Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Practice: Original Article
156 (
3
); 535-542
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2556_19

Cingulum bundle integrity in schizophrenia with auditory verbal hallucinations: A diffusion tensor imaging tractographic study

Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Department of Neuroimaging & Interventional Neuroradiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

For correspondence: Dr Raman Deep, Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029, India e-mail: drramandeep@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

Cingulum bundle (CB) is frequently implicated in schizophrenia; however, its role in specific symptoms of schizophrenia such as auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) is less explored. Few studies have reported association between reduced integrity of CB and severity of AVH. Using a symptom-based approach, this diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractographic study was aimed to assess and compare the integrity of CB in schizophrenia with AVH, schizophrenia without AVH and healthy controls.

Methods:

A total of 92 right-handed adult individuals (aged 18-50 yr) were recruited across three study groups. Those with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) diagnosis of schizophrenia with AVH (group I; n=30) were compared to those with DSM-5 schizophrenia without lifetime AVH (group II; n=32) and healthy controls (group III; n=30; screened using Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview version-7.0.0. and negative family history). Clinical assessments (groups I and II) included scale for assessment of positive symptoms, scale for assessment of negative symptoms, clinical global impression-schizophrenia and psychotic symptom rating scale. All participants underwent DTI, and quantitative tract-based measurements of fractional anisotropy (FA) were obtained for images using DTI studio version-3.0.

Results:

All groups were comparable for age, gender, education and severity of illness. Group I had significantly lower FA values in the cingulate gyrus (CG) part of the left CB compared to groups II and III. No significant difference was found between groups II and III.

Interpretation & conclusions:

The findings of this study suggest that the disruption in the left CB appears to be specific for AVH-positive schizophrenia. The finding is, however, preliminary subject to replication in future studies. Further investigations are needed to understand its relevance in the context of AVH-positive schizophrenia.

Keywords

Auditory hallucinations
diffusion tensor imaging
fractional anisotropy
schizophrenia
white matter integrity

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based neuroimaging studies in schizophrenia have consistently reported disruptions of several white matter tracts in individuals with schizophrenia1,2. However, only a few studies have assessed the white matter disruptions in relation to specific psychotic symptoms such as auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs)3,4. Understanding the neural mechanisms for AVH is of considerable interest and requires a symptom-based approach5.

The cingulum bundle (CB) is a major white matter tract that connects the neocortex (e.g. cingulate gyrus) with the limbic system, possibly acting as a bridge between emotion and cognition6. Initially thought to be a unitary tract, more recently, it has been observed that fibers from the cingulum bundle project posteriorly to entorhinal cortex and temporal lobe (posterior cingulum) and anteriorly to pre-motor, pre-frontal regions and the striatum (anterior cingulum)7,8. The disconnection seen in these fibers, which connect the limbic system and the cortical regions, could lead to internally self-generated thoughts being misinterpreted as externally generated sensory stimulus. This in turn could be a contributory factor towards development of psychotic symptoms913.

Reduced integrity of cingulum, especially anteriorly, has been frequently reported in studies on schizophrenia1418. Not much literature is, however, available on its relationship with AVH. The PubMed/Medline-based search [using search terms ‘Diffusion Tensor Imaging’ (Mesh) AND auditory hallucinations (All Fields) AND cingulum (All Fields)], supplemented by cross-reference search from relevant reviews9,19, yielded only a few relevant studies2025. Further, available studies reporting such an association have inferred it from correlations between AVH scale scores and reduced integrity of CB as part of their analysis, rather than pre-defined symptom-based groups with AVH as a defining criterion.

The present study was aimed to compare the integrity of CB, using quantitative tract measurements of fractional anisotropy (FA), among AVH-positive, AVH-negative schizophrenia patients and healthy controls.

Material & Methods

Study participants were recruited from the outpatient clinic and inpatient settings from the department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, and their DTI assessments were carried out at the department of Neuroimaging and Interventional Neuroradiology at the same institute. The data were collected from July 2015 to July 2016. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and a written informed consent was obtained from all the participants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A part of the study was conducted on two other fasciculi (arcuate and superior longitudinal), the findings of which have been described elsewhere4.

Study groups and selection criteria: The study sample comprised of three study groups, viz. group I-AVH-positive schizophrenia, group II AVH-negative schizophrenia and group III healthy controls, with pre-defined selection criteria, as described below.

Right-handed individuals of either gender, aged between 18 and 50 yr, with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5)26 diagnosis of schizophrenia with total duration of illness of at least two or more years were selected. Group I included individuals with schizophrenia who had significant lifetime/current AVH (operationally defined as hallucinations present for at least 50 per cent of days in current month and in previous exacerbation/s of illness). Group II included individuals with schizophrenia with no lifetime AVH [operationally defined as a score of 0 for auditory hallucinations on scale for assessment of positive symptoms (SAPS) along with no history of ‘hearing voices’ as per patient and corroborated from family and treatment records, wherever possible]. Group III consisted of healthy controls with no psychiatric diagnosis as per Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview I (MINI) version 7.0.027 and no family history of psychiatric illness. Healthy controls were selected from non-biological relatives and acquaintances of patients after an informed consent.

Patients with an ambiguous or transitory history of AVH, current history of any major psychiatric disorder (other than schizophrenia in groups I and II) and lifetime history of any major psychiatric disorder (other than schizophrenia and major depression in groups I and II) and nicotine dependence in all groups were excluded from the study. Those with history of receiving electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or any other neuromodulatory treatment were also excluded from the study. Those with intellectual disability and significant neurological or medical illness were excluded in addition to standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exclusions (e.g. metallic implants).

Screening and clinical assessment: Patients were screened using MINI 7.0.027 and Edinburgh’s handedness inventory28. For clinical assessment, a semi-structured proforma was used for relevant sociodemographic and clinical variables. Clinical assessments included SAPS29, scale for assessment of negative symptoms (SANS)30, clinical global impression-schizophrenia-severity31 and psychotic symptom rating scale (PSYRATS)32. Assessment instruments were applied in a single session. The DTI was done within one week of clinical assessments by prior appointment.

MRI data acquisition: A 3T (Tesla) MRI (Ingenia; Philips Medical Systems, Netherlands) was performed by using a 32-channel head coil. DTI was performed using a single-shot echo-planar sequence with the array sensitivity – encoding technique. Motion-probing gradient orientations were applied along at least 32 directions, and the b factor was set at 1000 sec/mm2. Acquisition parameters were repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE), 8000/83.3 msec; bandwidth, 143 kHz; matrix size, 128 × 128; section thickness, 2 mm without intersection gap; field of view, 30 × 30 cm and number of excisions, 2.

MRI data analysis: The DTI datasets were processed using DTI studio version-3.033 (developed and distributed by Prof Mori’s laboratory) after transfer to a computer with windows platform. The details of MRI analysis have been described elsewhere4.

Statistical analysis: Data analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version-20.0 (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA). Power analysis for one-way ANOVA was conducted in G-POWER34, to determine a sufficient sample size using an alpha of 0.05, a power of 90 per cent, an effect size of 0.4 (using Cohen’s convention) and two tails. There was an equal allocation of participants into each group. Based on the aforementioned assumptions, the desired sample size came out to be 84. To keep a margin for visual artefacts, or wasting of MRI films, a margin of 10 per cent was taken, which came to a total sample size of 84+8=92. Hence, a sample of at least 30 patients in each group was planned as part of the study. FA values were exported from DTI studio and analyzed using SPSS. The Shapiro-Wilk test was done to test for normality of the data (Supplementary Tables IV). For the descriptive data, means, standard deviations, frequencies, percentages, medians and ranges were used to describe the data. For finding associations and correlations, appropriate parametric and non-parametric tests were applied.

Supplementary Table I Tests of normality for sociodemographic variables in the three groups (if the data are not split according to the three groups)
Parameters Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df P Statistic df P
Age 0.117 92 0.003 0.937 92 0.000
Monthly income (Rs.) 0.256 92 0.000 0.759 92 0.000
FA (average) - CF (CG)-right 0.048 92 0.200* 0.984 92 0.333
FA (average) - CB (CG)-left 0.075 92 0.200* 0.987 92 0.482
FA (average) - CB (H)-right 0.076 92 0.200* 0.973 92 0.053
FA (average) - CB (H)-left 0.075 92 0.200* 0.956 92 0.004

*This is a lower bound of the true significance; aLilliefors significance correction; P<0.05, non-normal distribution. FA, fractional anisotropy; CG, cingulate gyrus; df, degree of freedom; H, hallucination subscale; CB, cingulum bundle

Supplementary Table II Tests of normality for clinical variables in groups I and II (if the data are not split according to the groups I and II)
Parameters Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df P Statistic df P
Age 0.106 62 0.080 0.946 62 0.009
Monthly income (Rs.) 0.180 62 0.000 0.723 62 0.000
Age of onset 0.118 62 0.032 0.949 62 0.013
Duration of illness (yr) 0.208 62 0.000 0.808 62 0.000
Time on treatment (yr) 0.243 62 0.000 0.749 62 0.000
Total SAPS score 0.136 62 0.006 0.899 62 0.000
Total SANS score 0.176 62 0.000 0.902 62 0.000
PSYRATS - H (0-44) 0.339 62 0.000 0.762 62 0.000
PSYRATS - D (0-24) 0.185 62 0.000 0.962 62 0.055
CGI severity (1-7) 0.232 62 0.000 0.878 62 0.000
FA (average) - CB (CG)-right 0.071 62 0.200* 0.983 62 0.532
FA (average) - CB (CG)-left 0.065 62 0.200* 0.990 62 0.902
FA (average) - CB (H)-right 0.067 62 0.200* 0.971 62 0.153
FA (average) - CB (H)-left 0.101 62 0.188 0.950 62 0.014

*This is a lower bound of the true significance; aLilliefors significance correction; P<0.05, non-normal distribution. SAPS, scale for assessment of positive symptoms; SANS, scale for assessment of negative symptoms; PSYRATS, psychotic symptom rating scale; CGI, clinical global impression; FA, fractional anisotropy; CG; cingulate gyrus; df, degree of freedom; H, hallucination subscale; D, delusion subscale; CB, cingulum bundle

Supplementary Table III Tests of normality for group Ia (if the data are split according to the 3 groups)
Parameters Kolmogorov-Smirnovb Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df P Statistic df P
Age 0.144 30 0.112 0.949 30 0.154
Monthly income (Rs.) 0.159 30 0.050 0.878 30 0.003
Age of onset 0.129 30 0.200* 0.935 30 0.067
Duration of illness (yr) 0.172 30 0.024 0.872 30 0.002
Time on treatment (yr) 0.262 30 0.000 0.787 30 0.000
Total SAPS score 0.182 30 0.013 0.821 30 0.000
Total SANS score 0.173 30 0.022 0.872 30 0.002
PSYRATS - H (0-44) 0.183 30 0.011 0.929 30 0.045
PSYRATS - D (0-24) 0.203 30 0.003 0.952 30 0.193
CGI severity (1-7) 0.253 30 0.000 0.891 30 0.005
FA (avg) - CB (CG)-right 0.129 30 0.200* 0.950 30 0.174
FA (average) - CB (CG)-left 0.102 30 0.200* 0.971 30 0.580
FA (average) - CB (H)-right 0.174 30 0.021 0.933 30 0.058
FA (average) - CB (H)-left 0.148 30 0.094 0.916 30 0.022

*This is a lower bound of the true significance; aGroup=With AH (Group I); bLilliefors significance correction; P<0.05, non-normal distribution. SAPS, scale for assessment of positive symptoms; SANS, Scale for assessment of negative symptoms; PSYRATS, psychotic symptom rating scale; CGI, clinical global impression; FA, fractional anisotropy; CG, cingulate gyrus; df, degree of freedom; H, hallucination subscale; D, delusion subscale; CB, cingulum bundle

Supplementary Table IV Tests of normality for group IIa,d (if the data are split according to the 3 groups)
Parameters Kolmogorov-Smirnovb Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df P Statistic df P
Age 0.122 32 0.200* 0.951 32 0.157
Monthly income (Rs.) 0.257 32 0.000 0.692 32 0.000
Age of onset 0.114 32 0.200* 0.970 32 0.489
Duratiion of illness (yr) 0.238 32 0.000 0.775 32 0.000
Time on treatment (yr) 0.167 32 0.023 0.850 32 0.000
Total SAPS score 0.263 32 0.000 0.820 32 0.000
Total SANS score 0.175 32 0.014 0.913 32 0.014
PSYRATS - D (0-24) 0.160 32 0.037 0.967 32 0.415
CGI severity (1-7) 0.242 32 0.000 0.803 32 0.000
FA (average) - CB (CG)-right 0.096 32 0.200* 0.976 32 0.681
FA (average) - CB (CG)-left 0.082 32 0.200* 0.986 32 0.938
FA (average) - CB (H)-right 0.144 32 0.092 0.926 32 0.030
FA (average) - CB (H)-left 0.101 32 0.200* 0.963 32 0.331

*This is a lower bound of the true significance; a Group=Without AH (Group II); bLilliefors significance correction; dPSYRATS - H (0-44) is constant; It has been omitted; P<0.05, non-normal distribution. SAPS, scale for assessment of positive symptoms; SANS, scale for assessment of negative symptoms; PSYRATS, psychotic symptom rating scale; CGI, clinical global impression; FA, fractional anisotropy; CG, cingulate gyrus; df, degree of freedom; D, delusion subscale; H, hallucination subscale; CB, cingulum bundle

Supplementary Table V Tests of normality for group IIIa (if the data are split according to the 3 groups)
Parameters Kolmogorov-Smirnovb Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df P Statistic df P
Age 0.193 30 0.006 0.891 30 0.005
Monthly income (Rs.) 0.240 30 0.000 0.839 30 0.000
FA (average) - CB (CG)-right 0.095 30 0.200* 0.977 30 0.739
FA (average) - CB (CG)-left 0.088 30 0.200* 0.980 30 0.833
FA (average) - CB (H)-right 0.149 30 0.088 0.957 30 0.256
FA (average) - CB (H)-left 0.136 30 0.167 0.957 30 0.259

*This is a lower bound of the true significance; aGroup=Healthy controls (Group III); bLilliefors significance correction; P<0.05, non-normal distribution. FA, fractional anisotropy; CG, cingulate gyrus; df, degree of freedom; H, hallucination subscale; CB, cingulum bundle

Results

A total of 92 patients were recruited (30 each in group I and III, and 32 in group II). Mean age in the three groups was 32, 27.5, and 27 yr, respectively. Males predominated in group I and II (63 and 70%, respectively) while group II had equal number of males and females. The differences in the gender distributions were, however, not significant.

Sociodemographic and clinical variables: Table I shows the sociodemographic and clinical profile of the three groups. No significant difference was found across three study groups with respect to age, gender and education. The SAPS score was different across AVH and non-AVH groups (7.1+2.6, 3.5+1.9; U=116.500, P<0.001). No other differences were found in the clinical variables between groups I and II, apart from illness duration (group I: 9.6+7.3 yr, group II: 5.5+4.1 yr; U=331.000, P=0.035).

Table I Sociodemographic and clinical profile across study groups: schizophrenia with auditory hallucinations, without auditory hallucinations and healthy controls
Parameters Group I (n=30), median (IQR) or n (%) Group II (n=32), median (IQR) or n (%) Group III (n=30), median (IQR) or n (%) Kruskal-Wallis/Chi-square test Statistic (df); P
Age (yr) 32.0 (23.8-40.5) 27.5 (21.3-32.0) 27.0 (23.0-30.0) H=5.873 (2); 0.053
Gender
Male 19 (63.3) 16 (50) 21 (70) χ2=2.714 (2); 0.257
Female 11 (36.7) 16 (50) 9 (30)
Education
Up to 10th std 14 (46.7) 12 (37.5) 7 (23.3) χ2=3.607 (2); 0.165
Above 10th std 16 (53.3) 20 (62.5) 23 (76.7)
Marital status
Never married 16 (53.3) 23 (71.9) 19 (63.3) χ2=5.527 (4); 0.237
Married 14 (46.7) 7 (21.9) 10 (33.3)
Separated/divorced - 2 (6.2) 1 (3.3)
Monthly family income (₹)
≤10,000 6 (20.0) 5 (15.6) 2 (7.7) χ2=2.288 (2); 0.319
>10,000 24 (80.0) 27 (84.4) 28 (93.3)
Age of onset (yr) 22.5 (17.0-28.0) 22.5 (17.3-26.0) - U=0.463.000; 0.810
Duration of illness (yr) 7.0 (3.4-15.0) 4.0 (3.0-6.8) - U=331.000; 0.035*
Past history of depression 9 (30) 6 (18.8) - χ2=0.301 (1); 0.379
Family history of psychosis 3 (10) 8 (25) - χ2=0.122 (1); 0.185
History of nicotine use 4 (13.3) 5 (15.6) - χ2=2.035 (2); 0.361
Duration on treatment (yr) 3.0 (1.9-10.5) 3.0 (1.0-4.9) - U=418.500; 0.384
CGI-SCH (severity) 5.0 (4.0-5.0) 4.2 (0.7) - U=386.00; 0.158
SAPS (0-20) 6.5 (5.0-8.0) 3.0 (2.0-4.8) - U=116.500; <0.001***
SANS (0-25) 5.5 (0-12.0) 8.0 (0-11.0) - U=467.500; 0.858
PSYRATS-D (0-24) 12.0 (9.5-16.3) 12.0 (8.0-15.8) - U=418.500; 0.379
PSYRATS-H (0-44) 30.0 (22.0-33.0) - - -

P *<0.05, ***<0.001 was considered significant. H, Kruskal-Walis test statistic; χ2, Chi square coefficient; U, Mann-Whitney U coefficient; df, degree of freedom; IQR, interquartile range; SAPS, scale for assessment of positive symptoms; SANS, scale for assessment of negative symptoms; PSYRATS, psychotic symptom rating scale; D, delusion subscale, H, hallucination subscale; CGI-SCH, clinical global impression-schizophrenia; INR, international normalized ratio

DTI data: Figures 1A and B depict, the CB as per DTI studio tractography technique. Table II shows the FA values in bilateral CB. FA values showed significant difference across the three groups in the left cingulate gyrus part of CB (CB-CG) (H=10.342; df=2; P=0.006). Post-hoc pair-wise comparisons revealed that FA was significantly lower in group I compared to group II which in turn had no significant difference as compared to group III.

DTI tracts formed by tractography on DTI studio software. (A) Cingulate gyrus of the right cingulum bundle, (B) Hippocampal part of the right cingulum bundle. DTI, diffusion tensor imaging.
Fig. 1
DTI tracts formed by tractography on DTI studio software. (A) Cingulate gyrus of the right cingulum bundle, (B) Hippocampal part of the right cingulum bundle. DTI, diffusion tensor imaging.
Table II Fractional anisotropy measures of study groups
Fasciculi Group I (n=30), median (IQR) Group II (n=32), median (IQR) Group III (n=30), median (IQR) H (df=2); P Post-hoc analysis (Dunn-Bonferroni test)
CB-CG (right) 0.5164 (0.4912-0.5436) 0.5385 (0.5028-0.5647) 0.5292 (0.5095-0.5623) 3.722; 0.155 -
CB-CG (left) 0.5406 (0.5004-0.5659) 0.5689 (0.5385-0.5913) 0.5694 (0.5500-0.5878) 10.342; 0.006** I<II (P=0.016)
I<III (P=0.015)
CB-H (right) 0.5056 (0.4580-0.5274) 0.4999 (0.4814-0.5312) 0.5158 (0.4961-0.5307) 2.594; 0.273 -
CB-H (left) 0.4842 (0.4621-0.5166) 0.4936 (0.4736-0.5201) 0.4915 (0.4734-0.5259) 1.242; 0.537 -

P **<0.01. df, degree of freedom; H, Kruskal-Walis test; IQR, interquartile range; CB, cingulum bundle; CB-H, CB-hippocampal; CG, cingulate gyrus

Figure 2 shows the error plots of FA values in CB-CG and hippocampal part of CB (CB-H) across the three groups. Group I showed significantly lower FA values in the left CB-CG as compared to groups II and III. There was no point of overlap between group I and other two groups (Fig. 2D) depicting significant difference of group I from the two groups (groups II and III). There was no significant difference in FA values between the groups II and III. The relationship between FA values and clinical variables within groups I and II was explored. No relationship was found between FA values and age of individuals, severity of psychosis/hallucinations, total duration of illness or treatment duration.

Error plots of comparative fractional anisotropy values in cingulate gyrus (CG) and hippocampal (H) part of cingulum bundle between the three groups; group I (schizophrenia with AVH), group II (schizophrenia without AVH), group III (healthy controls). (A) right cingulum bundle (CG), (B) right cingulum bundle (H), (C) left cingulum bundle (H), (D) left cingulum bundle (CG). AVH, auditory verbal hallucination.
Fig. 2
Error plots of comparative fractional anisotropy values in cingulate gyrus (CG) and hippocampal (H) part of cingulum bundle between the three groups; group I (schizophrenia with AVH), group II (schizophrenia without AVH), group III (healthy controls). (A) right cingulum bundle (CG), (B) right cingulum bundle (H), (C) left cingulum bundle (H), (D) left cingulum bundle (CG). AVH, auditory verbal hallucination.

Discussion

The present study is one of the few DTI studies to report reduced white matter integrity of CB in AVH positive schizophrenia compared to schizophrenia without AVH and healthy individuals. The study has attempted to overcome some of the previous methodological issues in similar studies1418,2025. The study included individuals with DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia whose illness duration was minimum of two years or more to ensure diagnostic stability and has used rigorous operational criteria to either establish or rule out lifetime AVH in the respective study groups, which included both disease controls and healthy controls in addition to AVH positive schizophrenia. The present sample size of 92 exceeds that in several previous DTI studies on neural correlates of hallucinations (samples varying between 20 and 66)20,21,23,25,3538. Further, DTI applied motion-probing gradient orientations along 32 directions which acquire more precise estimations of anisotropy and directionality of tensor8.

The present study found a reduced connectivity in the left CB-CG in AVH-positive schizophrenia based on a quantitative tract-based measurement of FA, a marker of reduced microstructural integrity of white matter axonal tracts. The FA value in the left CB-CG of AVH-positive schizophrenia was decreased by 6.19 per cent compared to AVH negative schizophrenia controls and by 6.17 per cent compared to healthy controls. The FA value was not significantly different between AVH-negative schizophrenia and healthy controls.

The main finding from the present study is that of a reduced connectivity (low FA) in the left CB-CG in current sample of AVH-positive schizophrenia. This finding broadly concurs with the findings from prior studies that have observed a significant association between hallucination scores and CB disruptions (i.e. reduced FA)20,23,24, though a few studies reported no association21 or even conflicting results22,25. Similar to the present study, Ćurčić-Blake et al23 also reported a decreased FA in the left cingulate, among few other tracts, in AVH-positive schizophrenia. Further, the white matter integrity correlated negatively with severity of AVH in that study23. Whitford et al24 found that a lower FA in the right dorsal anterior cingulum correlated with patient scores of hallucinations. Zhang et al20 demonstrated decreased FA values in multiple tracts including bilateral cingulum in 21 first episode schizophrenia patients with AVH and 12 chronic schizophrenia patients with AVH, compared to 26 healthy controls. Unlike the current study, they did not compare differences between hallucinators and non-hallucinators. Bopp et al21 found an alteration in the anterior part of the right CB in schizophrenia; however, FA values did not show a significant correlation with AVH scores21. In another study (33 schizophrenia patients and 40 healthy controls), the propensity to experience AVH in schizophrenia patients was significantly associated with an increased FA, rather than decreased FA, in the anterior cingulum25. Another study carried out on 88 schizophrenia patients and 40 healthy controls reported a positive correlation between FA values in anterior CB and ‘positive’ symptom score (delusions, hallucinations, bizarre behaviour), but it did not assess hallucination score separately22. Coming to correlations within group I itself, the CB-FA values were not correlated to severity of hallucination scores (PSYRATS–H). There is no singular explanation which can be put forth in definite terms for this particular finding. The study group I had an overall higher hallucination severity as a group, probably as patients were recruited from a tertiary care centre. It is possible that the relationship between CB-FA values and hallucination severity scores may not be a simple, linear relationship or that relationship may be potentially influenced by other clinical or neuroimaging variables pertaining to other brain areas. Finally, it is also possible that the reduced connectivity (low FA) in the left CB-CG is a marker for AVH-positive schizophrenia, though not necessarily a marker of severity of AVH.

Cingulate gyrus is a principal driver of the cingulum which has been linked to several brain functions. The functions most strongly linked to different parts of the CB are emotion, motivation, executive functions, including aspects of attention, pain and memory7. Allen et al9 showed that the hallucinator group made more external misattributions and showed altered activation in the anterior cingulate, besides superior temporal gyrus, compared with non-hallucinators and controls. A cingulate-based deficiency has been proposed to be related to an inability to distinguish one’s own internal thoughts from external events, which form a possible basis for hallucinations11. Further studies are required to ascertain its specific role in generation of AVH.

CB being a large tract, with various fibres joining and leaving from, may be affected by a number of disorders in addition to schizophrenia, such as mood disorders3940. In the present study, psychiatric comorbidities (other than lifetime depression) were excluded carefully using MINI 7.0.0. Lifetime depression (as per MINI 7.0.0) was found to be comparable between AVH-positive and AVH-negative schizophrenia with no statistically significant difference and is unlikely to confound or affect the study findings.

The study findings must be interpreted in light of certain limitations as discussed below. The AVH group had a relatively longer duration of illness compared to non-AVH group, though their severity was comparable and FA values did not correlate with illness duration. In DTI studio, fibre tracking was performed based on deterministic tractography without taking crossing-fibre into considerations. Furthermore, it is difficult to comment on whether these findings are part of a global white matter disruption or not, since the study did not use a whole-brain approach. The role of any other possible factors, including nutrition or medication, could not be accounted for. All participants with schizophrenia were on prescribed antipsychotic medications and drug-naive sample was difficult to recruit in view of ethical reasons. The duration of untreated psychosis or lifetime antipsychotic equivalents could not be calculated for either group, as many patients or their caregivers did not recall the names, doses or duration of medications taken by them in the past or did not bring or had lost older treatment records. Consequently, there was a limited access to information as far as past medication history was concerned. However, there are studies showing no effect of antipsychotic medication on white matter integrity21,41. The data derived from DTI may be influenced by magnetic susceptibility effects, and motion artefacts, all of which may be influenced by the acquisition parameters. Having another disease control group (e.g. depression with AVH) in future may help to study AVH across multiple diagnosis.

To conclude, a significantly reduced FA in CB-CG emerged as a possible marker for AVH in schizophrenia. Reduced integrity of the left CB-CG should be investigated further for its clinical relevance in the context of global findings on white matter integrity in AVH-positive schizophrenia. These findings in larger samples and need to be replicated in diverse diagnosis with AVH as a cross-cutting characteristic in the future. Such studies might help determine the potential targets for interventions in patients with persistent AVH and may raise the possibility of subtyping schizophrenia in newer ways.

Acknowledgment:

Authors acknowledge Dr Ashwani Kumar Mishra (Professor of Biostatistics), for his inputs on statistical aspects.

Financial support & sponsorship: Author NC’s MD thesis received financial support from the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India. The DTI could be done free of cost for all participants due to institute support (AIIMS).

Conflicts of Interest: Study dataset was included as part of findings presented as Poster at 72nd Annual Meeting of Society of Biological Psychiatry (SOBP), 18-20 May, 2017, San Diego, California, USA and at 70th Annual National Conference of Indian Psychiatric Society (ANCIPS) 2018, 5-8 February 2018, Ranchi, India.

References

  1. , , , , . Diffusion tensor imaging findings of white matter changes in first episode schizophrenia: A systematic review. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2012;10:13-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Alterations of cerebral white matter structure in psychosis and their clinical correlations:A systematic review of Diffusion Tensor Imaging studies. Riv Psichiatr. 2017;52:49-66.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Reduced integrity of the left arcuate fasciculus is specifically associated with auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2015;162:1-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Reduced integrity of superior longitudinal fasciculus and arcuate fasciculus as a marker for auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia: A DTI tractography study. Asian J Psychiatr. 2019;44:179-86.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . The characteristic features of auditory verbal hallucinations in clinical and nonclinical groups:State-of-the-art overview and future directions. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38:724-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . The anterior cingulate cortex. The evolution of an interface between emotion and cognition. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;935:107-17.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . The cingulum bundle:Anatomy, function, and dysfunction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;92:104-27.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Reproducibility of quantitative tractography methods applied to cerebral white matter. Neuroimage. 2007;36:630-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Neuroimaging auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia:From neuroanatomy to neurochemistry and beyond. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38:695-703.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Neural correlates of the misattribution of speech in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 2007;190:162-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Misattribution of external speech in patients with hallucinations and delusions. Schizophr Res. 2004;69:277-87.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Misattribution of speech and impaired connectivity in patients with auditory verbal hallucinations. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007;28:1213-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . The limbic cortex in schizophrenia:Focus on the anterior cingulate. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2000;31:364-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . White matter integrity of the whole brain is disrupted in first-episode schizophrenia. Neuroreport. 2006;17:23-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . Abnormal anterior cingulum integrity in first episode, early-onset schizophrenia:A diffusion tensor imaging study. Brain Res. 2010;1343:199-205.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Cingulate fasciculus integrity disruption in schizophrenia:A magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging study. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54:1171-80.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , . White matter abnormalities in early-onset schizophrenia:A voxel-based diffusion tensor imaging study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005;44:934-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . 3D DT-MRI using a reduced-FOV approach and saturation pulses. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51:853-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , . The neural mechanisms of hallucinations:A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;69:113-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Reduced white matter connectivity associated with auditory verbal hallucinations in first-episode and chronic schizophrenia:A diffusion tensor imaging study. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2018;273:63-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , . White matter integrity and symptom dimensions of schizophrenia:A diffusion tensor imaging study. Schizophr Res. 2017;184:59-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , . White matter volume abnormalities and associations with symptomatology in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2010;183:21-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , . Not on speaking terms: Hallucinations and structural network disconnectivity in schizophrenia. Brain Struct Funct. 2015;220:407-18.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , . Localized abnormalities in the cingulum bundle in patients with schizophrenia:A Diffusion Tensor tractography study. Neuroimage Clin. 2014;5:93-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , . A diffusion tensor imaging study of fasciculi in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:467-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. . American Psychological Association. .
  27. , , , , , , . The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M. I. N. I.):The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59((Suppl 20)):22-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , . The assessment and analysis of handedness:The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9:97-113.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , . The Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS). Iowa City: University of Iowa; .
  30. , . The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) 1983
  31. , , , , , , . The clinical global impression-schizophrenia scale:A simple instrument to measure the diversity of symptoms present in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2003;416:16-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , . Scales to measure dimensions of hallucinations and delusions:The psychotic symptom rating scales (PSYRATS) Psychol Med. 1999;29:879-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. F.M. Kirby Research Center. Available from: http://godzilla.kennedykrieger.org/
  34. , , , . G*power version 3.1.9.4. Available from: http://www.psychologie.hhu.de/arbeitsgruppen/allgemeine-psychologie-und-arbeitspsychologie/gpower.html
  35. , , , , , , . Pathways that make voices:White matter changes in auditory hallucinations. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61:658-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , , , . Auditory verbal hallucinations and the interhemispheric auditory pathway in chronic schizophrenia. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2015;16:31-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , , , . Interhemispheric hypoconnectivity in schizophrenia:Fiber integrity and volume differences of the corpus callosum in patients and unaffected relatives. Neuroimage. 2012;59:926-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , . Hearing voices:A role of interhemispheric auditory connectivity? World J Biol Psychiatry. 2012;13:153-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , . The density of pyramidal and nonpyramidal neurons in anterior cingulate cortex of schizophrenic and bipolar subjects. Biol Psychiatry. 2001;50:395-406.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , , , . Anterior cingulate cortex pathology in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Acta Neuropathol. 2001;102:373-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , . Diffusion tensor imaging in the early phase of schizophrenia:What have we learned? J Psychiatr Res. 2010;44:993-1004.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top