Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
147 (
3
); 312-314
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2004_16

Creation of monosodium iodoacetate-induced model of osteoarthritis in rabbit knee joint

Department of Physiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Orthopaedics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
Centre for Stem Cell Research, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
Division of Experimental Pathology, Biomedical Technology Wing, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences & Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India

*For correspondence: jpboopy@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Sir,

Osteoarthritis (OA), commonly known as degenerative joint disease, is the most common type of arthritis. Knee OA is one of the most common disabling diseases1. The aetiology of OA is partly known, and the precise pathological mechanism responsible for cartilage loss and degradation is not fully understood. The inability to reproduce an animal model that can simulate both the symptoms and histopathology of knee OA has hampered the understanding of the disease. The rabbit models of knee OA are broadly of two types, namely, mechanical (transection of anterior cruciate ligament in the knee joint23) and chemical (intra-articular injection of chymopapain and collagenase456). Intra-articular injection of monosodium iodoacetate (MIA) has been described for the creation of OA animal model237. Unlike the other models, the stage of OA can be controlled with the MIA by titrating the dose injected intra-articularly. Although this model (chemical model) has been described in rat knees78910, it has not been described in rabbit knees. This study describes the creation of various stages of OA in rabbit knees using titrated doses of MIA.

Approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (Christian Medical College, Vellore) and the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee. The study was conducted at the College Animal House Facility and Centre for Stem Cell Research, Christian Medical College, Vellore. The inclusion criteria for the study were as follows: male New Zealand white (NZW) adult rabbits above 7±1 months of age, weighing ≥1.5 kg with normal weight-bearing functions and veterinarian health inspection clearance. From a source population of 15, three adult NZW rabbits (five knees) were randomly selected. The rabbits were monitored closely, maintained at standard conditions and were allowed to move freely with free access to food and water. The duration of the study for the purpose of standardization of the ideal dose for creation of OA in the knee model was over three months (November 2015 to January 2016). The rabbits were anaesthetized using intramuscular (IM) injection of 50 mg/kg ketamine and 4 mg/kg of two per cent xylazine. Under sterile aseptic precautions, a single intra-articular injection of MIA reconstituted in sterile water was given. The dose and reconstitution are shown in Table.

Table Dose of monosodium iodoacetate (MIA) given in rabbit knee joint

Injection meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg) was given subcutaneously for post-procedure analgesia immediately after the procedure and was repeated.

Following sedation, the animals were euthanized with a lethal dose of IM ketamine on the 28th day post-MIA injection. Under sterile conditions, arthrocentesis was performed, where 150 μl of sterile water for injection was injected into the knee joints and synovial fluid was aspirated. The biological sample was immediately stored at −80°C for S100A12 protein analysis. The knee joints were removed, fixed with buffered formalin, decalcified in formic acid and embedded in paraffin. Five-micrometre sections in the transverse plane were prepared and stained with haematoxylin and eosin and safranin O.

Synovial fluid S100A12 is a specific biomarker to diagnose OA and also predict the severity of OA111213. The level of S100A12 was measured using commercially available rabbit protein S100A12 ELISA kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (MyBioSource, Cusabio, China). OA severity assessment was done using the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) OA cartilage histopathology assessment system and expression of synovial fluid S100A12 protein12131415. According to the OARSI OA cartilage histopathological system, the control knee without MIA (Fig. A1 and A2), 2.5 mg of MIA/250 μl and 3 mg of MIA/50 μl showed no change. A dose of 4 mg MIA in 50 μl of sterile water in adult rabbit (Fig. B1 and B2) showed Grade 1 changes. The changes included an intact surface with focal superficial fibrillations. The chondrocytes, chondron columns were arranged regularly in superficial, mid and deep zones with the tide mark appearing in the mid zone. The subchondral bone showed irregular trabeculae. The 4 mg dose of MIA in 250 μl sterile water showed Grade 3 changes (Fig. C1 and C2). The changes included surface discontinuity, difficulty in appreciating superficial and mid zone, deep fibrillations extending into the deep zone, empty lacunae with hypocellularity and disorientation of chondron columns, loss of subchondral bone density and safranin O stain depletion into the lower two-thirds of the cartilage.

Haematoxylin-eosin (A1, B1 and C1) and safranin O (A2, B2 and C2) staining of articular cartilage of rabbit knee, (scale bar=50 μm). A1 and A2 showing normal articular cartilage from control rabbit knee (Grade 0 as per Osteoarthritis Research Society International grading). B1 and B2, 28-day post-injection of 4 mg of monosodium iodoacetate in 50 μl of sterile water showing Grade 1 changes as per Osteoarthritis Research Society International grading. C1 and C2, 28-day post-injection of 4 mg of monosodium iodoacetate in 250 μl of sterile water showing Grade 3 changes as per Osteoarthritis Research Society International grading.
Figure
Haematoxylin-eosin (A1, B1 and C1) and safranin O (A2, B2 and C2) staining of articular cartilage of rabbit knee, (scale bar=50 μm). A1 and A2 showing normal articular cartilage from control rabbit knee (Grade 0 as per Osteoarthritis Research Society International grading). B1 and B2, 28-day post-injection of 4 mg of monosodium iodoacetate in 50 μl of sterile water showing Grade 1 changes as per Osteoarthritis Research Society International grading. C1 and C2, 28-day post-injection of 4 mg of monosodium iodoacetate in 250 μl of sterile water showing Grade 3 changes as per Osteoarthritis Research Society International grading.

The corresponding synovial fluid analysis of S100A12 protein biomarker showed comparable expression levels. Four milligram MIA in 250 μl showed 4×103-fold expression of S100A12 as compared to control. The other doses of MIA in variable volumes showed results similar to the control joint. Although 4 mg/50 μl showed Grade 1 changes on histology, it did not show S100A12 expression greater than the control levels.

The results obtained in this study showed that the stage of OA in rabbit knee joint could be successfully reproduced by intra-articular injection of MIA. The commonly described animal model of OA involves transection of anterior cruciate ligament in the knee joint (mechanical model) and the ensuing mechanical instability results in cartilage damage23. The treatment of the mechanical OA model with cell-based therapy does not address the persistent mechanical instability due to the transaction of cruciate ligament.

In rabbits, the other chemical induced models of knee OA include intra-articular injection of chymopapain and collagenase456. In chymopapain-induced OA, the mechanism of cartilage degeneration remains unclear requiring high doses. Collagenase has been reported to show dose-dependent OA changes, but its ability to damage other joint structures such as tendons, ligaments and menisci results in joint instability. The presence of collagenase inhibiting factors in vivo also limits its ability to produce a stable OA model5. MIA has been described for creation of OA in the temporomandibular joints of rabbits237, but not for rabbit knees. Our results showed dose-dependent histopathological changes. This chemical model of MIA-induced OA was dependent both on the dose and the final reconstituted volume used for injection. The volume of vehicle seemed to play a vital role probably by causing a uniform distribution of the chemical, thus increasing its availability to induce the inflammatory changes. Synovial fluid S100A12 protein, which is a specific biomarker to diagnose OA and predict the severity of OA, was also elevated12.

The limitations of our study included the sample size and minimal volume of retrievable synovial fluid which was just sufficient for protein analysis. Although the number of rabbits used for each arm was less, this pilot study showed that MIA could be used to create an effective model of OA in rabbit knee joints. Further studies can create the stages of OA by titrating the dose based on our preliminary results. This chemical model also offers a rapid and minimally invasive method of creating a rabbit knee model of early OA, a stage in disease condition where targeted research could offer prospective results. In conclusion, intra-articular injection of MIA into rabbit knee joints can be used to create an experimental model of OA. This model can be used to study more about the pathogenesis of OA and develop effective treatment options for the same.

Financial support & sponsorship: This study (Ref: AOTAP15-24) was funded by AO Trauma Asia Pacific Grant, Hong Kong.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , , , , . Insurer and out-of-pocket costs of osteoarthritis in the US: Evidence from national survey data. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:3546-53.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Animal models of osteoarthritis. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2001;1:363-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Animal model of osteoarthritis. J Rheum Dis. 2012;19:239-47.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Collagenase and sodium iodoacetate-induced experimental osteoarthritis model in Sprague Dawley rats. Asian J Sci Res. 2009;2:167-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Intra-articular injection of collagenase induces experimental osteoarthritis in mature rabbits. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1998;6:177-86.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . The effect of bone remodeling inhibition by zoledronic acid in an animal model of cartilage matrix damage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002;10:226-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Rabbit model for osteoarthrosis of the temporomandibular joint as a basis for assessment of outcomes after intervention. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54:e33-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Animal models of osteoarthritis: Classification, update, and measurement of outcomes. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11:19.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Application of in vivo micro-computed tomography in the temporal characterisation of subchondral bone architecture in a rat model of low-dose monosodium iodoacetate-induced osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13:R210.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Pre-emptive, early, and delayed alendronate treatment in a rat model of knee osteoarthritis: Effect on subchondral trabecular bone microarchitecture and cartilage degradation of the tibia, bone/cartilage turnover, and joint discomfort. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:1595-604.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Increased plasma S100A12 (EN-RAGE) levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:5423-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Role of S100A12 in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;422:508-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . S100A12 levels in synovial fluid may reflect clinical severity in patients with primary knee osteoarthritis. Biomarkers. 2013;18:216-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , . Osteoarthritis cartilage histopathology: Grading and staging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14:1-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . Osteoarthritis cartilage histopathology: Grading and staging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14:13-29.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    25

    PDF downloads
    12
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top