Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Addendum
Announcement
Announcements
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Books Received
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Corrrespondence
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Podcast
Errata
Erratum
FORM IV
GUIDELINES
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Panel of Reviewers (2006)
Panel of Reviewers (2007)
Panel of Reviewers (2009) Guidelines for Contributors
Perspective
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Method
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Authors’ response
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Public Notice
Research Brief
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Reviewers
Short Paper
Some Forthcoming Scientific Events
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
View Point
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
162 (
4
); 513-519
doi:
10.25259/IJMR_560_2025

Body composition following gender affirming hormone therapy in transgender individuals

Department of Endocrinology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

For correspondence: Prof Pramila Kalra, Department of Endocrinology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru 560 054, Karnataka, India e-mail: kalrapramila@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Abstract

Background & objectives

Gender-affirming hormone therapy may alter body composition and muscle strength, which may impact participation in sports and other activities. These changes are important to decide whether transgender should have separate categories of competition.

Methods

We conducted this prospective study, to assess the body composition using bioelectrical impedance analysis muscle strength and serum irisin levels at baseline and at 12 months following gender affirming hormone therapy in transgender individuals. The comparisons were done in both cis mode and trans mode.

Results

A total of 32 transfemales and 22 transmales were included in the study. Among transwomen, there was an increase in total subcutaneous fat (9.2%) and visceral fat (11.3 %) (P<0.001 in both cis and trans mode comparison) and a decrease in muscle mass (7.7%) (P=0.033 and P<0.001 in cis and trans mode, respectively) and muscle strength at all sites (P<0.001). Among transmen, there was a decrease in total subcutaneous fat (5.9%) (P<0.001 for both cis and trans mode comparison) and an increase in muscle mass (7.2 %) (P<0.001 for trans mode only) and muscle strength except shoulder abduction on right side (P<0.001). No significant changes were observed in irisin levels following hormonal therapy.

Interpretation & conclusions

Gender affirming hormonal therapy leads to body fat redistribution after twelve months of hormone therapy with significant alterations in muscle mass and strength among both transmen and transwomen. Irisin, an adipomyokine produced through muscle contraction, did not correlate with muscle mass or fat mass on follow up.

Keywords

Body composition
gender-affirming hormone therapy
muscle mass
muscle strength
serum irisin

Gender incongruence, previously known as gender dysphoria, is a condition where an individual's gender identity does not align with the sex assigned at birth1. The diagnosis of gender incongruence follows the DSM-V criteria2. Treatment includes psychological counselling, medical management through gender-affirming hormonal therapy, and surgical interventions like sex reassignment surgery3.

In transmales (on testosterone) and transfemales (on oestrogens and testosterone blockers), muscle mass and strength changes usually become noticeable within the first 3-6 months and may progress for up to 5 years4-7.

The International Olympic Committee in 2019 declared that transmen can compete in the male category without restrictions8. For transwomen, the requirement was set for testosterone levels to be below 2.5 nmol/L for at least twelve months prior to the competition, and if they have taken puberty blockers and not gone through puberty they can compete in the female category. In 2023, the IAAF (International Association of Athletics Federations) further specified that testosterone levels should be under 2.5 nmol/L, and the individual must not have experienced male puberty beyond Tanner stage 28. Concerning gender dysphoric/gender-incongruent adolescents undergoing pubertal suppression, potential risks include adverse effects on bone mineralization, fertility prospects, and cognition9,10. Irisin primarily produced in skeletal muscle, plays a role in the browning of adipose tissue and lipid and energy metabolism11. Some studies suggest that Irisin may have limited or variable effects on muscle strength12. The present study aims to investigate changes in body fat redistribution, muscle mass, muscle strength, and serum Irisin levels after gender-affirming hormonal therapy.

Materials & Methods

This prospective study was carried out at the outpatient department of Endocrinology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, a tertiary care centre. During a two-year period from (July 2021 to July 2023), transgender individuals who visited were screened after obtaining the ethical clearance from the Institutional Ethics Review Board. The research procedures followed the guidelines laid down in Declaration of Helsinki 1964 and as revised later.

Oral and written informed consent was also obtained from all the participants and use of their data for research and educational purposes was explained.

Study sample and data collection

Those in the age group of 18 to 40 yr who had not previously received treatment, met DSM-V diagnostic criteria, and consented to participate were included in the study and were given the usual standard of care as per the guidelines. Individuals diagnosed with conditions such as diabetes mellitus, thyroid disorders, neuromuscular disorders, HIV, hepatitis, liver failure, chronic kidney disease, Vitamin D deficiency, or chronic systemic illness, and participants on medications that could influence muscle strength or body composition as well as those on long-term steroid therapy, were excluded from participation.

Pilot study

A pilot study involving a small group of 30 individuals was conducted to validate the instruments, receiving approval from a panel of experts. All respondents agreed with the response options, the ease of application, and the adequacy of each instrument. No modifications were suggested by any participant.

Body composition

Participants were instructed to arrive after overnight fasting. Consent was obtained, followed by a comprehensive history-taking and anthropometric examination. Body composition was measured using the bioelectrical impedance analyser (BIA) Omron HBF 375 Karada, in both cis mode (when the participant's gender aligns with their birth-assigned gender) and trans mode (when the participant's gender aligns with their identified gender). The gender of the individual was the assigned gender only from initial recruitment to follow up. The same individual was compared at baseline and follow up in both cis mode and trans mode settings for BIA. There was no control group. Participants were advised to empty their bowel and bladder prior to the procedure.

Muscle strength

Muscle strength was evaluated using a handheld dynamometer, specifically an active force dynamometer, according to the instrument's protocol. The strength of various muscle groups in both the upper and lower limbs was assessed, including hand grip strength. Measurements were taken for muscle groups including shoulder abductors, adductors, elbow flexors, elbow extensors, hip flexors, knee extenders, and hand grip using a digital hand dynamometer. Each participant's muscle strength in these groups was assessed three times, and the average value was recorded. All participants were advised to follow a standard exercise regimen as part of general lifestyle counselling.

Blood samples

Blood samples were collected to assess serum irisin levels using ELISA, as well as serum Vitamin D levels and serum calcium. The serum calcium was analysed immediately, while the samples for Vitamin D and irisin were centrifuged and stored at -80°C. Serum irisin levels were measured using a sandwich ELISA kit (Cusabio Technology LLC, USA). The quantification limit of the assay was 1.8 ng/mL, with intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation of <15 per cent and <18 per cent, respectively.

Follow up and reassessment

All participants were universally supplemented with Vitamin D according to the guidelines, regardless of their initial Vitamin D status. The individuals were started on gender-affirming hormonal therapy: transwomen received oestradiol valerate and leuprolide, while transmen were given testosterone enanthate injections. All participants were advised to maintain a regular diet and exercise routine. Follow ups were conducted every three months, during which blood tests were used to adjust dosages as needed. Participants who experienced adverse events post-therapy initiation or were lost to follow up, including four transwomen and one transmen were excluded from the study.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics for demographic and clinical data were calculated, with continuous data presented as mean±standard deviation. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test confirmed parametric distribution. The Student’s t-test was used to compare means between two related groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 19 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY).

Results

After 12 months, body composition, muscle strength, and serum Irisin levels were reassessed.

Participant characteristics

A total of 32 transwomen and 22 transmen participated in this study. Figure illustrates a flowchart of participant selection and follow up in the study. Table I presents comprehensive demographic data including age, body mass index (BMI), oestradiol and testosterone dosages for transwomen and transmen, respectively, levels of oestradiol and testosterone at 12 months, as well as serum levels of Vitamin D, calcium, and HbA1c.

Flowchart of participant selection and follow up in the study
Figure.
Flowchart of participant selection and follow up in the study
Table I. Baseline characteristics of the study participants
Parameters* Transwomen (n=32) Transmen (n=22)
Age (yr) 27.4±5.3 25.2±4.7
Body mass index (kg/m2) 24.5±6 25.8±5.4
Oestradiol valerate dose (mg) 4.1±1.3 N/A
Testosterone dose (mg) 150±51.2
Serum oestradiol levels at 12 months (pg/mL) 140.6±10.1
Serum testosterone levels at 12 months (ng/dL) 524.8±103.5
Serum Vitamin D (ng/mL) 24.9±8.5 22.8±9.20
Serum calcium levels (mg/dL) 9.3±0.5 8.9±0.23
HbA1c levels (%) 5.5±0.75 5.3±0.40
All values are mean±SD. NA, not applicable; SD, standard deviation

Body composition

Body composition was evaluated at baseline and again at 12 months following the initiation of gender-affirming hormonal therapy, using both cis mode (aligned with the gender assigned at birth) and trans mode (aligned with the participant's gender identity).

Body fat

Table II summarises the changes in total body fat and visceral fat for participants, assessed in both cis mode and trans mode. Among the transwomen (n=32), there was a significant increase (9.2%) in total subcutaneous fat from baseline in both cis mode and trans mode and a significant increase in visceral fat (11.3%) following hormonal therapy. For the transmen, there was a significant decrease (5.9%) in total subcutaneous fat from baseline in both cis mode and trans mode but the change in visceral fat was not significant.

Table II. Body fat composition in transgender individuals at baseline and after 12 months of hormone therapy
At baseline (Mean±SD) At 12 months (Mean±SD) P value
Transwomen n=32 n=28
Total subcutaneous fat (%) (cis mode) 29.09±6 31.80±6.19 <0.001
Visceral fat (%) (cis mode) 8.40±6.67 9.05±7.10 <0.001
Total subcutaneous fat (%) (Trans mode) 28.76±7.34 31.26±7.40 <0.001
Visceral fat (%) (trans mode) 7.89±6.71 8.90±8.10 <0.001
Transmen (n=22) (n=21)
Total subcutaneous fat (%) (cis mode) 34.19±6.16 31.31±6.42 <0.001
Visceral fat (%) (cis mode) 9.38±6.13 9.29±6.15 0.600
Total subcutaneous fat (%) (Trans mode) 34.49±6.01 32.22±6.20 <0.001
Visceral fat (%) (trans mode) 9.07±8.79 8.77±5.23 0.227

Muscle mass

Table III details, changes in total muscle mass for participants, assessed in both cis mode and trans mode. Transwomen, exhibited a significant reduction in total muscle mass compared to baseline in cis mode and an even more pronounced decrease in trans mode (7.71%). Conversely, transmen did not show an increase in total muscle mass from baseline in cis mode but showed a significant increase (7.15%) in trans mode.

Table III. Muscle mass in transgender individuals at baseline and after 12 months of hormone therapy
At baseline (Mean±SD) At 12 months (Mean±SD) P value
Transwomen (n=32) (n=28)
Total muscle mass (kg) (cis mode) 31.15±3.97 29.55±5.16 0.033
Total muscle mass (kg) (trans mode) 30.05±4.95 27.90±4.78 <0.001
Transmen (n=22) (n=21)
Total muscle mass (kg) (cis mode) 26.27±2.76 27.03±2.40 0.205
Total muscle mass (kg) (trans mode) 26.17±3.11 28.04±3.38 0.001

Muscle strength

Table IV summarises the muscle strength in transwomen and transmen at baseline and 12 months. After gender-affirming hormonal therapy, transmen experienced a significant increase in overall muscle strength, while transwomen showed a significant decrease.

Serum irisin

The serum irisin levels at baseline and after 12 months of gender-affirming hormonal therapy in transwomen were 15.41±3.95 and 15.37±5.00 ng/mL, respectively (P=0.19). The serum irisin levels in transmen at baseline and 12 months follow up were 18.98±5.83 and 19.17±4.74 ng/mL; P=0.90. No correlation was found between irisin levels and muscle mass (transwomen r=-0.01, P=0.94 and transmen r=-0.11, P=0.61) or body fat (visceral fat; r=0.33, P=0.08 , subcutaneous fat r=0.31, P=0.10 in trans women; visceral fat r=-0.42, P=0.06 and subcutaneous fat r=-0.02, P=0.93 in trans men) on follow up.

Table IV. Muscle strength in transgender individuals at baseline and after 12 months of hormone therapy
Muscle group Transgender

At baseline (Mean±SD)

n=32 (Transwomen)

n=22 (Transmen)

At 12 months (Mean±SD)

n=28 (Transwomen)

n=21(Transmen)

P value
Shoulder abduction (Right) Transwomen 3.31±0.72 2.50±0.68 <0.001
Transmen 2.51±0.9 3.55±0.67 0.144
Shoulder abduction (left) Transwomen 3.30±0.65 2.48±0.54 <0.001
Transmen 2.61±0.93 3.32±0.91 <0.001
Elbow flexion (Right) Transowomen 4.48±0.85 3.75±0.84 <0.001
Transmen 3.20±0.94 3.81±0.96 <0.001
Elbow extension (Right) Transwomen 4.61±1.20 3.81±1.16 <0.001
Transmen 3.42±0.77 4.23±0.99 <0.001
Elbow flexion (Left) Transwomen 4.84±1.08 3.74±0.94 <0.001
Transmen 3.37±0.91 4.03±0.89 <0.001
Elbow extension (Left) Transwomen 4.76±1.29 3.65±1.13 <0.001
Transmen 3.26±0.88 3.96±0.87 <0.001
Hand grip (Right) Transwomen 25.00±3.56 22.41±3.30 <0.001
Transmen 21.60±3.78 23.96±3.35 <0.001
Hand grip (Left) Transwomen 23.60±3.42 32.35±3.55 <0.001
Transmen 20.00±4.66 22.56±5.05 <0.001
Hip flexion (Right) Transwomen 7.38±1.45 6.27±1.24 <0.001
Transmen 6.47±1.04 7.23±0.10 <0.001
Hip flexion (Left) Transwomen 7.47±1.45 6.36±1.13 <0.001
Transmen 6.36±1.25 7.25±1.17 <0.001
Knee extension (Right) Transwomen 7.80±1.32 6.70±2.34 <0.001
Transmen 6.73±1.17 7.68±1.25 <0.001
Knee extension (Left) Transwomen 7.50±1.43 6.56±1.28 <0.001
Transmen 6.35±1.50 7.07±1.46 <0.001

Discussion

The study showed that gender-affirming hormonal therapy impacts body fat redistribution, causing modest changes in visceral fat and significant alterations in muscle mass and strength in both transmen and transwomen, without major changes in serum irisin levels. Irisin, an adipomyokine produced by muscle contraction, did not show a strong correlation with changes in muscle mass or fat mass.

Ideally, body composition should be assessed using DXA, but it was compared with Bioimpedance Analysis in the present study13,14.

In the present study, transwomen exhibited a 9.18 per cent increase in total body subcutaneous fat after 12 months of oestrogen therapy in both cis and trans modes. This aligns with findings by Alvares et al15, and Yun et al16, and a meta-analysis by Fighera et al17, which also reported similar results. Conversely, transmen showed a significant decrease of 5.9 per cent in total subcutaneous fat after 12 months of gender-affirming hormonal therapy. Comparable outcomes were observed in the study by Caenegem et al18 and Ford et al7. Oestradiol and testosterone significantly influence body fat distribution in both men and women, exhibiting sexual dimorphism between sex hormones and body fat. In cismen, androgens are inversely related to visceral fat, whereas they are directly proportional in ciswomen19. The study by Klaver et al20 found an insignificant increase in visceral fat in transwomen, despite an increase in total body fat. However, our study reveals a significant increase in visceral fat of about 11.3 per cent transwomen, which might be attributed to the Y-Y paradox, a phenomenon commonly observed in the Indian phenotype21.

The change in visceral fat among transmen was insignificant in the present study. Some studies have shown a significant increase in visceral fat among transmen after starting gender-affirming hormonal therapy20. The varying results in our study compared to others might be attributed to the societal norms influencing the lifestyle choices of transmen in our cohort, potentially impacting their health outcomes. In the current study, transwomen showed a significant decrease in muscle mass of 7.71 per cent after 12 months of gender-affirming hormonal therapy. This finding aligns with Klaver et al20 longitudinal study of 179 transwomen, which observed similar results. Another two-year study reported a 5 per cent decrease in lean mass percentage in transwomen one year following the initiation of gender-affirming hormonal therapy18,20. In the present study, transmen demonstrated a significant increase of 7.15 per cent in muscle mass after 12 months of gender-affirming hormonal therapy with testosterone when comparison was done in the trans mode but not in cis mode. This is consistent with longitudinal studies showing approximately a 10 per cent increase in muscle mass among transmen during the first year of treatment20. In the current study, we observed a significant increase in muscle strength across various muscle groups among transmen. Some studies have assessed hand grip strength using a dynamometer. A prospective study involving 23 transmen noted an average 18 per cent increase in hand grip strength at 12 months18. Similarly, a longitudinal study involving 278 transmen reported an 18 per cent increase in hand grip strength from baseline22.

In transwomen, various longitudinal and cross-sectional studies assessing hand grip strength have yielded mixed results. Some indicate a significant reduction in muscle strength, while others show no significant difference18. Additionally, a study examining knee flexion and extension strength in transwomen after 12 months of gender-affirming hormonal therapy found no significant changes23

The current International Olympic guidelines allow individuals who have not undergone puberty to participate in women's categories8. However, since pubertal blockade is not widely practiced, those who have already undergone puberty may be at a disadvantage. Irisin, an adipomyokine induced by skeletal muscle contraction, has shown varied correlations with physical activity in cross-sectional studies12. In the present study, no significant changes in Irisin levels were observed in transmen and transwomen, and these levels did not correlate with muscle mass or strength.

The current study stands out as a prospective observational study, a notable approach in the context of Indian research. Its comprehensive analysis extends beyond the commonly assessed hand grip strength, encompassing multiple muscle groups for a more holistic understanding. However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations: the use of bioelectrical impedance analysis for body fat analysis, though practical, falls short of the precision offered by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Additionally, the operator-dependent nature of muscle strength assessment could introduce variability in the results. These considerations are crucial for a balanced interpretation of the study's outcomes.

Declaration

Authors declare that part of this study with the abstract titled "Effect of gender affirming hormonal therapy on muscle strength, body composition in individuals with gender incongruence" was presented at the ESICON 2022 Conference and published in the Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism (IJEM) as part of the official conference supplement issue (December 2022 edition). No full text in any form or original article of this study has been published anywhere. This research is original, conducted in accordance with Institutional Ethical Guidelines, and represents the genuine work of the authors. All authors have read and approved the manuscript. There are no conflicts of interest related to this work.

Financial support & sponsorship

This study was funded by the Endocrine Society of India (grant number ESI Grant 2021) awarded to first author (BK).

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of AI-assisted technology for assisting in the writing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , , , , , . Gender incongruence and gender dysphoria in childhood and adolescence-current insights in diagnostics, management, and follow-up. Eur J Pediatr. 2021;180:1349-57.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Gender incongruence: a comparative study using ICD-10 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. Braz J Psychiatry. 2017;40:174-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Endocrine treatment of gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent persons: An endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:3869-903.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Early hormonal treatment affects body composition and body shape in young transgender adolescents. J Sex Med. 2018;15:251-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Changes in regional body fat, lean body mass and body shape in trans persons using cross-sex hormonal therapy: Results from a multicenter prospective study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;178:163-71.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Time course of body composition changes in transgender adolescents during puberty suppression and sex hormone treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024;109:e1593-601.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Characterising body composition and bone health in transgender individuals receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2022;35:1105-14.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  8. . IOC framework on fairness, inclusion and non-discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sex variations. Available from: https://www.olympics.com/ioc/news/ioc-releases-framework-on-fairness-inclusion-and-non-discrimination-on-the-basis-of-gender-identity-and-sex-variations, accessed on July 30, 2025.
  9. , . Bone health in transgender people: a narrative review. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2022;13:20420188221099346.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . Bone mass in young adulthood following gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog treatment and cross-sex hormone treatment in adolescents with gender dysphoria. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:E270-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , . Irisin: Anew code uncover the relationship of skeletal muscle and cardiovascular health during exercise. Front Physiol. 2021;12:620608.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. Association of irisin serum concentration and muscle strength in normal-weight and overweight young women. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:621.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. Assessment of body composition in health and disease using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual energy X-Ray absorptiometry (DXA): a critical overview. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2019;2019:3548284.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Comparison of body composition assessment by DXA and BIA according to the body mass index: A retrospective study on 3655 measures. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0200465.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. Body composition of transgender women after long-term hormone therapy—Across-sectional study. J Endocr Soc. 2021;5:A788.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Effect of cross-sex hormones on body composition, bone mineral density, and muscle strength in trans women. J Bone Metab. 2021;28:59-66.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , . Bone mass effects of cross-sex hormone therapy in transgender people: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endocr Soc. 2019;3:943-64.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. Body composition, bone turnover, and bone mass in trans men during testosterone treatment: 1-year follow-up data from a prospective case-controlled study (ENIGI) Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172:163-71.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. Association between sex hormones and adiposity: Qualitative differences in women and men in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:E596-600.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. Change in visceral fat and total body fat and the effect on cardiometabolic risk factors during transgender hormone therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107:e153-64.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  21. , . The y-Y paradox. Lancet. 2004;363:163.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , . Change in grip strength in trans people and its association with lean body mass and bone density. Endocr Connect. 2019;8:1020-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , et al. Muscle strength, size, and composition following 12 months of gender-affirming treatment in transgender individuals. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105:dgz247.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top