Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Correspondence
152 (
1-2
); 147-148
doi:
10.4103/0971-5916.292093

Authors’ response

Translational Global Health Policy Research Cell, New Delhi, India
ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India
Division of Reproductive Biology, Maternal Health & Child Health, New Delhi, India
Division of Non-Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Informatics, Systems & Research Management Cell, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Division of Epidemiology & Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Multidisciplinary Research Unit/Model Rural Health Research Unit, New Delhi, India
Division of Clinical Medicine, ICMR-National Institute of Cholera & Enteric Diseases, Kolkata 700 010, West Bengal, India
ICMR-National AIDS Research Institute, Pune 411 026, Maharashtra, India
Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi 110 001, India; Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi 110 029, India

*For correspondence: director@nariindia.org

Read LETTER associated with this -

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

We thank the authors for a close reading of our article1. Given the known biases in recruiting study participants for a case-control study, we decided to choose symptomatic HCWs who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection to maintain evenness in the way cases and controls were selected. We would like to posit that the reasons for which asymptomatic HCWs got tested were likely to be different from those of symptomatic HCWs. Hence, to maintain comparability between the cases and controls, we decided to include only symptomatic HCWs. We tried to adhere to the basic tenets of case-control investigations - the cases and controls should be comparable, except in that the case group experienced the outcome of interest. In addition, we would like to add that an analysis of one million tests conducted in India between January and April 2020 has shown that about 28 per cent of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients are asymptomatic2.

The standard practice in developing logistic regression models begins with the selection of independent variables using multiple strategies - known or established theories, existing evidence, exploratory analyses or a combination of these and other strategies3. The purpose of the univariate analysis was to identify the variables that were more likely to be statistically and biologically associated with the outcome of interest. To construct a parsimonious model, we chose to include biologically plausible variables which met a cut-off value (P<0.1). This is clarified in the subsection titled ‘multivariate analysis'. Further, we would like to emphasize that it is important to limit the number of independent variables to avoid a mathematically unstable model with limited generalizability beyond the current data4. In order for readers to appreciate the process, and to declare the associations observed through the univariate analyses, we chose to present both analyses.

While we acknowledge the lower response rate, this is a known shortcoming of telephone-based surveys. While in-person interviewing remains the method providing the highest yield in terms of response efficiency and representativeness, it was an untenable strategy given the realities of the ongoing pandemic and restrictions imposed on the movement of people by the nationwide lockdown. Also noteworthy is that, compared to online, mail, or self-reported data collection, telephone-based surveys provide better representativeness, more complete data and higher data yield56. To improve the response rate, we employed different strategies such as training of interviewers and multiple call attempts at different times of the day. Further, our study received higher response rates than similar methodologies employed to cover HCWs in India (paediatricians: 57%)7 and abroad (Germany: physicians, 56%8; France: physicians, 59%9 and USA: internists, 64%10).

The study participants were asked to declare the side effects experienced by them in our investigation. As noted in the ‘Results’ section, a very small proportion of the participants self-reported adverse effects linked to HCQ intake, and the frequency of occurrence of side effects was not significantly different across the case and control groups1.

References

  1. , , , , , , . Healthcare workers & SARS-CoV-2 infection in India: A case-control investigation in the time of COVID-19. Indian J Med Res. 2020;151:459-67.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Laboratory surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 in India: Performance of testing & descriptive epidemiology of detected COVID-19, January 22 - April 30, 2020. Indian J Med Res. 2020;151:424-37. ICMR COVID Study Group, COVID Epidemiology & Data Management Team, COVID Laboratory Team, VRDLN Team
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Logistic regression: A brief primer. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18:1099-104.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Logistic regression for matched case-control studies. In: , , eds. Applied logistic regression. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc; . p. :223-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys - Comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research. Wine Econ Policy. 2013;2:57-66.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Evaluating the accuracy of data collection on mobile phones: A study of forms, SMS, and voice International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD2009); 2009 Apr 17-19. p. :74-84.
  7. , , , , , , . Comparison of two survey methods based on response distribution of pediatricians regarding immunization for children in India: Mail versus telephone. Int J Trop Dis Health. 2016;16:1-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Subjective reasons for non-reporting of adverse drug reactions in a sample of physicians in outpatient care. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2016;49:57-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Doctors’ opinions on euthanasia, end of life care, and doctor-patient communication: Telephone survey in France. BMJ. 2003;327:595-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . A national survey of US internists’ experiences with ethical dilemmas and ethics consultation. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:251-8.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    27

    PDF downloads
    10
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections
    Scroll to Top