Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
162 (
6
); 881-887
doi:
10.25259/IJMR_474_2025

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) tumour expression in gastric carcinoma

Department of Pathology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

For correspondence: Dr Lawrence D’Cruze, Department of Pathology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College, Chennai 600 116, Tamil Nadu, India e-mail: drlawcruz@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Abstract

Background & objectives

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is an emerging therapeutic strategy for several malignancies, including gastric cancer, that hinges on immune checkpoint expression by the tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) is a well-known inhibitory T-cell co-receptor that functions as an immune checkpoint. CTLA-4 has also been found to be expressed by tumour cells making it a potential area of research for targeted therapy. We attempted to explore tumour cell CTLA-4 expression, and its correlation with programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) and CD8 expression by the TILs and their correlations with histopathological parameters in gastric carcinoma.

Methods

A retrospective study carried out on archived paraffin blocks from 50 cases of gastric adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed and interpreted by grading the marker expression on the basis of its intensity and proportion of tumour cells stained. The relationship between tumour cell CTLA-4 expression, PD-1, CD8 expression in TILs and the histopathological features of gastric carcinoma was evaluated statistically.

Results

Most patients (n=37, 74%) were males and aged >60 yr (n=22, 44%). A statistically significant association was noted between high CTLA-4 expression in tumour cells and higher tumour stage (P=0.017). All cases with high CTLA-4 expression in tumour cells demonstrated nodal metastasis. CTLA-4 did not show a statistically meaningful association with other histopathological parameters. Positive PD-1 expression in TILs did not show a significant association with tumour aggression in terms of tumour grade, histologic type, nodal metastasis, lymphovascular and perineural invasion. Most TILs were found to be CD8+ T-cells.

Interpretation & conclusions

A higher CTLA-4 expression in tumour cells is linked to advanced tumour stage in our study. These findings can trigger research to elucidate a likely role of these markers as independent prognostic and therapeutic factors in determining overall outcome in gastric carcinoma.

Keywords

CTLA-4
gastric carcinoma
immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy
PD-1
TILs

Gastric carcinoma is the fifth most prevalent cancer diagnosed with associated cancer mortality ranking fourth worldwide. As per GLOBOCAN 2020 data, 1.1 million new gastric carcinoma cases were diagnosed globally in 20201. India has shown a trend towards increase in gastrointestinal malignancies and gastric carcinoma is a significant contributor. Roughly 34,000 cases are diagnosed in India every year, with a male predominance2. Five-year survival rates of early-stage gastric cancers treated with curative resection approaches 90 per cent, although a palliative approach is adopted for higher stage malignancies3. Advanced gastric carcinoma in India is associated with a reduced five-year survival rate (20%)4.

In recent years, there have been several developments in the therapeutic approach to advanced gastric cancer including chemotherapy and radiotherapy that are employed as adjuvant treatment or given post resection3,5. Research is now focused on the development of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy against immunosuppressors. Extensive studies on tumour microenvironment have uncovered how cancer cells utilize multiple strategies to escape immune system surveillance including ‘immunoediting’ and expression of a plethora of immunosuppressive markers, some of which are also found on tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), the targets of ICI therapy6. ICI therapy acts by enhancing host immune response against tumour.

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) is an immunosuppressive receptor that is expressed on activated T-cells. CD80 and CD86 expressed on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) engage the CTLA-4 receptor resulting in the blockade of the early stages of T-cell activation in a physiological setting preserving peripheral tolerance. CTLA-4 is involved in tumour immunity via the same pathway leading to the downregulation of T-cells7. Anti-CTLA-4 therapies override the suppressive action of CTLA-4 receptor on T-cells. Ipilimumab and tremelimumab are Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved anti-CTLA-4 drugs used for treatment of certain malignancies, including unresectable melanoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and hepatocellular carcinoma, in which they demonstrated significant improvement in progression free survival (PFS) of the patients8-10. Trials are in progress to evaluate their effectiveness in advanced gastric malignancies11,12. Several studies have identified that occasionally malignant cells show surface expression of CTLA-413. A literature search revealed contradictory data with regards to the significance of CTLA-4 tumour cell expression. It was shown to be associated with a better prognosis and improved overall survival in a few instances, while few studies reported tumour cell CTLA-4 expression to be associated with a poor prognosis and overall survival14-17. These findings reveal that the exact role of CTLA-4 expression on tumour cell surface and its pathway of action in immune surveillance evasion, if any, remains poorly characterised13.

Activated cytotoxic T-cells express another inhibitory co-receptor, programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1). The PD-1 receptor has two ligands, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed death-ligand 2 (PD-L2), expressed ubiquitously by macrophages and various other cell populations, including certain malignant cells. On binding by its ligands, PD-1 suppresses T-cell function in their effector phase and induces T cell apoptosis, limiting immune response and thus maintaining peripheral tolerance7,18. Expression of PD-L1 by tumour cells is an important pathway of immune evasion by malignancies and constitutes the PD-1/PD-L1 axis19. Malignancies expressing PD-L1 often show a higher tumour size, presence of nodal metastasis and poorer overall survival, underscoring their utility as potential targets of ICI therapy11,20-23. FDA has also approved ICI targeting PD-1 receptors, such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, and these are implemented in tumours with PD-1 positive TILs8,22. The potential synergistic benefits of combining anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapy is being investigated in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma12,24,25.

In this study, we attempted to analyse the CTLA-4 expression by gastric tumour cells and the expression of PD-1 and CD8 by TILs and the potential correlations of these markers with other histopathological parameters.

Materials & Methods

Study design

This retrospective, observational analysis was conducted at the department of Pathology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. The study was carried out on 50 archived paraffin blocks of cases diagnosed as primary gastric adenocarcinoma in resection specimens. The cases for the study were selected over a three-year period (July 2020 to July 2023). Institutional ethical clearance was secured prior to commencement of the study.

Case selection criteria and data collection process

Gastrectomy specimens diagnosed as primary gastric adenocarcinoma across all grades with the presence of tumour infiltrating immune cells (TILs), irrespective of adjuvant therapy status, were included in this study. Criteria for exclusion comprised endoscopic gastric biopsies, tumour resections lacking infiltrating lymphocytes and tumour blocks with extensive necrosis. The sample size was established at 50, ensuring an absolute precision of 10 per cent. Relevant clinical data of the patient including age, gender, and tumour location were retrieved from the hospital information system. Histopathological details were obtained from histopathological case files.

Methodology

Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections of cases diagnosed as primary gastric adenocarcinoma were retrieved, reviewed and appropriate blocks with representative sections of the tumour showing presence of TILs were selected.

IHC markers analysed were, monoclonal rabbit anti-human CTLA-4 antibody (Clone- IHC064), monoclonal mouse anti-human PD-1 antibody (Clone- IHC001), and monoclonal mouse anti-human CD8 antibody (Clone- IHC542) which were procured from GenomeMe Lab Inc. The IHC markers were pre-diluted, optimized and ready to use. The expression of each marker was standardized using tonsil as positive control tissue (as per provider recommendation). In the control tissue, CTLA-4 showed a membranous pattern of staining in the lymphocytes and PD-1 showed cytoplasmic and membranous staining. T-cells in the control tissue showed strong membranous staining for CD8.

IHC staining was performed on all 50 cases manually, in multiple batches along with controls, using 100 µL of primary antibody per sample. The IHC expression was graded and scored by two pathologists independently.

Assessment of CTLA-4 expression in gastric tumour cells

The tumour cells showed cell surface expression of CTLA-4 in a cytoplasmic and membranous pattern. The scoring system utilized by Zhang et al16 was employed. CTLA-4 tumour cell expression was assessed based on intensity of staining and the proportion of tumour cells stained.

Intensity of CTLA-4 expression was scored as 0 (no expression), 1 (weak expression), 2 (moderate expression), and 3 (strong expression). Tumour cell proportion was scored as 0 (0-5% of tumour cells), 1 (5-25% of tumour cells), 2 (25-50 per cent of tumour cells), and 3 (>50% of tumour cells).

Sum of intensity and proportion scores were taken and graded as scores 0-1: negative, scores 2-3: weakly positive, scores 4-5: moderately positive, and score 6: strongly positive. Scores 4 and above were considered as cases with high CTLA-4 expression in tumour cells. Scores below 4 were taken as low/no expression of CTLA-4.

Assessment of PD-1 expression in TILs

Immune cells with positive PD-1 expression showed uniform, membranous staining. A PD-1 positivity of 1 per cent and above was taken into consideration among the CD8+ TILs. Positivity less than 1 per cent was categorized as negative26.

Assessment of CD8+ TILs

The CD8+ T-cells showed uniform, membranous staining. Only CD8+ T-cells infiltrating the tumour were considered as positive.

Statistical analysis of results and data

The data collected were tabulated using Microsoft Excel sheet (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA) and analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Fisher’s exact test and Chi square test were employed to analyse the associations between CTLA-4 expression in tumour cells with PD-1, CD8 expression in TILs. The association between variables was considered significant when the P value was less than or equal to 0.05.

Results

Among our study population, the age group with the highest frequency was 61-70 yr, comprising 44 per cent (n=22). The mean age of the participants was 60.8 yr, with a standard deviation of 10.9 yr. Males comprised the majority of the study population (74%, n=37). Pyloric tumours were the most common, which includes antral tumours extending into the pylorus (each 24%, n=12), while tumours of the body and cardia were less common. The most prevalent histologic type was the intestinal type, observed in 58 per cent (n=29) of the sample. Moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated tumours were found in near equal proportions among the study population (Figs. 1A-D). A significant proportion of tumours belonged to the pT3 stage (penetrates subserosa connective tissue, no invasion of visceral peritoneum, adjacent structures) (46%, n=23). Most of the tumours demonstrated presence of lymphovascular invasion (58%, n=29) and nodal metastasis was present in 76 per cent (n=38) of the study population.

(A and B) Sections from gastric carcinoma showing moderately differentiated, invasive neoplastic glands (H&E, 400×); (C) Poorly differentiated gastric carcinoma with occasional signet ring cells and extracellular mucin (H&E, 400×); (D) Invasive malignant glands with TILs (H&E, 400×). TILs, tumour infiltrating lymphocytes; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.
Fig. 1.
(A and B) Sections from gastric carcinoma showing moderately differentiated, invasive neoplastic glands (H&E, 400×); (C) Poorly differentiated gastric carcinoma with occasional signet ring cells and extracellular mucin (H&E, 400×); (D) Invasive malignant glands with TILs (H&E, 400×). TILs, tumour infiltrating lymphocytes; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.

CTLA-4 expression on tumour cells (Figs. 2A-D) and PD-1 expression in TILs (Fig. 3; 3A) did not show a statistically significant association in this study population (Table I). PD-1 in TILs did not show statistically significant correlation with the histopathological parameters (Table II). Among the cases studied, 98 per cent (n=49) showed presence of CD8+ TILs (Fig. 3B).

CTLA-4 expression in tumour cells (A) Score 0 (No expression) (IHC, 400×); (B) Score 1 (Weak expression) (IHC, 400×); (C) Score 2 (Moderate expression) (IHC, 400×); (D) Score 3 (Strong expression) (IHC, 400×). CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4; IHC, immunohistochemistry.
Fig. 2.
CTLA-4 expression in tumour cells (A) Score 0 (No expression) (IHC, 400×); (B) Score 1 (Weak expression) (IHC, 400×); (C) Score 2 (Moderate expression) (IHC, 400×); (D) Score 3 (Strong expression) (IHC, 400×). CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4; IHC, immunohistochemistry.
(A) PD-1 positive TILs (IHC, 400×); (B) CD8+ TILs (IHC, 400×). PD-1, programmed cell death receptor 1; TILs, tumour infiltrating lymphocytes.
Fig. 3.
(A) PD-1 positive TILs (IHC, 400×); (B) CD8+ TILs (IHC, 400×). PD-1, programmed cell death receptor 1; TILs, tumour infiltrating lymphocytes.
Table I. Association between CTLA-4 expression in tumour cells and PD-1, CD8 expression in TILs
CD8+ TILs
PD-1
Positive Negative P value Positive Negative P value
CTLA-4 Low/no 41 0 0.18 28 13 0.467
High 8 1 5 4
PD-1 Positive 33 0 0.34
Negative 16 1

CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4; PD-1, programmed cell death receptor-1; TILs, tumour infiltrating lymphocytes

Table II. Association of CTLA-4, PD-1 and CD8 expression with histopathological parameters
CTLA-4
PD-1
CD8
Low/No High P value Positive Negative P value Positive Negative
Histological type Intestinal 25 4 0.084 18 11 0.651 28 1
Diffuse 16 4 14 6 20 0
Mixed 0 1 1 0 1 0
Grade Grade 2 20 4 1.000 16 8 0.126 23 1
Grade 3 21 5 17 9 26 0
T stage T1a (Invades lamina propria) 1 0 0.076 0 1 0.586 1 0
T1b (invades submucosa) 4 0 2 2 4 0
T2 (invades muscularis propria) 7 1 6 2 8 0
T3 (Penetrates subserosal connective tissue, no invasion of visceral peritoneum, adjacent structures) 21 2 16 7 22 1
T4a (Invades serosa/visceral peritoneum) 8 6 9 5 14 0
Lympho vascular invasion Present 22 7 0.271 16 12 0.238 29 0
Absent 19 2 17 5 20 1
Perineural invasion Present 14 6 0.13 11 9 0.229 20 0
Absent 27 3 22 8 29 1
Lymph node status Involved 29 9 0.092 25 13 1.000 37 1
Uninvolved 12 0 8 4 12 0

T stage, tumour stage

High CTLA-4 expression on tumour cells was seen in 9/50 cases (18%). The tumours invading the lamina propria (pT1a) or limited to the submucosa (pT1b) did not express CTLA-4 (Table II). High CTLA4 expression was observed in 2 out of 23 cases (8.7%) among the pT3 group and in 6 out of 14 cases (42.9%) among the pT4a group. There was no significant association between CTLA-4 expression and tumour extent (P=0.076). On reassessing the CTLA-4 expression among high stage tumours (pT3 and pT4a), a statistically significant association (P=0.017) was observed between high tumour CTLA-4 expression and tumour invasiveness (Table III). CTLA-4 expression did not correlate significantly with the other histopathological parameters (Table II).

Table III. Association of CTLA-4 expression with high tumour stage
T stage CTLA-4 expression P value
Low/N o expression High expression 0.017
pT3 21 2
pT4a 8 6

Discussion

In our study population, tumours with high CTLA-4 expression on correlation with tumour extent suggested a trend (P=0.076) towards meaningful association. Higher CTLA-4 expression was predominantly documented in tumours invading serosa (pT4a), followed by tumours invading the subserosal connective tissue (pT3). Strikingly tumours with invasion limited to the lamina propria or submucosa did not show high CTLA-4 expression. A revised analysis for CTLA-4 expression among only high stage tumours revealed a statistically significant association (P= 0.017). A study published in 2018 explored the expression of CTLA-4 in NSCLC tumour cells and its role in tumourigenesis. CTLA-4 tumour expression resulted in the upregulation of EGFR pathway, increased tumour PD-L1 expression and tumour proliferation, in the presence of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies27. High tumour CTLA-4 expression has been associated with poorer prognosis and overall survival in oesophageal and thymic malignancies16,17. Similar results have not, however, been replicated in prior research done on gastric carcinoma. Occasional publications have reported an association between low/no CTLA-4 expression in tumour cells of gastric carcinoma and aggressive tumour characteristics (such as a higher tumour grade and diffuse Lauren histological type), a finding not reflected in our data28. In other studies, high CTLA-4 expression in the tumour has been linked to less aggressive features, such as lower tumour stage, better differentiation and intestinal-type histology29,30. However, bearing in mind that there is lacunae in published research of similar studies undertaken in India and therefore among a comparable study population, our findings suggest significance. While our findings show discord from those previously reported in gastric carcinoma, the role of targeted therapy against CTLA-4 in high stage tumours would be a question of profitable debate in terms of patient management.

Anti-PD-1 therapy is yet another ICI therapeutic option that enhances anti-tumour immunity by overcoming the inhibitory effect of PD-1 receptor expressed by activated T-cells8. PD-1 is especially notorious since the tumour cells in gastric carcinoma are known to express its ligand PD-L119. PD-1 expression was analysed by IHC in the same zones showing presence of CD8+ TILs. All cases with PD-1 positive TILs (33/50) were positive for CD8. Significantly higher PD-1 expression in tumours has been observed with increased CD4+ and CD8+ TILs. Existing publications have correlated higher PD-1 expression in TILs with tumour progression19. The association between PD-1 and CD8+ TILs and clinicopathological features in gastric carcinoma has been explored in prior research, generally finding no statistically significant correlation between PD-1 expression on TILs and factors such as histologic type, tumour aggression and extent, lymph node status, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion. Our results are in alignment with these observations31.

CD8+ TILs were observed in 98 per cent cases (n=49) in our study group. Previous studies have linked the presence of increased CD8+ TILs with good prognosis and their presence also qualifies them as potential candidates for ICI therapy32.

As previously outlined, CTLA-4 is an inhibitory co-receptor that acts during T-cell activation and is expressed by tumour cells of several malignancies although its functional path remains unclear. In our study, high CTLA-4 expression in tumour cells demonstrated a statistically significant association with gastric tumours of advanced stage. Though in conflict with prior studies, we can conclude that this finding indicates the need for further research conducted on a larger cohort with the goal to analyse the potential relationship between gastric tumour CTLA-4 expression and prognosis as well as its effect on overall survival. The utility of these markers on small gastric biopsies in order to identify targets for ICI therapy to downstage the disease also remain to be explored.

Our study is not without its limitations. These include the potential inconclusive nature of the results obtained due to the limited sample size. Since ICI therapy was not employed in treatment of the patients, its benefit among the cases with CD8+ TILs could not be examined. Furthermore, correlation of IHC expression of CTLA-4, PD-1 and CD8 in TILs could not be comprehensively evaluated pertaining to their effect on prognosis due to the limited availability of long-term clinical follow-up data for the study cohort.

Financial support & sponsorship

None.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of AI-assisted technology for assisting in the writing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , . Epidemiology of stomach cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28:1187-203.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Indian council of medical research consensus document for the management of gastric cancer. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2014;35:239-43.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  3. The gastrointestinal tract. In: , , , eds. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease. Elsevier; . p. :774-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Management of gastric cancer in Indian population. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2:64.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Gastric adenocarcinoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours: Digestive system tumours. Int Agency Res on Cancer; . p. :85-95.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646-74.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , . CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways: similarities, differences, and implications of their inhibition. Am J Clin Oncol. 2016;39:98-106.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Review of indications of FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors per NCCN guidelines with the level of evidence. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:738.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. FDA-approved monoclonal antibodies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: What do we know so far? Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:2685.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  10. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves tremelimumab in combination with durvalumab and platinum-based chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-tremelimumab-combination-durvalumab-and-platinum-based-chemotherapy-metastatic-non, accessed on June 15, 2025.
  11. , , . Immunotherapeutic strategies for gastric carcinoma: A review of preclinical and clinical recent development. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:5791262.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy for gastric cancer: Research progress. Oncol Lett. 2020;20:46.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Beyond T-cells: Functional characterization of CTLA-4 expression in immune and non-immune cell types. Front Immunol. 2020;11:608024.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . CTLA-4 expression by human tumor cells and its impact on immunotherapeutic strategies: A systematic review. Immuno-oncology Insights. 2021;2:151-69.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. CTLA4 expression profiles and their association with clinical outcomes of breast cancer: A systemic review. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024;106:263-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 expression in esophageal carcinoma: Implications for prognosis. Oncotarget. 2016;7:26670-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. High CTLA-4 expression correlates with poor prognosis in thymoma patients. Oncotarget. 2018;9:16665-77.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . The PD-1:PD-L1 immune inhibitory checkpoint in Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer: A comprehensive review and future perspectives. Porto Biomed J. 2016;1:4-11.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , . PD-1/PD-L1 pathway: Current researches in cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2020;10:727-42.
    [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. Prognostic significance of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression in epithelial-originated cancer: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e515.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , et al. PD-L1 and gastric cancer prognosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0182692.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , . The new era of immunotherapy in gastric cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14:1054.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . Prognostic significance of PD-L1 in solid tumor: An updated meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e6369.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , . Patients with positive HER-2 amplification advanced gastroesophageal junction cancer achieved complete response with combined chemotherapy of AK104/cadonilimab (PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific): A case report. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1049518.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , et al. Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab and adjuvant nivolumab in localized deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: The GERCOR NEONIPIGA phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:255-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , . Tumorinfiltrating lymphocyte expression of PD-1 predicts response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. J Immunother Precis Oncol. 2022;5:90-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , et al. Tumour cell-intrinsic CTLA4 regulates PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23:535-42.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , et al. Immune checkpoints programmed death 1 ligand 1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated molecule 4 in gastric adenocarcinoma. Oncoimmunology. 2015;5:e1100789.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , et al. Prognostic implications of immunosuppressive protein expression in tumors as well as immune cell infiltration within the tumor microenvironment in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:42-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , et al. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression in gastric adenocarcinoma is a poor prognostic factor in a high CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes group. Oncotarget. 2016;7:80426-34.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , et al. PD-1 does not mark tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cell dysfunction in human gastric cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8:e000422.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , . Prognostic role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e11769.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top