Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
135 (
3
); 397-400

Evaluation of toxicity of plant extracts against vector of lymphatic filariasis, Culex quinquefasciatus

National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR), IDVC Field Unit, Chennai, India
World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India

Reprint requests: Dr M. Sakthivadivel, National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR), IDVC Field Unit, Ayapakkam, Chennai 600 077, India e-mail: msjk2004@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

Conventional insecticides are generally used as larvicides to control Culex quinquefasciatus, vector of lymphatic filariasis. This study was undertaken to evaluate the larvicidal activity of some potential larvicidal plants leaf extracts against Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae.

Methods:

The toxic effects of petroleum ether leaf extracts of plants viz., Argemone mexicana (Mexican prickly poppy), Clausena dentata (Dentate), Cipadessa baccifera (Rana bili), Dodonaea angustifolia (Hop bush) and Melia dubia (Pride of India) were evaluated under laboratory conditions in individual and in combination against 3rd - 4th instar larvae of Cx. quinquefasciatus.

Results:

The results indicated that among the selected plants, A. mexicana showed maximum larvicidal activity with an LC50 value of 48.89 ppm. Its toxicity was enhanced when the extract was mixed (1:1) with that of C. dentata as the LC50 value became 28.60 ppm indicating synergistic action of A. mexicana.

Interpretation & conclusions:

Our results showed high larvicidal potential in A. mexicana leaf extract, and it also showed additive effect when mixed with C. dentata extract.

Keywords

Argemone mexicana
biological control
Culex quinquefasciatus
LC50
plant extracts

The tropicopolitan mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus is the vector of lymphatic filariasis in India. Filariasis is a major public health problem and globally 120 million people are at risk1. In India, one-third of the people are afflicted with 40 per cent of the global burden of the disease2. Mass drug administration (MDA) is now accepted as a global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis. There is a general consensus that the time for elimination can be drastically reduced if MDA is coupled with appropriate vector control measures. At present, control of Cx. quinquefasciatus is practiced using conventional insecticide as larvicides. This approach has been confronted with twin problems of vector resistance to insecticides and environmental hazards likely to be caused by insecticides. It is considered that many plant based compounds have potential larvicidal activity and this would be used as alternative larvicides as these are effective, ecofriendly and minimize the development of resistance in mosquitoes3. Since, India has a rich plant diversity, attempts are in progress to find potential larvicidal plants. The objective of the present study was to evaluate extracts of a few promising plants against larvae of Cx. quinquefasciatus.

Material & Methods

The study was conducted at MS Swaminathan Research Foundation and National Institute of Malaria Research - Field Unit, Chennai during the period of August 2007 to March 2009.

The leaves of five species of plants viz., Argemone mexicana (Mexican prickly poppy), Clausena dentata (Dentate), Cipadessa baccifera (Rana bili), Dodonaea angustifolia (Hop bush) and Melia dubia (Pride of India) were collected from different geographical locations of Tamil Nadu. The leaves of each plant were washed thoroughly with water and shade dried. The dried leaves were powdered separately with an electric blender and Soxhlet extracted with petroleum ether cycles for 36 h and subsequently the extract was concentrated and dried using flask evaporates34.

A stock emulsified water solution of the extract of 1000 ppm was prepared using 250 mg of the extract in a flask dissolved in 4 ml of acetone and 0.1 ml of Tween 20 (emulsifier) and made up to 250 ml using distilled water. This was sequentially diluted with water to obtain 500, 250, 125 and 62.5 ppm of the extract. Before each dilution, the solution was shaken well to ensure uniform distribution of the extract in the emulsion. Stock control solution was prepared using 4 ml of acetone and 1 ml of Tween 20 in 250 ml of water and this was appropriately diluted with water to serve as control for each treatment. Since A. mexicana showed high toxicity to larvae5, this plant extract was mixed with other four plant extracts separately in 1:1 proportion to see for synergistic effect in any of the different combinations. Larval susceptibility tests were conducted as per WHO protocol6. Susceptibility tests were performed in disposable plastic cups. In each 125 ml of the emulsion of different concentrations were taken separately and in each cup 20 larvae (late 3rd and early 4th instar) were introduced. Each treatment had five replicates with appropriate controls. The independent and combined toxicity observations were made on total number of larval mortality, pupal development, pupal mortality and adult emergence with five replicates at every 24 h (24, 48, 72 and 96 h) interval (Tables I & II). Pupae when present were not included for calculation of percentage mortality.

Table I Effect of petroleum ether extracts of the selected plants against late 3rd instar larvae of Cx. quinquefasciatus
Table II Combined effect of A. mexicana with other selected plants (petroleum ether extract) against late 3rd instar larvae of Cx. quinquefasciatus

Statistical analysis: Corrected percentage mortality was calculated using Abbott`s formula7. From the corrected mortality larval LC50 and LC90 values were calculated using the computation programme of Probit analysis8.

Results & Discussion

Larvicidal efficacy of the plant extracts are given in Table III. Among the five plant extracts, C. baccifera and M. dubia were almost non-toxic as 1000 ppm ensured only 12 per cent mortality. Among the other three plant species, A. mexicana showed highest toxicity having an LC50 and LC90 values of 48.89 and 463.94 ppm, respectively. D. angustifolia extract showed LC50 value of 973 ppm and C. dentata 1435 ppm. A. mexicana extract when mixed with C. dentata (1:1 proportion) drastically reduced the LC50 value to 28.6 ppm. However, similar combination with extracts of C. baccifera, D. angustifolia and M. dubia showed an increase in LC50 values of A. mexicana indicating absence of any additive effect (Table III).

Table III Susceptibility of Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae to different plant extracts individually (A) and in combination of A. mexicana with other plants in 1:1 proportions (B)

The present study revealed that A. mexicana extract had high larvicidal potential among the five plant extracts tested. Further isolation and purification of the toxic principle from the extract can enhance the larval toxicity of A. mexicana. Other plants viz., C. dentata, C. baccifera, D. angustifolia and M. dubia were found to be non-toxic to the mosquito larvae. However, when the A. mexicana extract was mixed with plant extracts of C. dentata and D. angustifolia in 1:1 proportion, a reduction in their LC50 values was observed. Plant based compounds are known to be ecofriendly and can be used in mosquito larval control ensuring maximum safety in any ecological condition. The present results clearly indicated that A. mexicana leaf extract had high larvicidal potency that can be exploited by further purification of the toxic principles in A. mexicana and identifying the synergistic compound in C. dentata and D. angustifolia.

Acknowledgment

The first author (MS) acknowledges Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi for the financial support as Research Associateship.

References

  1. , . Preventive and social medicine (20th ed). Delhi: Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers; . p. :232.
  2. , , , , . The economic burden of lymphatic filariasis in India. Parasitol Today. 2000;16:251-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Mosquito larvicidal and growth disturbing activity of Annona squomosa extract. Trop Dis 1992:397-402.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Evaluation of some Moroccan medicinal plant extracts for larvicidal activity. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000;73:293-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Larvicidal and chemosterilant activity of the acetone fraction of petroleum ether extract from Argemone mexicana L. seed. Bioresour Technol. 2003;89:213-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. World Health Organization. In: Instruction for determining the susceptibility or resistance of mosquito larvae. Geneva: WHO; . p. :6. WHO/VBC/81.807
    [Google Scholar]
  7. World Health Organization. In: Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides. Vol 13. Geneva: WHO; . p. :10-11. WHO/CDS/WHOPES/GCDPP
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Probit analysis (3rd ed). London: Cambridge University Press; .
Show Sections
Scroll to Top