Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
129 (
3
); 268-278
doi:
10.25259/IJMR_20091293_268

Chronology of meiosis & synaptonemal complex abnormalities in normal & abnormal spermatogenesis

Laboratoire de Biologie de la Reproduction, AP-HM, Hôpital de la Conception, Marseille, France
Laboratoire de Biogénotoxicologie et Mutagenèse Environnementale (EA1784), IFR PMSE112 Marseille, France
Laboratoire d’Histologie-Embryologie, Faculté de Médecine, Oran, Algérie

Reprint requests: Dr M-R Guichaoua, Laboratoire de Biologie de la Reproduction, AP-HM, Hôpital de la Conception 147, Boulevard Baille, 13385, Marseille cedex 5, France e-mail: mguichaoua@ap-hm.fr

Licence
This open access article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

Background & objectives:

The study was taken up to define criteria of normality for meiosis by assessing the frequency of meiotic prophase cell types, the frequency of pachytene substage in normal and abnormal spermatogenesis and to determine what synaptonemal complex.

Methods:

A quantitative and qualitative analysis of the first meiotic prophase was performed in 10 patients presenting with non-obstructive infertility and 10 controls, using dual colour immunocytochemistry with SCP3 and BRCA1 which visualise axial elements and synaptonemal complexes (SC). The respective frequencies of the leptotene, zygotene and pachytene stages as well as the frequencies of the four substages of pachytene were evaluated. The frequencies of the main types of meiotic abnormalities at pachytene were also assessed.

Results:

The frequencies of leptotene and zygotene stages were significantly higher in patients (7.95 and 9.75%) than in controls (2.30 and 1.45%), whereas the frequency of pachytene was significantly higher in controls than in patients (96.25 vs. 75.30%). Detailed analysis of the sex chromosomes revealed that the controls showed a presence of late pachytene substages (P3 + P4 = 64.40%), whereas the patients showed a early pachytene substages (P1 + P2 = 63.40%). From these results, a new index was defined to evaluate spermatogenesis: the Pachytene Index, or PI (PI = P1 + P2 / P1 + P2 + P3 + P4). The same abnormalities (asynapsis, fragmented SC, dotted SC, thin SC) were observed in controls and in patients, but with different frequencies. The most frequent abnormality was fragmented SC, with a significant difference between patients and controls (15.28 vs. 9.74%). There was a significant difference between patients and controls for the frequency of asynapsed nuclei (7.97 vs. 2.95%) while the difference in other abnormalities were not significant.

Interpretation & conclusion:

The accumulation of early primary spermatocytes is an indication that progression of meiosis is defective in spermatogenesis failures. The value of the PI less than 0.50 indicates that the kinetic of meiosis is normal at pachytene. There is no normal spermatogenesis when the frequency of one or several SC abnormalities is significantly higher than in controls and/ or when the PI is more than 0.50.

Keywords

Infertility
non-obstructive azoospermia
meiotic prophase
Pachytene index
spermatogenesis

Fulltext Views
168

PDF downloads
92
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections
Scroll to Top