Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
142 (
Suppl 1
); S101-S107
doi:
10.4103/0971-5916.176635

Antimalarial efficacy of Albizia lebbeck (Leguminosae) against Plasmodium falciparum in vitro & P. berghei in vivo

Department of Zoology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

Reprint requests: Dr Upma Bagai, Department of Zoology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160 014, India e-mail: upmabagai@yahoo.co.in

Licence

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

Albizia lebbeck Benth. (Leguminosae) has long been used in Indian traditional medicine. The current study was designed to test antimalarial activity of ethanolic bark extract of A. lebbeck (EBEAL).

Methods:

EBEAL was prepared by soxhlet extraction and subjected to phytochemical analysis. The extract was evaluated for its in vitro antimalarial activity against Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine (CQ) sensitive (MRC2) and CQ resistant (RKL9) strains. Cytotoxicity (CC50) of extract against HeLa cells was evaluated. Median lethal dose (LD50) was determined to assess safety of EBEAL in BALB/c mice. Schizonticidal (100-1000 mg/kg) and preventive (100-750 mg/kg) activities of EBEAL were evaluated against P. berghei. Curative activity (100-750 mg/kg) of extract was also evaluated.

Results:

Phytochemical screening revealed presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, phenols, saponins, terpenes and phytosterols. The extract exhibited IC50 of 8.2 μg/ml (MRC2) and 5.1 μg/ml (RKL9). CC50 of extract on HeLa cell line was calculated to be >1000 μg/ml. EBEAL showed selectivity indices (SI) of >121.9 and >196.07 against MRC2 and RKL9 strains of P. falciparum, respectively. LD50 of EBEAL was observed to be >5 g/kg. Dose-dependent chemosuppression was observed with significant (P<0.001) schizonticidal activity at 1000 mg/kg with ED50 >100 mg/kg. Significant (P<0.001) curative and repository activities were exhibited by 750 mg/kg concentration of extract on D7.

Interpretation & conclusions:

The present investigation reports antiplasmodial efficacy of EBEAL in vitro against P. falciparum as evident by high SI values. ED50 of <100 mg/kg against P. berghei categorizes EBEAL as active antimalarial. Further studies need to be done to exploit its antiplasmodial activity further.

Keywords

Albizia lebbeck
chemosuppression
EBEAL
phytochemical
Plasmodium berghei
P. falciparum

Despite considerable progress in malaria control over the past decade, malaria remains one of the most important potentially fatal parasitic diseases in the world. It is one of the top three killers among communicable diseases, particularly in tropical Africa1. Appropriate selection of first- and second-line antimalarial medicines for country programmes is based entirely on the efficacy of various medicines against malaria. As the parasite evolves continuously to develop resistance to medicines, continuous global monitoring and reporting of drug efficacy and parasite resistance are needed.

Most of the medicines used today against malaria came from natural product lineages which can be traced back to herbal medicinal products: quinine, lapachol and artemisinin. There has been a resurgence in interest in indigenous phytomedicines, with a number of international and local initiatives actively exploring botanical resources, working with traditional healers to exploit known medicinal plants, as well as screening plants more generally for pharmacologically active compounds23.

The present study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Albizia lebbeck (Benth) family: Leguminosae, as an antiplasmodial agent. It is native to tropical southern Asia, is a large, erect, unarmed, deciduous spreading tree found throughout India and has been used in Ayurveda, Sidha and Unani medicines4. Albizia species is reported to have many important medicinal properties mainly anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial (leaf extract) and analgesic5. It has been used traditionally due to its antiproliferative, nootropic, anxiolytic, haemolytic, anti-diarrhoeal, antioxidant, anti-arthritic and antifungal activities6. The leaf extracts of A. lebbeck have been reported to possess antihyperglycaemic and antidiabetic potential as well as nematicidal effects7. Ethanolic bark extract of A. lebbeck (EBEAL) was screened in the present study for its phytochemical composition, cytotoxic activity (CC50) against HeLa cell lines, antimalarial activity against Plasmodium falciparum in vitro and acute toxicity (LD50) against rodent host. Schizonticidal, preventive and curative activities of EBEAL against P. berghei were also evaluated.

Material & Methods

Plant materials: The permission for collection of stem bark of A. lebbeck was duly granted by Head of Forest Force (HOFF) for research purposes in accordance with provisions under Biological Diversity Act, 2002. The permission for collection of specified quantity of plant from Himachal Pradesh (HP) was also granted by Divisional Forest Officer, HP. The stem bark of plant was collected in the month of September, 2013, from Shimla, India. Voucher specimen for A. lebbeck (No.17865) was identified and authenticated by comparison with reference specimens in the herbarium of Department of Botany, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.

Preparation of extract/Phytochemical screening: The bark of A. lebbeck was washed thoroughly with water, shade dried and powdered. Bark powder (110 g) was subjected to soxhlet extraction8 using ethanol (500 ml) as solvent till extract in the siphon underwent complete discoloration. Ethanolic extract of A. lebbeck was evaporated to dryness in vacuo at 40°C in a rotary evaporator. The residue thus obtained was stored in screw capped vials at -4°C until used further.

Phytochemical examination of the extract was carried out for detection of alkaloids, phenols, flavonoids, tannins, saponins, phytosterols, terpenes, glycosides and steroids9.

Animals and parasite strain: White Swiss albino mice (Mus musculus) of BALB/c strain (25-30 g), were obtained from Central Animal House, Panjab University, Chandigarh. Asexual blood stages of chloroquine (CQ)-sensitive strain (NK 65) of P. berghei were maintained by passaging intraperitoneal inoculation of 1 × 106 P. berghei-infected erythrocytes in citrate saline from infected to naive mice.

Cytotoxicity on HeLa cells: Cytotoxicity of EBEAL was evaluated on immortal cervical cancer cell line (HeLa) using 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5- diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay10. HeLa cell line obtained from National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune, India, showed 70-72 per cent viability, and was suitable to perform cytotoxicity studies. Cell cytotoxicity was tested and the per cent cell viability was calculated using the following formula:

Per cent cell viability= {(At-Ab)/(Ac-Ab)}x100

where, At= Absorbance of test, Ac=Absorbance of control and Ab= Absorbance of blank. The per cent cell viability was calculated at various concentrations (10-1000 μg/ml) of the extract to determine CC50. Cytotoxicity, CC50 for cell line, is the concentration of compound that causes a 50 per cent reduction in absorbance at 490 nm relative to untreated cells using MTT assay.

In vitro culture of P. falciparum and estimation of growth inhibition: MRC2 and RKL9, chloroquine sensitive and resistant strains of P. falciparum, respectively, obtained from National Institute for Malaria Research (NIMR), New Delhi, were kept in continuous in vitro culture according to the modified candle-jar method of Trager and Jensen11. Human red blood cells (blood type A+) in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma Chemical Co., USA) supplemented with 25 mM HEPES 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulphonic acid (Sigma), 0.2 per cent sodium bicarbonate (Sigma), and 15 per cent complement inactivated human AB+ serum were used for parasite culture.

Stock solution of EBEAL was prepared with RPMI 1640 to achieve the required concentrations (5-100 μg/ml) before being tested in culture in duplicate in 96-well microtiter plates. The cultures, before testing, were synchronized by treatment with 5 per cent D-sorbitol (Sigma). After 48 h, thin smears were made from duplicate wells, fixed in methanol, stained with Giemsa stain, and observed through a microscope to calculate parasite inhibition at various concentrations of extract.

Fifty per cent inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were determined graphically on dose-response curves with the help of probit analysis12 by SigmaPlot 8.02 software (Systat Software Inc., USA). This activity was analysed in accordance with the norm of plants’ antimalarial activity given by Lekana- Douki et al13. Based on WHO guidelines13, antiplasmodial activity was classified as follows: high (IC50 <5 μg/ml), promising (5-15 μg/ml), moderate (15-50 μg/ml) and inactive (IC50 >50 μg/ml).

Selectivity index was calculated as the ratio of cytotoxicity of extract on HeLa cell line (cytotoxicity) to the IC50 of the extract against P. falciparum (antiplasmodial activity) strains.

Acute toxicity (LD50): Limit test of Lorke14 was employed to determine the acute toxicity of the extract. LD50 median tethal dose is defined as concentration of extract/drug corresponding to 50 per cent mortality as compared to control. The acute toxicity of the extracts was determined using four female BALB/c mice, by oral administration of 5 g/kg concentration. Dried extract residue was dissolved in standard suspending vehicle (SSV). Mice were fasted for 4 h. After administration of EBEAL, mice were examined for mortality and side effects. If the mice died, lower concentrations of extracts were administered to mice, till LD50 was determined.

Evaluation of in vivo schizonticidal, repository and curative activities of plant extract: Schizonticidal activity of the plant extract was assessed by the method described by Knight and Peters15. On day 0 (D0), all the mice were inoculated with 1 × 106 P. berghei infected erythrocytes and divided into seven groups containing six mice in each group. Different concentrations of the extract dissolved in formulation vehicle i.e., standard suspending vehicle (SSV)16 were administered orally to mice. Treatment started one hour post-inoculation of parasite on same day (D0) and continued for four consecutive days (D0-D3) (Table). On D4, D7, D14, D21 and D28, respectively, thin blood smears were prepared from the tail of each mouse, fixed in methanol and stained with Giemsa's stain. The percentage of chemosuppression was determined by the formula

ED50 (median effective dose) of extract was determined as the concentration of the extract that caused 50 per cent growth inhibition of the parasite in vivo.

Table Evaluation of schizonticidal, repository and curative activities (% average parasitaemia) of ethanolic bark extract of A. lebbeck (EBEAL)

The repository or preventive activity of EBEAL was assessed using Peters’ method17. The mice were divided into six groups of six mice each and were orally administered distilled water, SSV, pyrimethamine (1.25 mg/kg, positive control) and various concentrations of EBEAL for four consecutive days (D0-D3), respectively (Table). On the fifth day (D4), mice were inoculated with 1×106 P. berghei infected erythrocytes. 72 h later, parasitaemia was assessed by studying Giemsa stained blood smears.

The suppressive activity of EBEAL in established infection of P. berghei was assessed using method described by Ryley and Peters18. On D0, mice were inoculated with 1×106 P. berghei infected erythrocytes; 72 h later, mice were divided into six groups of six mice each and were orally administered distilled water, SSV, chloroquine (5 mg/kg, positive control) and various concentrations of EBEAL for four consecutive days (D4-D7), respectively (Table). On D7, parasitaemia was assessed by studying Giemsa stained blood smears.

Statistical analysis: Level of significance was determined by applying Student t test using Graphpad Software 3 (GraphPad Software, Inc, USA) and Probit analysis was done using SigmaPlot 8.02 software (Systat software Inc., USA). Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimator of survival was used to evaluate follow up among mice with censored (incomplete) data during schizonticidal activity.

Results

Plant extract/Phytochemical screening: The collected 110 g dried stem bark of A. lebbeck (Voucher No. 17685) yielded 27.3 g of dried residue after ethanolic extraction and concentration in rota evaporator. Phytochemical screening of EBEAL showed the presence of alkaloids, phenols, flavonoids, saponins, phytosterols and terpenes.

Cytotoxicity on HeLa cells: The analysis revealed CC50 of >1000 μg/ml when per cent cell viability was plotted against various concentrations of the extract. Thus, according to criteria given by Osorio et al19, the extract can be categorized as potentially non-toxic for further use.

In vitro culture of P. falciparum and estimation of growth inhibition: Continuous in vitro culture of P. falciparum was maintained to check the efficacy of different concentrations (5-100 μg/ml) of EBEAL. In vitro antimalarial screening of EBEAL exhibited IC50 = 8.2 μg/ml and 5.1 μg/ml against MRC2 and RKL9 strains (Fig. 1a, b) of the parasite, respectively. Therefore, the extract was classified as active20 exhibiting selectivity indices of >121.9 and >196.07, respectively. Chloroquine, used as a reference antimalarial drug, tested in parallel had IC50 of 44 and 658 nM against sensitive and resistant parasite strains, respectively.

Plots showing determination of (a) IC50 of EBEAL on MRC2 strain and (b) IC50 of EBEAL on RKL9 strain of Plasmodium falciparum.
Fig. 1
Plots showing determination of (a) IC50 of EBEAL on MRC2 strain and (b) IC50 of EBEAL on RKL9 strain of Plasmodium falciparum.

Acute toxicity (LD50): The median lethal dose for EBEAL was determined to be >5 g/kg. No mortality was observed with this concentration during the study period. These observations revealed the safety of A. lebbeck as a medicinal plant without severe side effects.

Evaluation of in vivo schizonticidal, repository and curative activities of plant extract: In the early infection, there was a dose-dependent decrease in the levels of parasitaemia on D7 as compared to control (Table) after oral administration of different concentrations of the extract. The standard drug chloroquine caused a chemosuppression of 96.8 per cent, whereas, concentrations of 100, 250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg/kg/day caused chemosuppression of 69.4, 71.4, 71.9, 79.8 and 84.7 per cent, respectively.

KM curve for EBEAL (Fig. 2) denotes survival as a function of time. The steep decline in the curve for G1 indicated that the cumulative probability of survival decreased from 0.6 to 0 by day 10 indicating poor prognosis from disease. Maximum censored observations (2) in G2, G3 and G6 during the experimental study showed the survival of mice beyond the follow up period. However, 50 per cent of mice of G5 survived till 28 days in contrast to mice of G6 which died between 20-21 days suggesting that concentrations of the extract higher than this might be toxic to decrease the survival of mice. This was comparable to mice of positive control (G7) where three mice survived beyond 28 days as supported by cumulative survival probability.

Plot showing Kaplan-Meier curve for schizonticidal activity of mice of all the groups.
Fig. 2
Plot showing Kaplan-Meier curve for schizonticidal activity of mice of all the groups.

EBEAL produced significant (P<0.001) repository activity. Maximum chemosuppression was observed in G3 (94.9%) which was greater than that for standard drug pyrimethamine (71.2%). Low parasitaemia was recorded in all the extract-treated groups on D7. G4 (500 mg/kg) exhibited minimum parasitaemia of 0.3 per cent whereas maximum parasitaemia was observed to be 1.6±0.9 per cent in G2 (Table).

In established malaria infection, EBEAL exhibited dose-dependent reduction in parasitaemia levels on D7. Low parasitaemia was recorded in all the extract-treated groups on D28. The average chemosuppression values observed in extract-treated groups were 45.2, 50.9, 51.6 and 74 per cent on D7.

Discussion

In traditional medicine, whole plants or mixtures of plants are used rather than isolated compounds. There is evidence that crude plant extracts often have greater in vitro or/and in vivo antiplasmodial activity than isolated constituents at an equivalent dose21.

Phytochemical analysis is required for all plant materials being evaluated, test materials and controls, to establish their nature, and hence the fundamental validity and reproducibility of the experiments22. Medicinal plants contain some organic bioactive substances23 which have therapeutic value. In our earlier studies, Xanthium strumarium and Ajuga bracteosa plant extracts have been found to possess promising in vitro as well as in vivo antiplasmodial activities2425. EBEAL contained alkaloids, phenols, flavonoids, saponins, phytosterols and terpenes as reported earlier6. The presence of alkaloids may be responsible for antimalarial activity of this plant. There are reports of flavonoids being promising antiplasmodial compounds within clinically tolerant and non-toxic concentrations26 owing to their anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities. Terpenoids, saponins and phenols exert antimicrobial properties and together with alkaloids in synergistic manner inhibit growth of the pathogens27.

EBEAL showed CC50 of >1000 μg/ml depicting safety of the extract19 in vitro against human HeLa cell line. Fulfilling WHO criteria, EBEAL can be categorized as a promising antimalarial as in vitro antimalarial screening showed IC50 of 8.2 and 5.1 μg/ml against MRC2 and RKL9 strains of the parasite, respectively. To estimate the potential of extracts or molecules to inhibit parasite growth without toxicity, selectivity index was introduced. Therefore, the extract was classified as active exhibiting selectivity indices of >121.9 and >196.07, respectively, according to classification given by Valdes et al20. Selectivity indices indicate that antiplasmodial activity is probably due to activity against parasite rather than due to cytotoxicity.

The median lethal dose for EBEAL was determined to be >5g/kg which pointed towards good safety profile of A. lebbeck in the rodents. According to Munoz et al28, in vivo antiplasmodial activity can be categorized as moderate, good and very good if the extract displays a per cent growth inhibition equal to or greater than 50 per cent (ED50) at a dose of 500, 250 and 100 mg/kg, respectively. Based on this classification, EBEAL displayed good antimalarial activity which was evident by maximum chemosuppression of 84.7 per cent at 1000 mg/kg/day concentration of the extract in a dose-dependent manner. However, the standard drug chloroquine caused a chemosuppression of 96.8 per cent on D7. This antimalarial activity might be attributed to the presence of alkaloids or flavonoids in this plant; or even a combined action of more than one secondary metabolites.

For the evaluation of repository activity, the standard drug pyrimethamine (1.2 mg/kg) was used as reference drug. It is an antifolate and prevents DNA replication of parasite by binding to dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), which interferes with the folic acid mechanism necessary for DNA and RNA synthesis in parasite leading to its death29. EBEAL produced considerable repository activity. The extract was found to exhibit 94.9 and 76.2 per cent chemosuppression at concentrations of 500 and 750 mg/kg, respectively, which was greater than that for standard drug pyrimethamine (71.2%). G4 exhibited minimum parasitaemia (0.3%) in contrast to pyrimethamine (1.7±0.2%) on D7. In curative study also, dose-dependent reductions in parasitaemia on D7 were observed. Even after the follow up period, low parasitaemia of 7.2 ±2.1 per cent was observed in G2 supporting the antimalarial potential of the extract in established infection of P. berghei.

In conclusion, the findings of the present study exhibited significant antiplasmodial activity of A. lebbeck which should be exploited as a potential source of useful antimalarial drug in the future.

Acknowledgment

The first author (SK) acknowledges the University Grant Commission, New Delhi, for BSR Fellowship. The authors thank the DST-FIST programme of Zoology Department, Panjab University, Chandigarh, for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

References

  1. , , . Plasmodium falciparum malaria and antimalarial interventions in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and opportunities. Afr J Biotechnol. 2005;4:1598-605.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Natural products as starting points for future anti-malarial therapies: going back to our roots? Malar J. 2011;10(Suppl 1):S3.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . Plant-made therapeutics: an emerging platform in South Africa. Biotechnol Adv. 2012;30:449-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Indian medicinal plants. Vol II. Dehradun: International Book Distributors; .
  5. , , . In vitro anti-bacterial activity of leaves extracts of Albizia lebbeck Benth against some selected pathogens. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2012:S859-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Review on Albizia lebbeck: A potent herbal drug. Int Res J Pharm. 2012;3:63-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Nematicidal potential of selected flora of Pakistan. J Med Plants Res. 2012;6:4087-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . The gravimetric determination of milk fat. Polytech J. 1879;232:461-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , . Phytochemical methods- a guide to modern techniques of plants analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall; .
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65:55-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . Human malaria parasites in continuous cultures. Science. 1976;193:673-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , . Probit analysis: a statistical treatment of the sigmoid response curve (2nd ed). London: Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; .
  13. , , , , , , . In vitro antiplasmodial activity of crude extracts of Tetrapleura tetraptera and Copaifera religiosa. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:506.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , . A new approach to practical acute toxicity testing. Arch Toxicol. 1983;54:275-87.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . The antimalarial action of Nbenzyloxydihydrotriazines. 1. The activity of clociguanil (BRL 50216) against rodent malaria, and studies on its mode of action. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1980;74:393-404.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , . The chemotherapy of rodent malaria. LX. The importance of formulation in evaluating the blood schizontocidal activity of some endoperoxide antimalarials. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002;96:559-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , . Drug resistance in Plasmodium berghei. Vincke and Lips, 1948: chloroquine resistance. Exp Parasitol. 1965;17:80-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . The antimalarial activity of some quinolone esters. Ann J Trop Med Parasitol. 1970;64:209-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , . Antiprotozoal and cytotoxic activities in vitro of Colombian Annonaceae. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;111:630-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . In vitro antimalarial activity and cytotoxicity of some selected Cuban medicinal plants. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2010;52:97-201.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , . A call for using natural compounds in the development of new antimalarial treatments-an introduction. Malar J. 2011;10(Suppl 1):S1.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , . Phytochemistry and traditional medicine - a revolution in process. Phytochem Lett. 2011;4:391-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . Phytochemical analysis of some medicinal plants. J Phytol. 2011;3:10-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . Screening of antiplasmodial efficacy of Ajuga bracteosa Wall ex Benth. Parasitol Res. 2011;108:801-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , . Antiplasmodial activity of Xanthium strumarium against Plasmodium berghei-infected BALB/c mice. Parasitol Res. 2012;110:1179-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , . Common dietary flavonoids inhibit the growth of the intraerythrocytic malaria parasite. BMC Res Notes. 2008;1:26.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , . Ethanolic extraction and phytochemical screening of two Nigerian herbs on pathogens isolated from wound infections. Pharm Globale. 2011;10:1-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , . The search for natural bioactive compounds through a multidisciplinary approach in Bolivia. Part II. Antimalarial activity of some plants used by Mosetene Indians. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;69:139-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , . Antimalarial plants used by Hausa in Northern Nigeria. Trop Doct. 1997;27:12-6.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top