Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
162 (
1
); 53-65
doi:
10.25259/IJMR_1674_2024

Dietary guidelines across different countries & comparisons to dietary guidelines for Indians, 2024

Cell Physiology and Pathology Laboratory, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, India

For correspondence: Dr Uddhav K Chaudhari, Cell Physiology and Pathology Laboratory, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai 400 012, Maharashtra, India e-mail: chaudhariu@nirrch.res.in

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Abstract

Diet and lifestyle are important modifiable risk factors to reduce the global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). In this review, the Dietary Guidelines for Indians (DGI) were compared with one randomly selected country from each continent. The DGI were designed considering the traditional dietary diversity of the Indians’ food habits. DGI are explicit for all age groups, including nutritionally vulnerable populations such as children, pregnant women and older individuals. They include guidelines on pre-cooking and cooking methods, processed foods and other impactful health-related factors like sanitation, clean water supply and physical activity (PA). DGI, 2024 classified nutrient-rich food groups into 10 categories; however, all other countries’ food groups range between 4-7 categories. Considering the cultural and socio-economic factors, differences were observed across countries’ guidelines regarding recommendations for daily consumption of cereals, fruits, vegetables, pulses, legumes, flesh and dairy products. The unit of measurement, quantity of serving size, sample menus and frequencies of consumption differed across the countries based on availability, affordability and cultural practices in geographical locations. Dietary guidelines (DGs) for nutritionally vulnerable groups were not mentioned uniformly across the countries. Comparison of all DGs showed major emphasis on nutrient-rich food groups, limiting unhealthy fats and sugar and promoting PA. Regular monitoring, understanding the barriers and providing appropriate strategies to overcome them are the major steps to achieve the goals of accepting DGs for the general population. This review concludes by discussing possible barriers and recommending strategies to implement DGI, 2024.

Keywords

Comparison of dietary guidelines
dietary guidelines for Indians
food group
NCD prevention
nutrition policy
World Health Organization

A suboptimal or unhealthy diet is an important and preventable risk factor for obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and cancers. Several observational, epidemiological, long-term prospective and short-term randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown a relationship between dietary habits and chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs)1,2. Designing a long-term RCT to prove the direct relationship between complex dietary habits and NCD endpoints is difficult. However, the relationship between specific dietary factors, e.g., fruits in preventing CVDs, excess salt, a risk factor for CVDs, vegetables to reduce the risk of diabetes, processed meat and trans-fat intake for increased risk of colorectal cancer has been established2. These findings have been widely used to formulate the country-specific dietary guidelines (DGs) to prevent NCDs. DGs employ multidimensional approaches to ensure a holistic balance of food groups, their relative proportions and the nutritional diversity of foods consumed over time. DGI also covers traditional and cultural food preparations, storage and sanitation that can guide healthcare professionals, industries and policymakers.

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) have encouraged the development of national food-based DGs (FBDG) in line with the sustainable healthy diets3. On May 7, 2024, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)- National Institute of Nutrition (NIN) released the revised Dietary Guidelines for Indians (DGI)4. A healthy diet and lifestyle modification are essential to protect against malnutrition and to reduce the risk of chronic diseases. India faces the unique challenges of the double burden of malnutrition and NCDs across age groups5. The National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-5 data showed poor performance on a wide range of nutritional indicators, exhibiting high rates of underweight (18.7%), overweight or obesity (24%) and anaemia among women of reproductive age (57%). Among preschool children, stunting (35.5%), wasting (19.3%) and anaemia (67.7%) were major problems6,7. NCDs are the world’s leading cause of death, responsible for an estimated 41 million of the 55 million deaths in 20198. In India, mortality from NCDs accounted for 65 per cent of total deaths in 20198,9. The ICMR-INDIAB study states increased prevalence of metabolic diseases and the malnutrition burden in India10. It is estimated that 56.4 per cent of the total disease burden in India is due to an unhealthy diet. The 17 DGs have been proposed in DGI (2024) to fulfil all the nutritional needs for health promotion across the life-course.

The guidelines use food groups instead of specific nutrients for the population to understand and implement practically in their daily lives. India has diverse dietary practices related to cultural, regional, religious practices, availability and affordability of foods4. DGI covers the diversity in the food options and choices, diet plans, recipes and menus for easy understanding and implementation.

In recent years, many review articles compared DGs within the same geographical area or continent with food groups, key elements, graphical presentation and qualitative and quantitative analyses11-15. Rong et al16 conducted a comparative study on the graphics of food pyramids, food grouping, healthy eating messages and recommendations for specific populations. Another global review article assessed similarities and differences in key elements of a healthy diet across countries,15. Both these recent comparative reviews included DGI published in 2011; however, data on the comparison of DGI (2024) are not available. This review uses recent DGIs published in 2024 and compares them with the DGs of six countries and the WHO DGs.

Methodology/selection of countries

One country from each continent was randomly selected, with its updated guidelines for comparison with the DGI 2024. Countries included were India4, China17, Australia18, Spain19, South Africa20,21, Argentina22 and the United States of America23. WHO guidelines on healthy diets were also included in this review for comparison between countries3. The source of information for all guidelines was the FAO-FBDG (Food and Agriculture Organization-Food Bases Dietary Guidelines) repository24, which gathers information through global surveys on FBDG development, use and evaluation and has been continually updated. Table I outlines countries with their continent, year of publication and organisation involved in establishing guidelines. Each country’s FBDG was reviewed in detail and predetermined attributes like food groups for healthy adults and pregnant and lactating women were compared. Brief information on children’s and adolescents’ DGs was included if available. PA guidelines across different countries were also compared.

Table I. The details of randomly selected countries from each continent, year and source of publication of dietary guidelines
Countries Continent Year of publication Agency involved in developing DG
India Asia 2024 Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Nutrition
Australia Australia 2013 National Health and Medical Council, Dept of Health and Ageing
China Asia 2022 Chinese Nutrition Society, under the leadership of the National Health Commission, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA), the National Food and Nutrition Advisory Committee and other government agencies.
Spain Europe 2022 Spanish Agency of Foos Safety and Nutrition
Argentina South America 2016 National Ministry of Health, Health Promotion and Control of Non-communicable Diseases,
USA North America 2020-2025 The U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Agriculture (USDA)
South Africa Africa 2013 Nutrition Society of South Africa, Department of Health, the Medical Research Council

Results

Food groups of different countries’ DGs

The graphic illustration of DG also differs across the countries. The plate, according to the Australian DG, is partitioned into five food groups and surrounded by water, a small amount of fats and sometimes a minimum amount of alcoholic beverages, fast food and sugars. The Spanish food plate is partitioned into four food groups and suggests the consumption of olive oils instead of other fats/oils. South Africa shows places square and cereals in the centre surrounded by the six other food groups, including water. Argentina’s food plate is partitioned into six food groups and in the centre, emphasis is given to water. The United States of America divides the plate into four food groups surrounded by dairy products. The Chinese represent food as a pyramidal pagoda separated into five layers of food groups surrounded by intake of water and physical activity (PA). The Indian plate is divided into five food groups surrounded by 300 mL of milk.

The Indian, American and Australian guidelines give detailed food group division, considering different age groups (infant to elderly), dietary patterns (e.g., vegetarian/non-vegetarian) and sex-specific. The DGs for Americans (DGA) provide daily or weekly amounts from different food groups and components, based on individual calorie levels. South Africa’s DGs are for age >5 yr and above, with energy requirements based on age and sex. China, Spain and Argentina provide general guidelines for the adults. The details of all food groups have been mentioned in table II. Countries use different measurements to describe the amount of food groups. DGA mentions cup equivalent and ounces (1 ounce =28.3 g), whereas Australia and Argentina mention in terms of different units. WHO, India and China mention raw/uncooked gram weights and South African guidelines mention units.

Table II. Food groups included in the different countries’ dietary guidelines
India (2024) China (2022) Spain (2022)

Australia

(2013)

South Africa (2013)

USA

(2020-2025)

Argentina (2016)
1. Cereals & millets 1. Cereals tubers, legumes 1. Vegetables 1. Vegetables & legumes & beans 1. Starchy foods 1. Vegetables Dark-green vegetables, Red & orange vegetables, Beans, peas, lentils, Starchy vegetables, Other vegetables 1. Vegetables & fruit
2. Pulses 2. Fruits & vegetables 2. Fruits 2. Fruits 2. Vegetable 2. Grains & legumes
3. Vegetables 3. Meat, poultry 3. Cereals 3. Grains 3. Fruit 3. Fruits 3. Milk, yoghurt & cheese
4. Nuts, oilseed, oil & fats 4. Dairy & soybeans 4. Protein foods 4. Lean meats and poultry, fish, eggs, tofu, nuts and seeds 4. Dry beans, split peas, lentils, soya 4. Grains Whole grains Refined grains 4. Meats & eggs
5. Green leafy vegetables 5. Oil & nuts 5. Milk, yoghurt & cheese 5. Fish, chicken lean, meat, eggs 5. Dairy 5. Oil, dry fruits & nuts
6. Fruits 6. Milk, maas, yoghurt 6. Protein foods Meats, poultry, eggs seafood Nuts, seeds, soy products 6. Ultra processed foods
7. Diary 7. Fat, oil 7. Oils
8. Roots & tubers 8. Sugar
9. Flesh foods
10. Spices & herbs

Food groups comparison across DGs

Cereals

All DGs recommend cereals between 180 to 360 g/day. Spanish guidelines suggest 3-6 servings of cereals/day (∼180-360 g); higher amounts of cereals are recommended to individuals based on sex, age, active life, or high caloric expenditure. DGI, 2024, suggests 250 g/day, which is comparatively higher than that recommended by WHO (180 g/day), DGA (∼170 g/day) and Australia (∼180 g/day). Argentina suggests 4 servings/day (∼120 g), and China suggests 200-300 g/day of cereals with legumes and pulses. South Africa suggests 11-15 units/day of cereals (∼210 g- 450 g, cooked). DGA (6 ounces-170 g/day) and Australia (6 servings–180 g/day) align closely on amounts, coinciding with WHO (180 g/day). DGA specifies that more than 3 ounces (85 g) should be whole grains and less than 3 ounces of refined grains. Australia mandates the fortification of wheat flour with folic acid and thiamine25. All guidelines recommend restricted use of refined flour and encourage the use of whole grains with limited addition of salt, sugar and fats.

Fruits and vegetables

Guidelines for fruits and vegetables are consistent, suggesting ∼400-600 g of fruits and vegetables/day. DGI suggested 100 g/day of fruits and 400 g/day of vegetables, whereas WHO suggests 400 g/day, including both fruits and vegetables. Spain and Argentina suggest similar amounts, i.e., five servings (500 g/day). Spanish guidelines specify modest tubers with fruits and vegetables. South Africa suggests 1 unit of fruit (150 g/day) and 3 units of vegetables (225 g/day). Australia recommends two servings of fruits (300 g) and 5-6 servings of vegetables (375 g), including legumes (75 g), in a daily diet. The DGA recommended 2 cups eq/day (200 g) of fruits and 2½ cups eq/day (250 g), including legumes/day (150 g).

The DGA recommends fresh and frozen fruits, vegetables, canned fruits, or juices with minimal added sugars and preservatives. All other guidelines suggest limiting or avoiding the intake of canned fruits and vegetables due to their preservative content and encourage increasing the intake of fresh, seasonal and locally grown vegetables.

Pulses

DGI suggests 85 g/day (uncooked) pulses, of which 30 g can be substituted with animal flesh/meat as protein source. WHO suggests 160 g (raw and uncooked) pulses, including animal red meat, chicken, and fish in diet. Spanish guidelines mention four servings of pulses/day (200-240 g). China and Argentina combine pulses with the cereals group and specify using legumes with cereals, as they make a high biological protein when consumed in a mixed meal. Beans, legumes and lentils are added with vegetables according to DGA and Australian guidelines because they have a comparable nutrient profile to the vegetables and protein-rich food groups. South Africa mentions 1 unit/day (75 g cooked) of pulses.

Poultry, egg, meat and seafood

DGI does not specify the quantity of egg, poultry, seafood and meat separately; instead, they suggest replacing 30 g of flesh or animal proteins with pulses. China suggests 120-200 g/day and South Africa suggests 1 unit/day (∼100 g) of animal proteins. DGA mentions 5 ½ ounces/day (⁓150 g/day) of animal meat and 26 ounces/wk of egg, and 8 ounces/wk of seafood. Argentina suggests 1 serve in g/day (100 g/day), whereas Spain suggests 3 servings/wk of animal proteins. WHO guidelines suggest 160 g/day, including red meat 1-2 times/wk and poultry 2-3 times/wk. All guidelines emphasise consuming lean cuts of meat and poultry that are fresh, frozen, or canned and recommend avoiding animal fats3. Different guidelines suggest different amounts and frequencies due to cultural, traditional, availability and affordability. All guidelines suggest restricting processed meat for daily consumption.

Nuts

DGI and China suggest similar amounts of nuts, 35 g/day and 25-35 g, respectively. DGA and Australian guidelines have included nuts with the protein group, whereas India, China and Argentina have clubbed nuts under oils and fats. DGA suggests 5 ounces/wk of nuts (∼140 g), seeds, or soya and Australian guidelines add nuts with other protein foods and recommend 30g of nuts occasionally as a substitute for other protein foods. Spain suggests three servings of nuts/wk (∼90 g). All guidelines highlight avoiding salted nuts.

Dairy

Differences exist between the guidelines from countries on the intake of dairy food groups. DGI and China suggest 300 mL/day. Spain and Argentina suggest 3 servings/day (⁓600 mL). Australia recommends 2½ servings (625 mL/day) and DGA 3 cups eq/day (600 mL/day) of milk. Australia, Spain and DGA guidelines include low-fat cheese, lactose-free products and yogurt. Except for DGI, all other countries mention low-fat or fat-free milk and milk products. Full-fat milk, cheese and yogurts increase the total fat, saturated fat and overall energy content of the diet. Therefore, most guidelines recommend low-fat/fat-free dairy products. Comparison of all food groups and recommended quantities of each country and the WHO is shown in table III.

Table III. Comparison of dietary guidelines of different countries and WHO (adults)
Food groups India (2024) (raw)

China (2022)

(raw)

Spain (2022)

(servings/day)

Australia

(2013) (servings/day)

South Africa

(2013)

(No of units)

USA

(2020-2025)

(raw)

Argentina

(2016)

(servings/ day)

WHO

(2019)

Cereals/millet/starchy foods 250 g/day

200-300 g

(including pulses)

3-6 servings/day

(∼180-360 g)

6 servings/day

(∼180 g)

11-15 units

(∼210 g-450 g- cooked)

6 ounce/day

(170 g/day)

4 servings (with legumes) (∼120 g) 180 g/day
Fruits 100 g/day 200-350 g/day

5 servings/day

(120-200 g/day)

2 servings/ day (300 g)

1 units

(150 g)

2 cups eq/day

(200 g)

5 servings

(∼fruits-300 g)

400 g/day
Vegetables 400 g/day 300-500 g/day (150-200 g/day) 5-6 servings/day (375 g/day)

3 units

(225 g)

2½ cup eq/day (250 g) Vegetable- 200 g -
Legumes/pulses 85 g/day Mentioned along cereals

4 servings/wk

(∼200-240 g)

legumes – 75 g (cooked)

1 unit

(75 g-cooked)

150 g/wk (cooked) Mentioned along cereals

160 g/day

(raw uncooked)

Meat, chicken egg & fish

- 120-200 g/day

3 servings/wk

Fish 125 g-150 g/3 times/wk

4-eggs/wk

0-3 servings of meat/wk

2-3 servings/day

(200-300 g- raw)

1 unit

(100 g)

5½ ounces/day

(150 g/day)

Meat, poultry and eggs- 26 ounces/wk

Seafood- 8 ounces/wk

1 serving/day

(∼100g)

(1 egg/day,

fish 2/wk, meats 2-3/wk

Red meat 1-2 times/wk & poultry 2-3 times/wk
Nuts 35 g/day 25-35 g/day

3 servings/wk

(60-90 g/wk)

30 g occasionally as a substitute for other foods in the group - Nuts, seed, soy- 5 ounces/wk Handful of nuts/wk- ∼15-20 g -
Dairy 300 mL/day 300 g/day

3 servings/day

600-650 mL/day

2½ servings/day

(625 mL/day)

1 unit

(200 mL)

3 cup eq/day

(∼600 mL)

3 servings

(∼600 mL)

-

Guidelines on salt/sugar/fat

Following the WHO guidelines, all countries suggest a salt intake of less than or equal to 5 g/day. USA, Australian, Argentine and Indian guidelines do mention flavour enhancers. DGI highlights the use of herbs, spices, lime, vinegar and kokam to season foods without adding salt according to their cultural and personal preferences.

Added sugars are of special concern because excess intake of added sugar increases overall calorie intake. DGI suggests 5-10 per cent of total calories or 23-30 g/day and China suggests 25 g/day of added sugar. Australia and DGA have the same recommendation of less than 10 per cent of total calories from added sugar (<25-30 g). South Africa suggests 6 units (30 g/day). All guidelines suggest approximately a similar amount of 25-35 g/day in line with WHO guidelines of 5-10 per cent of total calories from added sugars. Spanish guidelines recommend minimising or avoiding the consumption of sugary and sweetened beverages.

All guidelines specify the quality and quantity of fat that should be consumed as part of a healthy diet. DGI, China, USA suggest 25-30 g/day of fats. South Africa suggests 6-8 tsp/day (∼30 g) and Argentina suggests 2 servings/day. Spanish guidelines mention 3-5 servings/day, specifying olive oil while reducing animal and saturated fats. WHO recommends less than 30 per cent of total calories from fats and replacing saturated fatty acids (SFA) or trans-fats (TFA) with polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), or proteins, which can improve blood lipid profiles and lower the risk of CVFD. Comparison of the salt, sugar and fats of each country and the WHO is shown in table IV.

Table IV. Comparison of Guidelines for salt, sugar and fats of different countries and WHO
India China Spain Australia South Africa USA Argentina WHO
Salt

5 g/day

Na-2300 mg

5 g

<5 g

Na- 2 g

1600 mg

(4 g of salt)

UL-2300 mg

<5 g/day

<2500 mg of Na

Na-

<2300 mg

- Na- 2300 mg
Sugar 5% of total energy or 25 g/day 25 g/d -

<10% of

total calories

6 units

30 g/day

<10% of

total calories

- 5-10% of total calories
Fats 27-30 g

25-30 g

Trans fat-2 g

3-5 servings/day

(30-50 mL)

2-4 servings/day

6-8 teaspoon

(30-40 mL)

27 g/day

2 servings

2 tablespoon (30 mL)

<30% of total energy intake

SFA-

>10% of total energy intake &

total trans fats >1% of total energy intake

sugar refers to added sugar in the diet

Guidelines for pregnancy and lactation

Out of the seven selected countries for this review, India, Australia and the USA provide DGs for pregnancy and lactation. Table V compares guidelines for pregnancy and lactation. Cereals during pregnancy recommended by DGI (240 g/day), USA 8½ servings (255 g/day) and Australia 8 ounces (170 g/day). DGI recommendation for fruits is 150 g/day, whereas Australia suggests two servings (300 g/day) and the USA suggests 2 cups eq (200 g/day) in pregnancy. DGI and DGA suggest 300 g of vegetables, where DGI particularly mentions an additional 150 g of green leafy vegetables as they are a rich source of iron and folic acid. Australia suggests five servings of fruits and vegetables/day. Australia and DGA include nuts with animal protein foods, whereas DGI specifies 40 g/day of nuts for pregnant women. Similarly, for adult guidelines, DGI suggests 85 g/day of pulses, including 30 g of animal flesh. DGI specifies marine fish/lean meat (80 g/day or 250-300 g/2 times/wk), to ensure high biological value protein. Australian guidelines suggest 3½ servings/day (350 g/day) and DGA suggests 6½ ounces (150 g/day) of animal flesh. Guidelines for dairy products are similar for Australia, i.e., 2½ servings/day (675 mL) and DGA 2 cup eq/day (600 mL). DGI suggests 400 mL/day of milk. Australia provides distinct guidelines for pregnancy and lactation.

Table V. Dietary guidelines for pregnancy and lactation (India, Australia and USA)
Food groups India (2024) (raw) pregnancy Australia pregnancy women (servin g/day) Australia breastfeeding women (servin g/day) USA pregnancy and lactation (2400 kcal diet)
Cereals/millet/starchy foods 240 g/day 8½ (255 g) 9 (270 g)

8 ounce/day

(170 g/day)

Fruits 150 g/day 2 (300 g) 2 (300 g) 2 cups eq/day (200 g)
Vegetables 300 g/day+ 150 g GLVs 5 (375 g) 7½ (550 g)

3 cup eq/day (300 g)

200 g/wk (cooked)

Legumes/pulses 85 g/day
Meat, chicken, egg & fish Marine fish/Lean meat- 80 g/day or 250-300 g/2 times in a wk 3½ (350 g) 2½ (250 g)

6½ ounces/day

(150 g/day)

Nuts 40/day

30 g

*Occasionally as a substitute for other foods in the group

30 g

*Occasionally as a substitute for other foods in the group

-
Dairy (milk & milk product) 400 mL/day 2½ (675 mL) 2 (600 mL) 3 cup eq/day (∼600 mL)

All three countries’ DG highlight the consumption of micronutrients like iron, folic acid, vitamin D, calcium and omega-3 fatty acids. Australia25 and the USA23 mandate fortification of flour with folic acid. The Government of India and FSSAI have also started fortifying rice and wheat flour with iron and folic acid26. All guidelines focus on a healthy, balanced diet and physical activity (PA) and encourage avoiding processed, high-fat, salt and sugar foods.

Physical activity (PA)

All countries follow WHO guidelines for PA across age groups. Age group between 5-17 yr of all guidelines mentions 60 min/day of moderate to vigorous activity. DGI mentions additional strength training PA at least 3 days/wk. For ages between 18-64 yr, on average, 150-300 min/wk of moderate intensity aerobic activity is suggested in all guidelines. Age 65 and above, all guidelines recommend 150-300 min/wk of moderate intensity aerobic activity PA. Comparison of PA is mentioned in table VI.

Table VI. Guidelines for physical activity of different countries and WHO
Physical activity 5-17 yr 18-64 yr 65 & above
WHO 60 min/ day of moderate-to-vigorous intensity, mostly aerobic PA, across the wk

150–300 min of moderate-intensity aerobic PA; or at least 75–150 min of vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity; or an equivalent combination of moderate & vigorous-intensity activity throughout the wk

muscle-strengthening -moderate intensity- 2 or more days a wk

Same as for adults; & should do varied multicomponent physical activity that emphasises functional balance & strength training at moderate or greater intensity, on 3 or more days a wk, to enhance functional capacity &prevent falls
Australia 60 min of moderate to vigorous PA 150–300 min/ wkof moderate PA, OR 75–150 min per wk of vigorous PA, or an equivalent combination of both per wk 30 min or more of physical activity on most, preferably all, days
India 60 min of moderate- vigorous-intensity aerobic PA per day, strength training at least 3 days/wk 30-60 min of moderate-intensity aerobic PA per day or at least 5 days a wk or 15 min of vigorous-intensity PA Similar to that of an adult
Spain 60 min of moderate aerobic PA every day 150 to 300 min of moderate-intensity aerobic PA or a minimum of 75 to 150 min of vigorous-intensity aerobic PA Similar to that of an adult
China 60 min of moderate-to-vigorous PA everyday 150–300 min of moderate-intensity 75–150 min of vigorous-intensity aerobic activity per wk, or an equivalent combination of moderate-intensity & vigorous-intensity aerobic activity. Engage in muscle-strengthening exercises at least 2 days a wk.

Similar to that of an adult

Persist in performing balance, agility & flexibility exercises

Argentina 60 min of moderate or vigorous physical activity every day of the wk 150 min of physical activity in the wk -
South Africa 60 min of activity per day 30 min of moderate-intensity physical activity each day of the wk, this can be accumulated in bouts of at least 10 min during the day -

Guidelines for infants, children and adolescent

Countries such as the USA, India and Australia recommend guidelines for infants, children and adolescents. South Africa focuses on children over five yr old. All guidelines recommend exclusively breastfeeding for the first six months of life and can continue to breastfeed until 1-2 yr of life. Australia and the USA also recommend that if human milk is not available, iron-fortified infant formula milk be recommended for the first year of life. Infant formulae are specifically formulated to meet the nutritional requirements of infants up to 12 months of age and are not suggested to be used beyond. USA and Australian guidelines recommend not using cow’s milk before 12 months of age. All guidelines suggest introducing complementary food after six months of age, including all food groups. DGI provides easy recipes, sample day’s menu plans, the process of making amylase-rich flour and its benefits. From two years of age to adolescence, DGA provides food groups based on calorie level patterns, whereas Australia provides serving sizes of different food groups. DGI guides for illness and details essential micronutrients required for growth and development for all age groups. South Africa provides guidelines for children above five years based on age and sex.

Discussion

Comparison of DGs of different countries and WHO (Adults)

Revised DGI were released in May 2024 by ICMR and ICMR-NIN, after a gap of 13 years from the last second edition published in 20114. In the last decade, dietary habits and the epidemiological transition from communicable diseases to NCDs have drastically emerged in India. The prevalence of obesity, CVD and diabetes has increased, with persistent problems of undernutrition and anaemia continuing to affect half of the women of reproductive age and children. A recent study reports that 56.7 per cent of the disease burden in India is due to an unhealthy diet27. Compared to previous guidelines, the current guidelines highlight restrictions on ultra-processed foods, focus more on protein quality and suggested avoiding regular consumption of protein supplements to build muscle mass. The latest guidelines emphasise reading information on food labels to make informed and healthy food choices. The current edition introduces the concept of ‘My plate for the day’ and microgreens4. The latest guidelines mention 10 food groups compared to the previous (four food groups), focusing more on micronutrients and macronutrient content4. Vegetables are divided into three different food groups. Also, special mention of herbs and spices as a food group, signifying their importance in our meals. Current guidelines use the updated ICMR-NIN Nutrient requirements 2020 report, with a reference to a sedentary man weighing 65 kg with a 2000 kcal/day.

The compassion between Chinese residents’ dietary pattern and the Chinese DGs shows inadequate consumption of dairy products, fruits and tubers, alongside the excessive intake of grains derived from livestock and poultry28. A systematic review29 indicates that 40 per cent of both high-income countries (HIC) and low-middle income countries (LMIC) do not adhere to their national FBDGs. Fruit and vegetables were mostly adhered to between 7 per cent and 67.3 per cent as per FBDGs. HICs consume more discretionary foods (salt, sugar and alcohol), while mixed results were observed in LMICs. In both HICS and LMICs, grains and dairy were consumed below recommended levels, however, consumption of animal proteins exceeded the recommended levels (>30%), particularly red meat30. Risk for all-cause mortality was found to reduced (56%) with increasing intake (for each daily serving) of whole grains, vegetables, fruits, nuts and fish. However, higher intake of red meat and processed meat was found associated with a 2-fold increased risk of all-cause mortality in a linear dose-response meta-analysis30.

For a balanced diet, carbohydrates are recommended to be 50-60 per cent of calories. A prospective cohort study has shown a U-shaped relationship between life expectancy and total carbohydrate intake. Individuals consuming 50-55 per cent carbohydrates showed increased lifespan. However, both low (<40%) and high (>70%) carbohydrate diets were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality31. All guidelines recommend 45-60 per cent of total carbohydrate intake from cereals. Rice, wheat and jowar are the major cereals consumed in India32. The National Sample Survey Office’s latest Household Consumption Expenditure Survey (HCES) report reveals a steady decline in cereal consumption from 350-425 g/day in 1999-2000 to 270-320 g/day in 2022-2023 in India33. Yet, the current consumption is higher than the recommended amount by the DGI, 2024 (250 g/day). The higher consumption of cereals, particularly white rice (>450 g/day), has been associated with increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) among the Indian population34.

DGI highlights the important concept of microgreens, which are rich in amino acids, fatty acids, micronutrients, antioxidants, bioactive compounds and phytochemicals. All countries’ guidelines recommended a similar quantity and quality of fruits and vegetables (500-600 g/day). National Non-Communicable Monitoring Survey (NNMS) in India reported that 98.4 per cent of adults do not consume fruits and/or vegetables according to DGI and WHO recommendations. The mean serving of fruits and/or vegetables was 1.7 servings/day (170 g)35. Similarly, food consumption data of Chinese residents reveal the gap between actual consumption and recommended values of vegetables and fruits28. Canned foods contain excessive added sugar and the canning process can lead to the loss of heat-labile nutrients. They are a major source of bisphenol A, an endocrine-disrupting chemical positively associated with coronary artery disease36. All the guidelines recommend avoiding canned products.

There is poor agreement among countries regarding guidelines for pulses. DGI includes animal protein along with pulses. A multilevel model analysis found that per capita consumption of pulses was about 50 per cent lower than the recommended intake across India and was influenced by availability, preferences, accessibility, affordability and cultural traditions37. Though animal products are highly nutritious, scientific evidence suggests reducing meat and increasing the consumption of other protein sources, such as legumes. Meta-analysis found consumption of processed meat, particularly red meat, as a risk factor for the development of T2D38. A systematic review39 of RCTs suggested a protective effect on total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by replacing animal protein with plant protein, which may decrease the risk of CVD mortality and T2D incidence.

Nuts and oilseeds have anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, and antioxidant effects40. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have shown that nuts have cardiovascular benefits beyond lowering LDL cholesterol and Apo B; they improve blood glucose and endothelial function41,42. A meta-analysis showed a reduction in relative risks for CVD and all-cause mortality on a daily intake of 28 g of nuts43.

Dairy products are disproportionately recommended across all countries, and all guidelines emphasise low-fat milk and milk products. A review concluded that dairy products may protect against NCDs, and very few reported adverse effects due to lactose intolerance in some populations44. Miller et al45 reported from the global dietary database that the mean milk consumption in India was lower (100 mL/day) than the recommended intake (300 mL/day). Another study showed that per capita milk consumption per day was 83.3 mL in the milk-consuming families. An average monthly milk consumption was higher in milk-producing households than in families relying on market purchases46. Another study showed that increased dairy consumption was associated with a lower risk of obesity and high fasting plasma glucose compared to a low dairy intake. A total dairy intake of ≥5 cups per day was also protective against hypertension and metabolic syndrome compared to an intake of ≤1.4 cups per day47.

WHO urges a 30 per cent reduction in salt intake by 202548. Studies concluded that salt consumption in India exceeds recommended levels in the guidelines49-51. A systematic review reported the mean salt intake of 11 g/day across India52. NNMS reported that more than 96 per cent of adults exceed the recommended daily intake (<5 g salt/day). Women consume less salt across all age groups than men and the mean dietary salt intake was 8 g/day36. Hidden forms of sodium increase overall salt intake. In India, 43.8 per cent of adults consumed home-based salt-added snacks weekly and 36.1 per cent consumed namkeen, papad and packaged chips monthly. The urban population consumed salt-containing foods more frequently than the rural population35.

As per Indian regulation, fortification of specific food items is allowed to combat nutrient deficiencies at the community level (e.g., salt fortified with Iodine). FSSAI implemented food fortification regulations for fortifying staple foods, namely wheat and rice flour, with vitamin B-12, iron and folic acid and oil and milk with vitamin D26,53. Fortification of ultra-processed foods or foods high in salt/sugar/fat does not make them healthy. Guidelines encourage wholesome and minimally processed food intake to ensure safety and sustainability.

Guidelines on physical activity (PA)

WHO recommended levels of PA are not met by 41.3 per cent of adults in India. Women reported being more active than men, with the lowest of 39.8 per cent in urban women. Only 10.5 per cent of all adults are voluntarily involved in any form of PA (like fitness, sports). On a typical day, the average time spent being sedentary was 308.9 min. Urban adults spent a mean of 324.4 min and rural adults spent 301.1 min a day being sedentary35. Several barriers exist to PA, prompting researchers to develop a culturally acceptable dance/fitness intervention called Taking High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Dance to Adolescents for Victory over NCDs (THANDAV). There was a significant increase in the heart rate and VO2 post-intervention. THANDAV is improves cardiorespiratory fitness and prevents NCDs54. The Diabetes Community Lifestyle Improvement Program (D-CLIP) was designed to increase Moderate to Vigorous PA (MVPA) to ≥150 min per wk. Results indicated a significant (P< 0.05) increase in the participants reporting ≥150 weekly min of MVPA by 28.5 per cent, 13.6 per cent and 14 per cent at 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively55.

A systematic review56 indicates that women in the preconception period and throughout pregnancy often fail to meet the DGs, associated with increased BMI and diabetes risk56. They consume fewer fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and nutrients like fibre, folate, iron and calcium, while consuming more carbohydrates, saturated fats, and less protein. Demographic factors impact adherence, with potential implications for future policy and practice57. Nutrition education and counselling can enhance maternal nutrition in pregnancy, which will aid in reducing maternal and foetal complications58. All these studies indicate the importance of these guidelines and mandate the implementation and monitoring process.

Barriers to following DGs

Economic, social and cultural factors significantly impact health inequalities and affect the ability to choose nutritious foods to follow the dietary recommendations. A study revealed that complying with Australian guidelines was associated with being female, older age, higher education, higher socioeconomic status and having nutrition knowledge59. On the contrary, low socio-economic status and low educational attainment are barriers to complying with DGs and lower socioeconomic groups often view cost as an obstacle to nutritious purchases60. Other barriers include availability and affordability, poor/ miscommunication of dietary advice, low food literacy and increased food insecurity; this may include the inability to access nutritious and culturally acceptable foods60.

Strategies to implement DGs

A multi-sectoral approach is essential for effective implementation of DGs61, involving the public-private sector, NGOs, the health sector, the education sector, government bodies and industrial and company stakeholders (Figure). Technology can help trace meals, calories and PA, standardised and tailored to individual needs and social media for dissemination of information. Policies and standards should be established for the food industry to improve the nutritional quality, following the guidelines (e.g., reduce sodium, fat and sugar content) and by regulating the marketing and sale of unhealthy, ultra-processed foods.

Multi-sectorial approaches and strategies for the implementation of dietary guidelines.
Figure.
Multi-sectorial approaches and strategies for the implementation of dietary guidelines.

The limitations of the current review are that the comparison of FBDG with selected countries is not across the global landscape. This is a narrative review and does not include systematic or meta-analysis approaches to actually quantify the food groups among the countries.

Conclusion

In conclusion, most of the common guidelines align with the recommendations articulated by the WHO. Among all countries, differences were observed in terms of recommended amounts of consumption, food grouping and inclusion of vulnerable populations. DGI, 2024 differs mainly in recommending quantities of cereals, animal foods and milk compared to other countries. The intake of animal foods and protein sources is lower; however, the consumption of cereals or carbohydrates is higher in India than in other countries. High-quality protein is an essential component to improve the growing burden of malnutrition in India. There is a need to reduce the gap between lower protein consumption and higher carbohydrate consumption for prevention of all forms of malnutrition.

Financial support & sponsorship

None.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of AI-assisted technology for assisting in the writing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. The Lancet. 2017;393:1958-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Etiologic effects and optimal intakes of foods and nutrients for risk of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses from the nutrition and chronic diseases expert group (Nutri CoDE) PLoS One. 2017;12:e0175149.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. . Sustainable healthy diets-guiding principles. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/329409/9789241516648-eng.pdf?sequence=1, accessed on 23 September 2024.
  4. . Dietary guidelines for Indians. Available from: https://www.nin.res.in/dietaryguidelines/pdfjs/locale/DGI07052024P.pdf, accessed on July 24, 2025.
  5. . The India State-level disease burden initiative. Available from: https://phfi.org/the-work/research/the-india-state-level-disease-burden-initiative/, accessed on July 10, 2024.
  6. . National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21, India report. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR375/FR375.pdf, accessed on August 14, 2024.
  7. . National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16, India report. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR339/FR339.pdf, accessed on August 14, 2024.
  8. , , . Global socioeconomic inequality in the burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases and injuries: an analysis on global burden of disease study 2019. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1771.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , . The burden of non-communicable diseases: a scoping review focus on the context of India. J Educ Health Promot. 2023;12:41.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Metabolic non-communicable disease health report of India: The ICMR-INDIAB national cross-sectional study (ICMR-INDIAB-17) Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023;11:474-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. . Comparative analysis of dietary guidelines in the Spanish-Speaking Caribbean. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19:607-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. North and South American countries’ food-based dietary guidelines: a comparison. Nutrition. 2017;42:51-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Food-based dietary guidelines of Arabic-speaking countries: a culturally congruent profile. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22:1129-37.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. European food-based dietary guidelines: a comparison and update. Nutrition. 2015;31:908-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , . A global review of food-based dietary guidelines. Adv Nutr. 2019;10:590-605.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Comparison of dietary guidelines among 96 countries worldwide. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2021;109:219-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. . Eight key recommendations from dietary guidelines for Chinese Residents, 2022. Available from: https://en.chinacdc.cn/health_topics/nutrition_health/202206/t20220616_259702.html, accessed on August 2, 2024.
  18. . Eat for Health-Australian Dietary Guidelines. Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/australian-dietary-guidelines-2013.pdf, accessed on September 5, 2024.
  19. . Healthy and sustainable dietary recommendations supplemented with physical activity recommendations for the Spanish population. Eat healthy, move and take care of your planet. 2022. Available from: https://www.aesan.gob.es/AECOSAN/docs/documentos/nutricion/RECOMENDACIONES_DIETETICAS_EN.pdf, accessed on September 17, 2024.
  20. , , . An introduction to the revised food-based dietary guidelines for South Africa. S Afr J Clin Nutr. 2013;26:S1-S164.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. . Guidelines for healthy eating information for nutrition educators. Available from: https://www.nutritionweek.co.za/NNW2014/docs/NNW-2013-Nutrition%20Educators%20Guideline.pdf, accessed on September 19, 2024.
  22. . Manual for the application of dietary guidelines for the Argentine population. 2016. Available from: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/bancos/2020-08/guias-alimentarias-para-la-poblacion-argentina_manual-de-aplicacion_0.pdf, accessed on August 24, 2024.
  23. . Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025. (9th Edition).
  24. . Dietary guidelines. Available from: https://www.fao.org/nutrition/education/food-dietary-guidelines/home/en/, accessed on June 2, 2024.
  25. . Food fortification. Available from: https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumer/food-fortification, accessed on September 19, 2024.
  26. . Food Safety and Standards (Fortification of Foods) Regulations, 2018. Available from: https://www.fssai.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/Compendium_Food_Fortification_Regulations_30_09_2021.pdf, accessed on October 1, 2024.
  27. , , , , , , et al. Forecasting the prevalence of overweight and obesity in India by 2040. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0229438.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , . Evaluation of the effects of Chinese dietary guidelines on nutrition, environment and cost. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment. 2024;22:515-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , et al. Food groups and risk of all-cause mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Am J Clin. 2017;105:1462-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , . Adherence to food-based dietary guidelines: a systemic review of high-income and low- and middle-income countries. Nutrients. 2021;13:1038.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , et al. Dietary carbohydrate intake and mortality: a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2018;3:e419-28.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. . Cereal consumption over time in the country and across the States. Ind Jn of Agri Econ. 2006;61:1-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. . Survey on Household Consumption Expenditure Survey: 2022-23. Fact Sheet. Available from: https://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/Factsheet_HCES_2022-23.pdf, accessed on September 18, 2024.
  34. , , , , , , et al. White rice intake and incident diabetes: a study of 132,373 participants in 21 countries. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:2643-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , , et al. National noncommunicable disease monitoring survey (NNMS) in India: estimating risk factor prevalence in adult population. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0246712.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , , , et al. Tinned fruit consumption and mortality in three prospective cohorts. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117796.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , , , et al. Factors influencing household pulse consumption in India: A multilevel model analysis. Glob Food Sec. 2021;29:100534.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , et al. Meat consumption and incident type 2 diabetes: an individual-participant federated meta-analysis of 1·97 million adults with 100000 incident cases from 31 cohorts in 20 countries. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024;12:619-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , , , et al. Animal versus plant-based protein and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. Food Nutr Res. 2023;67
    [Google Scholar]
  40. . Health Benefits of Nut Consumption. Nutrients. 2010;2:652-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , , . Effects of tree nuts on blood lipids, apolipoproteins and blood pressure: systematic review, meta-analysis and dose-response of 61 controlled intervention trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102:1347-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. , , , , . Risks and benefits of increased nut consumption: cardiovascular health benefits outweigh the burden of carcinogenic effects attributed to aflatoxin b₁ exposure. Nutrients. 2017;9:1355.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. , , , , , , et al. Nut consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMC Med. 2016;14:207.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , , , . Milk and dairy products: good or bad for human health? An assessment of the totality of scientific evidence. Food Nutr Res. 2016;60:32527.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , . MILK symposium review: Milk consumption is associated with better height and weight in rural Nepali children over 60 months of age and better head circumference in children 24 to 60 months of age. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103:9700-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , , . Evidence on milk consumption and production linkages from rural Bihar, India. Curr Dev Nutr. 2024;8:102122.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. , , , , , , et al. Higher intake of dairy is associated with lower cardiometabolic risks and metabolic syndrome in Asian Indians. Nutrients. 2022;14:3699.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. . Healthy diet. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/healthy-diet, accessed on August 20, 2024.
  49. , , , , , , et al. Sources of dietary salt in North and South India estimated from 24 hour dietary recall. Nutrients. 2019;11:318.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , , , , et al. Sodium intake, blood pressure and dietary sources of sodium in an adult South Indian population. Ann Glob Health. 2016;82:234-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. , , , , , . Salt intake among women in an urban resettlement colony of Delhi. Indian J Public Health. 2020;64:393-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , , , , et al. Mean population salt consumption in India: a systematic review. J Hypertens. 2017;35:3-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. , , , . Food fortification in India as malnutrition concern: a global approach. Sustainable Food Technol. 2023;1:681-95.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. , , , , , , et al. A novel high-intensity short interval dance intervention (THANDAV) to improve physical fitness in Asian Indian adolescent girls. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021;23:623-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. , , , , , . Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity changes in a diabetes prevention intervention randomized trial among South Asians with prediabetes – The d-CLIP trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021;174:108727.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. , , . Dietary guideline adherence during preconception and pregnancy: a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 2020;16:e12916.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. , , , , . Dietary patterns in India: a systematic review. Br J Nutr. 2016;116:142-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. , . Nutrition education and counselling provided during pregnancy: effects on maternal, neonatal and child health outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26:191-204.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. , , , . How well do Australian women comply with dietary guidelines? Public Health Nutr. 2004;7:443-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. , , . Weight status and perception barriers to healthy physical activity and diet behavior. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32:343-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. . Developing and implementing dietary guidelines in India. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17:66-9.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top