Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
136 (
4
); 676-677
pmid:
23168711

Daptomycin susceptibility of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh 160 022, India
Department of Biotechnology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160 022, India

+For correspondence: Dr Vikas Gautam, 3243 / 21-D, Chandigarh 160 022, India r_vg@yahoo.co.uk

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important cause of nosocomial and community acquired infections. There is a growing concern about MRSA with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, which is currently the most extensively used antibiotic for its treatment12. Many reports have stated discrepancies between in vitro susceptibility test results for vancomycin and clinical outcomes of MRSA infections treated with it3. This has made treatment of MRSA infections difficult due to limited antibiotic choices left. Thus, there is a need for evaluating newer agents as alternatives to vancomycin.

Daptomycin has been approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA), USA in 2003 for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSTI) and later for the treatment of S. aureus bacteraemia and right-sided endocarditis3. This drug causes myotoxicity and cannot be used in respiratory infections. In various clinical trials, daptomycin proved to be as effective as vancomycin against MRSA15. We conducted this study to determine the in vitro activity of daptomycin against clinical isolates of MRSA obtained consecutively over a 6 month period beginning in January 2010. Sixty three MRSA, isolated from blood (33) and pus (30) in the department of Medical Microbiology, Post-graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, were included in this study. These isolates were identified using standard biochemical tests6 and by oxacillin screen agar7.

E-test was done to determine minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to daptomycin for these MRSA strains using E strips (AB BIODISK Solna, Sweden) on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 50 mg/l calcium (Difco, USA) due to daptomycin's dependence on calcium. S. aureus ATCC 29213 was also tested concurrently for quality control. The isolates were categorized as susceptible or resistant according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines7.

The MIC value for S. aureus ATCC 29213 was within the range 0.25-1 μg/ml. All 63 clinical MRSA isolates were susceptible to daptomycin with MIC <1 μg/ml (Table). At present, MRSA accounts for more than 60 per cent of S. aureus infections8. Johnson and colleagues9 looked at the activity of daptomycin against multi-drug resistant isolates and found MIC for all organisms to be <1 mg/l. Daptomycin was also found active against strains resistant to linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin10. In one of the first reports from India11, in vitro activity of daptomycin and selected comparator agents was studied against S. aureus and vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) isolates recovered from hospitalized patients with SSTI. Daptomycin was the most active agent against both S. aureus (MIC90, 1 μg/ml; 100% susceptible) and VRE (MIC90, 4 μg/ml; 100% susceptible), highlighting the importance of the drug as an excellent therapeutic option.

Table Distribution of the MICs for daptomycin determined by E-test for 63 isolates of MRSA

Daptomycin was found to be highly active against all the MRSA isolates tested suggesting that daptomycin testing to be included in routine S. aureus susceptibility testing panel. It could be an alternative to vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA infections for which it is not possible to use it due to resistance or nephrotoxicity34. Considering its safety profile and rapid bactericidal action, and also ease of administration with once daily dose, daptomycin may be useful for the treatment of severe infection caused by MRSA.

References

  1. , , , , , , . Daptomycin versus vancomycin for bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration: a case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:51-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Evaluation of vancomycin and daptomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and heterogeneously vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63:155-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:2398-402.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Daptomycin: a review 4 years after first approval. Pharmacology. 2008;81:79-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Clinical experience with daptomycin: bacteraemia and endocarditis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;62(Suppl 3):iii35-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Staphylococcus: cluster-forming Gram-positive cocci. In: , , , , eds. Mackie & McCartney practical medical Microbiology (14th ed). New York: Churchill Livingstone; . p. :245-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 20th informational supplement. In: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; .
    [Google Scholar]
  8. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:470-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Activity of daptomycin against multi-resistant Gram-positive bacteria including enterococci and Staphylococcus aureus resistant to linezolid. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004;24:315-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . In vitro activities of daptomycin, vancomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin against Staphylococci and Enterococci, including vancomycin- intermediate and -resistant strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:1062-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . In vitro activity of daptomycin against Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates associated with skin and soft tissue infections: first results from India. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;65:196-8.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    23

    PDF downloads
    6
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top