Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Author’ response
Author’s reply
Authors' response
Authors#x2019; response
Book Received
Book Review
Book Reviews
Centenary Review Article
Clinical Image
Clinical Images
Commentary
Communicable Diseases - Original Articles
Correspondence
Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Correspondences
Correspondences & Authors’ Responses
Corrigendum
Critique
Current Issue
Editorial
Errata
Erratum
Health Technology Innovation
IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Malnutrition & Other Health Issues - Original Articles
Media & News
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Original Articles
Perspective
Perspectives
Policy
Policy Document
Policy Guidelines
Policy, Review Article
Policy: Correspondence
Policy: Editorial
Policy: Mapping Review
Policy: Original Article
Policy: Perspective
Policy: Process Paper
Policy: Scoping Review
Policy: Special Report
Policy: Systematic Review
Policy: Viewpoint
Practice
Practice: Authors’ response
Practice: Book Review
Practice: Clinical Image
Practice: Commentary
Practice: Correspondence
Practice: Letter to Editor
Practice: Obituary
Practice: Original Article
Practice: Pages From History of Medicine
Practice: Perspective
Practice: Review Article
Practice: Short Note
Practice: Short Paper
Practice: Special Report
Practice: Student IJMR
Practice: Systematic Review
Pratice, Original Article
Pratice, Review Article
Pratice, Short Paper
Programme
Programme, Correspondence, Letter to Editor
Programme: Commentary
Programme: Correspondence
Programme: Editorial
Programme: Original Article
Programme: Originial Article
Programme: Perspective
Programme: Rapid Review
Programme: Review Article
Programme: Short Paper
Programme: Special Report
Programme: Status Paper
Programme: Systematic Review
Programme: Viewpoint
Protocol
Research Correspondence
Retraction
Review Article
Short Paper
Special Opinion Paper
Special Report
Special Section Nutrition & Food Security
Status Paper
Status Report
Strategy
Student IJMR
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Viewpoint
White Paper
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Practice: Original Article
158 (
3
); 311-316
doi:
10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_2952_21

A study of post exercise hypotension in normotensive offspring of hypertensives after acute exercise

Department of Physiology, World College of Medical Science & Hospital, Jhajjar, Haryana, India
Department of Physiology, Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India
Present Address: Department of Physiology, Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Hospital, Rohini, Delhi, India

For correspondence: Dr Mona Bedi, Department of Physiology, Maulana Azad Medical College, 11 U.B. Bungalow Road, 1st Floor, Delhi 110 007, India e-mail: drmonabedi@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background & objectives:

Post exercise hypotension (PEH) is a well-known entity in hypertensive and borderline hypertensive patients. Since the results are inconsistent in normotensives and there is a genetic predisposition of the individuals to hypertension, we hypothesized that PEH is expected to occur in those normotensives who are offspring of hypertensive parents. In this study, we therefore aimed to compare the magnitude of PEH after an acute bout of moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICE) in the offspring of hypertensives vs. offspring of normotensives.

Methods:

Sixty normotensive participants of both genders (male and female in equal proportion), aged 18-40 yr, were divided into two groups based on their family history of hypertension. The cases (Group 1, n=30) consisted of the normotensives who were offspring of hypertensive parents while the normotensives who were offspring of normotensive parents were taken as the controls (Group 2, n=30). The hypertensive patients were excluded from the study. The individuals underwent a control session (sitting at rest for 5-10 min), followed by a single acute bout of MICE based on the target heart rate (60-70% of maximum heart rate) on a treadmill at the same time of the day (in the morning). The pre- and post-exercise measurements (after 10 min post exercise) of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were taken in all the participants using mercury sphygmomanometer in sitting position on the left arm. The intergroup and intragroup net effects of exercise on BP were compared with P<0.05 considered significant.

Results:

The mean SBP was reduced by 5 mmHg than the baseline in the offspring of hypertensives (cases) as compared to the controls after exercise (P=0.01). The fall in mean DBP and MAP was insignificant across both the groups, but the magnitude of PEH measured as delta changes (BP before and after exercise) in SBP (~5 mmHg) and MAP (~4 mmHg) were significantly higher for the cases as compared to the controls (P=0.01).

Interpretation & conclusions:

PEH occurs in higher magnitude in normotensives who are genetically predisposed to hypertension, such as offspring of hypertensive parents, and may find regular exercise-induced PEH as an important primary preventive tool to prevent or delay the development of hypertension.

Keywords

Family history of hypertension
moderate-intensity continuous exercise
normotensive offspring
post-exercise hypotension

The benefits of exercise in hypertension have been a focus of attention for clinicians for many years. Most of this interest has been on two issues: (i) the arterial blood pressure (BP) responses to exercise in hypertensives, and (ii) use of chronic exercise as a non-pharmacologic approach to lower arterial BP1. In recent years, however, the fall in BP after exercise - the post-exercise hypotension (PEH) has become an area of paramount interest to researchers.

Although there are no defined criteria for the magnitude of BP decrement or the duration of response, PEH is defined as sustained decrease in systolic and/or diastolic arterial BP below resting levels in the minutes and hours following a single bout of acute exercise2. The minimal magnitude of exertion for PEH, tested by Pescatello et al3,4 is compatible with a low-intensity walk, which is usually enjoyable and favours adherence. Furthermore, till date, it is not known whether a single session of high-intensity interval training (HIIE) maximizes PEH more than a bout of moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE). However, a recent meta-analysis found comparable reductions in BP in hypertensive adults following chronic HIIE training and MICE training5.

Hypertension clusters in families and a positive family history of hypertension represents a major risk factor for future hypertension in the non-hypertensive offspring6. Although PEH is a well known entity in hypertensive and borderline hypertensive patients, its occurrence in normotensive humans is inconsistent7-9. Hence, we hypothesized that the degree of PEH may be related to the genetic predisposition of humans to hypertension. To the best of our knowledge, no data has been reported yet to study PEH in the offspring of hypertensives and normotensives. Hence, the present study aims to compare the magnitude of PEH in normotensive offspring of hypertensives vs. normotensive offspring of normotensives, after an acute bout of MICE.

Material & Methods

Study design: This study was conducted in the Exercise Lab, department of Physiology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India, for a period of one year from September 2019-September 2020. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Prior written informed consent was obtained from all the participating individuals explaining the duration, type and objectives of the study.

Study design and participant enrolment: It was a non-randomized study, based on an interventional study design, with a convenience sampling strategy since only normotensive individuals were recruited from the general population based on their family history of hypertension. Following a single acute bout of moderate exercise on a treadmill, the studied outcome measures were the degree of PEH observed in both offspring of hypertensives and normotensives, in terms of changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP).

Sample size estimation: The sample size was calculated based on the following formula:

CV - coefficient of variation (CV=σ22)

PC - proportionate change in means (PC=µ121).

Considering the existing data10, CV=30 per cent (0.3) and PC=20 per cent (0.2). After putting these values in the above formula, the sample size came out to be 29.52 ≈ 30. A total sample size of 60 (30 individuals in each group) was proposed.

Participant screening and analysis: Individuals were screened based on their detailed history, thorough clinical examination and inclusion and exclusion criteria. All the participants underwent thorough history taking, including family history. Data on their family history of hypertension were collected by using interviewer-administered questionnaire. The response options ‘yes’ or ‘no’ were considered for diagnosing parental history of hypertension. Presence of either or both parents having hypertension was considered as positive (cases).

Sixty normotensive participants (BP <120/80 mmHg according to JNC 8 criteria11 of hypertension) of both genders (M=F), aged 18-40 yr, untrained for exercise, with a normal body mass index (BMI: 19-22.9 kg/m2) were taken as the study population. Individuals with history of hypertension, diabetes or any other chronic illness, substance abuse and pregnant/lactating females were excluded from the study. All the females selected as cases or controls participated during their follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.

Participants were further divided into two groups based on their family history of hypertension. The cases (Group 1, n=30) consisted of the offspring of hypertensive parents, while the offspring of normotensive parents were taken as the controls (Group 2, n=30).

Experimental protocol: Participants were asked to abstain from caffeinated drinks 24 h prior to testing. All the recordings were performed at the same time of the day (in the morning) after an overnight fasting. The anthropometric measurements (weight and height) were recorded using a stadiometer and balance beam scale. BMI (kg/m2) was calculated by dividing the weight (in kg) by the height in metres squared.

Exercise test: This consisted of an acute bout of moderate isotonic exercise based on target heart rate (60-70% of MHR)12, on a treadmill according to the modified Bruce protocol. The resting SBP, DBP and MAP were measured using a mercury sphygmomanometer on the left arm in all the participants in a sitting position.

After a rest period of 5-10 min, each subject was first asked to walk on a treadmill to warm up (at 1.7 mph). The speed of the treadmill was gradually increased in stages till the subject achieved the target heart rate. The target heart rate was calculated individually for every subject using the Karvonen formula (heart rate reserve multiplied by 60-70% plus the subject’s resting heart rate). This is more accurate since it takes both age and resting heart rate into account. At this target heart rate, the exercise was continued for 10 min and then stopped. The BP parameters were recorded again immediately and after 10 min of cessation of exercise. All the requisite precautions in conducting an exercise protocol for a subject were followed.

Statistical analysis: Data were analysed using SPSS-25 software (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). and were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test U or Student’s t test (independent group/unpaired data) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test or paired t test (for paired data) based on the normality of the data. A multiple linear regression model for BP-change as the dependent variable (output) was plotted, and beta-coefficients for independent predictors were assessed; P<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The baseline parameters in both the groups (cases vs. controls) were comparable with respect to their age (27.23±7.14 vs. 27.67±6.7 yr, respectively), gender composition (males:females = 1:1) and BMI (21.88±2.05 vs. 21.35±3.63 kg/m2, respectively).

As shown in Table I, it was observed that the pre-exercise resting SBP was similar in both the groups. However, after exercise, the mean SBP was reduced by 5 mmHg than the baseline SBP in cases (Group 1) as compared to the controls (Group 2; P=0.01). Although the fall in mean DBP and MAP was significant across both the groups (intragroup, paired t test; P<0.05), the intergroup variations were insignificant for the same.

Table I Comparison of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) before and after exercise in cases vs. controls
BP (mmHg) Cases (n=30), mean±SD Controls (n=30), mean±SD
Pre# SBP 113.33±7.28 111.93±7.34
Post## SBP 107.93±8.46** 108.67±7.88
Pre DBP 78.27±4.23 79.27±3.13
Post DBP 75.47±5.2* 76.87±3.35**
Pre MAP 89.96±4.62 90.15±3.68
Post MAP 86.29±5.54** 87.47±3.75**

#Before exercise; ##After exercise. P*<0.05, **<0.01. No significant difference was observed between cases and controls

The magnitude of PEH after exercise measured as delta change (BP change before and after exercise) in mean SBP (~5 mmHg) and delta MAP (~4 mmHg) was significantly higher (Table II) for the cases as compared to the controls (P=0.01). The delta DBP was insignificant for both the groups.

Table II Comparison of the magnitude of PEH in cases vs. controls
Change in BP (delta change) = pre (−) post exercise BP (mmHg) Cases (n=30) Controls (n=30)
Delta SBP 5.40±3.2** 3.27±2.26
Delta DBP 2.80±2.44 2.40±1.85
Delta MAP 3.66±2.26* 2.69±1.5

P *<0.05, **<0.01. (−) indicates net change in BP before and after exercise in both groups

A multiple linear regression model (Table III) was plotted for the change in systolic BP as the dependent variable or output (y). The model consisted of age, gender (M=1, F=0) and BMI as independent explanatory variables (x); none of which achieved significance.

Table III Multiple linear regression analysis for post exercise hypotension (the change in systolic blood pressure) as the dependent variable or output (y)
Model Unstandardized coefficients Standardized coefficients β t P Correlations
B SE Zero-order Partial Part
Constant −0.56 3.05 −0.18 0.85
Age 0.09 0.06 0.2 1.47 0.15 0.27 0.19 0.17
Gender (male=1, female=0) 0.22 0.71 0.04 0.31 0.76 0.07 0.04 0.04
BMI 0.05 0.13 0.05 0.38 0.71 0.17 0.05 0.04

Dependent variable: Delta SBP. Predictors: (Constant), gender (male=1, female=0), BMI, age. None of the predictors was significant. SE, standard error; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; SBP, systolic BP

Discussion

The uniqueness of the current study rests with the fact that it revealed a greater degree of PEH in the offspring of hypertensives as compared to that in the offspring of normotensive parents. To the best of our knowledge, no comparative study has been reported yet on PEH in the offspring of hypertensives and normotensives. However, our findings are consistent with the results of various investigations, which reported a greater degree of PEH in hypertensives as compared to normotensives1,2. Wilcox et al13 suggested that the magnitude of pressure decrement increases with longer duration of exercise in hypertensive patients than in the normotensive population, though this could not be substantiated in our study since the duration of PEH remained the same (for 10 min) in both the study groups in our investigation. The post exercise measurements were monitored after 10 min based on the fact that PEH has been observed after as little as 10 min with an average decline of 8/9 mmHg in normotensives to 14/7 mmHg in hypertensives1,2. Interestingly, according to U.S. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee, it is now known that exercising for as little as 10 min is effective for positive health benefits, so exercise duration is no longer emphasized14.

Most of the ongoing research work currently focuses on adults already diagnosed with pre- or established hypertension, with PEH being targeted as the non-pharmacological tool to treat hypertension7-9. Apparently, exercise works best for those who are in greatest need of its BP-lowering capabilities. Hence, clinicians need to be cognizant and ensure that the patients or even the normal population who have been referred to specific exercise interventions can really derive benefit out of them. Offspring of the hypertensives and not the clinically diagnosed hypertensives were considered since the present study attempts to better characterize those who benefit most from exercise and hence identify PEH as an important primary preventive tool (apart from being a non-pharmacological method) to prevent or delay the development of hypertension. With respect to the aforementioned facts, the present study reveals that the offspring of hypertensives who are more susceptible to hypertension are likely to derive a greater benefit even after a single bout of MICE, quantified in terms of PEH, as compared to the offspring of normotensives.

Various mechanisms such as reduction in blood volume, the activation of the cardiac efferent and afferent sympathetic nervous system and of skeletal muscle ergoreceptors, as well as production of nitric oxide, adenosine, etc., reflecting the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic influences have been postulated which regulate the cardiac output and peripheral resistance after exercise and hence explain the conflicting results in the degree and duration of PEH in normotensives vs. hypertensives7,13,15-18. However, no studies have been conducted on the offspring of hypertensives or normotensives, which may establish that the degree of PEH is determined by the genetic predisposition. Our study results may be explained by the fact that the complexity of BP regulation suggests that PEH has a multifactorial origin, also affected by genetic factors7. Cumulative data suggest that genetic polymorphism mapping may facilitate the identification of people that respond better in terms of PEH, particularly after moderate-intensity aerobic exercises3-4,19. The authors would recommend correlating PEH in the offspring of hypertensives and normotensives with gene polymorphism for candidate genes in future studies, so as to study the genetic predisposition to PEH in detail.

The main strength of our study was that in order to avoid the conflicting results as observed in previous investigations2,20 that revealed divergent relationship of PEH with gender and time of the day, the present study was conducted at the same time of the day and was designed to have an equal number of male and female participants. Our results are consistent with the studies which state that PEH occurs in both men and women21,22. Specifically, BP control post exercise in men seems to be centrally regulated through stroke volume, while females tend to regulate post exercise BP through peripheral vasodilation, although such regulation may be dependent on the mode and intensity of exercise21,22.

None of the predictors for PEH (age, gender or BMI) achieved significance in the present study and might be attributed to a smaller sample size as a limitation in our study. Gender based analysis can be carried out more accurately once larger number of participants are enrolled in future investigation. There were other limitations of our study as well. Firstly PEH had been documented under laboratory conditions in contrast to the ambulatory BP monitoring, and second, the duration for which PEH was observed was kept limited to only 10 min post exercise. The reason for choosing 10 min rather than 30-60 min or longer was that we were curious to explore the statement cited in the literature that PEH and positive effects of exercise could be observed as early as 10 min2,14. However, it would be worthwhile to study PEH in the offspring of both normotensives and hypertensives under normal day-to-day living conditions in future. Furthermore, we did not document a difference in the two groups either in terms of calculated METs from the treadmill at which 70 per cent HR max was reached or the duration of the exercise, which could be a potential confounder that might had affected the difference of magnitude of PEH in two groups. No resting BP screening or familiarization visits were performed that could have allowed greater rigour and reproducibility in the measure of PEH as recommended by de Brito et al23.

Post exercise hypotension may contribute to some of the long term adaptations associated with exercise training, such as amelioration of hypertension and plasma volume expansion24. Cumulative data support the notion that the reductions in BP experienced immediately following a single bout of aerobic exercise are similar to those experienced after aerobic exercise training; an observation that suggests BP-benefits attributed to chronic exercise is largely due to PEH1,2,16,24. PEH may thus serve a homeostatic purpose; henceforth, the development and understanding of non-pharmacological treatment modalities such as PEH for hypertension continue to deserve high priority.

From this investigation, it is concluded that the degree of PEH may be related to the genetic predisposition of humans to hypertension. PEH occurs in higher magnitude in normotensives who are genetically predisposed to hypertension, such as offspring of hypertensive parents. The present study supports the clinical implications of PEH as a crucial non-pharmacologic line of defence in treating hypertension and would justify participating in several periods of moderate physical activity interspersed throughout the day. The genetically predisposed normotensive offspring of hypertensives may find regular exercise-induced PEH as an important primary preventive tool to prevent or delay the development of hypertension, thus linking PEH to the long-term antihypertensive adaptations.

Financial support and sponsorship

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Acknowledgment:

The authors acknowledge Dr Vikramjit Singh, Fastat clinical data-based superspeciality research and analytics, for providing detailed statistical analysis for our study. Author further also acknowledge all the individuals participating in this study.

References

  1. , , . Brief review postexercise hypotension- key features, mechanisms, and clinical significance. Hypertension. 1993;22:653-64.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Potential causes, mechanisms, and implications of post exercise hypotension. J Hum Hypertens. 2002;16:225-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Exercise intensity alters postexercise hypotension. J Hypertens. 2004;22:1881-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . The alpha-adducin Gly460Trp polymorphism and the antihypertensive effects of exercise among men with high blood pressure. Clin Sci (Lond). 2007;113:251-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Effects of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on blood pressure in adults with pre- to established hypertension:A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Sports Med. 2018;48:2127-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Family (parental) history and prevalence of hypertension. Results of a nationwide screening program. JAMA. 1979;241:43-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Post exercise hypotension:possible relationship with ethnic and genetic factors. RBCDH. Brazilian J Kinanthropometry Human Perform. 2012;14:353-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Familial aggregation of resting blood pressure and heart rate in a sedentary population:The heritage family study. Health, Risk Factors, Exercise Training, and Genetics. Am J Hypertens. 1999;12:264-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , . Genetic and environmental influences on blood pressure in elderly twins. Hypertension. 1994;24:663-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Post-resistance exercise hemodynamic and autonomic responses:Comparison between normotensive and hypertensive men. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25:486-94.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , . A review of the JNC 8 blood pressure guideline. Tex Heart Inst J. 2015;42:226-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. . ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription (10th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins; . p. :480.
  13. , , , , , . Post-exercise hypotension:The effects of epanolol or atenolol on some hormonal and cardiovascular variables in hypertensive men. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1987;24:151-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. . 2018 physical activity guidelines advisory committee scientific report. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; .
  15. , , , , , . Blood pressure and plasma catecholamine responses to various challenges during exercise-recovery in man. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989;58:551-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Short-term effect of dynamic exercise on arterial blood pressure. Circulation. 1991;83:1557-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , . Effects of naloxone on exercise performance. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1984;57:674-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Exercise physiology and exercise electrocardiographic testing: Braunwald's heart disease: A textbook of cardiovascular medicine (12th ed). Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders; . p. :195.
  19. , , , . Genetics of human hypertension. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2005;16:127-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Post-exercise hypotension following a single bout of high intensity interval exercise versus a single bout of moderate intensity continuous exercise in adults with or without hypertension:A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Front Physiol. 2021;12:675289.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , . Gender influence on post-resistance exercise hypotension and hemodynamics. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34:939-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , . Influence of endurance exercise training status and gender on postexercise hypotension. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002;92:2368-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , . Recommendations in post-exercise hypotension:Concerns, best practices and interpretation. Int J Sports Med. 2019;40:487-97.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , . Mechanisms and clinical implications of post-exercise hypotension in humans. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2001;29:65-70.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections
Scroll to Top