. Expert Opin Investig Drugs.. 2024;33:757-73.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , . GLP/‐1 receptor agonists and glucagon/GIP/GLP‐1 receptor dual or triple agonists—Mechanism of action and emerging therapeutic landscape in MASLD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.. 2025;61:1872-88.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  42. , . Obesity – Standards, trends and advances. Adv Med Sci.. 2024;69:208-15.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. . The physiology of glucagon-like peptide 1. Physiol Rev.. 2007;87:1409-39.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , , , . GLP-1 single, dual, and triple receptor agonists for treating type 2 diabetes and obesity: A narrative review. EClinicalMedicine.. 2024;75:102782.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , . Recent advances in incretin-based therapy for MASLD: From single to dual or triple incretin receptor agonists. Gut.. 2025;74:487-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. , , . Poly-agonist pharmacotherapies for metabolic diseases: Hopes and new challenges. Drugs.2024. ;84:127-48.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. , , , , . Safety and efficacy of incretin-based therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and CKD: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney. 2016;68:733-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. , , . Future therapies for obesity. Clin Med. 2023;23:337-46.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. , , , , , , et al. GLP-1-based therapies for type 2 diabetes: From single, dual and triple agonists to endogenous GLP-1 production and L-cell differentiation. Diabetol Metab Syndr.. 2025;17:60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , , , , et al. Efficacy and safety of metformin and sitagliptin-based dual and triple therapy in elderly Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Subgroup analysis of STRATEGY study. J Diabetes Investig.. 2020;11:1532-41.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  51. , , , , , , et al. 100 years of glucagon and 100 more. Diabetologia.. 2023;66:1378-94.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , , . Proglucagon-derived peptides as therapeutics. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne).. 2021;12:689678.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  53. , , . Looking ahead to potential incretin combination therapies for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with diabetes. Expert Opin Pharmacother.. 2023;24:989-1000.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. , , . The road towards triple agonists: glucagon-like peptide 1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon receptor - An update. Endocrinol Metab.. 2024;39:12-2.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. , , , . Dual and triple incretin-based co-agonists: Novel therapeutics for obesity and diabetes. Diabetes Ther.. 2024;15:1069-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  56. , , . Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes: Emerging evidence of benefit of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors agonists and incretin-based therapies. World J Methodol.. 2024;14:91319.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  57. , , . Beyond GLP-1: Efficacy and safety of dual and triple incretin agonists in personalized type 2 diabetes care—a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Acta Diabetol.. 2025;62:1359-70.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  58. , , , . Dual and triple gut peptide agonists on the horizon for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity an overview of preclinical and clinical data. Curr Obes Rep.. 2025;14:34.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  59. , , , , , , et al. Gut hormone multi-agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity: Advances and challenges. J Endocrinol.. 2024;262:e230404.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. , , , , , , et al. Discovery of a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue from bullfrog and investigation of its potential for designing GLP-1-based multiagonists. J Med Chem.. 2024;67:180-98.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. , , . Glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists as a promising therapeutic option of metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease and obesity: Hitting two targets with one shot. Curr Opin Gastroenterol.. 2025;41:104-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. , , , . GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes – state-of-the-art. Molecular Metabolism.. 2021;46:101102.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  63. , , , , , , et al. Tirzepatide versus semaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med.. 2021;385:503-15.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. , , , , , , et al. Triple-hormone receptor agonist retatrutide in adults with obesity. N Engl J Med.. 2023;389:1324-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. . Mechanisms of action and therapeutic application of glucagon-like peptide-1. Cell Metabolism.. 2018;27:740-56.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top